[nfb-talk] Early Resolution on Assistive Technology

[David Andrews]

Joshua:

I would guess that your intentions, and idealism are good.  However, 
I personally couldn't support such a resolution for two 
reasons.  First, it would make our already expensive assistive 
technology more expensive then it already is.  Secondly, we 
traditionally support things directly related to blindness.  While 
solar power, and the environment are worthy causes -- they aren't our 
causes.  Further, much of the equipment we use wouldn't normally be 
taken out into the sunlight, and I don't know how good a  job at 
charging indoor light would do.

Dave

At 10:59 PM 9/24/2010, you wrote:
>Fellow federationists, I'm Joshua Lester from the Arkansas chapter. I
>won't be able to come to Orlando, next july, but I'd appreciate it if
>we could handle this NFB business on this thread. I find it quite
>shameful, that we as blind individuals are behind in solar powered
>technology! Our sited counterparts are able to have solar powered
>calculators, for example, while our talking calculators are battery
>powered. Our Pac Mates, Braille Notes, etc. are also battery powered.
>What a shame! The resolution I'm proposing will urge Freedom
>Scientific, HumanWare, and other companies to make their products
>solar powered. Not only is solar powered technology good for the
>environment, but it's good for us as endividuals. For instance, there
>will be no more of the Pac Mate going dead in the middle of a class,
>and a student's work being jumbled up after the machine is charged, or
>the constant "beepp" sound of the calculator letting us know that the
>battery is low. This technology will help us catch up with our sited
>counterparts at work, in the classroom, and in life in general. Please
>second this motion to pass this resolution. Blessings, Joshua

                         David Andrews:  dandrews at visi.com
Follow me on Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/dandrews920