[nabs-l] update on rehab affairs

Wed Aug 28 03:19:43 UTC 2013

Yes, we're both in CO. Yes, the list is primarily college students who registered after a certain date. The reason given was that the agency's funding was cut and there is a very large number of students who applied for services after the cut. Blind students have high priority (the agency is not restricted to serving blind people, it handles all disabilities) but other than that its just a waiting game. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:02 PM, "justin williams" <justin.williams2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> As a college student you got put on that waiting list?  I've never seen
> college students have to be on the waiting list if they put their request in
> at a reasonable amount of time like the year before.  Are you in the same
> state as Beth? You might want to look in to filing a cap claim yourself.
> I'm not trying to be critical or anything, but I've worked at an agency
> before, I've seen the process be speeded up when they needed to be, like
> when someone filed a claim.  A year is too long.    Don't worry about the
> list; make your own list with you at the front, and at the back.  You got to
> get what you need to get.  I'm not trying to say that you or anyone else
> should be obnoxious and impatient, but sometimes the system has to be pushed
> a little bit.  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nabs-l [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of
> blackbyrdfly at gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:59 PM
> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] update on rehab affairs
> 
> I'm not even going to try to cover all of this here. I just wanted to point
> out that EVERYONE is on that wait list, and it has nothing to do with you.
> I've been on it for over a year now and have had to pay my tuition for the
> past year out of pocket and start looking for a survival job to stay in
> school. You can't just get magically bumped to the front of the queue for no
> related reason. You have to wait for funds to become available just like the
> rest of us. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Beth Taurasi <denverqueen1107 at comcast.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hey you all, this is a brief update as nothing much has happened in the
> saga of me and Rehab.
>> I have contacted Client Assistance program rep Anna French, if any
> Coloradoans have known who she was.  Or is.  Sorry about the miswording
> there.  I contacted Anna French twice and left two messages, and have
> contacts else where and around the U.S. I can reach, but it seems none of my
> contacts will get back to me.  Shoot, I don't know what to do next.  I think
> I'm going to see about resolving the issue like this, see if anyone has any
> ideas for this:
>> 1. The counselor must be changed.
>> 2. The services must be provided and compensatory funds must be provided
> for all technological stuff I am asking for, no matter the plans.
>> 3. A plan must be written up, no wait list, nothing.  And in this plan, we
> need to do an employment goal of computers and stuff, like web design,
> networking, IT basically.  I want to get an IT certification from CISCO, so
> they should ideally pay for something accessible and not something that
> would require too much paying in advance accommodations and such.  I'd
> chosen CISCO Academy of the Visually Impaired because it accommodates blind
> people and teaches all the skills needed to do Linux and stuff, networking
> and the like.
>> 3. Any psychological evaluations must be carefully mmonitored and if a
> racial profiling like that which occurred in 2011, in which the doc wrote
> that I was pretending to be Arab occurs in the form of, "pretending to be
> Syrian/Catholic", I will ask that the doc be revoked of his license.  I am
> already thinking about actions to take against the doc because Richele, my
> counselor current, has the copy that says I was pretending to be Arab and
> didn't think to shred and get a copy without the Arab comments.  One more
> thing in the resolution, if they refuse to put together an employment goal
> that I write for myself, then I will drop the case with them and sue them
> for lost wages and compensatory damages related to racial profiling.
>> This may all sound weird, but how does this all sound to the public as a
> whole?  SHould I go about this?  If they refuse to do as I ask since the
> social skills group isn't available and since this provider is notorious for
> being not only white/American biased but sighted and custodially biased, do
> you think this is good?
>> Thanks you all,
>> Beth Taurasi
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/blackbyrdfly%40gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/justin.williams2%40gmail
> .com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/blackbyrdfly%40gmail.com