[nagdu] FW: letter to the board of directors of Guide Dogsfor the Blind
Darla Rogers
djrogers0628 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 14 03:20:30 UTC 2013
Absolutely; in fact, she and her husband live here in the Kansas City Metro,
and I hang with them whenever I can, and Sheila and I worked--as well as
Seeing Eye--to try to help the little sweet Roxy Girl with her confidence.
Darla
-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of L Gwizdak
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:58 PM
To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
Subject: Re: [nagdu] FW: letter to the board of directors of Guide Dogsfor
the Blind
Hi Tina,
The petition I signed was on MoveOn.org and the petitioner was Sheila Styron
who I used to know from GDUI in California. Several years ago, she moved to
the midwest and has been on the national board of GDUI. She's legit.
Lyn and Landon
"Asking who's the man and who's the woman in an LGBT relationship is like
asking which chopstick is the fork" - Unknown
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Thomas" <judotina48kg at gmail.com>
To: "'NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users'"
<nagdu at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [nagdu] FW: letter to the board of directors of Guide Dogsfor
the Blind
>I saw a petition concerning the matter with GDB on another list but I
>didn't sign it because it did not provide me with information to make a
>informed decision. It focused on staff firing and cut backs but it had
>no real meat to it. Also it only had the first name of its author. Is
>there another petition?
> Thanks,
> Tina and the girls
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Cindy Ray
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:19 AM
> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] FW: letter to the board of directors of Guide
> Dogs for the Blind
>
> I don't think it matters where you got your dog. The point of signing
> would be to let them know that their practices aren't what you'd like
> them to be.
> CL
>
> On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Sheila Leigland <sleigland at bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>> hi, I do use a dog just not a gdb dog. I went to another school
>> because I
> was turned down. Gdb would have been my first choice at the time.
>> On 6/6/2013 11:01 AM, Michael Hingson wrote:
>>> Thanks. Even though you don't have a guide dog I would appreciate
>>> you and others signing the online petition. GDB has made some
>>> decisions which reflect badly on its positive attitudes of blind
>>> people. Already today I have seen several letters from people
>>> telling me that because of what has been occurring at GDB they and
>>> others
> will not be getting guides from there.
>>> On the petition page comment 125 is from a former prominent GDB
>>> board of directors member who resigned last year because of actions
>>> and attitudes of the current CEO.
>>>
>>> What is happening at GDB affects us all.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the nice comment on "Thunder Dog". We are getting close
>>> to having a children's version and we have begun working on another
>>> book. Too early to comment on the second book yet, but we are excited.
>>>
>>> Take care.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Hingson
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Sheila
>>> Leigland
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:26 PM
>>> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] FW: letter to the board of directors of Guide
>>> Dogs for the Blind
>>>
>>> hi, I don't have a guide from gdb but was familiar with them while
>>> growing up In california during the sixties and seventies.
>>> wWe lived next door to a blind couple with dogs from gdb and my Dad
>>> always hoped that someday I would get a dog from them. The letter is
>>> well written and I understand your concerns. I hope their issues
>>> will be resolved in a favorable manner for all involved.
>>> By the way, I loved reading thunderdog.
>>> On 6/5/2013 10:05 PM, Michael Hingson wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> The following is a letter I just sent to the board of directors of
>>>> Guide Dogs for the Blind, Inc. Although it may appear that the
>>>> content of this letter is guide dog specific I believe you all
>>>> should be aware of this issue as it reflects on how agencies which
>>>> should do better are in fact treating blind people and their own
>>>> staffs.
>>>>
>>>> There are now significant problems within the Guide Dogs for the
>>>> Blind organization which stem from bad leadership by a relatively
>>>> new
> CEO.
>>>> The problems in part are due to a poor attitude about blindness and
>>>> partly they stem from his lack of competence in managing well a
>>>> nonprofit organization, at least as far as I am concerned.
>>>> Actually, hundreds of consumers have already sent letters
>>>> concerning this issue to the board and many others have signed a
>>>> petition
> concerning this.
>>>> The petition is located at
>>>> http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/tell-the-board-its-time?source=c.e
>>>> m
>>>> .m
>>>> t&r_by
>>>> =7790633.
>>>>
>>>> I am widely disseminating my letter because many of you may be
>>>> asked about this issue, especially around the convention. Also, as
>>>> many of you know I happen to be a quite visible guide dog user due
>>>> to my
>>> experience on 9-11.
>>>> The fact is that what is happening at GDB should not be permitted
>>>> nor ignored. You may wish to sign the petition and I ask you to
>>>> consider so doing.
>>>>
>>>> There are issues I did not discuss within the letter in order to
>>>> protect staff at all levels within the organization. However,
>>>> suffice it to say that the amount of outrage and pushback by
>>>> consumers and other stakeholders toward the leadership of Guide
>>>> Dogs for the Blind is
>>> unprecedented.
>>>> Again, I send this for your information. Should you feel it
>>>> necessary to contact me please feel free to do so at
> info at michaelhingson.com.
>>>> Thanks for reading.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michael Hingson
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Michael Hingson [mailto:Mike at michaelhingson.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 08:47 PM
>>>> To: bburke at guidedogs.com; gkerscher at guidedogs.com;
>>>> sodell at guidedogs.com; ruthann.dodson24 at gmail.com;
>>>> jboyd at guidedogs.com; mwatkins at guidedogs.com; sbutton at guidedogs.com;
>>>> dgershen at guidedogs.com; jharris at guidedogs.com;
>>>> amathieson at guidedogs.com; smansfield at guidedogs.com;
>>>> jackscott at guidedogs.com
>>>> Cc: mike at michaelhingson.com
>>>> Subject: letter to the board of directors of Guide Dogs for the
>>>> Blind
>>>>
>>>> Dear Members of The Board of Directors, Guide Dogs for the Blind,
>>>>
>>>> For some time I have been monitoring the changes at our school and
>>>> the stakeholders' reactions to them. I am writing to express my
> feelings.
>>>> Before proceeding let me introduce myself to those of you I have
>>>> not
> met.
>>>> My name is Michael Hingson. I received my first guide dog from GDB
>>>> in June, 1964. For the past forty-nine years I have used guides
>>>> only from GDB. I grew up with the school, its staff, and its
>>>> advancements in guide dog and student training. While a college
>>>> student I assisted Guide Dogs' staff in preparing testimony
>>>> concerning pending legislation to change current guide dog laws in
> California.
>>>>
>>>> I am a firm believer in the value a guide dog brings to blind
>>>> persons who can effectively learn to use it, and I know firsthand
>>>> the value and strength of the human-animal bond. You see my fifth
>>>> guide, Roselle, and I worked in the World Trade Center and escaped
>>>> from the attacks on 9-11, 2001. Because of a story GDB put out
>>>> concerning our escape Roselle and I became quite visible throughout
>>>> the
> world.
>>>>
>>>> After 9-11 I came to work at GDB where I stayed for six and a half
> years.
>>>> During that time I worked to keep Guide Dogs for the Blind visible
>>>> to donors and prospective donors, possible students, and others. I
>>>> successfully raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for the school
>>>> and I met with countless donors and spoke to tens of thousands of
>>>> interested persons about the organization.
>>>>
>>>> In June, 2008, after a change in the leadership at GDB I left the
>>>> organization to continue a developing speaking career. I now
>>>> travel the world talking about issues like strengthening the
>>>> Human-Animal Bond. In
>>>> 2011 Roselle's and my story was published in a book called "Thunder
>>>> Dog, the story of a blind man, his guide dog, and the triumph of
>>>> trust" which became an instant New York Times Bestseller and which
>>>> has now been published in 12 languages. Today I continue to
>>>> travel, consult,
>>> and speak worldwide.
>>>> I tell you all this to say that I understand change and know the
>>>> challenges change and new ideas bring to any organization.
>>>> Specifically I have seen much change during my 49 years associated
>>>> with Guide Dogs. I have seen the school lead by several different
>>>> CEOs each with their own leadership style and priorities. I also
>>>> have seen the concern each time a new leader came along and took
>>>> the school in a different direction. I never have found it
>>>> necessary to speak out
>>> concerning a CEO until now. Below are my thoughts.
>>>> When Bob Phillips took the reins in 2001 he brought something new
>>>> to the school when, for the first time, the CEO had a daughter who
>>>> was a graduate of GDB. Bob's empathy permeated throughout his
>>>> leadership as he worked to bring more of a marketing effort to the
>>>> school. During his term Bob helped the school grow to be the
>>>> largest guide dog school in
>>> the United States.
>>>> While some were concerned that he was bringing too much of a
>>>> "business approach to the school", what he did was to improve the
>>>> efficiency of the organization, and he helped enhance the
>>>> reputation of GDB within the guide dog community, the service
>>>> animal world. He supported actions which improved the reputation
>>>> of Guide Dogs within the ranks of blindness consumer organizations.
>>>> I participated in efforts Bob promoted to integrate GDB more into
>>>> the local and Marin business community. In short, during 2001 to
>>>> 2007 Guide Dogs for the Blind began to move out of a role as a
>>>> large nonprofit, but relatively isolated from the world around it
>>>> to a responsible community family member which was growing in
>>>> stature and standing within the world
>>> community.
>>>> After Bob Phillips left the organization a new CEO was hired. We
>>>> need not go into her contributions except to say that for the most
>>>> part Nancy Gardner's leadership proved destructive to many of the
>>>> initiatives begun by Bob Phillips and his predecessors.
>>>>
>>>> When Paul Lopez began his term as CEO there was much optimism for
>>>> continued growth among many stakeholders. Some of us had concerns
>>>> that he did not have a good grounding in a positive philosophy
>>>> about blindness, but everyone took a wait and see approach. Rather
>>>> than growth Paul has demonstrated that his approach is not well
>>>> suited to a nonprofit philanthropic organization such as Guide Dogs
>>>> for the Blind.
>>>> I know you have heard from many concerning the issues stakeholders
>>>> have with Paul's leadership and I do not want to go over ground you
>>>> already have encountered. However, I believe my perspective is
>>>> somewhat unique since I have a 49-year history as a student, and a
>>>> six and a half year back ground as a GDB mid level management and
>>>> leadership staff member. Also, I have served in management
>>>> positions within various companies including serving as a company
>>>> president, vice president, and I have served as a senior level
>>>> manager in more than one sales organization. I know first-hand
>>>> good leadership as well as poor and disconnected leadership. Paul
>>>> Lopez is not demonstrating
>>> good leadership for the benefit of Guide Dogs for the Blind. Let me
>>> illustrate.
>>>> 1. Consumer Relations. To date Paul Lopez has not made an
>>>> appearance at any of the blindness consumer organization National
>>>> meetings, and it is my understanding that he has not even attended
>>>> any of the California affiliate meetings. I know he has received
>>>> such invitations in the past because I delivered one to him
>>>> personally last year long before the time of the National
>>>> convention season. I also know he has received written invitations
>>>> this year, but has not accepted them. The National organization
>>>> conventions are the best places for any new leader to learn about
>>>> the issues blind people find important. Also, they are the best
>>>> platforms for any new blindness related program director to market
>>>> their organization and to promote discussion. The fact that Paul
>>>> has not attended National conventions among blind people is noticed
>>>> by blind people throughout the country and red flags have gone up
>>>> especially since his lack of action is directly opposite to what
>>>> Bob Phillips did to promote relations during the early 2000s.
>>>> Given the lack of visibility by the school and its newest CEO, and
>>>> given the bad press within the consumer world I believe any
>>>> positive momentum concerning consumer
> interest is gone.
>>>> Furthermore I believe Paul Lopez's lack of visibility concerning
>>>> consumer
>>> organizations is a bad reflection on his value of input and
>>> cooperation with blind people.
>>>> On another front I have heard from many students who have attended
>>>> classes over the past year and a half that Paul will not spend time
>>>> with them, or at least he spends very little time with them,
>>>> especially in the past few months. This is the exact time Paul
>>>> should be selling his decisions and actions to his consumers, but
>>>> he seems to be
>>> having none of that.
>>>> 2. Budget. Earlier this year when the announcement of lay-offs
>>>> took place we all heard that the decision to terminate eight
>>>> employees was in part a budgetary one. The local newspapers also
>>>> reported the layoffs and stated that the reason was related to a
>>>> need to reduce or
>>> adjust the budget.
>>>> This makes little sense especially when the stock market and the
>>>> GDB reserves are growing. Also, given that ten employees lost
>>>> their jobs in a similar move during the Nancy Gardner
>>>> administration it is hard to understand why an additional eight,
>>>> mostly long time employees, were dismissed.
>>>>
>>>> I like the concept of establishing the new call center which can
>>>> help improve efficiency if handled properly. It seems to me that
>>>> any time a call goes unanswered for more than one business day any
>>>> organization which permits this is remiss in its obligation toward
>>>> the consumers it serves. If students' did not get return calls
>>>> before and if that has changed then well and good. Creating the
>>>> call center should help improve
>>> efficiency.
>>>> However, laying off several long-term key staff people and choosing
>>>> to terminate the head of graduate services given his standing in
>>>> the world-wide guide dog community and the vast amount of knowledge
>>>> and respect from consumers he brings to GDB does not seem efficient
>>>> or wise. The community at large does not buy the budget and
>>>> efficiency arguments for laying off some of the people who were
>>>> terminated earlier this year. I agree with them. It can never be
>>>> good to lose people of the caliber of those employees who were let
>>>> go and expect any organization to continue to operate as well as it did
before.
>>>> Also, one aspect of decreasing the number of field reps while
>>>> increasing the call return effectiveness is that you may find that
>>>> more people actually need visits from a GDB rep. While Mr. Lopez
>>>> has chosen to believe it more efficient to send people from GDB you
>>>> cannot yet know if it might have been better to keep the people you
>>>> lost, but work to keep them busier with visits as well as better
>>>> involving them in GDB's marketing effort. Also, given that some of
>>>> the employees worked on campus might it have been better to
>>>> reassign or split their duties rather than dismissing them
>>>> outright? Please do not say it was for budgetary reasons as GDB
>>>> was not and is not in
> peril of going under.
>>> The "business decision" to let them go is a bad one by any basic
>>> business staffing morale standard.
>>>> Speaking of morale, I have not heard any positive comments about
>>>> moving Barbara Browning away from the switchboard and removing the
>>>> friendly face that greets visitors to the administration building.
>>>> The approach taken with Barbara again shows a business orientation
>>>> not suited or appropriate for a nonprofit like GDB.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Trust. While blind people go to guide dog schools to obtain
>>>> guides and gain the additional mobility assets they feel come with
>>>> using a guide dog, the trust of the senior staff of guide dog
>>>> schools often is
>>> lacking.
>>>> Senior staff have, for example, in the past changed school policies
>>>> concerning dog ownership, reduced consumer representation on
>>>> boards, reduced the influence levels of or eliminated consumer
>>>> advisory committees, and downright ignored issues and input by
stakeholders.
>>>> Many of us have seen new senior staff come with ideas of "making
>>>> the organization run more like a business" and "improving efficiency"
>>>> while all they do is to alienate stakeholders and not grow the
>>>> organization. The result is that students go to schools because of
>>>> positive experiences with the staff members who work directly with
>>>> them and they ignore leadership which they view as something which
>>>> doesn't concern them, or they go elsewhere or decide not to use a
>>>> guide
>>> dog altogether. I have seen all three happen regularly.
>>>> The unfortunate reality is that "business oriented CEOs" do not
>>>> understand the subtleties of running a nonprofit or philanthropic
>>>> organization. Yes, nonprofits should operate more in line with
>>>> business practices than most do today. In fact, some of today's
>>>> concepts regarding the "good" operation of a nonprofit are the very
>>>> things which keep it from growing as they go against what makes any
>>>> organization grow in our changing world. However, while trying to
>>>> bring good business practices into the nonprofit arena the
>>>> "corporate way" as it exists today also tends to exclude some of
>>>> the very attitudes, drives, and strengths which make good nonprofits
great.
>>>> The most important of these is Trust. If a CEO arrives and changes
>>>> some of the very core foundations upon which an organization is
>>>> built without obtaining support from stakeholders then he or she
>>>> loses the faith of those individuals and probably staff as well.
>>>> Nonprofits must have emotional buy-in and support in ways many
>>>> corporations today seem not to have and seem not to need in order
>>>> to be
> successful.
>>>> Corporations can buy loyalty while today's nonprofits cannot.
>>>> Also, with an organization like GDB consumers have no permanent
>>>> stake in the organization since they have many choices of guide dog
schools.
>>>> So, if they become disenchanted or dissatisfied with one school
>>>> they do not suffer a financial hardship when deciding to attend
another.
>>>> Trust
>>> and emotional buy-in are all the building blocks a school like GDB
>>> has to make a consumer relationship work.
>>>> In the past five years 18 people have been laid off from GDB.
>>>> Right or wrong no employee had ever been laid off before. Before
>>>> 2008, budgets were cut, some staff perks were cut, some positions
>>>> and departments were realigned, and puppy raisers and breeder
>>>> keepers were asked to shoulder more financial obligations to care
>>>> for their charges, but no employee was simply eliminated in order
>>>> to decrease staff size. When the first ten people were separated
>>>> there was grumbling and concern, but in general, stakeholders felt
>>>> that the programs would continue and thrive. However, with the
>>>> latest staff reductions, programs and staff directly connected to
>>>> consumers were dramatically affected. Well loved, trusted, and
>>>> effective staff members were removed. Personal access to trusted
>>>> staff was eliminated. Consumers were asked to trust a decision
>>>> maker who had not established any kind of bond with them as he made
>>>> changes those very
>>> consumers considered part of the fabric that made GDB better than
>>> ANY OTHER SCHOOL.
>>>> Also, it didn't stop with the lay-offs. Two very senior staff
>>>> members retired at a time many of us find suspicious at best.
>>>> Terry Barrett and Don Frisk worked at GDB long after they might
>>>> have retired simply because they loved their jobs and because they
>>>> wanted to continue to make
>>> contributions.
>>>> I tell you that you will have a very hard time convincing consumers
>>>> that the timing of these two retirements is a coincidence. In
>>>> addition, at least one other training supervisor has quit and left
>>>> the
>>> guide dog field completely.
>>>> Right or wrong, again, many of us find this additional departure
>>>> not to be coincidental.
>>>>
>>>> If all the "changes" aren't enough Paul Lopez has further eroded
>>>> consumer confidence in his leadership with what he has done
>>>> concerning Guide Dogs for the Blind's reputation and involvement in
>>>> the international guide dog community by reducing the number of GDB
>>>> certified assessors for the International Federation of Guide Dog
>>>> Schools from four to one, all in the name of saving money.
>>>> Previous administrations spent time and effort to move GDB into the
>>>> 21st century including establishing relationships and connections
>>>> which made our school one of the preeminent guide dog organizations
>>>> in the
>>> world. Trainers came to consult with the GDB staff.
>>>> GDB experts helped insure that other schools throughout the world
>>>> were held to high standards of excellence in all aspects of their
>>>> operations. GDB could do this only because it is so large and
>>>> staffed so well that it had the necessary expertise within its
>>>> ranks. Even before the lay-offs three assessors working at GDB
>>>> were told to withdraw from their IFGDS commitments which also mean
>>>> that fewer individuals will attend International Federation meetings.
>>>>
>>>> Guide Dogs for the Blind has lost the trust and confidence of much
>>>> of its consumer base. I said earlier that due to my 9-11
>>>> experiences I am a highly visible guide dog user. I am contacted
>>>> daily by GDB users who tell me they will not return to this
>>>> organization for their next guide. I have been told by people who
>>>> are in a position to know that staff is demoralized in ways never
>>>> experienced before. I have spoken with past members of the board
>>>> who tell me that they are angered and outraged at the way the
>>>> organization is being run today. I am amazed that the board has
>>>> not done anything visible to stem the tide of outrage and anger and
>>>> that its only public position is that people simply do not know the
>>>> internal issues and budgetary challenges which led to the decisions
>>>> we now discuss. When I am asked my opinion and guidance I do not
>>>> have positive encouragement I can offer because I have come to have
>>>> the same views as others. I know I will be asked about the GDB
>>>> issues when I attend the consumer National conventions this summer,
>>>> and I do not have anything I can say with confidence that
>>> will alleviate consumer fears and concerns.
>>>> It is hard for me to write this letter. I love GDB, but I, like
>>>> many, have no confidence in Paul Lopez and I am concerned that the
>>>> board of directors has not done anything obvious either to show the
>>>> value of Mr. Lopez's decisions or to remove him as CEO. I call on
>>>> the Guide Dogs for the Blind board of directors to take a vote of
>>>> no confidence toward Paul Lopez and I call on the board to remove
>>>> him as CEO and begin a search for a truly qualified replacement.
>>>> Thank you for your time
>>> and consideration.
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Michael Hingson
>>>> The Michael Hingson Group, INC.
>>>> "Speaking with Vision"
>>>> Michael Hingson, President
>>>> (415) 827-4084
>>>> info at michaelhingson.com
>>>> To order Michael Hingson's new book, Thunder Dog, and check on
>>>> Michael Hingson's speaking availability for your next event please
> visit:
>>>> www.michaelhingson.com
>>>> To purchase your own portrait of Roselle painted by the world's
>>>> foremost animal artist, Ron Burns, please visit
>>>> http://www.ronburns.com/roselle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>>> for
>>> nagdu:
>>>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/sleigland%4
>>>> 0
>>>> br
>>>> esnan.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nagdu mailing list
>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>> for
> nagdu:
>>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/info%40micha
>>> e
>>> lhingso
>>> n.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nagdu mailing list
>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
>>> for
> nagdu:
>>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/sleigland%40
>>> b
>>> resnan.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
>> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40gm
>> a
>> il.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/judotina48kg%4
> 0gmail
> .com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/leg1950%40cox.
> net
_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/djrogers0628%40gmail
.com
More information about the NAGDU
mailing list