[nabs-l] 5 Reasons Why Guide Dogs Are a Terrible Idea!

Fri Mar 20 07:24:42 UTC 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I actually read the article twice before I posted. The subject line
was as much garbage as the article itself. People talk about how they
found positive points to this and I'd still love to see any of them.

Maybe it wasn't Joe's intention, but he really brought down owning a
guide to a whole new level. I'm not really interested in a fight over
a guide vs cane because I don't really care to.

Basically what my response boils down to is this: if someone has a
guide, they know that their dog loves them, is loyal and in general is
happy to work. They have a happy furry companion next to them who does
some seriously amazing stuff. With that said, the only point I'll give
some weight is the expense bit because that is an important
consideration. the time is also important, but I feel like you should
know if you're going to devote time to your dog. the rest are just
pointless babble from what I can tell. I don't really know that
someone having their feelings hurt because people ask about their dog
rather than them is a compelling reason not to get a guide dog.

In the end, the choice should be left up to the user; the cane Vs
Guide issue is relevant to all students. I would like to make sure
that people have accurate information though. A post just for the sake
of writing a discouraging post does not really fall under that category.

When I started looking at this, I can think of reasons why someone
might not want a guide, so that's what I expected. Valid, well-thought
out compelling reasons with experience behind them to explain the pros
and cons of having a guide. Sadly, I didn't receive any of that.

Best,
Ty

On 3/20/2015 3:16 AM, Justin Harford via nabs-l wrote:
> I agree.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 19, 2015, at 8:41 PM, Brice Smith via nabs-l
>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Did those of you who feel offended actually read the blog, 
>> particularly the explanations under the heading, "Damn! Any Words
>> of Encouragement?"
>> 
>> The subject line is purposely and brilliantly provocative--the
>> kind that gathers almost a dozen responses in just a couple of
>> hours. Joe clearly understands how to use rhetoric to make a
>> compelling argument, and some of the knee-jerk reactions on this
>> list to this post were disappointing.
>> 
>> 
>> Brice
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 3/19/15, Littlefield, Tyler via nabs-l <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>>> wrote:
> Positives? You can summarize this up in 5 really fast points. I
> seen no positives and really, the negatives aren't huge drawbacks
> that were listed. I mean, if you want to tell people not to get a
> dog, you surely can do better than that.
> 
> But I'll address each of these points in turn. 1. It's expensive! 
> It can be, yes. There are programs like GDB offers to help with
> vet bills, so the food and grooming are really all I have to pay
> for. That and toys, which we probably spend way to much money on.
> More money than I would usually spend? Certainly, but it's nowhere
> near a lot (and I'm a student living on a budget). It's also well
> worth the money.
> 
> 2. It's inconvenient! Yes, taking your dog out must be such hard
> work. Wait, I do it every day, what am i talking about? It's not
> fun when you're sick and yes, finding a trash can be kind of tough.
> That's why O'Mally and Minh's viva know "find the trash." That's
> also when social skills come into play. "Excuse me mam, do you see
> a trashcan nearby?" Works every time. If you're at an unfamiliar
> hotel, you just ask at the front desk and they're usually pretty
> cool about it. Airports also have relieving areas. Unless you
> travel twice a week, a couple hours of slightly less leg room (and
> I'm fairly tall) is really not that big of a deal.
> 
> 3. It's time-consuming! Yes, having a dog does take time. You'd
> think this would be inherently obvious, but it was needed to be
> pointed out here. You don't need to go for 12 mile runs, O'mally
> and I have left today to relieve and that was pretty much it. I
> played with him and listened to a book and sat with him on the
> floor for a bit. He's totally happy and hasn't demolished
> anything.
> 
> 4. It's unwelcomed attention! I find it kind of funny you're
> talking about being covert and not making a name for yourself with
> complaints when the NFB files more lawsuits than I can keep up
> with. But beyond that, I've never been turned down from eating
> because I have a dog. Cabs, certainly; we all have. If an
> establishment turns me down, I'll make sure that people know they
> did it and they're not treating me equally. Just because I'm blind
> doesn't mean I should sit in the corner and hope that things get 
> better; I want to educate people. I've had a lot of really amazing 
> people come up and talk to me and ask questions about my guide. It 
> certainly does get a bit trying at times, but in no way is it a
> huge problem. I am sorry however if you're not the center of the
> topics and people do ask about your dog. It happens.
> 
> 5. It can be dirty work! Best not ever get sick by yourself then,
> or have kids, or anything else. Yes, it can be tough. If you're
> squeamish maybe it's not for you. Cleaning up doggy vomit really
> isn't the best part of my day, but you do it. mostly because these
> dogs do so much for you and if O'mally is sick I'm worried about
> him and just want him to get better. You do it because you love
> your dog.
> 
> "If you were contemplating a dog, came across this post and felt 
> discouraged, you should not get a dog. It's a lot of work. It's a
> lot of responsibility. It's constant care and attention and a
> commitment to keep up the dog's level of training. No one will
> fault you for being mature enough to walk away."
> 
> So let me sum this up: expensive; inconvenient; time-consuming; 
> unwelcome attention; messy work. Yeah, I'd say you probably
> shouldn't have a dog. Please though, do try to at least provide
> constructive and good information on both sides of this issue. The
> issues you raised were incredibly self-centered, rude, generalizing
> and really didn't convey any issues beyond negative criticism.
> 
> My guide does amazing work each and every day. when I pick up his 
> harness, he's by my side, tail wagging ready to work for me. He
> only asks that I give him love, attention and take care of him with
> vet visits, grooming and toys. Given the amount of travel that he
> has enabled me to do (I am and was proficient with a cane), I think
> it only fitting that I pay for his food, give him attention, clean
> up after him when he's sick and treat him well. My guide loves me,
> no questions asked. while I somewhat understand these points, I
> think anyone who has actually had a guide would really agree that
> they are huge issues that should prevent you from getting one.
> 
> At first, this looked like a trolling post; it still feels like a 
> trolling post.
> 
> Be well, Ty
>>>>> On 3/19/2015 10:20 PM, Justin Harford via nabs-l wrote: At
>>>>> first, this looked like a trolling post, but after I
>>>>> actually read the article, I  enjoyed it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is a very frank and honest examination of the positives
>>>>> and negatives of one individual's experience with a guide
>>>>> dog, and clearly reads as the opinion of one person.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards Justin
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2015, at 6:52 PM, Juanita Herrera via nabs-l 
>>>>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Being a guide dog user myself, I found the blog offensive
>>>>>> and thought of how other guide dog handlers might feel. I
>>>>>> didn't want to generalize like the blog seems to do but I
>>>>>> felt that if I felt offended by it many other people
>>>>>> would have too. I would have appreciated it more if
>>>>>> somewhere in the blog post it would have been
>>>>>> acknowledged that this was one person's opinion, and not 
>>>>>> make it seen as if though everyone possessed the same
>>>>>> opinion. Being that I am a guide dog user and have been
>>>>>> for three years, it has been one of the best experiences
>>>>>> of my life. I would never change it for anything, and I
>>>>>> don't consider going back to using a cane after I have to
>>>>>> retire my dog. Therefore, I highly disagree with the blog
>>>>>> post. However, I must reinstate that this is simply my
>>>>>> opinion. Juanita
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2015, at 6:28 PM, minh ha via nabs-l 
>>>>>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I agree with Aleeha's sentiments one hundred percent.
>>>>>>> Over generalization is a huge mistake to do under any
>>>>>>> circumstances, and this blog post was offensive to me
>>>>>>> and other guide dog handlers on so many levels. If you
>>>>>>> want to write a fair and informative blog post about
>>>>>>> the guide dog lifestyle, then by all means, point out
>>>>>>> the negative aspects, but do not conveniently forget to
>>>>>>> mention the thousand of other more positive and
>>>>>>> beneficial impacts that a guide dog can have on a 
>>>>>>> person's life. Yes, a guide dog is not the right choice
>>>>>>> for everyone and a blind person needs to think long and
>>>>>>> hard before getting one, but for the right reasons, a
>>>>>>> guide dog can completely turn someone's life around and
>>>>>>> give them the confidence in order to live life more
>>>>>>> productively. Honestly, your five reasons seem very
>>>>>>> childish, and i have to wonder if they are that
>>>>>>> important to you, then you should be contemplating
>>>>>>> about getting another guide dog at all.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Respectfully, Minh and my hard working little guide,
>>>>>>> Viva
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 3/19/15, Aleeha Dudley via nabs-l
>>>>>>>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org> wrote: Personally, I find your
>>>>>>>> subject line a bit offensive, as it assumes that
>>>>>>>> guide dogs are a terrible idea for everyone. Being
>>>>>>>> the proud handler of a wonderful dog myself, and a
>>>>>>>> quite independent cane traveller before that, I am a 
>>>>>>>> bit upset as what I find to be a somewhat
>>>>>>>> inflammatory post. You are right; guide dogs are not
>>>>>>>> for everyone. They are a huge responsibility and need
>>>>>>>> a lot of daily care. But to say that there are five
>>>>>>>> reasons why a guide dog is a terrile idea seems to be
>>>>>>>> going too far, especially addressing such a large
>>>>>>>> body of people such as that on this list. Now,
>>>>>>>> having clicked the link and read the blog, I know
>>>>>>>> that you are making an attempt to be fair and point
>>>>>>>> out the disadvantages, but to not point out that this
>>>>>>>> was a blog post or an opinion article, can make some
>>>>>>>> folks pretty mad fairly quickly. Can wa choose our
>>>>>>>> words and subject lines a little more wisely next
>>>>>>>> time? Aleha and Dallas, Seeing Eye dog extrordinaire
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/15, Joe via nabs-l <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote: If you're blind, you obviously read Braille.
>>>>>>>>> Your hearing must naturally be superior to your
>>>>>>>>> sighted peers, and of course you have a guide dog!
>>>>>>>>> Right?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Well, that last may not be as pervasive as the
>>>>>>>>> first and second. Someone recently told me the
>>>>>>>>> number of guide dog users has actually declined in
>>>>>>>>> my millennial generation. I have no evidence
>>>>>>>>> proving this one way or the other, but for the
>>>>>>>>> general public, to see a blind person with a guide
>>>>>>>>> dog feels as natural as butter and toast.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thing is, I'm not so sure guide dogs are right for 
>>>>>>>>> everyone. Or, maybe I'm just projecting my own 
>>>>>>>>> uncertainties onto the rest of the community?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Last November I took the first step in the
>>>>>>>>> application process to return for a second Seeing
>>>>>>>>> Eye dog. It's been more than three years since I
>>>>>>>>> lost Gator, and even though I've gotten around just
>>>>>>>>> fine with a white cane, I am approaching what feels
>>>>>>>>> like the final years with sight, however minimal
>>>>>>>>> that sight might be. I admit it's unnerving if I
>>>>>>>>> sit still long enough to contemplate total
>>>>>>>>> blindness. NFB philosophy be damned, and the
>>>>>>>>> thought of an extra set of eyes to help me navigate
>>>>>>>>> the world does bring a measure of comfort. But, is
>>>>>>>>> it enough to go get another dog?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> In no particular order, here are reasons why a
>>>>>>>>> guide dog would be a terrible idea:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Read more:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> http://serotalk.com/2015/03/18/5-reasons-why-guide-dogs-are-a-terrible-idea/
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
_______________________________________________
>>> nabs-l mailing list nabs-l at nfbnet.org 
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org To
>>> unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>> for nabs-l: 
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/brice.smith319%40gmail.com
>>
>>
>>> 
_______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list nabs-l at nfbnet.org 
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org To
>> unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>> for nabs-l: 
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/blindstein%40gmail.com
>
>> 
> _______________________________________________ nabs-l mailing
> list nabs-l at nfbnet.org 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org To
> unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l: 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/tyler%40tysdomain.com
>
> 
- -- 
Take care,
Ty
twitter: @sorressean
web:http://tysdomain.com
pubkey: http://tysdomain.com/files/pubkey.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVC8s6AAoJEAdP60+BYxejMMcH/2HWFLcs1KNN3MU+mxc9OnwO
X85ciwAHcZM5A1fxeTRwXh7VBxf2XY/6cgojeg824mqcQgHBxbflkICqfpuMkoqX
pBSOmrZWdICrm/05+qUgXRqPDM18PGS4GUPYhPxbsu4FhKpVSxZEBrLFMpPm+YwI
Sy/G8xSrkyEgl5iRdPn6f6TvZiMSbuIZWdkOd27XGZBe7QN4zrV0bmLk7Ifnjh7n
WCZ8CBsGs0JAGqPv8yVF6Bb2STr6vgFfbUMiFuq5H2+H1FdyhdjOiYD5RXo1b0GH
1fYSm5mgcrRdWPnKsfv1vhiMRWdnCPogC/HC6zZ8NhFFvoO9lEG+ZDhUHx0M0vA=
=9Uvg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----