[nfb-talk] TSA discrimination in Orlando

[Steve Jacobson]

In my mind, we need to be careful how we look at this.  I agree completely with Mike's position that we are not going to win any court battles at this point 
over invasion of personal space and such.  However, if the regulations permit us to keep our canes, particularly if there is a reasonable chance they won't 
set off a metal detector, I don't see why it hurts to report a violation of the regulations to persons within the department.  I think we have a right to expect 
consistent treatment.  If Joe passed through the metal detector and did not set it off but was patted down simply because someone was trying to teach him 
a lesson, this is wrong in my opinion and needs to be challenged at least within the department or perhaps brought to the attention of the person who spoke 
to NAGDU last week.  I don't know to what degree pat downs are supposed to be done in private, so I'm not so clear if there is an issue there.  What is an 
issue is why the pat down if the detector didn't go off.  Of course, it is now Joe's word against theirs that it didn't go off.

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson


On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:37:52 -0500, Alicia Richards wrote:

>I agree with Mike and others here.  Yes, the TSA has been given too much 
>power.  It's shameful that they can perform such invasive patdowns, 
>violating one's personal space and dignity.  but as Ryan said, that's not a 
>blindness issue: they can do that to anyone.  And, I've never understood 
>people's issue with giving up their cane for 30 seconds, taking someone's 
>hand to walk five steps through the security check, and then have their cane 
>handed right back to them.  I question someone's mobility training if they 
>are unable to walk five steps without their cane, and also can't help but 
>wonder if they're exhibiting what I believe was once called, "rebellious 
>independence," by refusing to take the hand or arm of a TSA official for 
>that very brief time.  But to each their own.  Joseph, I'll be curious if 
>you get a reply from Scott LaBarre about this?

>Alicia 


>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 6282 (20110710) __________

>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

>http://www.eset.com




>_______________________________________________
>nfb-talk mailing list
>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfb-talk:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40visi.com