[nagdu] Air Charters and the extra seat

Linda Gwizdak linda.gwizdak at cox.net
Tue Aug 18 18:48:44 UTC 2009


No, Peter. You were asked to buy a second seat because you don't fit in the 
standard seat. Period. It has nothing to do with you having a dog. I have a 
friend who is very large and he has to do the same thing - purchase a second 
seat.  He is not a dog user.

It would be nice if ALL the seats were wider and less people were crammed on 
the planes. I wish there was also more foot room as well.  After a 
cross-country flight with my dog on my feet, I can barely walk upon 
deplaning.  This kind of leg immobility is hazardous to many people with or 
without dogs - you know, the blood clot issue.

Rather than small seats being a service dog issue, it is a PEOPLE issue and 
how the airlines treat people in general.  They get away with it because we 
can't sprout wings and fly ourselves. We are dependant on them and they know 
it.  It really sucks and I don't know what will happen on my up-coming 
cross-country flights.

Linda and Landon
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Donahue" <pdonahue1 at sbcglobal.net>
To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users" 
<nagdu at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Air Charters and the extra seat


> Hello Dar and listers,
>
>    Thanks to our meeting location and the lateness of our paratransit
> service I decided to stay home so can answer your question. I'd like to
> believe that my being asked to buy the second seat was due to my not being
> able to fit in the standard coach seat with both arms down.
>
>    What really makes me feel uncomfortable about this business is that 
> it's
> a convenient way for an airline to mask discrimination against a guide dog
> user. I wonder if the same thing would have happened had I not had Johnny
> with me? For all I know there may have been a passenger or crew member 
> that
> may have objected to there being a dog on the plane. To refuse us due to 
> the
> dog out right would be a direct violation of the Air Carrier Access Act.
> However it was observed that I was large and could be classified as a
> passenger of size and subject to Southwest's rules regarding carriage of
> such passengers. If indeed someone took issue with there being a dog on 
> the
> flight and noticing that I was a large passenger they found an easy and
> convenient way to dodge the ACAA, "If he can't pay for an extra seat we'll
> be rid of him and that dog" the thinking would probably go. Be where that
> using an airline's passenger of size policy to attempt to cover up
> discrimination against a guide dog user would most likely be a bear to 
> prove
> in court. For all I know I could take another Southwest flight and no one
> would say anything about it. They'd figure that although I was a large
> passenger and the flight wasn't sold out they could give me the extra room
> for myself and Johnny so why make a big deal about it. It's just a matter 
> of
> time before some airline makes the wrong judgment call and gives us the
> conclusive evidence needed to win a guide dog discrimination complaint
> against them resulting from the abuse of their passenger of size policy to
> put such policies out of commission and hasten the day when wider seats 
> are
> installed in all classes of service making such policies unnecessary and
> giving us additional room for our dogs.
>
>    Oh yes! Printing out my boarding pass in Detroit for my return flight
> was quite amusing. Before my boarding pass with the extra seat was printed
> all of Southwest's computers in Detroit went down for about a half hour. 
> It
> took 2 CROS,6 ticket agents, and calls to Southwest's Corporate 
> Headquarters
> to get the computers in Detroit back up and print my boarding pass. I
> thought to myself in the words of Paul Watson of Whale wars fame, "They
> picked a fight with the wrong passenger!"
>
>    This story has one more scary chapter. We changed planes in Nashville.
> Before our flight to San Antonio left the ground we heard an awful 
> grinding
> sound coming from the lower part of the aircraft. That shook up a few
> passengers. One of them began crying. I have reason to believe that Johnny
> must have smelled something unusual as he became wrestless but settled 
> down
> once we began climbing and the plane leveled off. I can't help but wonder 
> if
> he sensed a possible danger and was alerting me to it. The grouchy head
> flight attendant wasn't making things much better. She was rude and nasty 
> to
> everyone on board. Upon landing in San Antonio we told the pilot what we
> heard. He was surprised to learn that we heard the noise before the plane
> left the runway and not after we became airborne. Such sounds are heard 
> when
> the wheels are retracted in to the belly of the plane during ascent but we
> heard that horrible sound before the plane left the ground. To our shock 
> the
> captain seen unconcerned. Safety you say? To my way of thinking no one
> should have been allowed to set foot on that plane until it was inspected 
> to
> be sure it was fit to remain in service.
>
>    I'm sure many of you heard the news a few days later about the 
> Southwest
> jet that lost a part of its fuselage. The question that haunts us is 
> whether
> or not we may have been on that same plane. If the captain took our 
> concerns
> seriously and the aircraft undergone a thorough inspection and the 
> problems
> with the plane's fuselage discovered and repaired. that air mishap could
> have been prevented.
>
>    It's this kind of stuff that has us and many others seeking airtravel
> alternatives such as the use of chartered flights. As for guide dogs on 
> air
> charters I've heard that many charter companies allow pets to fly in the
> cabin with their owners so flying with a guide dog in the cabin shouldn't 
> be
> an issue. I'm sure we'll have more to say about this in the coming months.
> All the best for a great weekend.
>
> Peter Donahue
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "d m gina" <dmgina at samobile.net>
> To: <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 12:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Air Charters and the extra seat
>
>
> I am pleased you got your money back.
> Now they embarrassed you because of size not how large the dog was?
> Is this the concern?
> Or because the dog would go in front of the second seat?
> I just need to understand.
> this is where I question the balk head, because no matter the size of
> the dog, they have to go across the feet, they can't go under the seat
> in front of you.
> or they stick out in the isle in balk head.
> thanks for replying so quickly.
> I would be willing to ask my chapter or on the MAB list, if you would
> like me to.
> Asking how folks would feel about a charter plane.
> As long as I understood how folks in Montana would get to the charter.
> I sure would hate to see the plane go down with so many blind persons
> on it though.
> just my thoughts.
>
> -- 
> --Dar
> skype
> dmgina23
> every saint has a past
> every sinner has a future
>
> Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit
> www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/pdonahue1%40sbcglobal.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/linda.gwizdak%40cox.net
> 






More information about the NAGDU mailing list