[nfb-talk] Fw: Legislative Agenda of Blind Americans:
Kenneth Chrane
kenneth.chrane at verizon.net
Wed Jan 26 04:08:15 UTC 2011
This Ambassador is from Illinois.
Go to:
http://www.republicfortheunitedstates.org
and go to contacts and you will find him in the Republic of Illinois.
You may want to check the ACB web site.
Hope this helps.
Ken Chrane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Johnson" <blinddog3 at charter.net>
To: "'NFB Talk Mailing List'" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Fw: Legislative Agenda of Blind Americans:
> Kenneth, what are they an ambassador of? I am guessing another blind
> organization that also has an agenda, but probably not one that works
> toward
> systemic change.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Kenneth Chrane
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:01 AM
> To: NFB Talk Mailing List
> Subject: [nfb-talk] Fw: Legislative Agenda of Blind Americans:
>
> This ambassador sure hates the NFB.
> Ken Chrane
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Carol
> To: kenneth.chrane at verizon.net
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:55 AM
> Subject: Fw: Legislative Agenda of Blind Americans:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Illinois Ambassador
> To: Carol
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Legislative Agenda of Blind Americans:
>
>
> Do not spam this address again. We do not and will not work with anything
> that is defacto related
> I used to work with EEOC and the American Disabilities Act is filled with
> Constitutional violations.
> If you think it is ok to hinder the growth of one group to cater to
> another,
> you are mis-guided.
> All you people want is more legislation to enslave the masses with your
> agendas, whether honorable or not.
> There are other ways to help the blind and it sure isn't through more
> legislation and taxation or tax credits.
> YOU do more harm thank good.
>
>
>
>
> On 1/24/2011 9:13 PM, Carol wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Legislative Agenda of Blind Americans:
>
> Priorities for the 112th Congress, FIRST Session
>
>
>
> The National Federation of the Blind (NFB) is the oldest and largest
> organization of blind people in the United States. As the Voice of the
> Nation's Blind, we represent the collective views of blind people
> throughout
> society. All of our leaders and the vast majority of our members are
> blind,
> but anyone can participate in our movement. There are an estimated 1.3
> million blind people in the United States, and every year approximately
> 75,000 Americans become blind. The social and economic consequences of
> blindness affect not only blind people, but also our families, our
> friends,
> and our coworkers.
>
>
> Three legislative initiatives demand the immediate attention of the 112th
> Congress in its first session.
>
>
> Initiative 1
>
> We urge Congress to work with blind Americans to create a Technology Bill
> of Rights for the Blind which mandates that consumer electronics, home
> appliances, kiosks, and electronic office technology and software provide
> user interfaces that are accessible through nonvisual means.
>
> This legislation should:
>
> a.. Mandate that all consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks, and
> electronic office technology and software be designed so that blind people
> are able to access the same functions as sighted people by nonvisual means
> and with substantially equivalent ease of use.
> b.. Create a commission within the Department of Commerce to establish
> standards for nonvisual accessibility of electronic devices intended for
> use
> in the home or office. Such a commission should represent all
> stakeholders,
> including:
> - organizations of the blind;
>
> - manufacturers of consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks,
> and electronic office technology and software, or associations
> representing
> such manufacturers; and
>
> - experts on universal design, electronic engineering, and related
> fields.
>
>
>
> . Establish within the Department of Justice the authority to
> enforce the regulations promulgated by the commission established by this
> legislation.
>
> a.. Authorize the commission to reexamine and rewrite standards
> periodically as consumer electronic technology continues to evolve.
>
> Initiative 2
>
> We urge Congress to work with blind Americans to establish a commission
> within the Department of Education to set uniform national standards for
> the
> education of blind students in grades K-12. The Individuals with
> Disabilities Education Act and other existing laws and regulations do not
> currently provide objective standards to measure the educational progress
> of
> blind students.
>
> This legislation should:
>
> . Create a commission within the Department of Education,
> comprised
> to ensure representation of all stakeholders, to set educational standards
> for blind children, and to promulgate regulations.
>
>
> Initiative 3
>
> We urge Congress to increase business opportunities for disabled
> Americans
> by enacting the Americans with Disabilities Business Opportunity Act.
>
> This legislation should:
>
> . Authorize tax credits to for-profit businesses that purchase
> goods or services from businesses owned by individuals with disabilities
> (including from businesses operated under the federal Randolph-Sheppard
> program),
>
> . Amend Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act to include people
> with disabilities as presumptively socially disadvantaged,
>
> . Change federal procurement law to provide that businesses owned
> by individuals with disabilities (including businesses operated under the
> federal Randolph-Sheppard program) are included on the list of preferred
> small businesses to which subcontracts must be awarded, and
>
> . Create training and technical assistance programs to prepare
> individuals with disabilities to operate businesses capable of securing
> federal and private contracts.
>
>
> For more information about these priorities, please consult the attached
> fact sheets.
>
>
> Blind Americans need your help to achieve our goals of economic security,
> increased opportunity, and full integration into American society on a
> basis
> of equality. Enactment of these legislative proposals will represent
> important steps toward reaching these goals. We need the help and support
> of each member of Congress. Our success benefits not only us, but the
> whole
> of America as well. In this time of national economic insecurity, these
> measures will contribute to increasing the tax base and encouraging the
> purchase of consumer goods.
>
>
>
>
> A TECHNOLOGY BILL OF RIGHTS FOR THE BLIND
>
>
>
> Purpose:
>
> To mandate that consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks, and
> electronic office technology provide user interfaces and software that are
> accessible through nonvisual means.
>
>
> Background:
>
> In recent years rapid advances in microchip and digital technology have
> led to increasingly complex user interfaces for everyday products such as
> consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks, and electronic office
> technology. Many new devices in these categories require interaction with
> visual displays, on-screen menus, touch screens, software, and other user
> interfaces that are inaccessible to people who are blind or have low
> vision.
> Settings on the stove, dishwasher, or home entertainment system are no
> longer controlled by knobs, switches, and buttons that can be easily
> discerned and readily identified. Inaccessibility of these devices is a
> major barrier to a blind person's independence and productivity. If a
> blind
> person cannot operate the interfaces of basic office equipment or software
> such as copiers, fax machines, and basic word processing programs, that
> person's opportunity to join the workforce or maintain an existing job is
> in
> great jeopardy.
>
> Many popular, cost-effective mechanisms are available for manufacturers
> to
> create interfaces usable through nonvisual means. For example,
> text-to-speech technology is inexpensive and more prevalent than it has
> ever
> been-it is used in everything from automated telephone systems to the
> weather forecasting service broadcast by the National Oceanic and
> Atmospheric Administration. Apple has incorporated VoiceOver (a
> text-to-speech function) into the touch-screen iPhone, making it the only
> fully accessible wireless handset on the market. The key is to build in
> nonvisual access at the design stage. Despite these available
> accessibility
> solutions, the majority of manufacturers have continued to design
> interfaces
> that do not include nonvisual means of use. This trend of inaccessibility
> will continue to grow as technology becomes more advanced and
> accessibility
> solutions are ignored.
>
>
> Need for Legislation:
>
> No enforceable mandates currently exist for manufacturers of consumer
> electronics, home appliances, kiosks, or electronic office technology to
> make their products accessible to blind consumers. There are also no
> accessibility standards to provide guidance to manufacturers on how to
> avoid
> creating barriers to access for the blind.
>
> Congress should enact a Technology Bill of Rights for the Blind that:
>
> a.. Establishes that manufacturers must create accessible user
> interfaces for their products,
> b.. Provides a means for enforcement, and
> c.. Establishes standards that will provide meaningful benchmarks that
> manufacturers can use to make their products accessible.
> The legislation should not mandate a single, one-size-fits-all solution
> for all consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks, or electronic
> office
> technology. Rather it should mandate regulations setting meaningful
> accessibility standards that allow manufacturers to select from a menu of
> potential solutions or create new ones. This will not only give
> manufacturers the freedom and flexibility they desire, but will also
> encourage innovations that make consumer technology more usable for
> everyone.
>
>
> Proposed Legislation:
>
> Congress should enact a Technology Bill of Rights for the Blind that:
>
> a.. Mandates that all consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks,
> and
> electronic office technology be designed so that blind people are able to
> access the same functions as sighted people by nonvisual means and with
> substantially equivalent ease of use.
> b.. Creates a commission within the Department of Commerce to establish
> standards for nonvisual accessibility of electronic devices intended for
> use
> in the home or office. Such a commission should represent all
> stakeholders,
> including:
> - organizations of the blind;
>
> - manufacturers of consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks,
> and electronic office technology and software, or associations
> representing
> such manufacturers; and
>
> - experts on universal design, electronic engineering, and related
> fields.
>
> a.. Establishes within the Department of Justice the authority to
> enforce the regulations promulgated by the commission established by this
> legislation.
> b.. Authorizes the commission to reexamine and rewrite standards
> periodically as consumer electronic technology continues to evolve.
>
> Requested Action:
>
> Please support blind Americans by sponsoring the Technology Bill of
> Rights
> for the Blind to ensure that blind people can fully participate in all
> aspects of society. Increased access leads to increased independence,
> increased employment, and increased tax revenue.
>
>
>
> Contact Information:
>
> Lauren McLarney
>
> Government Programs Specialist
>
> NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>
> Phone: (410) 659-9314, extension 2207
>
> E-mail: lmclarney at nfb.org
>
>
>
>
> ENSURING EQUAL EDUCATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN:
>
> SETTING STANDARDS THAT PROMOTE EXCELLENCE
>
>
> Purpose:
>
> To establish a commission within the Department of Education to set
> uniform national standards for the education of blind students in grades
> K-12.
>
>
> Background:
>
> Blind students have been integrated into America's public schools since
> the 1960s, but educators have never made an attempt to quantify or measure
> the quality of their education consistently and effectively. Although
> school districts are required by law to provide a "free, appropriate
> public
> education" to all students with disabilities, current regulations and
> practices only establish what services and accommodations blind students
> will receive individually and do not measure or attempt to measure the
> effectiveness of these services and accommodations. All too often this
> means that blind students are burdened with low expectations and inferior
> educational services.
>
> To the extent that a blind child's performance is poor, too many
> educators
> incorrectly believe that this occurs because of the child's incapacity due
> to blindness rather than because of the inadequacy of the services and
> accommodations provided. The real problem, however, is what former
> President George W. Bush called "the soft bigotry of low expectations."
> The
> low expectations of educators for blind children become self-fulfilling
> prophecies when blind students receive inadequate Braille instruction; are
> not provided textbooks and other educational materials in specialized
> formats on time; or are not given adequate instruction in the skills of
> blindness including the use of access technology. Materials supporting
> the
> Common Core State Standards recently developed by the National Governors
> Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State
> School
> Officers state that students with disabilities "must be challenged to
> excel
> within the general curriculum and be prepared for success in their
> post-school lives, including college and/or careers" and must receive
> appropriate accommodations to achieve academic excellence. In order for
> this goal to become a reality, however, uniform national standards are
> needed to ensure that blind students have the skills they need to perform
> at
> age- and grade-appropriate levels throughout their educations. Such
> standards will finally put an end to the vicious circle of low
> expectations
> and inadequate services that has condemned far too many blind children to
> lives of frustration, illiteracy, and ultimately poverty.
>
>
> Existing Law:
>
> The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides that
> every
> student with a disability must have an Individualized Education Program
> (IEP), agreed upon by a team that includes the student's parents,
> teachers,
> and school administrators. While the IEP sets out what services and
> accommodations a student will receive and sets goals for the individual
> student's progress, the effectiveness of the IEP itself is not measured
> against objective benchmarks in order to determine whether the blindness
> skills being taught and services being provided are allowing the student
> to
> perform to the same standards as other students of the same age, grade
> level, or level of intellectual functioning. Procedures exist for a
> child's
> parents to object if they believe that the IEP is not being followed or
> needs to be changed, but the process is onerous and puts the burden of
> proof
> on the parents to show that the child is not receiving an adequate
> education, rather than on school administrators to show that the IEP is
> producing good results. Uniform standards outlining the services and
> accommodations that must be made available to all blind children, as well
> as
> the specific blindness skills the students need to acquire in order to
> succeed, would solve this problem by establishing benchmarks against which
> each child's performance would be measured, providing a clear and unbiased
> assessment of whether the child is being educated effectively.
>
>
> Need for Legislation:
>
> The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and other existing laws
> and regulations do not currently provide objective standards to measure
> the
> effectiveness of the education of blind students against accepted
> standards
> like the Common Core State Standards. Such standards must be set by a
> regulatory body that consists of and receives input from all stakeholders,
> including educators, blind Americans, and parents of blind children.
> Congress should enact legislation that creates a commission within the
> Department of Education, to ensure representation of all stakeholders in
> order to set educational standards for blind children and to promulgate
> regulations providing for the enforcement of the standards throughout the
> United States. Only through the establishment of objective standards by
> such an independent body will blind children in America finally be freed
> from the chains of inadequate instruction, lackluster educational support,
> and low expectations.
>
>
> Requested Action:
>
> Please support blind Americans by sponsoring legislation to establish a
> commission within the Department of Education to set standards for the
> education of all blind children in America.
>
>
>
> Contact Information:
>
> Jesse Hartle
>
> Government Programs Specialist
>
> NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>
> Phone: (410) 659-9314, extension 2233
>
> E-mail: jhartle at nfb.org
>
>
>
>
> AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY ACT
>
>
>
> Purpose:
>
> To unleash the entrepreneurial capacity of Americans with disabilities in
> order to reduce the staggering unemployment rate among these individuals
> and
> welcome them into the mainstream of American business.
>
>
> Background:
>
> According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than two-thirds of
> Americans with disabilities are unemployed or vastly under-employed.
> Strong
> and innovative initiatives are necessary to remedy this problem and put
> Americans with disabilities to work. To a substantial degree America's
> economic success is tied to the freedom to engage in entrepreneurial
> activity and create one's own wealth. It has long been the policy of the
> United States to promote the economic well-being of traditionally
> disadvantaged groups by creating a variety of business incentive programs
> that allow these groups to participate in the mainstream of the nation's
> economy. These programs have not, however, been extended to Americans
> with
> disabilities. The Americans with Disabilities Business Opportunity Act
> (ADBOA) would greatly expand the ability of Americans with disabilities to
> secure entrepreneurial opportunities by:
>
> . Authorizing tax credits to for-profit businesses that purchase
> goods or services from businesses owned by individuals with disabilities
> (including from businesses operated under the federal Randolph-Sheppard
> program);
>
> . Amending Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act to include
> people
> with disabilities as presumptively socially disadvantaged;
>
> . Changing federal procurement law to provide that businesses
> owned
> by individuals with disabilities (including businesses operated under the
> federal Randolph-Sheppard program) are included on the list of preferred
> small businesses to which subcontracts must be awarded; and
>
> . Creating training and technical assistance programs to prepare
> individuals with disabilities to operate businesses capable of securing
> federal and private contracts.
>
>
> Need for Legislation:
>
> Each of the four components of the ADBOA would enhance the ability of
> businesses operated by Americans with disabilities to be fully integrated
> into the mainstream of the American economy. Together these components
> would reduce the unemployment rate among Americans with disabilities and
> make them fully productive members of society.
>
> 1. Tax Credits: One effective method of encouraging and enticing
> business entities to subcontract with, or purchase goods and services
> from,
> businesses owned or operated by Americans with disabilities is to offer
> such
> entities tax credits. These tax credits would allow traditional
> businesses
> to realize substantial tax savings and also promote the goal of
> integrating
> businesses owned by people with disabilities into the economic mainstream.
>
> 2. Amendment of Section 8(a): Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act
> is a powerful program allowing businesses owned by racial, cultural, and
> ethnic minorities or women to secure federal contracts. Anyone seeking
> Section 8(a) certification must prove that he/she is socially and
> economically disadvantaged. Individuals who are from a racial, cultural,
> or
> ethnic minority or women are presumed to be socially disadvantaged. It is
> currently possible for individuals with disabilities to secure 8(a)
> certification, but such individuals must prove that they are socially
> disadvantaged. It is onerous to establish such a disadvantage under
> current
> laws and regulations. Placing people with disabilities on the presumptive
> list of those who are socially disadvantaged would create a much easier
> path
> to 8(a) certification for such individuals and therefore to the
> opportunity
> to secure federal contracts.
>
> 3. Changes to Federal Procurement Practices: Under current law
> business entities attempting to secure large federal contracts must
> guarantee that they will subcontract a portion of the work to small
> businesses that are owned by traditionally disadvantaged populations.
> Businesses owned by individuals with disabilities are currently not on the
> list of disadvantaged populations. ADBOA will permit for-profit business
> entities attempting to secure large federal contracts to meet procurement
> requirements by subcontracting with businesses owned by individuals with
> disabilities.
>
> 4. Establishment of Technical Assistance and Training Programs:
> Through the award of federal grants, ADBOA would establish technical
> assistance and training programs allowing business owners with
> disabilities
> to acquire the technical expertise to secure federal contracts and
> otherwise
> maximize entrepreneurial opportunities. The purpose for these federal
> grants will be to increase substantially the number of individuals with
> disabilities capable of operating successful businesses. The emphasis in
> federal disability policy in the past has not been on providing people
> with
> disabilities the tools and training necessary to support themselves.
> Rather
> many governmental programs for the disabled have been based on a welfare
> model. ADBOA would emphasize economic independence for individuals with
> disabilities by training them to run their own businesses. ADBOA grants
> would also allow entities to create tools to assist individuals with
> disabilities in running a successful business.
>
>
> Requested Action:
>
> Please support blind Americans by sponsoring the Americans with
> Disabilities Business Opportunity Act, legislation to increase business
> opportunities for disabled Americans.
>
>
>
> Contact Information:
>
> Jesse Hartle
>
> Government Programs Specialist
>
> NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>
> Phone: (410) 659-9314, extension 2233
>
> E-mail: jhartle at nfb.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
More information about the nFB-Talk
mailing list