[nagdu] Access denied- in the news
Angie Matney
leadinglabbie at mpmail.net
Sat Feb 28 17:12:57 UTC 2009
Hi Marion,
Actually, here's the Virginia statute. I would argue that denying access is interfering with the dog's duties. I don't know that I'd win such an argument, but it's the one I'd make. This, as you see, is punishable as a class 3 misdemeanor.
§ 3.2-6588. Intentional interference with a guide or leader dog; penalty
A. It is unlawful for a person to, without just cause, willfully impede or interfere with the duties performed by a dog if the person knows or has reason
to believe the dog is a guide or leader dog. A violation of this subsection is a Class 3 misdemeanor.
B. It is unlawful for a person to, without just cause, willfully injure a dog if the person knows or has reason to believe the dog is a guide or leader
dog. A violation of this subsection is a Class 1 misdemeanor.
"Guide or leader dog" means a dog that: (i) serves as a dog guide for a blind person as defined in § 51.5-60 or for a person with a visual disability; (ii) serves as a listener for a deaf or hard-of-hearing person as defined in § 51.5-111; or (iii)
provides support or assistance for a physically disabled or handicapped person.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:35:35 -0500, Marion & Martin wrote:
>Ron,
> All states have laws enforceable by local law enforcement.
>Unfortunately, the remedies are inconsistent. In some states, such as
>Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Ohio, and Michigan, to name a few, there are
>criminal remedies (second degree misdemeanors). In others, such as Virginia,
>New York, Maryland, Wisconsin, and new Jersey, the remedies are civil. NAGDU
>would like to have all states impose criminal remedies and is helping to
>write a resolution for the 2009 convention creating this initiative.
> Unfortunately, many law enforcement officers are ignorant of state
>statutes, believing that the only remedies are Federal civil ones. Part of
>our responsibility is to be better informed, educate law enforcement, and
>advocate on behalf of those whom are discriminated against.
>Fraternally,
>Marion Gwizdala
More information about the NAGDU
mailing list