[nabs-l] research and accomodations
Ashley Bramlett
bookwormahb at earthlink.net
Tue Sep 1 05:18:43 UTC 2015
Hi Glen,
I have central vision but never used sighted research methods of
organization although I was exposed to them from high school classes;
probably from history and english.
I've always used braille and jaws.
Anyways, yes that was helpful, and I'm glad someone else struggled with
organizing due to the multiple sources, some of which have similar titles,
similar info, or similar authors.
I currently have been using Word for my citations which I write down
manually. I do these records as I find sources. I take entries out if I find
the source is not relevant.
I used my braille note for writing my notes. But I find they are too long
and generalized; and I think this is a learning style for me; I need to
write to remember and pay attention as I listen to a reader or synthesized
speech.
So, I overwrite things and then feel overwelmed. I could do what you do by
making brief notes in a Word file under each citation and have another file
for just citations.
I like the idea of having one idea or paraphrased fact per line.
Its so true that going by line or paragraph makes it easier to skim.
However, I can just see the file getting rather big!
Is there ways to divide up the file to search it? For instance a way to put
in bookmarks?
Another idea I had was to label my sources with letters which works if I
have 26 or less and I doubt I will have over 26 ever, unless I'm a doctoral
student. I could then write what source coresponds to each letter and search
by letter in the file. Maybe for you all using low vision reading, using
different colors of text would help you skim for material.
Thanks for sharing, and best of luck with any research you do!
Ashley
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn III via nabs-l
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 12:44 AM
To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
Cc: Glenn III
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] research and accomodations
Hi Ashley.
You had a lot of questions, so I hope this is useful for some of what you
were asking about organizing information for citation.
for a quick background, I am high-partial, and in school, I was taught to
use sighted research methods; using a notecard for each
point/note/citation, paraphrase the note, collect cards together, etc.
Returning to college many years later, I found that method wouldn't work
both because I couldn't see what I used to, and everything now being
electronic, I'd prefer an electronic (and accessible) method. the biggest
logistical challenge is, like you say, when different sources have similar
information that is hard to recall and keep straight. What I've found works
pretty well (at least when I have a paper that I have enough time to
research more leaseurly, and which I know pretty specifically what I'm
looking for is this.
I start with picking good sources, then in a document file (I use MS Word,
but a simple text file may work even better for you, so, I'll use text for
the example), I'd make basically an indented paragraph for each source,
then below the line identifying the source, I can take notes as I review
the source material. every point i think worth noting, I make a new line
and write the note (which works well for finding that point later, since
each piece of information is on an individual line, arranged in a neat
list, already paraphrased, similar to the old notecard method to avoid
accidental plagarism). If you start each line with, say, the page number of
the information you're citing, then that's both a good marker for each data
point, if you later want to add another note you noticed, just search for
the page numbers where it belongs and add it in, and you'll need those page
numbers for your in-line parenthetical citation. So, all the sources for
that paper are in one accessible document that you can review later if you
need to refresh your memory, where all the info for each source is in its
original logical (i.e., word/language) arrangment, and you can include
whatever you need to make that a works cited. So, I think of it as a
Bibliography with notes.
It's simple, accessible, needs no special software, is searchable, and
helps with good research method (e.g., you paraphrase the same way you
would with notecards, to digest and synthesize, rather than copy or
plagarize content, or over generalize from a broad reading that cannot be
traced back to specific citeable points in the source), and for someone
like me, without a steel trap mind, it is a pretty good way to keep all
that information straight in my mind, especially when sources are similar,
and so I can read, take notes, digest everything to get the big picture,
construct my argument/outline, and still be able to go back and find my
supporting details.
Is that any help?
-Glenn Moore III
State Secretary,
National Federation of the Blind of Illinois
(find our calendar at nfbofillinois.org/?page_id=158)
nfb.org <http://www.nfb.org> "Live the Life You Want"
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list