[Nfb-science] [nfb-science] professional networking
Nathanael T. Wales
ntwales at omsoft.com
Mon Feb 23 01:29:22 UTC 2009
Fellow Listers:
My apologies for my previous post. I do not mean to post it on-list.
Please disregard. My apologies for any confusion.
Nathanael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathanael T. Wales" <ntwales at omsoft.com>
To: <nfb-science at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Nfb-science] [nfb-science] professional networking
> Paul,
>
> Your very welcome.
>
> To follow up on my suggestion about letting your blindness help you
> bypass the red tape when applying for a federal government job, be sure to
> mark on the online applications that you are blind/disabled. Most often
> this is referred to as Schedule A. Of course, be sure your search of
> www.usajobs.gov includes all positions that are advertised under Schedule
> A separately or before they are advertised to the general public/all U.S.
> citizens: be sure that your searches and agents that you should have set
> up have checked "yes" for "Applicant Elligibility (non-competitive
> appointment)". This may be important because many jobs are advertised
> exclusively to applicants on this schedule or may have been laid off from
> another federal job, be veterans, etc. Applying under this schedule will
> not at all guarantee you a job, but it will 1) flag your application, 2)
> almost always get you an interview if you meet the minimum elligibility
> for the job (like having the appropriate college degree), and 3)
> streamline the process that the hiring official has to follow to make a
> hire (making filling the open position with an otherwise great candidate
> easier and faster). Finally, using Schedule A is just another tool;not
> all positions are advertised or filled using Schedule A priority: in fact
> the job I got didn't use Schedule A at all; I just happened to be the
> competitive applicant they wanted (and, perhaps, keep reading...).
>
> When I was looking for a job to be closer to my then girlfriend two and a
> half years ago, persistence and patience did pay off, trite as that
> sounds. As you relate in your first issue, I too had the experience,
> especially when applying for federal government jobs, of very little
> personal contact with the officials making the hiring decisions that would
> be my supervisors. If I got called for an interview, I made a careful
> point of considering if the particular job, my qualifications for it, and
> what I learned about the proposed depth of the interview were worth the
> time and expense of traveling to an in-person interview. Indeed, on this
> point of finding out the depth of the interview for which you are being
> scheduled, it can be very valuable: will it be just a 15-minute screening
> interview or will it be an hour-long interview with standard technical
> questions conducted with a panel called by the hiring official. In my
> search, one job I interviewed for had a hiring official who wouldn't let
> anyone come in person: they did all of their interviews, even of local
> applicants, by telephone. The job I have now was the first that seemed
> worth it to me to make an additional trip and come all the way from
> California to New York City (and, well, spend an afternoon with my
> by-that-point fiance). I felt well qualified, the work sounded
> interesting, I liked what I knew and learned about the employer, and I
> hoped that coming in person would show how serious I was about the job.
> How much coming in person actually helped me I don't know even two years
> later, but I do know that the other engineer who got hired under the
> advertisement (they were looking for up to three) also came in person, in
> her case, from Florida. For federal government jobs, in my opinion, only
> then can sending a follow-up note to a person you've shaken hands with be
> practical and worthwhile. Finally, traveling to an interview as part of a
> job search is tax-deductible, so if you do get a job write it off the
> income taxes you'll pay, and VR should also assist you; most federal
> government interviewers will NOT pay for you to come in person.
>
> On your second issue, CAD software, I have very little experience to
> offer. You describe what you do knowledgeably and well, and this--and
> perhaps demonstrating with a laptop--may convince hiring managers.
>
> Let me know on- or off-list if you have further questions. My thoughts
> are here in part because they may be useful to everyone. Let me know if
> you need any help with www.usajobs.gov, the various agency-specific
> application forms, etc.
>
> Again, best,
> Nathanael
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: aerospace1028 at hotmail.com
> To: ntwales at omsoft.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:51 AM
> Subject: re: [nfb-science] professional networking
>
>
> dear Nathanael,
> thank you for responding to my message. I would be very interested in
> hearing any tips you might have for locating and obtaining a job
> (especially bipasses to red-tape).
>
> currently, I use threemain job searches; indeed.com, dice.com, and
> usajobs.gov.
>
> There seem to be two main issues I am having trouble getting around.
> The general advice i get from the public at large--V.R., parents,
> siblings, etc--is to "remain persistant and keep my name in front of the
> hiring manager:" call or e-mail once a week with questions about the
> job/company or just to check on the status of my application; write a
> letter or call the day after an interview to thank him/her/them for the
> interview; etc. But I find that I rarely have a human contact to which I
> may apply this technique. The bulk of my applications are through
> nameless internet forms (nameless in that I have no hiring manager or
> senior engineer to whom I may refer questions, not that the internet page
> has no name [I.e. possible identity theft scam; it is an expanding
> practice]): and when I get to the point of an interview, it's usually over
> the phone--they give me a number to their conference line with a meeting
> code and a date and time, that way an H.R. manager, an engineering manager
> and I can have a three-way conversation (no possibility for a follow-up
> thank you).
>
> The second problem involves CADD/CATIA. At least in aerospace, it
> seams that the bulk of entry-level positions require a high degree of 3D
> modeling. I have some limitted exposure to CADD; in highschool, I took
> two semesters of arcatectural drafting (the copy of auto CADD was running
> in Windows 3.1, but the concepts are still the same). When I got to
> college, there were difficulties in arranging access to the required 3D
> modeling course, so my academic advisor had me substitute the class with
> an extra technical elective. I can make basic wire models, I tend to zoom
> in and out a lot to get the detail in different areas. When working with
> someone else's models, I tend to save a working and an original copy of
> the file, and then alter the working copy to better contrasting
> set-up--usually white lines on a black background (true story; in my
> senior design, our resident CATIA-guru worked with purple lines on a kind
> of bluish-grey background--I wasn't the only one who had problems seeing
> them).
>
> When the topic of CADD arises in an interview, I am honest about what
> experience I do have. I let the interviewers know that I have my system
> worked out--it's methodical, but it works for me--and that usually works
> as my entry point in the conversation for my visual impairment.
>
> Thank you gain, I apreciate any advice yu might have.
> --Paul
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Windows Live™ Hotmail®…more than just e-mail. See how it works.
> _______________________________________________
> Nfb-science mailing list
> Nfb-science at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-science_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Nfb-science:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-science_nfbnet.org/ntwales%40omsoft.com
>
>
More information about the NFB-Science
mailing list