[nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort

[Tamara Smith-Kinney]

Good explanation!  I was mulling that one over, too; still getting there!
But I think you put it very well.  /smile/

Tami Smith-Kinney

-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
Of The Pawpower Pack
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 7:45 AM
To: NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Fw: [buddy-l] A very bad legislative effort

Albert,

most dogs who alert to a medical condition such as diabetes are doing  
it out of instinct.  Some dogs choose their alert by engaging in some  
very inappropriate behaviors for public access such as barking or  
jumping up on the person.  The alert itself needs to be accompanied by  
a *trained* task.

Here is my question.  If I had an alert dog who's default alert was  
barking, and if I retrained this alert so that the dog nudges my arm  
when I'm about to experience a medical event, would that then be a  
train task?  I would say yes.  However if I did not retrain that alert  
and just let my dog bark, it wouldn't be doing a trained task.

Rox and the Kitchen Bitches
Bristol (retired), Mill'E SD. and Laveau Guide Dog, CGC.
"Struggle is a never ending process. Freedom is never really won, you  
earn it and win it in every generation."
-- Coretta Scott King
pawpower4me at gmail.com

Windows Live Only: Brisomania at hotmail.com
AIM: Brissysgirl Yahoo: lillebriss

_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/tamara.8024%40comcast
.net