[nfb-talk] thoughts on the new telescopic carbon fiber cane

Fri Apr 8 22:08:35 UTC 2011

Carbon fiber is stronger than the material used in the other canes.
You can't break it as easy.
This is also one of the reasons that the ivories of the piano were
replaced with carbon fiber.
Real ivory breaks all the time.
That's why you feel cracks in the keys of the old pianos.
The keys on today's pianos are made of carbon fiber, (or at least,
that's what I was told at a piano store/company I worked for.)
Blessings, Joshua
On 4/8/11, Cindy Handel <cindy425 at verizon.net> wrote:
> Well, I guess it's just because I've never been a big fan of the telescoping
> canes.  But, I'd rather know how the cane holds up after several months or a
> year of use.  When the old, original telescoping cane I have was new, it
> stayed together pretty well.  But, after use, it no longer does.  So, I hope
> these new carbon fiber canes last.  But, I'll stick with my straight cane.
>
> Cindy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] thoughts on the new telescopic carbon fiber cane
>
>
> I may have to replace mine as well.  Last one I bought was two years
> ago—I carry them as a backup—and just days after I bought it, I ran
> into Willie Black at Youth Slam who had something happen to a
> student’s cane, and needed to borrow one until he could get said
> student back for a replacement.  Of course, I had a spare (because I
> always do), so it came in handy.
>
> Of course, and anyone who has used one of these things knows where
> I’m going with this, the cap was cracked not half an hour later.
> (And I thought I was rough on the things!)
>
> I’ve never found a suitable replacement cap for the things.  (If you
> have, lemme know!)
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 09:20:18PM -0500, Ray Foret Jr wrote:
>>thanks.  I really do honestly believe you will be leased with the purchase.
>>
>>I know I certainly am for sure; for now, you see, we have, at long last, a
>>telescopic cane in which we can truly say we are proud to clame ownership.
>>
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>
>>Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>>Skype name:
>>barefootedray
>>
>>Facebook:
>>facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1
>>
>>On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:50 PM, BMW wrote:
>>
>>> Yep.  I'm getting ready to retire my guide dog and I'm going to buy one
>>> based on your recommendation.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Foret Jr" <rforetjr at att.net>
>>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:55 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] thoughts on the new telescopic carbon fiber cane
>>>
>>>
>>>> you know, you might  just be on to something there.
>>>>
>>>> HMM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>>>
>>>> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>>>> Skype name:
>>>> barefootedray
>>>>
>>>> Facebook:
>>>> facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 7, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Anjelina wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray, You should go into sales. :)
>>>>> I'm going to give this cane a gry; I need a backup and your description
>>>>>
>>>>> is exactly what I've been looking for in a telescoping cane.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ray Foret Jr
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 4:33 PM
>>>>> To: NFB Talk Mailing List
>>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] thoughts on the new telescopic carbon fiber
>>>>> cane
>>>>>
>>>>> Heck Mike, how come not three or four?  You'll just love the thing.  I
>>>>> promise!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>>>>> Skype name:
>>>>> barefootedray
>>>>>
>>>>> Facebook:
>>>>> facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Mike Freeman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm gonna get two!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike Freeman
>>>>>> sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2011, at 2:54, "Michael D. Barber" <michael.nfbi at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, Ray for this review.  I am in the market for a new
>>>>>>> telescoping cane,
>>>>>>> and your review has just about convinced me to get one or two.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael Barber
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>>>>> Behalf Of John Heim
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:57 PM
>>>>>>> To: NFB Talk Mailing List
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] thoughts on the new telescopic carbon fiber
>>>>>>> cane
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am only speculating but the case might be for the purpose of
>>>>>>> allowing you
>>>>>>> to attach the cane to your belt or fanny pack.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Ray Foret Jr" <rforetjr at att.net>
>>>>>>> To: "Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:55 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [nfb-talk] thoughts on the new telescopic carbon fiber cane
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just thought I'd pop in here and give my first impressions of the
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> carbon fiber telescopic cane which I have just purchased.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First, the cane comes in a nice zipper case.  IF you care for such
>>>>>>>> details, this is nice I suppose; but, frankly, for me, this seems
>>>>>>>> overkill.  Now for the cane itself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the top of the cane is equipped with a string which is itself
>>>>>>>> attached to
>>>>>>>> a thinner string.  This thinner string is attached to a metal cap.
>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>> cap screws on and off the top most element of the cane.  The only
>>>>>>>> thing
>>>>>>>> about the string attachment is that to look at it, it almost seems
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> though it wants to come off at the merest touch; however, it does
>>>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>>> Having the screw on metal cap is a plus just on the chance that
>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>> should happen to the string.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the next quite noticeable difference is the cane tip.  this tip;
>>>>>>>> (which is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so made that it will fit the standard straight cane), also serves as
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> stopper.  This totally illuminates the necessity for the separate
>>>>>>>> stopper
>>>>>>>> as in canes past.  The fit for the stopper tip is quite a tight one;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but,
>>>>>>>> better to have it almost too tight then not tight enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At first appearance, it may seem that these differences really don't
>>>>>>>> amount to much; and, were these the only differences, perhaps maybe
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> would not.  However, there is another quite substantial difference.
>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>> difference does not really show itself until you actually take the
>>>>>>>> cane
>>>>>>>> out on to the street and start really using it seriously.  Actually,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are two differences which require serious use to show themselves.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1.  The carbon fiber which comprises the new cane must have been
>>>>>>>> modified
>>>>>>>> in a fairly substantive way because it feels and handles much
>>>>>>>> lighter than
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> did the previous telescopic cane.  In fact, it feels so very much
>>>>>>>> lighter
>>>>>>>> that you almost feel you have to make a slight effort to keep it's
>>>>>>>> tip on
>>>>>>>> the ground.  Whether you just tap it using the usual ark or slide
>>>>>>>> the tip,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the lighter feel is instantly evident.  If you are in the habit of
>>>>>>>> sliding
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> your tip; (as I am) you will note that rough street surfaces are not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> hard on the new tip at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2.  The next quite substantive difference is this.  The cane
>>>>>>>> actually
>>>>>>>> stays extended.  That's right.  You did not misread what i said.
>>>>>>>> the cane
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> actually remains extended and thus is more appropriate for serious
>>>>>>>> cane
>>>>>>>> users who might have stayed away from telescopic canes of the
>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>> generation;  owing to the tendency of the previous generation of
>>>>>>>> telescopic cane to colaps even if extended as much as possible.
>>>>>>>> Even if
>>>>>>>> the elements of the new telescopic cane are not extended firmly, the
>>>>>>>> elements of the cane still stay extended.  Even rough street
>>>>>>>> surfaces seem
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not to cause problems in this area.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for manually colapsing  the cane, it seems that with the new
>>>>>>>> model,
>>>>>>>> this is also easier.  No more need to bang the cane on the ground
>>>>>>>> just to
>>>>>>>> get all the elements callused;  well, much less need anyhow.  I have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it necessary only one time; and, were my hands not wet at the time,
>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>> not even sure that time would have been necessary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, the new telescopic cane is a very appropriate choice for when
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> time comes to replace your cane.  IF you've always tended to avoid
>>>>>>>> telescopic canes before; owing to elements that don't stay extended
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> rough roads and so forth, I believe I can firmly assert that you can
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> buy
>>>>>>>> and use this new telescopic model with the utmost confidence.  Just
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> more observation.  When you are shore-lining a fence, the new tip is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> prone to getting stuck in the links of the fence as you move along;
>>>>>>>> unlike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the standard old tip.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest, I'd say the new
>>>>>>>> model of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> telescopic carbon fiber cane rates a 10.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>>>>>>>> Skype name:
>>>>>>>> barefootedray
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Facebook:
>>>>>>>> facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>>>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anjelina
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>nfb-talk mailing list
>>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>