[Nfb-river-city] Federal Judge Orders the National Conference of Bar Examiners to Provide Individualized Testing Accommodations to Blind Law School Graduate
Ries, Valerie
VRies at library.ca.gov
Mon Mar 15 23:37:50 UTC 2010
Please delete this email and send to sacramentovalerie at yahoo.com
Thanks!
Valerie Ries-Lerman
Reader Advisor
Braille and Talking Book Library
California State Library
900 N St.
P.O. Box 942837
Sacramento, CA 94237-0001
EMail: vries at library.ca.gov
Phone: 916 654-0640
Fax: 916 654-1119
Website: http://www.btbl.ca.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: nfb-river-city-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:nfb-river-city-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Freeh, Jessica
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:44 AM
To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
Subject: [Nfb-river-city] Federal Judge Orders the National Conference
of Bar Examiners to Provide Individualized Testing Accommodations to
Blind Law School Graduate
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Chris Danielsen, National Federation of the Blind, (410) 659-9314, ext.
2330
Scott LaBarre, LaBarre Law Offices, P.C., (303) 504-5979
Daniel Goldstein, Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP, (410) 962-1030
Anna Levine, Disability Rights Advocates, (510) 665-8644
Federal Judge Orders the National Conference of Bar Examiners
to Provide Individualized Testing Accommodations
to Blind Law School Graduate
San Francisco, California (February 5, 2010): A federal court has
ruled that the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) will cause
a blind law school graduate irreparable harm unless it provides her
the technology-based testing accommodations she needs to take two
exams required to become a member of the State Bar of
California. The court issued its ruling in an order granting the law
school graduate's motion for preliminary injunction on Thursday,
February 4, 2010. The court's ruling allows the plaintiff, Stephanie
Enyart, to take the February 2010 Multistate Bar Examination (MBE)
and March 2010 Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
(MPRE) on a laptop computer equipped with the assistive technology
software Ms. Enyart relies upon for screen reading (JAWS) and screen
magnification (ZoomText).
Dr. Marc Maurer, President of the National Federation of the Blind,
said: "The National Federation of the Blind is extremely pleased with
the ruling in this case. Law and equity simply do not permit the
NCBE to dictate a one-size-fits-all solution for all bar candidates
with disabilities. We hope that this ruling will cause the NCBE to
think long and hard before it denies the requested accommodations of
applicants to take its examinations."
The plaintiff, Stephanie Enyart, said: "A little over a year ago I
sent my first request for accommodations on the March 2009 MPRE, and
tonight I can go to sleep knowing when and how I can effectively take
the exams to fulfill my dreams."
Anna Levine of Disability Rights Advocates, an attorney representing
the plaintiff, said: "I hope that our hard-fought victory here will
send a message to testing organizations that they need to comply with
the ADA and provide each individual test taker with a disability the
accommodations that he or she needs to demonstrate his or her actual
knowledge, skills, and abilities."
The suit was filed on November 3, 2009, due to the NCBE's refusal, on
multiple occasions during the past year, to allow Ms. Enyart to use
the same technology on the MBE and MPRE that she has used on
university and law school exams and in various jobs and
internships. The suit charged that the NCBE violated the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act
by denying accommodations on the MBE and the MPRE.
NCBE had argued that it fulfilled its legal obligations to Ms. Enyart
by offering alternative accommodations, such as a human reader,
notwithstanding evidence that these alternatives did not, in fact,
accommodate Ms. Enyart's disability. In rejecting NCBE's argument,
the court's ruling paves the way for other individuals prevented from
pursuing their professional dreams by high stakes testing providers
who take a rigid approach to disability accommodations.
The plaintiff is represented with the support of the National
Federation of the Blind by LaBarre Law Offices, P.C., in Denver,
Colorado, and by Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP, in Baltimore,
Maryland. The plaintiff is further represented by Disability Rights
Advocates, a nonprofit law center that specializes in civil rights
cases on behalf of persons with disabilities, based in Berkeley,
California.
###
About the National Federation of the Blind
With more than 50,000 members, the National Federation of the Blind
(NFB) is the largest and most influential membership organization of
blind people in the United States. The NFB improves blind people's
lives through advocacy, education, research, technology, and programs
encouraging independence and self-confidence. It is the leading
force in the blindness field today and the voice of the nation's
blind. In January 2004 the NFB opened the National Federation of the
Blind Jernigan Institute, the first research and training center in
the United States for the blind led by the blind.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 4852 (20100209) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
<http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfb-river-city_nfbnet.org/attachments/2
0100211/d9f98a23/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Nfb-river-city mailing list
Nfb-river-city at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-river-city_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfb-river-city:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-river-city_nfbnet.org/vries%40
library.ca.gov
More information about the NFB-River-City
mailing list