[nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian signals

Dewey Bradley dewey.bradley at att.net
Thu May 27 17:15:19 UTC 2010 

I do not agree with everything the NFB does, but I do on this one.
I have been saying it for years that they should try more to make transit 
companies follow the ADA, I really don't think they care about that stuff.
The people that run the NFB all have drivers and don't have to take the bus 
or trains.
They are big in Denver, but yet the transit company RTD does not comply with 
the ADA.
But what does the people that rate them do?  Name them the best transit 
company year after year.
So you can't say that everyone agrees with them all the time.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John G. Heim" <jheim at math.wisc.edu>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian signals


> Well, it doesn't really make sense to criticize me for not admitting I'm 
> wrong when you have never done that either. Have you ever admitted you 
> were wrong, TJC? In fact, I don't recall anyone on this list ever even 
> admitting to the slightest truth to any criticism of the NFB.
>
> Is the NFB infallible? If you're going to criticize me for never saying 
> anything good about the NFB (which isn't even true) its fair for me to ask 
> you when you've ever done anything but praise the NFB.
>
> So lets here it, people... Is the NFB perfect? Is Dr. Maurer infallible 
> like the Pope?Has the NFB made any significant mistakes over the past 10 
> years? I'm not talking about minor stuff like saying they should have sued 
> K-Mart instead of Target. Do you all agree 100% with all the policies of 
> the NFB or not? If not, what things about the NFB do you think should be 
> changed?
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian 
> signals
>
>
>> Of course he wants to replace our values with his!  You and Dewey have 
>> been sucked in, Jim. I support honest debate, but you might just as well 
>> be trying to reason with a cantaloupe.
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:09:48PM -0600, Jim Marks wrote:
>>>Many of us share the belief and practice that we should set personal 
>>>goals
>>>for ourselves that stretch our actions and thoughts.  Aiming high works 
>>>well
>>>as a tool for improving ourselves.  The NFB helps this process out by the
>>>power of collective action and philosophy.  Of course the NFB has values,
>>>the kinds of values that help us break away from dysfunctional behaviors 
>>>and
>>>attitudes.  To do otherwise would be to permit ourselves and the NFB to 
>>>aim
>>>merely for mediocrity.  Ethically, the NFB must aim high so that all of 
>>>us
>>>up and down the continuum of functioning as a blind person can have a 
>>>decent
>>>chance at doing better in whatever it is we choose to do as individuals.
>>>
>>>John, I can't resist this.  On one hand, you say that the NFB should have 
>>>no
>>>values.  On the other, you say the NFB should speak for those who don't
>>>share its values.  Putting the obvious contradiction aside, aren't you
>>>really trying to replace one set of values for another?
>>>
>>>Also, even if you were to object to aiming high, which you say you do 
>>>not,
>>>can't you see that aiming high serves everyone who is blind no matter 
>>>where
>>>their abilities stand?  After all, none of us have arrived at a state of
>>>total independence.  To break the chains that hold us back, we are all
>>>learning and growing.  The NFB does more to help those who are stuck than
>>>any other organization out there.  It's kind of the point behind the NFB.
>>>If the NFB dumped its values, then it would stand for nothing and have no
>>>reason to exist except to argue only for environmental access.  That 
>>>would
>>>be horribly dysfunctional since function is rooted on the combination of
>>>environmental access and personal development.  We have to believe that 
>>>it's
>>>OK to be blind and that the alternate techniques of the blind are what 
>>>sets
>>>the blind free just as much as we believe that we have a right to access
>>>information on equal footing with the rest of society.  We must work both
>>>ends, and that's what the NFB does.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----
>>>Jim Marks
>>>blind.grizzly at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>Behalf Of John G. Heim
>>>Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 10:17 AM
>>>To: NFB Talk Mailing List
>>>Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian 
>>>signals
>>>
>>>Super Blind Guy is my term for the person the NFB wants you to be.  This 
>>>is
>>>the guy for whom blindness has become a mere nuisance.
>>>
>>>Its truely ironic that I am being criticized on this list for not being
>>>Super Blind Guy. Earlier this month, I was thuroughly trashed on the 
>>>acb-l
>>>list for insisting that everyone should try to be Super Blind Guy. IMO, 
>>>that
>>>
>>>is the goal every blind person should set. But I don't think that should 
>>>be
>>>an official policy of the NFB because they have no right to tell people 
>>>how
>>>to be blind.
>>>
>>>Nobody has a right to tell anyone else how to deal with their disability. 
>>>I
>>>
>>>happen to agree that with proper training blindness can be reduced to a 
>>>mere
>>>
>>>nuisance. But I bristle at the NFB telling me that I should feel that 
>>>way.
>>>That's a personal value that nobody has a right to determine on my 
>>>behalf.
>>>I happen to agree with that value judgement but I would never tell anyone
>>>that they have to share my values. I think they should share them but 
>>>that
>>>decision *must* be left up to the individual.
>>>
>>>The NFB has an ethical responsibility to represent those who do not share
>>>its values.  In fact, the NFB should not even *have* values. The NFB is 
>>>not
>>>a church or a religious organization. It should not be dictating values.
>>>That is inappropriate and unethical.
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Jim Marks" <blind.grizzly at gmail.com>
>>>To: "'NFB Talk Mailing List'" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>>Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:48 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian 
>>>signals
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's OK to be blind.  And it's sure a lot more functional to develop 
>>>> solid
>>>> blindness skills.  Blind people can either fix our environments or we 
>>>> can
>>>> learn how to be good at being blind.  Most of us blend the two options 
>>>> for
>>>> the best effect.  APS give us information about our environment.  They
>>>> don't
>>>> affect the alternative techniques of blindness, though.
>>>>
>>>> What does this common sense approach have to do with blaming the victim
>>>> and
>>>> being super blind?  Also, what does being super blind mean?  Aren't we
>>>> talking about function here?  I thought the re-print of the speech was
>>>> pretty good stuff.  When I read it, I thought that we are starting to 
>>>> turn
>>>
>>>> a
>>>> corner to a better understanding of APS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Jim Marks
>>>> blind.grizzly at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] 
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of John G. Heim
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:16 AM
>>>> To: NFB Talk Mailing List
>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian
>>>> signals
>>>>
>>>> My mobility skills are not at issue here. The fact is that not everyone
>>>> has
>>>> perfect mobility skills and everyone can make a mistake. I've already
>>>> posted
>>>>
>>>> a link to an article about the ways that audible walk signals help 
>>>> blind
>>>> people deal with confusing and difficult situations.  Did you read that
>>>> article?
>>>>
>>>> In fact, my mobility skills are just fine. But that's not the point. I
>>>> have
>>>> had access to some of the best mobility training in the world via the
>>>> Wisconsin Council of the Blind and Guide dogs for the Blind. But not
>>>> everyone has that access. And even if they do, everyone makes mistakes.
>>>> Audible walk signlas help blind people avoid mistakes.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I'm glad you brought this up. Blaming the blind person for 
>>>> their
>>>> problems is not a solution. But all too often, that is exactly what the
>>>> NFB
>>>> does.  Its a direct result of the NFB philosophy that blindness can be
>>>> reduced to a mere nuiscance. Well, that may or may not even be true. 
>>>> But
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>> main problem with it is that it inevitably results in blaming the 
>>>> victim.
>>>> If
>>>>
>>>> you can't cross a street without audible walk signals, that's your
>>>> problem.
>>>> If you're not Super Blind Guy (or Gal), the NFB has no use for you.
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Dewey Bradley" <dewey.bradley at att.net>
>>>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:44 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian
>>>> signals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you should get some travel training, I don't like them because 
>>>> when
>>>> the dam things are makeing all the raket, I can't hear the traffic.
>>>> This is a fact of life, people don't always stop for a red light, I 
>>>> want
>>>> to
>>>> be able to hear them.
>>>> Maybe someone on the list can explain to you how blind people are able 
>>>> to
>>>> tell when the light is ready for you to cross.
>>>> These things are where sighted people get there negative stereotypes 
>>>> from.
>>>> They think that we can't do anything for our selves, like open a door,
>>>> cross
>>>> the street, find a seat, carry our food, take care of our kids, and 
>>>> much
>>>> more.
>>>> Its guys like you that hold us back.
>>>> That's just one reason that they wont hire us, they think we can't do
>>>> anything.
>>>> I know someone else like you, he wont even go to the store or to the 
>>>> bank
>>>> by
>>>> him self, and he knows how to, but wants everyone to know that blind
>>>> people
>>>> are stupid and helpless.
>>>> Maybe you should get rehab to send you to one of the NFB training 
>>>> centers.
>>>> I whent to the Colorado center myself, they are good, I'm not shore 
>>>> about
>>>> the other 2, but I'm shore they are good as well.
>>>> They can show you how to tell when the light changes, and when and how 
>>>> to
>>>> cross the street
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "John G. Heim" <jheim at math.wisc.edu>
>>>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:57 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian
>>>> signals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, of course I need audible walk signals.
>>>>
>>>> I hope you're not trying to imply that I shouldn't need audible walk
>>>> signals. By that logic, visible walk signals are also unnecessary. That
>>>> would imply that cities all over the globe have wasted millions of 
>>>> dollars
>>>> installing visible walk signals for sighted people.  If you don't 
>>>> believe
>>>> that visible walk signals help sighted people cross streets more 
>>>> safely,
>>>> you
>>>> should contact the traffic engineers in your city and they will set you
>>>> straight. Just as visible signals help sighted people cross streets 
>>>> more
>>>> safely, audible signals help blind pedestrians cross streets more 
>>>> safely.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a link to some information about audible walk signals helping
>>>> blind
>>>> people cross streets more safely:
>>>> http://www.apsguide.org/appendix_c_research.cfm
>>>>
>>>> If you have any reason to believe that audible signals do not help 
>>>> blind
>>>> pedestrians cross the street more safely, I would like to see it.  It
>>>> certainly seems counter-intuitive to say that audible signals would not
>>>> make
>>>> blind pedestrians safer. If you're going to say that, you are obligated 
>>>> to
>>>> provide some evidence.  The NFB should not be organizing protests 
>>>> against
>>>> something that by all appearances would make blind pedestrians safer
>>>> unless
>>>> they have some compelling reason to believe it doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, the NFB should stop playing games with the lives of blind
>>>> pedestrians.
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Dewey Bradley" <dewey.bradley at att.net>
>>>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:06 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian
>>>> signals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why do you think the NFB  should change its stance?
>>>> Do you need them?
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "John G. Heim" <jheim at math.wisc.edu>
>>>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 9:51 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian
>>>> signals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As recently as 2003, the NFB organized protests against audible  walk
>>>> signals:
>>>> http://nfb.org/legacy/bm/bm03/bm0301/bm030103.htm
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I feel there is no more important issue on which the NFB 
>>>> needs
>>>> to change its stance. This is about as wrong-headed as an organization 
>>>> can
>>>> be.
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Sherri" <flmom2006 at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>; "Florida Association 
>>>> of
>>>> Guide Dog Users" <flagdu at nfbnet.org>; "NAGDU Mailing List,the National
>>>> Association of Guide Dog Users" <nagdu at nfbnet.org>; "NFB Florida"
>>>> <nfbf-l at nfbnet.org>; "NFB of Florida parents" <fopbc at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Cc: "Dianne Ketts" <dianne at ketts.org>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 8:20 AM
>>>> Subject: [nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian 
>>>> signals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The FCB is streaming their convention and I am currently listening to a
>>>> speech by an O & M instructor, Dianne Ketts, who happens to work for 
>>>> the
>>>> Lighthouse of Central Florida. I know Dianne personally and find her to 
>>>> be
>>>
>>>> a
>>>> very progressive-thinking O & M instructor. She is explaining the 
>>>> various
>>>> kinds of Pedestrian signals, traffic lights and the use of audible
>>>> pedestrian signals. She particularly emphasizes that you need proper O 
>>>> & M
>>>> techniques and training whether or not the audible indications exists,
>>>> saying that the audible signal only indicates that the walk signal is
>>>> showing, not that it is safe to cross the street. I find her outlook
>>>> refreshing and the lecture fascinating.  It is interesting to learn how
>>>> the
>>>> various lights are actuated as well as how the audible pedestrian 
>>>> signals
>>>> work. I think it would be of great use to have an explanation of these
>>>> various signals and the technology regarding APS'S AT A FUTURE NFBF
>>>> CONVENTION AND EVEN POSSIBLY AT AN NFB national convention. I really
>>>> believe
>>>> with traffic patterns changing, with more and more cars on our 
>>>> roadways,
>>>> this information is useful for us to know. She says, for example, that
>>>> whether there is an APS or not, there are some intersections where it 
>>>> is
>>>> imperative for people to find the push-button. Really interesting!
>>>>
>>>> Sherri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sherri Brun, NFBF Secretary and NewslineR Coordinator
>>>> E-mail:  flmom2006 at gmail.com
>>>> http://www.nfbnewslineonline.org
>>>> http://www.nfbflorida.org
>>>>
>>>> "Don't give up something you want forever for something you want only 
>>>> for
>>>> now!"
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>nfb-talk mailing list
>>>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>nfb-talk mailing list
>>>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org

More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list