[nfb-talk] Explanation of traffic lights and pedestrian signals

[T. Joseph Carter]

With respect, David, "help" and John Heim just is not going to 
happen.  He is not open to any opinion but his own, as evidenced by 
his tendency to discount or ignore any evidence presented in 
opposition to his viewpoint, usually using loaded terms such as 
"illogical", "wrong-headed".

When combined with the pattern of his threads, easily seen by looking 
at posts by author in our mailing list archives, each of his posts 
begins with the assertion that the NFB position is ridiculous, 
followed by a straw man explanation of that position, and an attempt 
to stir up the NFB against itself.

How many more years of this crap are you going to allow him to post?  
It's not helpful.  It's not educational.  It's not giving otherwise 
dead lists some activity.  It is a disruption, and it happens on a 
pretty frequent basis.  Has been so for years now.

It's starting to drive people away from the lists.

How long does it continue?

Joseph


On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:42:29PM -0500, David Andrews wrote:
>Let's not get insulting.  That isn't going to help any@!
>
>David Andrews, Moderator
>
>At 06:39 PM 5/26/2010, you wrote:
>>Of course he wants to replace our values with his!  You and Dewey 
>>have been sucked in, Jim. I support honest debate, but you might 
>>just as well be trying to reason with a cantaloupe.
>>
>>Joseph
>
>                        David Andrews:  dandrews at visi.com
>Follow me on Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/dandrews920
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>nfb-talk mailing list
>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org