[Nfb-editors] In terms of addressing and questioning NFB policies

LoriStay at aol.com LoriStay at aol.com
Tue Mar 22 22:29:33 UTC 2011


I think the answer lies in the phrase, In unity, there is strength.   We 
are free to question and debate within the Federation, but once policy has 
been agreed upon, we need to speak with one voice.
Lori
In a message dated 3/22/11 6:02:00 PM, bpollpeter at hotmail.com writes:


> 
> I ask a question purely out of curiosity so please do not read more into
> this.  What is the concern with members voicing questions or problems
> with NFB policy outside the organization?  I often hear the argument
> comparing the NFB to Democrats and Republicans, and how we can not be
> both-- we must choose one.  True, however, individuals in the Democratic
> and Republican parties are allowed to speak against happenings within
> their own party, and this is done without censure.  I have read our NFB
> Constitution and know the policy and consequences for such behavior, but
> I am curious as to why we established this.
> 
> 



More information about the NFB-Editors mailing list