[nagdu] On Ownership

Chantel jawsgirl87 at gmail.com
Sat May 3 21:01:40 UTC 2014 

I agree with you, Cindy. Kicking a dog to death in a drunken rage isn't right. I wouldn't give this man another dog, even if he begged and pleaded with me to do so.

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 3, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Cindy Ray <cindyray at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, I would not give such a person another dog whether I was a school that gave ownership or not, at least not for a period of time. If I was a breeder selling dogs to people and someone did that to one of my dogs, and then said person came to me wanting another dog, I would not sell him another dog, and blindness wouldn’t have anything to do with it. Anger management classes would not be the only kind of classes I would want him to do. 
> 
> Cindy Lou
> 
>> On May 3, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Darla Rogers <djrogers0628 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Marion,
>> ]
>>    I don't believe I am, as this information can be used as well as misused.
>>    Let me take, for example, the man who kicked his dog to death and had a felo0ny charge, I believe. Now he can't remain hidden because of the net, but what if he got sober and took anger management classes and psychotherapy; should those reports be enough?
>>    If he has done these things, he is probably beating himself up every day for what he did to his dog in a drunken rage.
>> Darla & Happy Huck
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Marion Gwizdala
>> Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 6:28 AM
>> To: 'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] On Ownership
>> 
>>    I would also assert that a criminal background check should not be the only information used to arrive at a decision. The information gleaned should be used in perspective and other mitigating or aggravating information should be considered. I don't know if I am in favor of background checks of any kind. 
>> 
>> Fraternally yours,
>> Marion
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Star Gazer
>> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 8:53 PM
>> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] On Ownership
>> 
>> I was only suggesting that a criminal background check is not the only check worth doing 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On May 2, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Cindy Ray <cindyray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m kind of confused about criminal checks leading to financial ones. Maybe it is because I didn’t read Rebecca’s message?
>>> 
>>> Cindy
>>> 
>>>> On May 2, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Daryl Marie <crazymusician at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> But then how far would those financial checks go?  Even though Jenny is my responsibility, I am married to someone who historically has had credit problems.  Would a guide dog school checking in to my financial background also breach his confidentiality and deny me the chance to train with a dog because of it?  Does that seem fair?
>>>> 
>>>> Daryl and Jenny (who is a little on edge today)
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Star Gazer <pickrellrebecca at gmail.com>
>>>> To: 'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users' 
>>>> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:47:33 -0600 (MDT)
>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] On Ownership
>>>> 
>>>>  Criminal background checks only "get" people who have found heir 
>>>> way into the criminal justice system. Many many people commit crimes 
>>>> and are not caught. And, an arrest means absolutely nothing.
>>>> I wonder if the schools also do finantial background checks as 
>>>> finantial stress can make people act in ways they normally wouldn't.
>>>> Not to say that a person under finantial stress would or wouldn't 
>>>> abuse a dog, just that criminal background checks aren't the only 
>>>> background checks in town, and may not give a full picture.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Julie J.
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 1:49 PM
>>>> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
>>>> Subject: Re: [nagdu] On Ownership
>>>> 
>>>> Do any of the programs do criminal background checks?  What about the 
>>>> references?  Is a reference letter submitted or are these people 
>>>> called and asked questions?
>>>> 
>>>> I feel that the programs should use whatever means necessary to 
>>>> assess the suitability of a particular person to have a dog and then 
>>>> let them have the dog.  If there is some concern that the person 
>>>> won't properly take care of the dog, then that person shouldn't get one.  Once the person has the dog,
>>>> it's too late to prevent abuse or neglect.   Ownership or no ownership isn't
>>>> 
>>>> going to change the condition of the dog.
>>>> 
>>>> The only way that ownership can influence how people act toward their 
>>>> dog is if it's used as a threat.  If you don't do what we say, then 
>>>> we'll repossess your dog.  the thing with this approach is that it 
>>>> only works on folks who would have taken proper care of the dog regardless of the ownership policy.
>>>> People who do bad things are going to do bad things regardless of the rules.
>>>> 
>>>> An ownership policy isn't going to prevent abuse, any more than domestic 
>>>> abuse laws stop spouses from hitting each other.    People who don't commit 
>>>> abuse don't do it because of a law, they are non abusers because they 
>>>> feel it's the right way to act.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd really like to know what the actual reason is for the various 
>>>> schools ownership policies.  I've heard obesity, abuse, better follow 
>>>> up, being able to place the dog after retirement, better service and 
>>>> all other manner of nonsense.  It doesn't make any sense to me.  How 
>>>> does the ownership policy affect the school's ability to provide good 
>>>> service?  It smells like an excuse to me.
>>>> 
>>>> It would be interesting to see solid statistics comparing things like 
>>>> obesity rates, abuse, time between a follow up request and the 
>>>> provision of service and overall success rates between programs that 
>>>> retain ownership and those that don't.  My hunch is that there is no 
>>>> correlation between ownership and these items.  I think the better 
>>>> indicator is the quality of the applicant screening process, and the 
>>>> quality of the training at the program
>>>> 
>>>> Julie
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/pickrellrebecca%40
>>>> gmail.c
>>>> om
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/crazymusician%40sh
>>>> aw.ca
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nagdu mailing list
>>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40gmail.c
>>>> om
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nagdu mailing list
>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/pickrellrebecca%40g
>>> mail.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/blind411%40verizon.net
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/djrogers0628%40gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40gmail.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/jawsgirl87%40gmail.com

More information about the NAGDU mailing list