[NAGDU] NAGDU Submission for the DOT Comments Form?

[Lisa Belville]

Thanks, Richard, for making me feel less technically inept. I spent 45 
minutes bouncing around on that site trying to find where to comment.  
It seems the search brings back everything having to do with that 
specific docket number.  But entering comments is a seemingly more 
complicated form with more additional information requested.  And 
there's one of those I'm Not A Robot check boxes.


Do you mind providing the exact link?


Lisa Belville
missktlab1217 at frontier.com

On 1/11/2024 7:53 PM, Richard via NAGDU wrote:
> The difficulty of reviewing the proposed changes and accessing the comment
> form may have resulted in a small number of responses. I wasted quite a bit
> of time earlier in the week trying to access the comment form from the DOT
> announcement. It's aggravating that DOT did such a poor job of seeking
> comments. Accessibility of their materials was poor; I'm considering a
> complaint regarding the inaccessibility of the announcement.
>
> I will submit comments tomorrow. Earlier today The Seeing Eye sent out a
> direct link to the DOT comment form and the link TSE send does work.
>
>
> Richard Petty
> Richard.petty at earthlink.net
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NAGDU <nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Heather via NAGDU
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 2:41 PM
> To: nagdu at nfbnet.org
> Cc: heather.l.bird at gmail.com
> Subject: [NAGDU] NAGDU Submission for the DOT Comments Form?
>
> Hello. I am enquiring as to whether or not the NAGDU will be submitting
> comments? I was surprised to see less than 50 comments altogether on the
> website. There were comments from GDUI, the Seeing Eye and CCI. I was
> concerned not to see comments from NAGDU since GDUI has posted comments, as
> well as a second comment submitted specifically by Sarah Calhoun their
> president. The response from TSE honestly, as a TSE grad left me feeling a
> bit flat, but at least they posted comments. TSE and CCI were the only
> service dog training programs that I could find in the comments, although
> Greg Steinmetz who, last I knew, worked for GDA did post comments from
> himself personally. I know that the NFB is a strong, and innovative force in
> issues of legislation, litigation, advocacy, and education, and I know that
> its divisions, of which NAGDU is one, work hard to represent the concerns of
> their members. To be fair I do not see any comments from the ACB or BVA, so
> I am less concerned not to see any specifically from the NFB. I had the
> thought though that perhaps Raul and the rest of the board is in the process
> of coordinating with President Riccobono regarding presenting a united front
> on any comments to be submitted. I understand that such collaboration takes
> time, but as the deadline is very swiftly approaching, I felt that I should
> reach out and ask the question that has been weighing heavily on my mind.
> Chiefly, is the National Association of Guide Dog Users going to submit
> comments on this matter?
>
>   
>
> With love, hope, and determination\
>
> Heather Bird
>
> President
>
> National Federation of the Blind of New York State Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NAGDU mailing list
> NAGDU at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for NAGDU:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/richard.petty%40earthlink
> .net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NAGDU mailing list
> NAGDU at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for NAGDU:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/missktlab1217%40frontier.com