[nabs-l] How can NFB better include people withmultipledisabilities?
Darian Smith
dsmithnfb at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 03:53:46 UTC 2014
Hi Arielle and all,
I agree that some clarity and transparency on this matter would be helpful. it is always good to know where we stand on the policies of our organization.
I seem to remember somehow that there was an interest on some level to have some sort of interest group for african-americans. I’m not entirely sure how serious the talk was of this and if the organizing of such a group never went much further because it opened up the door for more special interest divisions than we as an organization intended to have. So, basically an example to support the idea of clarity an transparency on these matters.
I’ll try not to contribute to this thread in this manner because I’m sure I’m helping to drift this off-topic :-)
Darian
On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:34 PM, Arielle Silverman <arielle71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kaiti and all,
>
> The national convention usually includes one invocation from a Jew,
> usually an Orthodox Jewish prayer. But all the others I remember
> hearing have been Christian prayers. It would be great if Muslims,
> Hindus, Buddhists or other religious representatives were recruited to
> lead invocations. Personally, I feel that religious and secular
> business should be separate in this country and part of that means not
> including communal prayers as part of a secular meeting (a moment of
> silence where everyone could pray or not pray individually as they
> chose might be more appropriate). But that's my opinion and I know it
> is politically charged. I don't think the NFB takes any kind of
> religious position and nor should it, but it would be great if such
> decisions about how to handle prayer at convention, and similar
> issues, were decided by the membership instead of just following a
> policy that was probably set decades ago. If a majority of the
> membership voted to include Christian prayers, I would support that
> decision.
>
> The NFB has members and some in leadership roles who are openly gay or
> lesbian, and several leaders who are ethnic minorities. I don't think
> anyone is openly shunned in the NFB because of their sexual
> orientation, religion or any other characteristic. However, the issue
> that arose was that an LGBT group was not permitted to advertise its
> events or to get any kind of formal recognition. I don't know if a
> group based on race, mental illness, etc. would have faced the same
> treatment. The NFB does have a Communities of Faith division, and an
> NFB in Judaism group that is not very active to my knowledge, and a
> group for those in twelve-step addiction recovery. I honestly don't
> know if what happened to the LGBT group was a one-off or if it
> reflects a more general policy about special-interest groups. Again,
> it would be great if the policy about recognizing special-interest
> groups would be set clearly by the membership and made transparent to
> everyone so we don't have all this speculation.
>
> Arielle
>
> On 4/1/14, Kaiti Shelton <crazy4clarinet104 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In answer to Carly's question about connections between the blind, (we
>> may call them "just blind" for the purposes of this conversation), and
>> those with blindness and other disabilities, or other disabilities
>> without blindness, I think organizational relationships are the
>> starting point to working interpersonally. Much like the NFB is a
>> huge group of blind people, and is often used as a catalyst for
>> working interpersonally to accomplish tasks, other groups are the
>> same. If we want to work interpersonally with the deaf, persay, then
>> we need to go where the deaf are and start forming relationships with
>> that group. Once repore is established, people from the various
>> organizations can work interpersonally. Darian might have phrased it
>> better than I did, but it's the same sort of view.
>>
>> I was admittedly not around for that episode that Desiree described,
>> but I'm really sad to hear that it happened. Especially since, as
>> Arielle pointed out, there are some pretty out there groups like the
>> car one. I mean, it's okay for people to get together and discuss
>> cars that we can't even drive (yet at least), so their discussion is
>> purely based on mechanical and aesthetic knowledge of the cars rather
>> than a personal user experience, but a support group for blind people
>> who are seen as a minority for another reason is not okay? To me,
>> that just doesn't make sense.
>>
>> I'm not particularly religious, and probably would label myself as
>> unitarian even though I was raised catholic if I had to label myself
>> at all, so I realize my personal views on things of that nature are
>> more liberal than the views of others. However, conservatives aren't
>> always going to be happy, just as liberals aren't, and it is important
>> that we compromise. I was not under the impression that the NFB had
>> any religious affiliation, and even remember asking someone what
>> Invocation was, because I really didn't know the term. Even in this
>> light, why is Christianity made such a prevalent part of convention?
>> What about those who practice Islam, Judism, or anything else? I
>> would hate for a majority faction within the NFB to shun double
>> minority members, because after all, we're all minorities in the
>> greater world, so to pretend that those who are different from us are
>> less valuable or don't deserve the right to organize a group to suit
>> their unique set of needs or circumstances doesn't seem right.
>> Sorry for the rant.
>>
>> On 4/1/14, melissa R Green <lissa1531 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Arielle once again. You are so right! I also hope that will never
>>> happen
>>> again.
>>> Another way to look at this is, many devisions get started and then they
>>> just fall by the waist side. Noone will keep it going. IMO the
>>> devisions
>>> are started by people that have to be in the spotlight and be the darling
>>> of
>>>
>>> the Federation and the devision suffers. The same happens with chapters
>>> and
>>>
>>> state devisions. Then everyone is shaking their head and wondering what
>>> happened and why this person didn't work out. I could give examples of
>>> backing the wrong person.
>>> Finally, I always felt badly for those children who were born and grew up
>>> in
>>>
>>> the federation. They have a lot of pressure on them to be the darling of
>>> the federation. Have a blessed day.
>>> Best Wishes
>>> Melissa R. Green and Pj
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Arielle Silverman" <arielle71 at gmail.com>
>>> To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:37 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] How can NFB better include people
>>> withmultipledisabilities?
>>>
>>>
>>> I too was at the NFB convention when the LGBT group wasn't able to
>>> announce its meetings. I'm disappointed this happened, especially the
>>> symbolic exclusion it represented, and hope never to see something
>>> like that again as long as I am part of the Federation. I completely
>>> understand the leadership's desire not to have a division for every
>>> special interest. However, we need clearer and more evenhanded
>>> criteria about what should constitute a division. It doesn't make
>>> sense to allow a division for car enthusiasts with its own annual
>>> activities and then not even allow an LGBT group to advertise informal
>>> meet-ups. We can't try to say we don't want LGBT because it's too
>>> politically controversial and then have religious invocations at all
>>> the general sessions. Has the general membership ever even been polled
>>> about whether to keep having these religious invocations? In other
>>> words, unless we want to be in an organization that reflects the
>>> president's or the board's interests and political views alone, we
>>> really need to have some transparency about how divisions are formed
>>> and what kinds of characteristics are meaningful enough to justify
>>> forming a division. Furthermore, as Darian pointed out, a well-run
>>> group can probably be just as effective without a lot of the hassle
>>> associated with keeping up a division. I know at least some of the
>>> folks in the LGBT group would have been totally happy with just a
>>> group, not a full division, but even that wasn't supported.
>>>
>>> Arielle
>>>
>>> On 4/1/14, melissa R Green <lissa1531 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> what a good topic. I know that there is a blind rollers list. But the
>>>> devision never came into being. I think that the committee of the under
>>>> served is supposed to address these issues. However this is not
>>>> occurring.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that nfb has a primary focus of blindness. Yet, we are a
>>>> diverse
>>>> population. So I believe that the nfb needs to become more diverse. I
>>>> also
>>>>
>>>> believe that the leadership are going by their assumptions that if they
>>>> have
>>>>
>>>> a devision dedicated to a certain grou that it will not do anything to
>>>> assist blind people. For example, years ago, a group came together and
>>>> wanted to form a devision for blind gay bisexual and transgendered
>>>> people.
>>>> I was at the convention when doctor Maurer was reading the announcement
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> then he ripped it up in the middle of reading it. Many people left the
>>>> federation because they felt that they were not wanted and that the
>>>> leadership assumed that it would be a devision strictly for social
>>>> purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Many people are hopeful that the new president will bring many more
>>>> changes
>>>>
>>>> and lots of diversity to the federation. I am going to wait and see
>>>> what
>>>> happens.
>>>> Have a blessed day.
>>>> Best Wishes
>>>> Melissa R. Green and Pj
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Arielle Silverman" <arielle71 at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
>>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:53 PM
>>>> Subject: [nabs-l] How can NFB better include people with
>>>> multipledisabilities?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to start a separate thread to address an important issue
>>>> that's come up recently. It's clear that more and more blind folks
>>>> today also have other disabilities. For several reasons, the number of
>>>> blind people with additional disabilities is likely to increase, and
>>>> more than that, the number of blind people with additional
>>>> disabilities who are getting educated and involved in advocacy is
>>>> likely to increase. I do think that, for the most part, the NFB
>>>> centers do a good job of tailoring training to the needs that people
>>>> with other disabilities may have, but I also think that we as an
>>>> organization have far to go in order to truly appreciate the
>>>> contributions of all blind people. I think it's particularly true when
>>>> we think about including people with intellectual disabilities and
>>>> mental illnesses. These kinds of conditions are stigmatized in
>>>> general, but especially since our leadership has tended to be highly
>>>> educated and to stress academic excellence and consistent effort from
>>>> the leadership, I can see how folks who have intellectual
>>>> disabilities, mental illnesses or chronic health conditions can feel
>>>> left out. I've known some blind folks who had trouble holding down
>>>> leadership positions in the NFB due to the ups and downs of mental
>>>> illnesses, for example, but who are still incredibly creative and
>>>> passionate people with a lot of good ideas that are getting lost.
>>>> Further, as several folks have pointed out, people with multiple
>>>> disabilities can experience difficulties related to getting
>>>> employment, education, etc. that the NFB hasn't really been able to
>>>> help them with.
>>>> I agree that NFB can't be expert about all disabilities, just
>>>> blindness, but I think there is a definite place for more divisions
>>>> and groups within the NFB that focus on other conditions. There is a
>>>> deaf-blind division, but I have not heard many great things about its
>>>> effectiveness. I have heard about efforts to possibly start a
>>>> blind-rollers division, and it makes sense to me that blind wheelchair
>>>> users might have unique concerns they'd want to discuss with each
>>>> other. But to my knowledge such a division has not been formed. I
>>>> would love to see a division for blind people with mental health
>>>> conditions. This is a huge segment of our population, and there are
>>>> probably unique concerns there. I am not sure if such divisions don't
>>>> exist because the national leadership opposes them or if there just
>>>> hasn't been enough interest or momentum to get them going. But I think
>>>> having such divisions could help folks who have additional
>>>> disabilities obtain leadership positions within the organization, and
>>>> also to provide a vehicle for collective action and education about
>>>> issues affecting these groups specifically, even if the NFB as a whole
>>>> should just focus on blindness. I hope that makes sense. I would be
>>>> interested in other suggestions from you about how members with
>>>> multiple disabilities can feel more valued. While there is something
>>>> to be said for going ahead and running for leadership positions in
>>>> order to change things, change also needs to come from the
>>>> organization as a whole if folks with multiple disabilities are going
>>>> to be elected and welcomed in these positions.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Arielle
>>>>
>>>> On 3/31/14, Steve Jacobson <steve.jacobson at visi.com> wrote:
>>>>> Joe and others,
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not my position that anything said about the NFB that is negative
>>>>> is
>>>>> wrong. Organizations are made up of
>>>>> human beings and we are not perfect so our creations are not likely
>>>>> going
>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>> be perfect. Still, some of what one
>>>>> person may seem as wrong isn't so much a matter of right or wrong as
>>>>> perspective and opinion. We embarked a good
>>>>> while back now on an expansion that has resulted in the need to raise
>>>>> more
>>>>> funds than we used to have to raise. I
>>>>> do not think I am alone among NFB supporters in recognizing that this
>>>>> is
>>>>> a
>>>>> risk. When you look at our budget and
>>>>> that of the ACB and then compare legislative successes as you did, Joe,
>>>>> it
>>>>> is certainly clear that legislative
>>>>> successes are not
>>>>> proportional to one's budget. Whether I completely agree with
>>>>> legislation
>>>>> ACB passes or not, I recognize that the
>>>>> ACB has made contributions. However, I have felt for some time and I
>>>>> feel
>>>>> particularly more so now that our
>>>>> problems can't be solved by legislation alone. Let's take
>>>>> accessibility,
>>>>> for example. There is a lot of emphasis
>>>>> on getting more legislation passed that will force software to be
>>>>> accessible, for example. I happen to believe
>>>>> this is necessary, but it isn't going to make everything better for us,
>>>>> particularly on the job, all by itself.
>>>>> If we are going to make any serious gains, we need to understand the
>>>>> limits
>>>>> of current technology and explore ways
>>>>> of getting information that is new. I am not one who got all excited
>>>>> about
>>>>> being able to drive a car, although I
>>>>> certainly hope that blind people can do that at some point. However, I
>>>>> got
>>>>> very excited about the fact that as a
>>>>> result of looking at the problem, we experimented with a number of ways
>>>>> of
>>>>> getting information that had not been
>>>>> explored before. A significant portion of our budget went into the
>>>>> KNFB
>>>>> reader. At the time, it was something
>>>>> nobody was doing, and it was a moving experience when I held up a KNFB
>>>>> reader to the lists of registered people at
>>>>> a national convention that were just hanging from a crossbar and have
>>>>> it
>>>>> start to read the content. There have
>>>>> probably been over a thousand kids who have attended science camps of
>>>>> one
>>>>> kind or another through our efforts. We
>>>>> have been able to sponsor other gatherings as well for blind lawyers,
>>>>> teachers, and major players in the
>>>>> technology field. We couldn't have done any of this in the 80's or
>>>>> 90's,
>>>>> and much of this would not have been
>>>>> done even now if we hadn't tried it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what's my point, I'm not saying anything new, you know all this. My
>>>>> point is that a lot of this is about risks
>>>>> and perspectives. We won't know for a long time if some of these
>>>>> efforts
>>>>> will make a difference. Frankly, I am a
>>>>> believer that one learns almost as much from what doesn't work as one
>>>>> learns
>>>>> from what does, because if you make a
>>>>> mistake you can eliminate or refine that approach. Will some of those
>>>>> thousand kids get into math or science
>>>>> because of what we did? Is the OCR in the new HIMS product a little
>>>>> better
>>>>> because of what we did with the KNFB
>>>>> reader? Will we see a really good reader on the iPhone? Might we ever
>>>>> see
>>>>> a reader that could use artificial
>>>>> intelligence to interpret software on a computer screen instead of
>>>>> having
>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>> educate every person who writes
>>>>> software? Will some of our efforts mean that there might be a way for
>>>>> us
>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>> control the Google self-driving cars
>>>>> because of some of the work we did on our own car? I hope that at
>>>>> least
>>>>> some of the answers are yes, but at this
>>>>> point I can't really say. What I do know is that the smaller dynamic
>>>>> grass
>>>>> roots organization that we were in the
>>>>> 80's couldn't have had any affect on some of what I've listed above,
>>>>> nor
>>>>> was
>>>>> it the right time for that. But it
>>>>> also means that we change. Not only do we change, but we make mistakes
>>>>> as
>>>>> we adjust to change. Joe, what you see
>>>>> as a downward spiral, I see as the challenges of change. I'm not
>>>>> satisfied
>>>>> to say that it has to be that way,
>>>>> though. We can and must learn how to do better, as individuals and as
>>>>> an
>>>>> organization.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe, I think you are right that getting training at one of our centers
>>>>> won't
>>>>> miraculously make life better, and
>>>>> the marketing does sometimes imply that. However, you are wrong to
>>>>> draw
>>>>> conclusions about such training based
>>>>> upon the marketing. Discussing and exploring the uncertainties and
>>>>> challenges of seeking employment as a blind
>>>>> person is a big part of what is addressed at BLIND Incorporated here in
>>>>> Minnesota and I assume by our other
>>>>> centers. Some of the point of such training is to encourage the idea
>>>>> that
>>>>> you have to have a set of tools to
>>>>> approach a given situation and not just one tool. Still, we have to do
>>>>> more
>>>>> than run people through training.
>>>>> This is true of any single aspectof our challenges, though.
>>>>> Legislating
>>>>> that software must be accessible and that
>>>>> one cannot discriminate based upon a disability was and is still
>>>>> needed,
>>>>> but
>>>>> it won't matter much if we don't have
>>>>> training. Legislation and even training won't matter all that much if
>>>>> we
>>>>> don't get a good basic education.
>>>>> Requiring that school districts teach braille won't fix that problem if
>>>>> there are no braille instructors in a
>>>>> given area. You can't pick any one thing out and say that it can lead
>>>>> to
>>>>> success by itself, and you can't see any
>>>>> given issue as completely standing on its own.
>>>>>
>>>>> I feel that we are in a better position as an organization to impact
>>>>> the
>>>>> complex challenges we face with a larger
>>>>> budget than we were. However, it is more important than ever that we
>>>>> understand where we are going and how our
>>>>> philosophy fits in. The question of what can we change to address the
>>>>> challenges of the world and what do we need
>>>>> the world to change is more important than ever, and I don't see anyone
>>>>> asking questions like that outside of this
>>>>> organization. With our strengths and our failings, I think our
>>>>> understanding of asking for help and looking for
>>>>> our own solutions is what has set us apart in my mind, and while it is
>>>>> risky, I think that branching out is a risk
>>>>> worth taking to try to have a wider impact. We need the help of all
>>>>> members, though, to handle change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve Jacobson
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 12:57:22 -0600, Jamie Principato wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Arielle,
>>>>>> That was a very thoughtful and politically sensitive response.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Joe,
>>>>>> I am pleased to see I am not alone in making these observations furring
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> own relationship with the NFB. while I
>>>>> deeply respect the organization's history and truly appreciate the raw
>>>>> potential the organization has moving
>>>>> forward, the passion I joined with back in high school has turned to
>>>>> cautious cynicism. I don't think this
>>>>> perspective is bad, though. I think the NFB desperately needs members
>>>>> who
>>>>> can see past the smoke and mirrors of
>>>>> PR, and who are willing to discuss issues of blindness and politics in
>>>>> a
>>>>> no-nonsense way that isn't always easy to
>>>>> hear. It is a shame though when those of us less willing to toe the
>>>>> line
>>>>> and
>>>>> pander to those with political power
>>>>> are treated with hostility by some at the national level, and more
>>>>> still
>>>>> within our local chapters.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Arielle Silverman <arielle71 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for sharing your experiences. I have not been following the
>>>>>>> Braille Monitor that closely but I can understand what you are saying
>>>>>>> about the increased emphasis on fund-raising. I have also felt like
>>>>>>> the national convention is turning into more of a carnival with all
>>>>>>> the exhibitors and prizes being given away, and much of banquet that
>>>>>>> used to focus on philosophy and NFB spirit is now taken up with prize
>>>>>>> drawings and the like.
>>>>>>> To be fair, NFB was stronger financially when we joined than it is
>>>>>>> now, and I understand that some national programs have been cut due
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> a decrease in revenue from what used to be steady reliable income
>>>>>>> sources. So NFB may be pushing fund-raising more, but the alternative
>>>>>>> could be a loss of programs and resources.
>>>>>>> I have not heard of anyone being blatantly turned away or refused
>>>>>>> membership in an NFB chapter. If that ever happens it is truly
>>>>>>> shameful. I do think that sometimes prospective members choose not to
>>>>>>> join because they perceive hostility from the organization or
>>>>>>> judgment
>>>>>>> of their lifestyle choices. I think part of that is perception only,
>>>>>>> and part of it is reality. The NFB is stereotyped as a radical
>>>>>>> one-size-fits-all organization, and new members expecting to find
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> could be especially sensitive to cues of hostility. However, there
>>>>>>> probably is some real lack of acceptance among certain segments of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> organization, which, again, is unfortunate. I will say that I am not
>>>>>>> the most graceful blind person and was relatively unskilled when I
>>>>>>> first joined, and I still felt completely accepted. But I know not
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> of us are so lucky. I would encourage prospective members who have a
>>>>>>> negative experience to try again in a different chapter or division
>>>>>>> and perhaps they will find acceptance there. But at the same time,
>>>>>>> this is something we need to be sensitive to in the organization.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arielle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/14, Michael Capelle <michael.capelle at frontier.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>>>> This is why I am not apart of any "blind movement." I live my own
>>>>>>>> life,
>>>>>>>> live my own philosophy, ETC. I do not believe in a one size fits
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>> mentality, which is unfurtunately what the NFB does.
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: RJ Sandefur
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 11:51 AM
>>>>>>>> To: jsoro620 at gmail.com ; National Association of Blind Students
>>>>>>>> mailing
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Success and Why I Left the NFB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Joe, I agree with you. I had to attend both college, and Seminary
>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>> the NFB's help, although it would have been nice to have a mentoor.
>>>>>>>> RJ
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "Joe" <jsoro620 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: "'National Association of Blind Students mailing list'"
>>>>>>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 12:25 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: [nabs-l] Success and Why I Left the NFB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2006 was the last year I attended a national convention. While
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> caught up in the ra ra of the movement and felt glad to be in the
>>>>>>>>> company
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> so many people who could relate to the challenges that awaited me
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> recent college graduate. I left convention, finished up my summer
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> counselor in Iowa, and set off for DC to begin my business with the
>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>> world. I would never take away someone's enthusiasm from attending
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> national convention or Washington Seminar or one of the weekend
>>>>>>>>> leadership
>>>>>>>>> seminars in Baltimore. They are very well-suited to boost a
>>>>>>>>> person's
>>>>>>>>> spirit,
>>>>>>>>> but I believe too many people fall through the cracks when faced
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> reality outside of those infrequent gatherings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To be fair, the organization is no different from any other
>>>>>>>>> nonprofit
>>>>>>>>> business. It needs money to sustain itself, and in turn it needs
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> members to help raise the money. Still, I found it rather
>>>>>>>>> disappointing
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> so much of the board meeting I tuned into listen to last summer was
>>>>>>>>> dominated by calls to raise money for this fund or that effort. I
>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> even sadder that a recent issue of the Braille Monitor, our monthly
>>>>>>>>> dose
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> inspiration, featured several articles just to the focus of
>>>>>>>>> generating
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> ways to drum up more financial support, but perhaps the most
>>>>>>>>> frustrating
>>>>>>>>> byproduct of this new NFB are the e-mails from so-called friends
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> whom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> have not heard in years but boldly ask me to contribute to their
>>>>>>>>> NFB
>>>>>>>>> fundraising campaigns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In short, at some point the NFB embraced enterprise and forgot
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> movement. Between 2006 and 2012 I went on to help lead development
>>>>>>>>> efforts
>>>>>>>>> for other nonprofits outside of the blindness field, also national
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>> They too made fundraising a priority, but it never felt like the
>>>>>>>>> top,
>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> only, priority. It gets tiresome when we focus on recruiting new
>>>>>>>>> blood
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> raising new money and forget about strengthening the members and
>>>>>>>>> resources
>>>>>>>>> we've already had.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nowadays I have the privilege of knowing some excellent blind
>>>>>>>>> professionals.
>>>>>>>>> I think they would do well in the NFB. They are smarter than I ever
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> and have accomplished more than I may ever achieve, but they shun
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> organization because they were turned away or because they were
>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>> welcomed in the first place. It's something I should have kept in
>>>>>>>>> mind
>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>> I had my brief taste of leadership in the organization. I had too
>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> mouth on me to ever be anyone's golden child, but I was reliable
>>>>>>>>> enough
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> get the job done. But, getting the job done should have really
>>>>>>>>> meant
>>>>>>>>> attracting and pulling in these men and women who could have made
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> NFB
>>>>>>>>> lots better, listening to new ideas, and most important, remaining
>>>>>>>>> true
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the cause and not some multi-million-dollar institute we find
>>>>>>>>> ourselves
>>>>>>>>> incapable of sustaining.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, what does any of this have to do with the original post? I
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> to ever be said I was a hypocrite. The leadership may as well know
>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> think of them, but more importantly, to the college kids on the
>>>>>>>>> verge
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> spreading their own wings, I want you to know the NFB banner will
>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>> guide
>>>>>>>>> your way so far. Take what's great about the organization and leave
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> political drama and marketing ploys behind. In the end it will be
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> own
>>>>>>>>> wits and talents that will earn your pay check. The NFB will never
>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> anything new. The philosophy merely helps you uncover what you
>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> be successful. Anything could happen with the new NFB president,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> be the first to retract my words if he is brave enough to reverse
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> downward spiral. You see, we no longer live in a world where the
>>>>>>>>> NFB
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> necessary for collective momentum. Technology has seen to that.
>>>>>>>>> Whether
>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>> not the movement sticks around largely depends on how badly we want
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is the ACB doing it any better? That's debatable, but you know what
>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>> found from the people I've met on that side of the house? They seem
>>>>>>>>> happier,
>>>>>>>>> and that's something we can't seem to figure out in our camp. The
>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>> victories they celebrate they do with even less money. Let that be
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> lesson
>>>>>>>>> in financial management to you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know what the hell I'm doing back here. I told myself I
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>> become one of those bitter former NFB members. My only goal was to
>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>> different perspectives to the new generation of leaders coming up
>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>> the ranks. After all, if you never taste the real world, you have
>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>> business leading. That's like the teacher who teaches because they
>>>>>>>>> couldn't
>>>>>>>>> cut it, and believe it or not, I want to see more and more of you
>>>>>>>>> excel
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> whatever it is you want to do. The more of you there are, the
>>>>>>>>> greater
>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>> strength.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Moving forward I reckon I'll keep my opinions to myself here lest I
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> rotten apple that spoils the bunch, but in some lame attempt to
>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> original question, my answer would be this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The characteristics of a successful blind person are humility to
>>>>>>>>> consume
>>>>>>>>> what they need to be successful, fortitude to turn away what will
>>>>>>>>> not,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> wisdom to recognize the difference.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @ScribblingJoe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Visit my blog:
>>>>>>>>> http://joeorozco.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/joltingjacksandefur%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/michael.capelle%40frontier.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/blackbyrdfly%40gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40visi.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/lissa1531%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> nabs-l:
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/lissa1531%40gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> nabs-l:
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/crazy4clarinet104%40gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kaiti
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40gmail.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dsmithnfb%40gmail.com
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list