[nagdu] Miniature Horses as Guides

Marion & Martin swampfox1833 at verizon.net
Mon Nov 30 02:40:17 UTC 2009


Dear All,
    Just for the record, I wrote comments on behalf of the National 
Association of Guide Dog Users concerning the NPRM that would eliminate 
"farm animals" from the definition of service animals. I requested that the 
DOJ consider leaving in miniature horses as guide animals. I have attached 
the entire comment to this message.
    I learned from Susan duncan, one of the leading experts in the field of 
environmental infection control and service animals, that one of the 
challenges faced with horses as service animals is the potential risk of 
severe allergic reactions. Dogs are ubiquitous and most people have been 
exposed to dog dander, creating immuno suppressants to that allergen. This 
may not necessarily be so for horse dander. This is not meant to be 
unsupportive of those who choose a horse as a guide; rather, it is meant to 
provide another element to our understanding of the larger issue.
    I am fully supportive of removing monkeys, snakes, and other wild 
animals and reptiles from the definition, as I have read some authoritative 
papers concerning the risks these animals pose and their inability to be 
"trained to perform tasks", as required by the ADA.

Fraternally yours,
Marion Gwizdala

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Linda Gwizdak" <linda.gwizdak at cox.net>
To: "NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users" 
<nagdu at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fake service dogs news story


> Hi Ann,
> Your guess is as good as mine - no logic at all! (grin!)  I don't know why 
> guide horses are being eliminated as service animals with the ADA.  Hey, 
> when was the last time anyone had a problem with a service mini horse 
> anywhere???  I never saw one in person.
>
> The whole thing of thinking we can stop the problem of unruly or fake 
> service animals by punishing everyone is stupid.  It's like punishing the 
> whole class for the actions of one kid in school.  You'd think it was 
> obvious that you punish the OFFENDERS only!
>
> Guess that tag is really useless in being accurate in identifying real 
> service animals!  I was unaware of all this when I got it.
>
> Personally, I have NO problem with well behaved and socialized animals in 
> public places - I do love animals after all! I never complained or 
> questioned a well behaved animal - it never mattered to me if the animal 
> was a bona fide service animal or just a pet. But you know the bad apple 
> spoiling the whole basketful.
>
> I have a friend who is training a guide horse in Georgia and she is really 
> scared that the ADA will dash that dream for her.  And for you who has 
> used a mini horse for years.  I wrote in a comment to the DOJ when they 
> were taking commentary from the public. I asked them to leave in the mini 
> horses.
>
> Hope it all works out well for everyone.
>
> Linda and Landon
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ann Edie" <annedie at nycap.rr.com>
> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users" 
> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 12:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fake service dogs news story
>
>
>> Hi, Linda and Everyone,
>>
>> My comments were not met as criticism of you, Linda, for getting a 
>> "service dog " tag or for considering the article as a good educational 
>> one.  I am just puzzled by the logic of the government  in proposing to 
>> ban animals other than dogs as a solution to the problems caused by 
>> fraudulantly-claimed "service dogs" in public places.
>>
>> Since the officer clearly states in the article that no attempt is made 
>> to verify that the applicant for a "service dog" tag actually has a 
>> medical need for the dog or that the dog is suitable for safe public 
>> access, I wonder just what purpose the possession of the tag actually 
>> fills.  Since a dog with a "Service Dog" tag which appears in public 
>> might be a service dog, but might be a pet, and since a dog which appears 
>> in public places without a "Service Dog" tag might also be a service dog, 
>> or might be a pet, it seems to me that nothing has been gained by having 
>> the "service dog" tags, especially since the requirement of the "service 
>> dog" tags is in contradiction to the stipulations of the ADA.
>>
>> As I said, it is just a crazy, illogical world we live in these days.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ann
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Linda Gwizdak" <linda.gwizdak at cox.net>
>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users" 
>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fake service dogs news story
>>
>>
>>> Hi Ann,
>>> I was just as surprized to see in the story that the tags are 
>>> mandatory - just like the law cited about busting people for fraudulent 
>>> service animals. The thing about the tags is NEVER enforced.  I know 
>>> many guide dog users who never got around to getting the tags when they 
>>> started issuing them several years ago. I got one so if by chance Landon 
>>> got loose and was wearing only his collar, his finder would know right 
>>> away that he was a service dog - that's the only reason I got it.
>>>
>>> When I got the tag, the Animal Control folks NEVER said that these tags 
>>> were mandatory as the officer in the article said.  I could very easily 
>>> find out since I go to their campus to volunteer with the adjoining 
>>> Humane Society twice a month!
>>>
>>> I think the article was addressing that there is a definate problem with 
>>> these "fake" service animals in the San Diego area - and I assume in 
>>> other locales as well.  When Channel 10 did the story, they NEVER 
>>> approached the San Diego guide dog using residents.  All they needed to 
>>> do is call up the Blind Community Center or the San Diego Center for the 
>>> Blind to find us.
>>>
>>> So, yeah, the story was contradictory, I can try to contact the writer 
>>> of the story and find out more.  I've just been quite busy with other 
>>> pressing things.
>>>
>>> As to rabbits, I have never encountered one as a service animal and I 
>>> don't think it would be a problem to me as some of these untrained, 
>>> unsocialized dogs people bring out and claim they are their service 
>>> dogs.
>>>
>>> What I think needs to be done is to bust the offenders who cause 
>>> problems. I have encountered some "emotional support" dogs on the bus 
>>> who were very well behaved and socialized.  the dogs were suited for the 
>>> work. I even had one that lay under the seat on the bus with Landon and 
>>> it was Landon who tried to misbehave! (grin!)  I told these people that 
>>> I appreciated that they had nice dogs and I have no problem with these. 
>>> It is unfortunate that some people spoil it all for the people who are 
>>> responsible whether it is a pet or a service dog.
>>>
>>> If people in this country trained their dogs and were responsible 
>>> owners, I think the bans on dogs would go away.  But, you know how it 
>>> is - people lump everyone into one group when it comes to dogs or other 
>>> things.  I wish that the OFFENDERS would be punished and leave the good 
>>> folks alone.
>>>
>>> Have a Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
>>>
>>> Linda and Landon
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Ann Edie" <annedie at nycap.rr.com>
>>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users" 
>>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:16 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fake service dogs news story
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi, Linda,
>>>>
>>>> The logic behind news stories such as this one never ceases to amaze 
>>>> me! Can someone please explain to me how banning rabbits as service 
>>>> animals is going to have any effect on the number of pit bulls, 
>>>> Yorkies, and Chihuahuas being fraudulently claimed as service animals?
>>>>
>>>> And, while you say that "service dog" tags are not required by 
>>>> California to gain public access with a service animal, the article 
>>>> clearly tells the public--and managers of places of public 
>>>> accommodation--the exact opposite, "Lt. Dan DeSousa of the San Diego 
>>>> County Animal Shelter told 10News that California requires all service 
>>>> dogs wear a special tag, which can be obtained at your local animal 
>>>> shelter by filling out a form."  Who is John Q. Public going to 
>>>> believe, Linda G. who claims that she has the right under the ADA to 
>>>> take her "service dog" into any public place on just her say-so that 
>>>> the dog performs tasks to mitigate her disability, or Lt. Dan DeSousa, 
>>>> (who sounds like an *official* law enforcement officer to me), and who 
>>>> clearly states that California requires that a dog be wearing "service 
>>>> dog" tags which can be obtained at your local animal shelter in order 
>>>> for the person to be granted public access?
>>>>
>>>> What good does it do to state on an e-mail list populated by guide dog 
>>>> users who already presumably know their rights under the ADA, that 
>>>> "Service dog" tags are not required for public access, while Lt. Dan 
>>>> DeSousa is quoted in the public media stating the exact opposite? 
>>>> Perhaps you should try to interest the TV news organization in airing a 
>>>> debate on the subject of public access by persons with disabilities 
>>>> accompanied by service animals between Lt. Dan DeSousa and yourself or 
>>>> some other representative of the disability community.  And perhaps 
>>>> they should also include a user of a service rabbit and a non-disabled 
>>>> person who has fraudulently obtained a "service dog" tag for his/her 
>>>> pet pit bull in the debate as well.
>>>>
>>>> It is truly an Alice Through the Looking Glass World we live in!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Ann
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Linda Gwizdak" <linda.gwizdak at cox.net>
>>>> To: "NFBnet NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog 
>>>> Users" <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 10:23 PM
>>>> Subject: [nagdu] Fake service dogs news story
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> Here below is an article from a newsstory aired last night on San 
>>>>> Diego's KGTV Channel 10.  It was a good piece and I wanted to share it 
>>>>> with you.
>>>>>
>>>>> The service animal tags issued by SD Animal Control is NOT required to 
>>>>> have our guide dogs admitted into public places.  Some of us have them 
>>>>> and some don't. Under ADA these tags can't be the determining factor 
>>>>> in order to admit a service dog - it just lets the public know that 
>>>>> the dog has been registered with the County of San Diego as a service 
>>>>> dog.
>>>>>
>>>>> We experience the problem of these dogs mentioned in the story all the 
>>>>> time. One of my friends was getting off the bus when a "service dog" 
>>>>> lunged and growled not only at her guide dog, but at several 
>>>>> passengers! The bus driver did nothing about this.  He was probably 
>>>>> afraid of being sued under ADA.
>>>>>
>>>>> I personally have encountered these nasty dogs on the bus and in 
>>>>> public buildings.  It sure is scary when all of a sudden you hear this 
>>>>> menacing dog near you!
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope the new ADA regs will help get rid of this problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Linda and Landon
>>>>>
>>>>> Loopholes Allow Pets to Be Taken Anywhere
>>>>> SAN DIEGO -- We all love our pets but some people are willing to break 
>>>>> the law so they can take their dogs with them everywhere they go. 
>>>>> 10News reporter Rachel Bianco investigated San Diego's canine 
>>>>> companion controversy and how it threatens the rights of people who 
>>>>> are truly disabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sady the miniature daschund doesn't look like your typical service dog 
>>>>> nor -- with her jumping and barking -- does she act like one, but when 
>>>>> she wore a service dog vest and badge she had no trouble getting into 
>>>>> North County restaurants.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tami Michaels has a legitimate disability and a legitimate service 
>>>>> dog. She said that when Fido is a fake it poses a real problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "A lot of them don't have the right temperament to be out in public," 
>>>>> Michaels said. "So, when I go in with my dog to a grocery store or a 
>>>>> restaurant, often times these kinds of dogs will lunge and growl and 
>>>>> snap at my dog."
>>>>>
>>>>> But snapping dogs aren't the only problem. "I've seen a lot more 
>>>>> suspicion from people where they automatically assume you are trying 
>>>>> to pull something over on them," Michaels added.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lt. Dan DeSousa of the San Diego County Animal Shelter told 10News 
>>>>> that California requires all service dogs wear a special tag, which 
>>>>> can be obtained at your local animal shelter by filling out a form. 
>>>>> The only problem, DeSousa said, is that there is no way to follow up 
>>>>> on the answers.
>>>>>
>>>>> DeSousa said that when someone applies for a service dog tag the only 
>>>>> question they have to answer is if the animal is trained to perform a 
>>>>> task for the person. There is no way to verify that what they're 
>>>>> saying is true.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Doctors notes and disablities, that's off limits to us," DeSousa 
>>>>> said, "we can't ask about that, so we have to take people at their 
>>>>> word."
>>>>>
>>>>> So far this year, the county has issued the most service dog tags --  
>>>>> 43 --  to labradors. Chihuahuas came in second with 37 tags, beating 
>>>>> golden retrievers which had 25.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also curiously high on the list: yorkshire terriers, pit bulls, and 
>>>>> pugs.
>>>>>
>>>>> "There are people who want this tag just so they can take their dog 
>>>>> wherever they want to, so they can take it into the stores, 
>>>>> restaurants and things like that," said DeSousa.
>>>>>
>>>>> "A lot of people really just don't see anyting wrong with it I guess," 
>>>>> Michaels said. "They just really don't understand how much it hurts 
>>>>> legitimate service dog teams."
>>>>>
>>>>> Having a fake service animal is a misdemeanor fraud punishable by six 
>>>>> months in jail or a $1,000 fine but the San Diego Sheriff's Department 
>>>>> told 10News that it has never been enforced.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now it is simply too hard to tell whether the canine is a con.
>>>>>
>>>>> The U.S. Justice Department is currently looking to tighten the rules 
>>>>> for service animals. The new guidelines under review would exclude 
>>>>> reptiles, amphibians, rodents, farm animals, ferrets and rabbits. A 
>>>>> final decision is expected by the end of the year.
>>>>> Copyright 2009 by 10News.com. All rights reserved. This material may 
>>>>> not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/annedie%40nycap.rr.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>>>> nagdu:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/linda.gwizdak%40cox.net
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nagdu mailing list
>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>>> nagdu:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/annedie%40nycap.rr.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> nagdu:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/linda.gwizdak%40cox.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833%40verizon.net 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NAGDU Comments on NPRM.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 32256 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nagdu_nfbnet.org/attachments/20091129/414a4c10/attachment.doc>


More information about the NAGDU mailing list