[NABS-L] The Difference Between Structured Discovery and Conventional Training
Mariya Vasileva
mkvnfb94 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 22:09:56 UTC 2018
Hi, The structured method allows you to explore other options and ways of doing things versus the conventional where you learn only one way and one way only of doing something. For example, travel, the conventional method teaches one route from point a to point B, while the structured version teaches the alternative routes in case that primary one is blocked off. The reason why a lot of people are better off learning the structured method as apposed to the conventional, is because once they get employed or go to college, they have those other alternatives to handling stuff instead of just one way in case that way does not work all the time depending on the situation.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2018, at 15:56, Roanna Bacchus via NABS-L <nabs-l at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>
> Dear Students,
>
> I hope this message finds all of you well. Today I was reading a study about the competitive employment outcomes for blind and visually impaired individuals. The report discussed the conventional and structured discovery approaches to training. Many blind people have benefitted from the structured discovery approach taught at the Nfb training centers. What is the difference between structured discovery and the conventional approach to training? Look forward to reading you thoughts on this topic.
>
> Roanna Bacchus
> _______________________________________________
> NABS-L mailing list
> NABS-L at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for NABS-L:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/mkvnfb94%40gmail.com
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list