[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On RushLimbaughtalkingaboutblind justice

Dewey Bradley dewey.bradley at att.net
Sun Aug 15 03:52:04 UTC 2010


Agreed, I'll say no more
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael D. Barber" <michael.nfbi at gmail.com>
To: "'NFB Talk Mailing List'" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On RushLimbaughtalkingaboutblind 
justice


>I heartily agree with that.  I think this thread has about run its course,
> but I'm not the moderator.   (smile)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Ray Foret Jr
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 6:25 PM
> To: NFB Talk Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush
> Limbaughtalkingaboutblind justice
>
> Well, I reckon, Joseph, that between you, me and Dewey, we've about done
> this to death.
>
> There are some who think that there should be no such thing as a blind
> conservative, but, we do exist.  There are conservatives who think that 
> all
> blind people should just shut up and go away and sit in rocking chairs 
> when
> we're not making brooms for $0.50 (fifty cents) an hour.
>
> Well, neither is going to happen.
> Sincerely,
> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>
> A Very Proud and Happy Mac User!!!
>
> E-Mail:
> rforetjr at comcast dot net
> Skype Name:
> barefootedray
>
> On Aug 14, 2010, at 4:35 PM, T. Joseph Carter wrote:
>
>> Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and
> that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.)  He
> doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because those
> classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He assumes
> things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd think he'd
> have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's using it as an
> example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
>>
>> Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of
> the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense.
> Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not
> concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the
> intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots.  However,
> that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, since the law
> requires that the universities do what they were not doing.
>>
>> No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before,
>> and will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever
>> admit to being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and
>> correct his reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the
>> NFB and "our" being blind conservatives who think he was being an
>> idiot here...)
>>
>> I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>>> Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what it
> would have anything to do with the NFB.
>>> He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, he
> still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even keep a
> marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
>>> So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
>>> besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org 





More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list