[nagdu] Rlease: New Service animal Hotline

Lyn Gwizdak linda.gwizdak at cox.net
Mon Apr 4 17:29:57 UTC 2011


Marion,
Do you know how these new regs will be enforced and the changes disseminated 
to businesses and places of public access?  I had a friend ask me this and I 
had no idea as to how this would be enforced.

Lyn and Landon
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marion Gwizdala" <blind411 at verizon.net>
To: "NAGDU List" <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:59 AM
Subject: [nagdu] Rlease: New Service animal Hotline


Dear All,
    As members of this NAGDU sponsored list, I wanted to share this 
information with you first. Please feel free to circulate this message as 
widely as it is appropriate. Many thanks to Mike Hingson who serves as the 
Project manager for this excellent service and everyone who gave of their 
time, talent, and treasure to serve on the committees responsible for the 
project. This hotline is evolving and information on updates will be shared 
with the NAGDU List first. Please take a few minutes to check out the 
hotline and offer your input to us. Comments can be sent to

Info at NAGDU.ORG

If you are receiving this information as the result of a forwarded message 
and would like more information about the National Association of Guide Dog 
Users or would like to join the NAGDU discussion list, please visit our 
website
HTTP://NAGDU.ORG

Fraternally yours,
Marion Gwizdala, President
National Association of Guide Dog Users (NAGDU)
National Federation of the Blind
813-626-2789
President at NAGDU.ORG
HTTP://WWW.NAGDU.ORG

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FROM: National Association of Guide Dog Users

DATE: March 13, 2011

TO: All Media

CONTACT: Marion Gwizdala

                     (813) 626-2789

                     President at NAGDU.ORG



GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION LAUNCHES INNOVATIVE HOTLINE



            The National Association of Guide Dog Users (NAGDU), the leader 
in service animal advocacy, has launched an innovative new service. The 
NAGDU Education & Advocacy Hotline not only offers information about the 
legal rights of individuals who use service animals, it offers the option to 
speak with an advocate who is trained to resolve access denials. According 
to the new federal guidelines that took effect on March 15, 2011, , a 
service animal is "any dog that is individually trained to do work or 
perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability". (28 CFR 
Part 35.104 & 28 CFR Part 36.104). The new regulations specifically state, 
"Other species of animals, whether wild or domestic, trained or untrained, 
are not service animals for the purposes of this definition." In an effort 
to further clarify its intent, the Department of Justice specifically 
states, "The crime deterrent effects of an animal's presence and the 
provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship do not 
constitute work or tasks for the purposes of this definition." The new 
regulations concerning service animals follow this release.



            "We find that most access problems are the result of a lack of 
information," says Michael Hingson, the Association's Vice President who 
serves as Project Manager for the hotline. "This hotline is an excellent 
resource for accurate information."



            The NAGDU Education & Advocacy Hotline currently offers general 
information about service animals under the Americans with Disabilities Act 
(ADA),   as well as specific guidance concerning restaurants, taxicabs, and 
health care facilities. Callers needing immediate assistance can connect 
directly to a live trained advocate. Future plans for the hotline include 
summaries of each of the state laws concerning service animals, more 
industry specific information, and guidance in a variety of languages, such 
as Mandarin and Arabic. The Hotline is available anytime by calling, 
toll-free, 866-972-3647.



            The NAGDU Education & Advocacy Hotline was created by a grant 
from the National Federation of the Blind's (NFB) Imagination Fund, as well 
as with contributions from the California and Florida Associations of Guide 
Dog Users. The National Association of Guide Dog Users is a strong and proud 
division of the NFB. NAGDU conducts public awareness campaigns on issues of 
guide dog use, provides advocacy support for guide dog handlers who face 
discrimination, supports effective legislation to protect the rights of 
service animal users, offers educational programs to school and civic 
organizations, and functions as an integral part of the National Federation 
of the Blind. For more information about the National Association of Guide 
Dog Users, you can visit their website at



HTTP://WWW.NAGDU.ORG



Or send an email message to



Info at NAGDU.ORG

# # #



The following information is excerpted from

http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/titleII_2010/titleII_2010_integrated.htm

and

http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/titleIII_2010/titleIII_2010_integrated.htm



28 CFR part 35.104 & 28 CFR Part 36.104

Service animal means any dog that is individually trained to do work or 
perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including 
a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability. 
Other species of animals, whether wild or domestic, trained or untrained, 
are not service animals for the purposes of this definition. The work or 
tasks performed by a service animal must be directly related to the 
individual's disability. Examples of work or tasks include, but are not 
limited to, assisting individuals who are blind or have low vision with 
navigation and other tasks, alerting individuals who are deaf or hard of 
hearing to the presence of people or sounds, providing non-violent 
protection or rescue work, pulling a wheelchair, assisting an individual 
during a seizure, alerting individuals to the presence of allergens, 
retrieving items such as medicine or the telephone, providing physical 
support and assistance with balance and stability to individuals with 
mobility disabilities, and helping persons with psychiatric and neurological 
disabilities by preventing or interrupting impulsive or destructive 
behaviors. The crime deterrent effects of an animal's presence and the 
provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship do not 
constitute work or tasks for the purposes of this definition.



28 CFR § 35.136 Service animals
(a) General. Generally, a public entity shall modify its policies, 
practices, or procedures to permit the use of a service animal by an 
individual with a disability.

(b) Exceptions. A public entity may ask an individual with a disability to 
remove a service animal from the premises if-

(1) The animal is out of control and the animal's handler does not take 
effective action to control it; or

(2) The animal is not housebroken.

(c) If an animal is properly excluded. If a public entity properly excludes 
a service animal under § 35.136(b), it shall give the individual with a 
disability the opportunity to participate in the service, program, or 
activity without having the service animal on the premises.

(d) Animal under handler's control. A service animal shall be under the 
control of its handler. A service animal shall have a harness, leash, or 
other tether, unless either the handler is unable because of a disability to 
use a harness, leash, or other tether, or the use of a harness, leash, or 
other tether would interfere with the service animal's safe, effective 
performance of work or tasks, in which case the service animal must be 
otherwise under the handler's control (e.g., voice control, signals, or 
other effective means).

(e) Care or supervision. A public entity is not responsible for the care or 
supervision of a service animal.

(f) Inquiries. A public entity shall not ask about the nature or extent of a 
person's disability, but may make two inquiries to determine whether an 
animal qualifies as a service animal. A public entity may ask if the animal 
is required because of a disability and what work or task the animal has 
been trained to perform. A public entity shall not require documentation, 
such as proof that the animal has been certified, trained, or licensed as a 
service animal. Generally, a public entity may not make these inquiries 
about a service animal when it is readily apparent that an animal is trained 
to do work or perform tasks for an individual with a disability (e.g., the 
dog is observed guiding an individual who is blind or has low vision, 
pulling a person's wheelchair, or providing assistance with stability or 
balance to an individual with an observable mobility disability).

(g) Access to areas of a public entity. Individuals with disabilities shall 
be permitted to be accompanied by their service animals in all areas of a 
public entity's facilities where members of the public, participants in 
services, programs or activities, or invitees, as relevant, are allowed to 
go.

(h) Surcharges. A public entity shall not ask or require an individual with 
a disability to pay a surcharge, even if people accompanied by pets are 
required to pay fees, or to comply with other requirements generally not 
applicable to people without pets. If a public entity normally charges 
individuals for the damage they cause, an individual with a disability may 
be charged for damage caused by his or her service animal.

(i) Miniature horses.

(1) Reasonable modifications. A public entity shall make reasonable 
modifications in policies, practices, or procedures to permit the use of a 
miniature horse by an individual with a disability if the miniature horse 
has been individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of 
the individual with a disability.

(2) Assessment factors. In determining whether reasonable modifications in 
policies, practices, or procedures can be made to allow a miniature horse 
into a specific facility, a public entity shall consider-

(i) The type, size, and weight of the miniature horse and whether the 
facility can accommodate these features;

(ii) Whether the handler has sufficient control of the miniature horse;

(iii) Whether the miniature horse is housebroken; and

(iv) Whether the miniature horse's presence in a specific facility 
compromises legitimate safety requirements that are necessary for safe 
operation.

(C) Other requirements. Paragraphs 35.136 (c) through (h) of this section, 
which apply to service animals, shall also apply to miniature horses.





28 CFR § 36.302 Modifications in policies, practices, or procedures.

(c) Service animals.

(1) General. Generally, a public accommodation shall modify policies, 
practices, or procedures to permit the use of a service animal by an 
individual with a disability.

(c)(2) Exceptions. A public accommodation may ask an individual with a 
disability to remove a service animal from the premises if:

(i) The animal is out of control and the animal´s handler does not take 
effective action to control it; or

(ii) The animal is not housebroken.

(3) If an animal is properly excluded. If a public accommodation properly 
excludes a service animal under § 36.302(c)(2), it shall give the individual 
with a disability the opportunity to obtain goods, services, and 
accommodations without having the service animal on the premises.

(4) Animal under handler´s control. A service animal shall be under the 
control of its handler. A service animal shall have a harness, leash, or 
other tether, unless either the handler is unable because of a disability to 
use a harness, leash, or other tether, or the use of a harness, leash, or 
other tether would interfere with the service animal´s safe, effective 
performance of work or tasks, in which case the service animal must be 
otherwise under the handler´s control (e.g., voice control, signals, or 
other effective means).

(5) Care or supervision. A public accommodation is not responsible for the 
care or supervision of a service animal.

(6) Inquiries. A public accommodation shall not ask about the nature or 
extent of a person´s disability, but may make two inquiries to determine 
whether an animal qualifies as a service animal. A public accommodation may 
ask if the animal is required because of a disability and what work or task 
the animal has been trained to perform. A public accommodation shall not 
require documentation, such as proof that the animal has been certified, 
trained, or licensed as a service animal. Generally, a public accommodation 
may not make these inquiries about a service animal when it is readily 
apparent that an animal is trained to do work or perform tasks for an 
individual with a disability (e.g., the dog is observed guiding an 
individual who is blind or has low vision, pulling a person´s wheelchair, or 
providing assistance with stability or balance to an individual with an 
observable mobility disability).

(7) Access to areas of a public accommodation. Individuals with disabilities 
shall be permitted to be accompanied by their service animals in all areas 
of a place of public accommodation where members of the public, program 
participants, clients, customers, patrons, or invitees, as relevant, are 
allowed to go.

(8) Surcharges. A public accommodation shall not ask or require an 
individual with a disability to pay a surcharge, even if people accompanied 
by pets are required to pay fees, or to comply with other requirements 
generally not applicable to people without pets. If a public accommodation 
normally charges individuals for the damage they cause, an individual with a 
disability may be charged for damage caused by his or her service animal.

(9) Miniature horses.

(i) A public accommodation shall make reasonable modifications in policies, 
practices, or procedures to permit the use of a miniature horse by an 
individual with a disability if the miniature horse has been individually 
trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of the individual with a 
disability.

(ii) Assessment factors. In determining whether reasonable modifications in 
policies, practices, or procedures can be made to allow a miniature horse 
into a specific facility, a public accommodation shall consider -

(A) The type, size, and weight of the miniature horse and whether the 
facility can accommodate these features;

(B) Whether the handler has sufficient control of the miniature horse;

(C) Whether the miniature horse is housebroken; and

(D) Whether the miniature horse´s presence in a specific facility 
compromises legitimate safety requirements that are necessary for safe 
operation.


_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/linda.gwizdak%40cox.net 





More information about the NAGDU mailing list