[nabs-l] the accessibility of newer versions of Windowsand Microsoft Office
Ashley Bramlett
bookwormahb at earthlink.net
Fri Jun 15 02:33:57 UTC 2012
Humberto,
How do you turn and off virtual ribbons? Chris was describing the regular
ribbon where you have tabs and a lower ribbon in each tab. The virtual
ribbons are a jaws feature and simulate menus
-----Original Message-----
From: Humberto Avila
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 9:16 PM
To: 'National Association of Blind Students mailing list'
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] the accessibility of newer versions of Windowsand
Microsoft Office
Chris, do you have the virtual ribbon menus turned on on JAWS? This makes
things so easier! PS in case you don't have them turned on.
-----Original Message-----
From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
Of Chris Nusbaum
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 5:44 PM
To: 'National Association of Blind Students mailing list'
Subject: [nabs-l] the accessibility of newer versions of Windows and
Microsoft Office
Hi Kirt, Ashley, and everyone,
With this message, I'm changing the subject so it reflects the new topic of
this thread more clearly.
Don't forget about Microsoft Outlook! I've been using Outlook for about two
months now, and I love it! Gmail's Web interface is pretty accessible, but
it only works in basic HTML view, which doesn't have all the features of
Gmail's standard view, which isn't accessible in the least. Outlook, on the
other hand, is totally accessible, easy to learn and to use (much easier
than Gmail's Web interface, I believe,) and all of its features are
accessible. By the way, I'm using Outlook 2010, which is part of Microsoft
Office 2010, on a laptop running Windows 7 Home Premium and JAWS 12.
I actually think the virtual ribbons are pretty easy to use, once you get
the hang of it. They're very much like the submenus in older Microsoft
Office menu bars, except the ribbons are set up in the form of tabs which
appear across the top of the screen for a sighted person with lower ribbons
inside those tabs. This may seem a little confusing, as I'm describing
partly what it would look like to a sighted person, based on what sighted
people have told me. If you are using JAWS, the ribbons, like older menu
bars, are accessed by pressing the alt key from within a program that has
them, such as Microsoft Word or Outlook 2010. You will first see tabs, which
are the "top" part of the ribbons. You navigate through these tabs by
pressing the left and right arrow keys. Once you find the tab you want,
press down arrow, which takes you into that tab's lower ribbon, which is
like its submenu. Each option in this submenu is interpreted by JAWS as a
button. So, for example, if you are wanting to reply to all in Outlook, you
would go to the message tab, then down arrow on it, then go to the respond
submenu, right arrow, and down arrow until JAWS says "reply all button" and
hit enter. So, the ribbons are similar to menu bars once you get used to
them.
Hope this helps,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
Of Kirt Manwaring
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:57 PM
To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Getting employed/accessing the workplace
Ashley,
You might want to enable virtual ribbons in the jaws quick settings.
(or with insert + v in microsoft office applications, whichever you
prefer) I actually find microsoft office 2010 extremely accessible because
of things like the quick access tool bar and because I don't have to tab
through everything in a ribbon to access it...keystrokes still work, you can
turn on virtual ribbons to make it look almost like it used to before and,
honestly, I like the ribbons better than the menus sometimes just because
it's really easy, in my opinion, to find what I need. And, as I said, the
quick access tool bar is a huge plus for me.
Best,
Kirt
On 6/13/12, Ashley Bramlett <bookwormahb at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Bill,
> There are many barriers in accessibility in windows with software.
> However,
>
> that said, I believe windows with a paid screen reader like jaws or
> window eyes gives us more accessibility in the Operating system. We
> have more access too because you can customize not only the
> applications but you can customize your screen reader settings. I do
> not know how much customization
>
> you can do with voice over. As you said, its drawbacks are it only
> works with products produced by Apple.
> The only way we solve the accessibility challenge is to raise
> awareness so software makers build accessibility in the software from
> the beginning. Too
>
> often its an after thought and then if you are lucky, your employer
> may have
>
> scripts produced for you to access their software.
> Accessibility is getting worse. The new ribbons from Office suite as
> of 2007
>
> make finding things more a challenge because while a sighted person
> can skim
>
> the row and click on stuff, we have to tab and hear all options. In a
> traditional menu, we could scroll it pretty fast with first letter
> navigation or a hot key if Office assigned one. For instance, In the
> old Word, I would press alt t for tools, then w for word count.
> If you think its bad now, the windows 8 interface is worse. I know as
> I spoke to some computer trainers and testers. The windows 8 system
> looks more like a touch screen. We will not have a shut down option on
> the start menu as we do now.
>
> Popular software currently isn't accessible. These include quickbooks,
> quicken, as well as Microsoft's Access, publisher, and share point.
> So there are certainly accessibility challenges out there but that
> said, I think the paid screen readers give us a lot more flexibility
> to access a wide variety of applications and we can customize it as well.
>
> Ashley
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:22 AM
> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
> Subject: [nabs-l] Getting employed/accessing the workplace
>
> I shutter to think that Apple becomes the standard. The only thing
> they have going for them is a poor screen reader built right into the
> system. Don't forget that VO only works fully with applications
> produced by Apple. MS office experience is not great, support for
> firefox I have heard is not good to not existent. I would imagine the
> third party business applications, though sometimes not accessible on
> windows probably would be less so with VO. Until Apple and the
> software vendors for Mac OS, I think that windows gives us better
> access to a fully capable screen reader with access to a far wider
> viriety of everyday and specialty programs.
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Wasif, Zunaira
> <Zunaira.Wasif at dbs.fldoe.org> wrote:
>> It doesn't directly mention web cites, but it has been applied to web
>> cites a long with telecommunications and other such services. There is
>> a miscellaneous portion as well, I believe its section 5, that may
>> apply. What do you suggest to improve job accessibility? The Apple
>> conversion was just a thought.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>> Behalf Of David Andrews
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:00 AM
>> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>
>> Please get your information straight. The ADA does not currently
>> cover web sites. It is likely too in the future but currently doesn't.
>>
>> Apple stuff is primarily consumer-oriented, and while they should be
>> applauded for their efforts in accessibility, they do not even come
>> close in giving us the tools we sometimes need to make
>> employment-oriented web sites and software accessible.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> At 02:19 PM 6/12/2012, you wrote:
>>>I'm hoping, some what fancifully, that five years from now all
>>>employers will be using Apple products and many jobs will become
>>>accessible. If we sue employers for not having accessible soft ware,
>>>it might push them towards the accessibility conversion. I have two
>>>clients right now who may get fired because JAWS isn't working well
>>>with the employer's technology. This is a form of discrimination and
>>>it violates the ADA in the same way that inaccessible web cites
>>>violate
>>
>>>the ADA. I have a client who was denied a job interview even though
>>>he's worked in the field because he wasn't working with the Lighthouse.
>>
>>>All of these people should have jobs and probably would if the ADA
>>>were
>> enforced.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>Behalf Of Sophie Trist
>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 12:40 PM
>>>To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>>You make some very good points. I did not know that most employers
>>>ask for Lighthouse certification. This is bad for people like me who
>>>are not affiliated with a Lighthouse because they remind oo much of
>>>the schools of the blind. As to the inaccessible computer programs,
>>>maybe we should institute a program where we payed them to install
>>>acessible
>> programs?
>>>I'm not entirely sure, that's just an idea.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Wasif, Zunaira" <Zunaira.Wasif at dbs.fldoe.org
>>>To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
>>><nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>Date sent: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:00:57 -0400
>>>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>>Sometimes extreme measures are required to overcome attitudinal
>>>hurdles
>>
>>>such as this one. I haven't made up my mind about the quota but I know
>>>that it helped African Americans enter the work place. Maybe
>>>the only
>>>way to quickly and effectively remedy this employment issue is
>>>through reverse discrimination. The legislation is there in the form
>>>of the ADA and rehab acts, but it isn't implemented. I work with
>>>clients every day who can't get a job because the employer's computer
>>>system is
>>
>>>running a program that is incompatible with JAWS or Zoom text. The
>>>fact that employers are still purchasing this type of software is
>> discriminatory!
>>>It is the equivalent of not providing an elevator in a multiple level
>>>building. Maybe the best antidote for this type of discrimination is
>>>reverse discrimination. The NFB is advocating for "more programs,"
>>>but
>>
>>>the potential applicant shouldn't have to go through a lighthouse or
>>>through any program. They should be able to apply off of the street
>>>like anyone else. A blind applicant shouldn't require a
>>>certification from a Lighthouse saying that they can type before an
>>>employer will even interview them. I'm working in this field and I
>>>see that happen every day. If a visually impaired client calls
>>>Hilton for a customer service job the first question the recruiter
>>>asks is, "are you working with the Lighthouse?" The reason that
>>>companies do this is because they want their corporate tax credit and
>>>they want assurance from the Lighthouse that the blind person has the
>>>skills for the job. My question is, how do they find out if a
>>>nonvisually impaired employee
>> has the skills?
>>>They want an incentive to hire disabled people. The attitude is "oh,
>>>yeh? You want me to hire a blind person? You better give me a tax
>>>break." In other words, they are saying, "Oh yeh? You better pay me
>>>to hire that blind person." This is the current situation. Our
>>>government pays people to hire disabled workers and companies like
>>>Goodwill thrive off of this. In job development exercises we are
>>>taught to market the corporate tax credit, not the client. How is
>>>this
>>
>>>any better than the quota system? I'm not saying the quota system is
>>>perfect, but maybe it's the best option we have right now. Maybe its
>>>an
>> effective way of
>>>proving that "we are worth something." If there is a better
>>>option I
>>>would love to hear it so I can advocate for it in my agency and make
>>>change.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>[mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Sophie Trist
>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:26 AM
>>>To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>>The issue of hiring quotas for minority groups has popped up in the
>>>past, and it has caused nothing but controversy. If there is to be
>>>ahiring quota for disabled people, non-disabled people who were
>>>rejected or whose jobs were taken away and given to the disabled
>>>could argue reverse--discrimination. Besides, we want them to hire us
>>>because
>>
>>>we're worth something, not just because they have to fill a certain
>> quota.
>>>Evem mentally disabled individuals can perform simple factory jobs.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Wasif, Zunaira" <Zunaira.Wasif at dbs.fldoe.org
>>>To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
>>><nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>Date sent: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:57:06 -0400
>>>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>>What do people think about a hiring quota for disabled people?
>>>This
>>>would render Good Will's argument, that disabled people need to
>>>settle for subminum wages or no wages, obselete.
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>[mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Kirt Manwaring
>>>Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:03 PM
>>>To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>>Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>>Ashley,
>>> You said there may not be a set corporate policy, and I suppose
>>>you're probably right. But there should be, and that's why this
>>>boycott makes sense to me. If you have some branches paying any
>>>employees below the minimum wage, you really do need a national
>>>policy
>> to set that straight.
>>>Unfortunate, but true. I really think it is that simple...this is
>>>one of those few issues where there isn't much of a grey area, in my
>>>humble
>>
>>>opinion.
>>> Take it or leave it,
>>>Kirt
>>>
>>>On 6/11/12, Ashley Bramlett <bookwormahb at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Elizabeth,
>>> Perhaps, the figure supports my theory that in fact most employees
>>>are
>>>
>>> paid
>>>
>>> above minimum wage. As Arielle said, most locations vary in what
>>> they
>>
>>>pay. I
>>>
>>> don't think there is a set corporate policy.
>>>
>>> Ashley
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Elizabeth
>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:24 PM
>>> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> Please forgive me as I did not read through the entire article you
>>>make reference to in your post. However, now that I have read it, I
>>>am
>>>
>>> still wondering how they can come up with an average of $7.47 when
>>>someone is only making $1.44. I am not a math genius by any means,
>>>but
>>>
>>> it would seem to me that if someone is only making $1.44, and the
>>>average is $7.47, then that would mean someone is making a
>>>considerable
>>
>>>amount more than what most people are making to achieve such an
>>>average. Does this make any sense? I am not necessarily questioning
>>>the
>>
>>>information you cited from the article, but rather questioning the
>>>information that was cited in the article itself.
>>> There is just something about it that does not make sense to me.
>>>I am
>>> sorry that I cannot find a better way to explain it.
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Elizabeth
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Greg Aikens" <gpaikens at gmail.com
>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:26 PM
>>> To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>> Hi Elizabeth,
>>> I should have included my sources. The first was the article
>>>recently posted to the list by Anil Lewis:
>>>
>>>http://www.wusa9.com/news/article/208068/189/Goodwill-Pays-Disabl
>>>ed-E
>>> mployees-Less-than-Minimum-Wage This article gives the number of
>>>employees impacted and their average wage. The reason that an
>>>average wage of $7.47 could still be below minimum wage is because
>>>many states
>>
>>>have minimum wage laws that are higher
>>>
>>> than the federal minimum wage. For a quick list of minimum wage
>>>by state, go to:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._minimum_wages
>>>
>>> Please check my facts in case I misread.
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Elizabeth wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Gregg,
>>>
>>> I have to say that your numbers to not make much sense to me. If
>>>these employees are making $7.47 as mentioned in your post, , then
>>>how
>>
>>>exactly
>>>
>>> does that constitute as a subminimum wage? Is it possible the
>>>calculated
>>>
>>> average of these employees also includes the outrageously high
>>>salaries of those who may hold management positions which in effect
>>>would cancel out the extremely low subminimum wages paid to the
>>>factory
>>
>>>worker or the
>>>
>>> average employee thus creating an average that appears to be above
>>>the national minimum wage? I am not sure where you found your
>>>numbers, but if
>>>
>>> what you state is true, then I do not see how this would be an
>>> issue
>>>
>>> of paying people subminimum wage.
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Elizabeth
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Greg Aikens" <gpaikens at gmail.com
>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 10:46 AM
>>> To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Good Will Boycott Etc.
>>>
>>> Sean's post got me thinking about how many employees are actually
>>>impacted by this policy and how much it would cost for them to
>>>actually
>>>
>>> make these changes. According to the article Anil Lewis posted,
>>> 7300
>>
>>>employees are hired on their certificate to pay disabled workers
>>>less than minimum wage, but the average wage paid them is $7.47,
>>>which is actually higher than the federal minimum wage of $7.25. I
>>>can't say what the average minimum wage for these workers
>>>
>>> would be because each state is different, but I wouldn't imagine it
>>>
>>> could be higher than $8.50. So they would have to on average pay
>>>workers with disabilities
>>> $1 more per hour, $40 more per week, $2080 per year. Multiply that
>>>
>>> by the 7300 employees on the certificate and you get $15,184,000.
>>>
>>> I was surprised that the number of workers impacted by this policy
>>>is so
>>>
>>> high.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I thought these numbers were interesting and thought I
>>>would post in case others are interested too.
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>> On Jun 10, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Gmail wrote:
>>>
>>> Good afternoon,
>>>
>>> One of the primary purposes of the boycott is to garner media
>>> attention
>>>
>>> for
>>> the minimum wage issue. The boycott effort and PR/media efforts are
>>>complementary rather than mutually exclusive.
>>>
>>> We "pick on" Good Will because they are one of, if not the, largest
>>> and
>>>
>>> most
>>> visible nonprofits who take advantage of the current law to pay
>>> workers
>>>
>>> with
>>> disabilities subminimum wages. When you're the biggest fish in the
>>>
>>> pond you're going to get noticed and your actions will be
>>> scrutinized
>>
>>>by people in and out of your field. That's just the way it goes.
>>>
>>> Most of these workshops do the vast majority of their business with
>>>the federal government, providing goods and services through
>>>non-competitive set-aside contracts. These goods and services are
>>>frequently provided at costs that exceed their fair market value.
>>> Obviously Good Will has their hands in other activities as well,
>>>but the point stands. If taxpayers are being asked to subsidize
>>>nonprofits to create employment opportunities
>>>
>>> for
>>> blind or otherwise disabled individuals, and we all, in effect,
>>>subsidize the very good, and sometimes exorbitant, salaries of the
>>>
>>> management of
>>>
>>> these
>>> non-profits, why is it a bad idea to subsidize the wages of
>>>disabled individuals, even those who may not be able to produce
>>>output justifying the minimum wage in the market?
>>>
>>> I think that the number of disabled folks in these workshops who
>>>are incapable of truly earning the minimum wage is much lower than
>>>
>>> most people assume. And, again, if there is somebody whose level of
>>>output truly only justifies $1.50 per hour, I am happy to subsidize
>>>the
>>
>>>wage to give them
>>>
>>> the
>>> dignity of equal treatment under the law.
>>>
>>> I myself worked for a time in a shop and was paid less than $4 per
>>>
>>> hour. I'm worth more than that. I saw others in the very same boat.
>>>The law is discriminatory, and the system is corrupt and fails to
>>>achieve its stated goals. Not only should the minimum wage apply,
>>>but organizations wishing to receive preferential treatment in
>>>government contracting should have to
>>>
>>> fill
>>> a stated percentage of their managerial positions with folks with
>>>disabilities and offer true training and upward mobility. As it
>>>stands
>>>
>>> now,
>>> there is no real opportunity in the vast majority of these workshops.
>>>
>>> While it is true that, generally speaking, the NFB only speaks for
>>>
>>> the blind, on this issue we have over 40 different disabilities
>>>rights organizations standing shoulder to shoulder with us saying
>>>that
>>
>>>it is reprehensible that we, today in the United States of America,
>>>have a law on the books that codifies the inferiority and
>>>
>>> lesser ability of those with disabilities. We, and they, are
>>>completely correct. The boycott of Good
>>>
>>> Will
>>> is but one piece of the larger effort. It is incumbent upon each of
>>> us
>>>
>>> to
>>> keep pressure on our Members of Congress to change the law. Will it
>>>cost Good Will and other non-profits more money to pay all their
>>>workers minimum wage? Yes, it will. Is the tiny increase in cost
>>>realistically going to
>>>
>>> lead
>>> to the loss of job opportunities as many of the workshops claim?
>>>I
>>>
>>> can't see how it would. In fact, it won't. And the argument is
>>>disingenuous and, frankly, pretty disgusting. Say a shop worker
>>>currently makes $1.50 an
>>>
>>> hour.
>>> Say the law is changed and minimum wage now applies. Say the
>>> employee
>>
>>>is now paid $7.50 an hour. That's an extra $6 an hour, an
>>>
>>> extra $240 a week, and $12,480 a year. Say Good Will has 100
>>>employees of whom this is the case (in reality there are fewer).
>>> This would represent an annual cost increase
>>>
>>> of
>>> $1,248,000 to Good Will. That's a lot of money to you or me, but a
>>>
>>> pittance to this giant non-profit. The same can be said of smaller
>>>
>>> shops, just on a smaller scale. The argument that all the poor
>>>unemployable disabled folks will be sent home jobless if the law is
>>>changed is bogus and cynical.
>>> As I
>>> said before, the majority of these shops get the majority of their
>>>
>>> business through non-competitive contracts with the government, so
>>>
>>> the additional labor cost would be built right into the price the
>>>government pays.
>>> And, as
>>> I also said, I am happy to have my tax dollars go to affirm the
>>>dignity, value and legal equality of all individuals rather than to
>>>support the
>>>
>>> 70,
>>> 80, 100k salaries of the management types at these shops who
>>>somehow sleep at night under the illusion, or maybe delusion, that
>>>
>>> they are doing something positive for people with disabilities.
>>> It's wrong, it's disgusting, and, yes, it hits a raw nerve with me
>>>
>>> because I've lived it. If there is a minimum wage it should apply
>>> to
>>
>>>everybody in the employment market, full stop.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/zunaira.wasif%40dbs.
>> fldoe.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/cassonw%40gmail.c
>> om
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Casson
> University of New Mexico
> M.S. Computer Science
> Lewis & Clark Alumnus '11
> B.A. Physics and Math/Comp Sci.
> (505) 695-1374
> cassonw at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40eart
> hlink.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/kirt.crazydude%40g
> mail.com
>
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nusbaum%40gmail.c
om
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/avila.bert.humberto2%40g
mail.com
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list