[nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort

cheryl echevarria cherylandmaxx at hotmail.com
Sun Dec 27 10:43:43 UTC 2009


Well why not ask, I got mine from GDF, so did Albert.


Cheryl Echevarria 
Independent Contractor
Echevarriatravel.com
1-866-580-5574

Reservations at echevarriatravel.com<mailto:Reservations at echevarriatravel.com>
Affiliated as an Independent Contractor with Montrose Travel CST-1018299-10
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marion & Martin<mailto:swampfox1833 at verizon.net> 
  To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org> 
  Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 5:40 AM
  Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort


  Albert,
      I am not sure of the relevance of this question. However, I got my last 
  guide from Southeastern Guide Dogs and am getting my next guide from the 
  Guide Dog Foundation.

  Marion


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Albert J Rizzi" <albert at myblindspot.org<mailto:albert at myblindspot.org>>
  To: "'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'" 
  <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 11:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort


  > May I ask where you got your last guide from?
  >
  > Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
  > CEO/Founder
  > My Blind Spot, Inc.
  > 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
  > New York, New York  10004
  > www.myblindspot.org<http://www.myblindspot.org/>
  > PH: 917-553-0347
  > Fax: 212-858-5759
  > "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one who is
  > doing it."
  >
  >
  > Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
  >
  >
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org> [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
  > Of Marion & Martin
  > Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 10:24 PM
  > To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
  > Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >
  > Albert,
  >    My assumption is that there is a school that has the ear a senator or
  > representative that wants to have these protections in the ADA.
  >
  > Marion
  >
  >
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: "Albert J Rizzi" <albert at myblindspot.org<mailto:albert at myblindspot.org>>
  > To: "'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'"
  > <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  > Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 5:35 PM
  > Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >
  >
  >> Ok, so then what is all the fuss about? If the protections are there 
  >> then
  >> perhaps someone should let the feds know.  Over kill is still over kill.
  >> In
  >> your opinion which state affords the best accessibility  protections and
  >> enforcements of the ADA as the same relates to the topic at hand?
  >> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
  >> CEO/Founder
  >> My Blind Spot, Inc.
  >> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
  >> New York, New York  10004
  >> www.myblindspot.org<http://www.myblindspot.org/>
  >> PH: 917-553-0347
  >> Fax: 212-858-5759
  >> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one who 
  >> is
  >> doing it."
  >>
  >>
  >> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org> [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On 
  >> Behalf
  >> Of Marion & Martin
  >> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 5:19 PM
  >> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
  >> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>
  >> Albert,
  >>    Most states, including New York, have provisions for trainers of
  >> service
  >>
  >> animals already included in their access laws.
  >>
  >> Fraternally yours,
  >> Marion
  >>
  >>
  >> ----- Original Message ----- 
  >> From: "Albert J Rizzi" <albert at myblindspot.org<mailto:albert at myblindspot.org>>
  >> To: "'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'"
  >> <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  >> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:05 PM
  >> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>
  >>
  >>> True, but when and where could we as an organization facilitate that to
  >>> happen on a state by state basis, when and where necessary?
  >>>
  >>> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
  >>> CEO/Founder
  >>> My Blind Spot, Inc.
  >>> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
  >>> New York, New York  10004
  >>> www.myblindspot.org<http://www.myblindspot.org/>
  >>> PH: 917-553-0347
  >>> Fax: 212-858-5759
  >>> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one who
  >>> is
  >>> doing it."
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> -----Original Message-----
  >>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org> [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
  >>> Behalf
  >>> Of Marion & Martin
  >>> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 12:25 PM
  >>> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
  >>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>>
  >>> Buddy,
  >>>    As I stated in my previous message, this is the difficulty I have 
  >>> with
  >>> this proposed legislation. Once we open the proverbial can of worms to
  >>> those
  >>>
  >>> who are not disabled, where would it lead? I think it is best to allow
  >>> the
  >>> states to allow trainers access, rather than to place it in a federal 
  >>> law
  >>> prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability.
  >>>
  >>> Fraternally,
  >>> Marion
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
  >>> From: "Buddy Brannan" <buddy at brannan.name<mailto:buddy at brannan.name>>
  >>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
  >>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  >>> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 6:45 PM
  >>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>> By the way, before we go a whole bunch further, I think it's important
  >>>> that I point up a distinction here. It is not the animal which is
  >>>> granted
  >>>> or denied access. Not in the law and not in reality. It is, rather, the
  >>>> disabled person (or, perhaps, not disabled trainer) who is allowed to 
  >>>> be
  >>>> accompanied by a task trained service animal (or, perhaps, an animal in
  >>>> training for said service related tasks).
  >>>>
  >>>> That is all.
  >>>> --
  >>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
  >>>> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> On Dec 25, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Steve Johnson wrote:
  >>>>
  >>>>> I think it is best to keep the "companion" animal out of this mix as 
  >>>>> it
  >>>>> is
  >>>>> is defined simply as a pet.  See Delta Society.org, and JAN.wvu.edu.
  >>>>>
  >>>>> And, this everyone, is where the whole issue of abuse of such a law
  >>>>> comes
  >>>
  >>>>> in
  >>>>> to play if such an allowance were to be.  Perhaps, better 
  >>>>> understanding
  >>>>> of
  >>>>> the current laws would be the better approach than trying to fix
  >>>>> something
  >>>>> that there is no solid evidence that it is even broke?  Albert, you
  >>>>> refer
  >>>
  >>>>> to
  >>>>> animals being trained that are being denied access.  Please show me 
  >>>>> the
  >>>>> hard
  >>>>> data on this.
  >>>>>
  >>>>> I'd bet you anything that most formal agencies do not have any problem
  >>>>> with
  >>>>> accessing places of public accommodation with dogs in training before
  >>>>> they
  >>>>> are matched with the new master.  All of my guides have been from
  >>>>> Leader,
  >>>>> and it is amazing how open the communities are in allowing access from
  >>>>> everything ranging from restaurants to public transit. These cities 
  >>>>> and
  >>>>> towns include little ol' Rochester to Detroit.  So, where's the
  >>>>> problem,
  >>>>> or
  >>>>> is this just another piece of make me feel good legislation that will
  >>>>> hurt
  >>>>> us more than it will actually help us?
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Unless one can show me that there is an actual need for this with
  >>>>> something
  >>>>> concrete to back it up, then our tax payer dollars are again being
  >>>>> wasted
  >>>
  >>>>> on
  >>>>> a Federal legislator wasting all of our time with something frivelous
  >>>>> and
  >>>
  >>>>> really, nothing to back it up.
  >>>>>
  >>>>> again, JMO
  >>>>>
  >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Albert J Rizzi"
  >>>>> <albert at myblindspot.org<mailto:albert at myblindspot.org>>
  >>>>> To: "'NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users'"
  >>>>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  >>>>> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 1:37 PM
  >>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>> I would think then we need to qualify and quantify the verbiage 
  >>>>>> which
  >>>>>> is
  >>>>>> being considered for amendment because all to often trainers of 
  >>>>>> guides
  >>>>>> are
  >>>>>> being denied access.  What would be a suitable wording which would 1.
  >>>>>> protect and ensure that trainers of service animals are included in
  >>>>>> the
  >>>>>> a.d.a., which as you  yourself presented, can be interpreted to
  >>>>>> prevent
  >>>>>> such
  >>>>>> access unless and until the service animal is being used by a person
  >>>>>> using
  >>>>>> the same for the intended purpose?  And what of our peers who use
  >>>>>> companions
  >>>>>> for a diagnosable  condition where a companion animal/service animal
  >>>>>> is
  >>>>>> needed? The manner of the wording at present does not seem to afford
  >>>>>> them
  >>>>>> the same protections, or do they?  I think that trainers should be
  >>>>>> held
  >>>>>> to
  >>>>>> a
  >>>>>> higher measure so people like many of those on this list who got bum
  >>>>>> dogs
  >>>>>> do
  >>>>>> not live through that pain again.  there is something to say for the
  >>>>>> consideration of certification  provided that a standard  of national
  >>>>>> proportions  could be meaningful.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
  >>>>>> CEO/Founder
  >>>>>> My Blind Spot, Inc.
  >>>>>> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
  >>>>>> New York, New York  10004
  >>>>>> www.myblindspot.org<http://www.myblindspot.org/>
  >>>>>> PH: 917-553-0347
  >>>>>> Fax: 212-858-5759
  >>>>>> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one
  >>>>>> who
  >>>>>> is
  >>>>>> doing it."
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
  >>>>>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org> [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
  >>>>>> Behalf
  >>>>>> Of Steve Johnson
  >>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 2:14 PM
  >>>>>> To: NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users
  >>>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Hi Cindy,
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> PWD = People or Persons with disabilities.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> I think that the points being made are very strong, and the
  >>>>>> certification
  >>>>>> issue does not broaden as Albert eluded to, but does indeed restrict
  >>>>>> the
  >>>>>> definition of who who could eventually access a place of public
  >>>>>> accommodation.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> So, if only a certified trainer, which the points are well-expressed
  >>>>>> on
  >>>>>> this, is allowed to access a place of public accommodation, then
  >>>>>> would'nt
  >>>>>> this essentially mean that unless an animal trained by a certified
  >>>>>> entity
  >>>>>> could only then access a place of public accommodation?
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> There are a lot of frauds out there, and again we are speaking about
  >>>>>> places
  >>>>>> of public accommodation.  The fair housing amendments act already
  >>>>>> provides
  >>>>>> for any person to have an emotional support, or even companion 
  >>>>>> animals
  >>>>>> in
  >>>>>> Federal assisted housing, and this can also move into private housing
  >>>>>> where
  >>>>>> emotional support animals can be granted access through a request for
  >>>>>> reasonable accommodation.  The underlying problem is that these are
  >>>>>> not
  >>>>>> highly trained animals that are specifically trained to provide a
  >>>>>> functional
  >>>>>> support/service for the individual whether it be through a
  >>>>>> professional
  >>>>>> entity or an individual who chooses to self-train.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> I have to disagree with Albert in that his comment that this would
  >>>>>> expand
  >>>>>> the coverage of access as it clearly discriminates against those who
  >>>>>> self-train and again, I will point out that this language is
  >>>>>> specifically
  >>>>>> stated in the ADA.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Furthermore, if the word certification were deleted from this, then 
  >>>>>> we
  >>>>>> are
  >>>>>> where we are at now, and is this a bad thing?
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> While this proposed legislation specifically addresses service
  >>>>>> animals,
  >>>>>> the
  >>>>>> problem herein is that it creates this slippery slope that I mention
  >>>>>> in
  >>>>>> that
  >>>>>> there will be a push like you have never seen by other groups to
  >>>>>> expand
  >>>>>> and
  >>>>>> include emotional support, therapy, and companion animals.  Mark my
  >>>>>> word.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Let's go back to the intent of the ADA, and you will further
  >>>>>> understand
  >>>>>> that
  >>>>>> this narrows, not expands as these other types of animals are not
  >>>>>> providing
  >>>>>> a service.  A support yes, a service no.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Steve
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy Ray" <cindyray at qwest.net<mailto:cindyray at qwest.net>>
  >>>>>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
  >>>>>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  >>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 12:20 PM
  >>>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>> What is PWD?
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> And you make a good point. Who certifies? If the schools where the
  >>>>>>> people
  >>>>>>> train certify them, then what about these independents, particularly
  >>>>>>> those
  >>>>>>> who train their own dogs. And, of course, NAC was a certification
  >>>>>>> outfit
  >>>>>>> that certified places, but any of us who knows the history of NAC
  >>>>>>> knows
  >>>>>>> what
  >>>>>>> certification meant for agencies and schools serving the bolind. So
  >>>>>>> why
  >>>>>>> bother if you can't certify better than that? Suppose the Guide Dog
  >>>>>>> School
  >>>>>>> Association, whose official name I don't remember, certified
  >>>>>>> trainers?
  >>>>>>> Would
  >>>>>>> they be willing to certify an independent, and would such a person 
  >>>>>>> be
  >>>>>>> willing to do that (be certified by such a certifying body?)
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> CL
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Pawpower Pack"
  >>>>>>> <pawpower4me at gmail.com<mailto:pawpower4me at gmail.com>>
  >>>>>>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
  >>>>>>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>>
  >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 12:15 PM
  >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> and who certifies the trainers?
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> There is no certifying body for dog trainers.  If I want to call
  >>>>>>> myself a dog trainer, I can.  There are outfits like CPDT who are
  >>>>>>> trying to certify pet dog trainers but it's all voluntary.  The 
  >>>>>>> guide
  >>>>>>> and service dogs, with the exception of California, may "certify"
  >>>>>>> their trainers but it's about as valuable as the paper it's printed
  >>>>>>> on.
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> California "certifies" it's trainers but frankly, I would hate to 
  >>>>>>> see
  >>>>>>> an outfit like the California guide dog board become the norm.
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> I also think it's a step awy from certifying trainers to certifying
  >>>>>>> PWD.
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Rox and the Kitchen Bitches
  >>>>>>> Bristol (retired), Mill'E SD. and Laveau Guide Dog, CGC.
  >>>>>>> "Struggle is a never ending process. Freedom is never really won, 
  >>>>>>> you
  >>>>>>> earn it and win it in every generation."
  >>>>>>> -- Coretta Scott King
  >>>>>>> pawpower4me at gmail.com<mailto:pawpower4me at gmail.com>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Windows Live Only: Brisomania at hotmail.com<mailto:Brisomania at hotmail.com>
  >>>>>>> AIM: Brissysgirl Yahoo: lillebriss
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
  >>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
  >>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
  >>>>>>> for
  >>>>>>> nagdu:
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40qwest.net<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40qwest.net>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
  >>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
  >>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
  >>>>>>> for
  >>>>>>> nagdu:
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/stevencjohnson%40cent<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/stevencjohnson%40cent>
  >>>>>> urytel.net
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  >>>>>> ----
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
  >>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/>
  >>>>>> Version: 9.0.722 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release Date:
  >>>>>> 12/25/09
  >>>>>> 03:33:00
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> _______________________________________________
  >>>>>> nagdu mailing list
  >>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >>>>>> nagdu:
  >>>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot>.
  >>>>>> org
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> _______________________________________________
  >>>>>> nagdu mailing list
  >>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >>>>>> nagdu:
  >>>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/stevencjohnson%40cent<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/stevencjohnson%40cent>
  >>> urytel.net
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  >>> ----
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
  >>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/>
  >>>>> Version: 9.0.722 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release Date:
  >>>>> 12/25/09
  >>>>> 03:33:00
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> _______________________________________________
  >>>>> nagdu mailing list
  >>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >>>>> nagdu:
  >>>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/buddy%40brannan.name<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/buddy%40brannan.name>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> _______________________________________________
  >>>> nagdu mailing list
  >>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >>>> nagdu:
  >>>>
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizo<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizo>
  >>> n.net
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> _______________________________________________
  >>> nagdu mailing list
  >>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >>> nagdu:
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot>.
  >>> org
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> _______________________________________________
  >>> nagdu mailing list
  >>> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >>> nagdu:
  >>>
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizo<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizo>
  >> n.net
  >>
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> nagdu mailing list
  >> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >> nagdu:
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot>.
  >> org
  >>
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> nagdu mailing list
  >> nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
  >> nagdu:
  >>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizo<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizo>
  > n.net
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > nagdu mailing list
  > nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
  > nagdu:
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot>.
  > org
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > nagdu mailing list
  > nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
  > nagdu:
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizon.net<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizon.net> 


  _______________________________________________
  nagdu mailing list
  nagdu at nfbnet.org<mailto:nagdu at nfbnet.org>
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org>
  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cherylandmaxx%40hotmail.com<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cherylandmaxx%40hotmail.com>



More information about the NAGDU mailing list