[nagdu] Section 501(d)

Marion Gwizdala blind411 at verizon.net
Sat Mar 27 12:21:57 UTC 2010


Albert,
    Perhaps one could disengage the sound a quiet car makes in the same way 
one would disengage the sound a vehicle's horn creates! (smile)

Fraternally yours,
Marion


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Albert J Rizzi" <albert at myblindspot.org>
To: "'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'" 
<nagdu at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Section 501(d)


> And as I put before, what if someone does not like nor prefer the
> accommodation of a noise being put into a hybrid car and wants to 
> disengage
> that? how would we go about doing that in the same vein as presented here?
>
> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
> CEO/Founder
> My Blind Spot, Inc.
> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
> New York, New York  10004
> www.myblindspot.org
> PH: 917-553-0347
> Fax: 212-858-5759
> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one who is
> doing it."
>
>
> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
> Of Marion Gwizdala
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:26 PM
> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
> Subject: [nagdu] Section 501(d)
>
> Section 501
> (d) Accommodations and Services. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
> require an individual with a disability to accept an accommodation, aid,
> service,
>
> opportunity, or benefit which such individual chooses not to accept.
>
> Marion Gwizdala
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Peter Donahue" <pdonahue1 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:49 PM
> Subject: [nagdu] ADA Correction
>
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>    This is a correction to my earlier message concerning the ADA. I said
>> Section IV when it should have been Title V. There is a provision  that
>> clearly states that if a disabled individual deems an accommodation to be
>> inappropriate or unnecessary he/she has the right to refuse such
>> accommodations. What this would mean is that all audible traffic signals
>> would be required to be user-activated allowing those who wish to use 
>> them
>> to do so while respecting the rights of those who find them unnecessary.
>>
>> Peter Donahue
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Peter Donahue" <pdonahue1 at sbcglobal.net>
>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>
>>
>> Hello Gary and everyone,
>>
>>    Provided they're not shoved down the throats of those who choose not 
>> to
>> use them as specified in Section IV of the ADA. One provision of that
>> section clearly states that a disabled individual has the ability to
>> refuse
>> an accommodation they deem to be unnecessary. If audible traffic signals
>> are
>> installed at intersections they must permit one to disable them should
>> they
>> choose not to use them. This is in compliance with the above section in
>> the
>> ADA. So why spend large sums of money on installing something very few
>> people would use. Our municipalities have better things to do with public
>> monies than spending it on these things.I'd rather see such funds spent 
>> on
>> improving access to quality orientation and adjustment training rather
>> than
>> APS any day. Blind individuals would not only receive quality travel
>> training, but they would learn many other valuable blindness skills as
>> well.
>> Please keep the big picture in focus.
>>
>> Peter Donahue
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Gary" <rainshadowmusic at shaw.ca>
>> To: "'NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users'"
>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 9:10 AM
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello:
>>
>> Of course I agree with the fact that having silent cars create noise and
>> audible traffic signals are not the same issue.
>>
>> First, let me state that I am totally for the  laws being moved forward 
>> to
>> create sounds in electric silent cars. However, I think that audible
>> traffic
>> signals are a great assistance to all people. It is great to say that at 
>> a
>> four way stop we don't need audible signals but I live in a city where
>> there
>> are probably over a 100 audible signals and I certainly believe that they
>> tmake getting around the city much easier especially considering I have 
>> to
>> often cross six lane roads. Of course I don't blindly start walking
>> (pardon
>> the pun) once I hear the signal but as someone stated earlier, I then 
>> know
>> that the sign says walk. Now it is up to me to use my other senses to be
>> sure that the intersection is truly safe before I proceed.
>>
>> Secondly, when I make my request for audible signals to the city staff,
>> I'm
>> not just selling them on the fact that this will allow me, the poor 
>> little
>> blind man -- not  <chuckle> get out of my house but it willl be of
>> assistance to many other pedestrians  by stimulating another sense 
>> besides
>> their sight to inform them that the light has changed. Even drivers may
>> have
>> their attention drawn by the sounds.
>>
>> I get annoyed by those who try to put up barriers to universal adaptions
>> that will make my travelling much more informed. I agree that we want to
>> inform the public that we are not helpless and can cross roads as blind
>> people but I certainly don't think we need to do that by excluding any
>> adaptations such as  edge markings on stairs, subway platforms, audible
>> traffic signals, etc. These are tools that we put into our tool bag to
>> allow
>> us to move throughout our community more routinely. Think of the big
>> movement that happened to get cut curbs for wheelchairs, ramps in to
>> buildings and accessible washrooms. Is it only people in wheelcharis who
>> have benefited from these  upgrades? Of course not. Talk to any mother
>> with
>> a stroller. The changes we make to allow places to be more accessible in 
>> a
>> way that assists an individual with a vision problem will help many 
>> others
>> in society be safer as well. The majority of those losing their sight in
>> our
>> society are seniors. If things like wheelchair ramps and audible signalls
>> can make it possible for them to feel safer and be a continued part of 
>> our
>> community then I think not just the blind are served by these upgrades.
>>
>> Just my thoughts.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Michael Hingson
>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:46 PM
>> To: 'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>
>> Ann,
>>
>> The difference is that audible signals on the one hand do not add
>> significant value at standard 4-way stops.  True hearing a sound tells 
>> you
>> that the walk sign is on.  However, the traffic informs you of that in a
>> more accurate way without being masked with other sounds which you might
>> use
>> to mistakenly tell you that it is safe to cross.  The fact that some have
>> said on this list that the signals tell you when to cross proves the
>> point.
>>
>> On the other hand, the very cue we use to know when it is safe to cross 
>> is
>> being taken away with silent cars.  It is also being taken away for many
>> other persons as well.  The very fact that governmental reports now
>> validate
>> that more accidents are like due to the silence of silent cars
>> demonstrates
>> the value of vehicles making a noise.  Also, the cost to produce this
>> noise
>> is not significant even compared to ATS devices.
>>
>> ATS do offer aid at intersections where crossing is atypical such as T
>> intersections and other than the usual 4-way stop.  Again, those signals
>> do
>> not say it is safe to cross but they do tell us where to cross safely.
>>
>> The fact that the NFB recognizes the value of some audible signals
>> demonstrates that wisdom will out.  To say that every signal should have
>> an
>> audible component is unnecessary and it promulgates the myth that without
>> these signals blind people wouldn't be able to cross a street.  I cannot
>> tell you the large number of times the installation of an audible signal
>> has
>> been publicized on TV with comments like "now sightless people will know
>> when it is safe to cross the street" or "now blind people will finally be
>> able to cross this street".
>>
>> I think there are basic differences between the use of audible signals 
>> and
>> installing a sound in a silent car.
>>
>>
>> Mike Hingson
>>
>>
>> The Michael Hingson Group, INC.
>> "Speaking with Vision"
>> Michael Hingson, President
>> (415) 827-4084
>> info at michaelhingson.com
>> www.michaelhingson.com
>>
>>
>> for info on the new KNFB Reader Mobile, visit:
>> http://knfbreader.michaelhingson.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Ann Edie
>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:00 PM
>> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>
>> Hi, Jonathan and Everybody,
>>
>> I'm a bit puzzled by this discussion of audible traffic signals and 
>> silent
>> cars.
>>
>> On the one hand, the NFB has always been very skeptical of the value of
>> APS,
>>
>> stating that requiring audible signals implies that blind people are not
>> capable of traveling safely in the sighted world without extensive
>> adaptations.  On the other hand, the NFB has led in the effort to require
>> that hybrid and electric cars be modified to produce sound so that blind
>> people can hear them approaching.  If the car manufacturers can be
>> expected
>> to produce cars which provide for non-visual access to information--the
>> presence and speed of the vehicle--then why shouldn't traffic signal
>> manufacturers be equally responsible for producing signals which provide
>> non-visual access to the information they are designed to provide--that
>> is,
>> the status of the light cycle at anygiven moment?
>>
>> Neither the sound produced by cars nor the sound produced by APS in and 
>> of
>> themselves protects pedestrians or ensures their safety, whether the
>> pedestrians are sighted or blind.  The sound produced by both cars and 
>> APS
>> merely provides an additional channel of information about the
>> environment,
>> in these cases a very important channel of communication for the blind
>> pedestrian, because the visual channel is not dependable or operational.
>> I
>> find the information provided to me by APS at a local intersection to be
>> very helpful.  It does not tell me to cross the street; it merely tells 
>> me
>> that the Walk cycle is active.  It is still my responsibility to check
>> that
>> all vehicles which are approaching the intersection are at a stop or are
>> coming to a stop before I step foot into the street.  I take this
>> responsibility very seriously, because I have witnessed many cars running
>> this light.  But that is not a good reason for disregarding the
>> information
>> about when the Walk sign is lit.  If there were no audible signal at this
>> intersection, it would be very difficult to tell when that Walk cycle
>> began,
>>
>> because the traffic flow is intermittant.  So if I waited until all was
>> quiet and then started to cross, I might very well be crossing at a point
>> when the Walk signal was not lit.  And if any accident were to happen
>> under
>> such circumstances, I might very well be judged to have been negligent 
>> for
>> stepping into the street at the wrong point in the cycle.  Besides, I do
>> not
>>
>> want to become a statistic, no matter how much in the right I might be in
>> my
>>
>> decision of when to cross a street.
>>
>> For me, it's all about accessible information.  Not all of the 
>> information
>> is necessary all of the time for every individual.  But all of it is
>> absolutely vital to some of the people at some time.  Information is only
>> useful if coupled with a rational brain.  But without the information,
>> even
>> the most powerful and rational of brains cannot make informed decisions
>> and
>> considered judgements.
>>
>> Wishing you all safe and happy travels.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ann
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jonathan Lyens" <jonathan at lyens.com>
>> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>
>>
>>> Albert,
>>>
>>> Requiring aps implies blind people cannot safely cross streets. This  is
>>> simply untrue, blind people show this everyday and have for many  years.
>>>
>>> Seems like the issue is quiet cars. In that case it should fall too  the
>>> manufactorer to produce a safe product. When unsafe products are  sold,
>>> they're supposed to be recalled.
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 6:52 AM, "Albert J Rizzi" <albert at myblindspot.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That is exactly the point I was hoping to make Tracey, when I 
>>>> responded
>>>> to
>>>> Jule. It is another tool in the arsenal of safe pedestrian travel  that
>>>> is
>>>> for sure. it would also allow the blind pedestrian specifically to 
>>>> know
>>>> when
>>>> to cross with the light rather then against it, and give some sense  of
>>>> calm
>>>> so as to not be as hyper vigilant about listening for cars no one
>>>> hears.
>>>> This audible option in our lives would also allow for some of the
>>>> positions
>>>> taken in some of the  cane laws as written, I think it was David who
>>>> shared
>>>> how he found it effective to extend his white cane in an obvious 
>>>> manner
>>>> when
>>>> crossing 6 lanes of traffic. Imagine how effective that technique if
>>>> necessary, coupled with an audible sign would make crossing a two  lane
>>>> road
>>>> or any road for that matter. I give you kudos for making that happen 
>>>> in
>>>> your
>>>> life and your community. More of us need to take your lead.
>>>>
>>>> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
>>>> CEO/Founder
>>>> My Blind Spot, Inc.
>>>> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
>>>> New York, New York  10004
>>>> www.myblindspot.org
>>>> PH: 917-553-0347
>>>> Fax: 212-858-5759
>>>> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one 
>>>> who
>>>> is
>>>> doing it."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>> Behalf
>>>> Of Tracy Carcione
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:22 AM
>>>> To: NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>>>
>>>> Last year, after years of fighting for it, I got an audible signal  put
>>>> in
>>>> at a T intersection near my home.  It is really helpful.  No more
>>>> mistaking a lull in traffic for having the light, or having to wait 
>>>> for
>>>> someone to come along and help me.  It also tells me just how often
>>>> people
>>>> drive through the beginning of the walk signal, or turn when they are
>>>> supposed to stop, since it's an all-stop signal.
>>>> So of course I still have to be cautious, even when I have the signal.
>>>> But it is great to know when I actually do have the signal.  It's  made
>>>> a
>>>> real difference in my life.
>>>> Tracy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Marion,
>>>>> the audible signal is of course for the pedestrians . the vehicles
>>>>> already have an effective cue to stop and go. The audible sign  would
>>>>> at
>>>>> least be a way to combat those hybrid cars with the silent engines. 
>>>>> if
>>>>> we
>>>>> were and if all others were able to depend on a reliable audible
>>>>> signal
>>
>>>>> to
>>>>> let us know it is ok to cross, coupled with effective pedestrian 
>>>>> laws,
>>>>> the
>>>>> hybrid cars would only present issues at areas with stop signs and 
>>>>> not
>>>>> at
>>>>> busy intersections. How did you infer that I suggested the audible
>>>>> signs
>>>>> could impact the safe use of a car? The safe driver makes that  choice
>>>>> and
>>>>> I
>>>>> have yet to learn about a device that could ensure a drivers safe
>>>>> operation
>>>>> of a vehicle.
>>>>> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
>>>>> CEO/Founder
>>>>> My Blind Spot, Inc.
>>>>> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
>>>>> New York, New York  10004
>>>>> www.myblindspot.org
>>>>> PH: 917-553-0347
>>>>> Fax: 212-858-5759
>>>>> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the one
>>>>> who
>>
>>>>> is
>>>>> doing it."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>>> Behalf
>>>>> Of Marion Gwizdala
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:48 AM
>>>>> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>>>>> Subject: [nagdu] Audible Traffic Signals
>>>>>
>>>>> Albert,
>>>>>    Audible traffic signals have absolutely no effect on the safe
>>>>> operation
>>>>> of a vehicle. Now, in St. Petersburg, Florida, they have a pretty 
>>>>> good
>>>>> idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> They have a pedestrian crossing sign near the trafic signal. When a
>>>>> pedestrian activates the crosswalk signal, a yellow light flashes
>>>>> within
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>> sign to alert the driver that a pedestrian is crossing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fraternally yours,
>>>>> Marion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Albert J Rizzi" <albert at myblindspot.org>
>>>>> To: "'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog
>>>>> Users'"
>>>>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:07 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] White Cane laws
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now in reaction to the hybrid cars which are environmentally 
>>>>>> friendly
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> very quiet, why are we not mobilizing the forces to require that
>>>>>> urban
>>>>>> planners and departments of roads or transportation or what ever
>>>>>> department
>>>>>> it is that regulates crossing signs start using audible crossing
>>>>>> signs
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> done in many European cities. I hear tell of how the  infrastructure
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> old and to costly to work with, yet I would think that Paris and
>>>>>> London
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> much older cities then any of ours and they some how were able to
>>>>>> bridge
>>>>>> that gap. Would be another great focus of our community to work
>>>>>> together
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> effect if you ask me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
>>>>>> CEO/Founder
>>>>>> My Blind Spot, Inc.
>>>>>> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
>>>>>> New York, New York  10004
>>>>>> www.myblindspot.org
>>>>>> PH: 917-553-0347
>>>>>> Fax: 212-858-5759
>>>>>> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the  one
>>>>>> who
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> doing it."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>> Of Jewel S.
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 11:33 PM
>>>>>> To: NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] White Cane laws
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here, here!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been hit by a car, albeit a very slow moving car, so I was 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> injured very much at all. The car was backing out of a parking spot
>>>>>> after telling me to go ahead. He didn't look where he was going, and
>>>>>> his bumper struck me before I knew what was going on. I beat the
>>>>>> trunk
>>>>>> with my cane and shouted at him, trying to scuttle out of the way
>>>>>> (not
>>>>>> easy for me), but he would not stop. I would have fallen if someone
>>>>>> hadn't run up and caught me and another man knocked on the driver's
>>>>>> window, the idiot. I told them to get the license plate number, but
>>>>>> they did not. I was very upset. This was also a quiet car.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Quiet Car Bill is something I have been watching very closely. 
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> is almost passed through to law. It is getting sooo close. When it
>>>>>> does pass, the government will be required to do a survery and 
>>>>>> figure
>>>>>> out a way for quiet cars to produce the sound needed by pedestrians.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am very sorry about the loss of your guide dog, friend, and the
>>>>>> injury of your other friend. Your story is one of the many very real
>>>>>> reasons why the White Cane Laws were ut in place in the first place,
>>>>>> to save lives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many lives must be taken before the laws are enforced?
>>>>>> ~Jewel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/24/10, Albert J Rizzi <albert at myblindspot.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Here here!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Albert J. Rizzi, M.Ed.
>>>>>>> CEO/Founder
>>>>>>> My Blind Spot, Inc.
>>>>>>> 90 Broad Street - 18th Fl.
>>>>>>> New York, New York  10004
>>>>>>> www.myblindspot.org
>>>>>>> PH: 917-553-0347
>>>>>>> Fax: 212-858-5759
>>>>>>> "The person who says it cannot be done, shouldn't interrupt the  one
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> doing it."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Visit us on Facebook LinkedIn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>> Of Tamara Smith-Kinney
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:07 PM
>>>>>>> To: 'NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog 
>>>>>>> Users'
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] White Cane laws
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tracy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm so sorry!  I didn't know that had happened to you.  It must 
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>> awful for a long, long time after the fact.  And I'm sure whatever
>>>>>> recourse
>>>>>>> you received was not worth the loss.  I'm glad you're well and 
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>> living
>>>>>>> your life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I am glad the white cane laws and pedestrian laws  underlying
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> give me some added rights and protections.  Greater awareness and
>>>>>>> greater
>>>>>>> enforcement does and will give us better odds of traveling safely
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>> our daily lives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There will still be those people who disengage brain before turning
>>>>>>> key,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> the more drivers who are aware of the law, of their 
>>>>>>> responsibilities
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> drivers, and of the consequences of their not taking their
>>>>>> responsibilities
>>>>>>> seriously when they're behind the wheel, the better off we'll all
>>>>>>> be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tami Smith-Kinney
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>> Of Tracy Carcione
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:23 AM
>>>>>>> To: nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> Subject: [nagdu] White Cane laws
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could we possibly get back to discussing better enforcement of 
>>>>>>> White
>>>>>>> Cane
>>>>>>> laws, and drop all the sniping?  Or is it the concensus that the
>>>>>>> White
>>>>>>> Cane laws are outmoded, and we should just let them drop and ignore
>>>>>>> them?
>>>>>>> I'm not asking for someone else to be responsible for my safety, 
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>> asking that the drivers take their share of responsibility.  They
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> ones in charge of the vehicle that is a lot faster and heavier  than
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> am.
>>>>>>> I am especially concerned with new quieter cars becoming more
>>>>>>> common.
>>>>>>> I've lost count of the times my dog has stopped short, then I've
>>>>>>> heard
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> car whizzing by in front of us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I personally know 3 people who've been hit.  One was crossing  with
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> light when a bus turned on top of her, and she was killed.  One was
>>>>>>> crossing a quiet street, when some old fool came speeding around a
>>>>>>> blind
>>>>>>> corner and hit her.  Now she has to use a wheelchair.  And one  was
>>>>>>> me,
>>>>>>> trying to cross a street to get home during an ice storm.  There
>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>> enough traffic, and there wasn't anyone around to ask, and I
>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>> misjudged the traffic light.  My dog was killed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two of these accidents could have been avoided, if the driver were
>>>>>>> paying
>>>>>>> propper attention.  We have laws on the books that say they  should
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> particularly careful when a blind pedestrian is in the street.  I'd
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> to see greater awareness of those laws.  It doesn't seem so much to
>>>>>>> ask,
>>>>>>> to save a life.
>>>>>>> Tracy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/tamara.8024%40comcast
>>>>>>> .net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot
>> .
>>>>>>> org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/herekittykat2%40gmail
>>>>>> .com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot
>> .
>>>>>> org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/blind411%40verizon.ne
>>>>> t
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot
>> .
>>>>> org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>> nagdu:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/carcione%40access.net
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info  for
>>>> nagdu:
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot
>> .
>>>> org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info  for
>>>> nagdu:
>>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/jonathan%40lyens.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nagdu mailing list
>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> nagdu:
>>>
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/annedie%40nycap.rr.co
>> m
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nagdu:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/mhingson%40sbcglobal.
>> net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nagdu:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/rainshadowmusic%40sha
>> w.ca
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nagdu:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/pdonahue1%40sbcglobal
> .net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nagdu:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/pdonahue1%40sbcglobal
> .net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nagdu:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/blind411%40verizon.ne
> t
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/albert%40myblindspot.
> org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/blind411%40verizon.net 





More information about the NAGDU mailing list