[nfb-talk] Where the Senate Health Care Bill Fails
Jack Heim
john at johnheim.com
Mon Jun 26 15:40:32 UTC 2017
Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin published an op-ed piece in the NYT
today explaining his objection to the Republican health care bill.
Here is a quote, "it also boosts spending on subsidies, and it leaves in
place the pre-existing-condition rules that drive up the cost of
insurance for everyone."
Can we all agree that the subsidies and the rule on pre-existing
conditions benefit disabled people a great deal? It would be bad for
blind people in general if those things were to be done away with,
right? Essentially, Senator Johnson is objecting to the bill because it
still does too much. There certainly is a chance that the bill will be
modified before it passes but there is, in fact, a good chance it will
be made worse! Anyone who thinks the Republican majority in the Senate
won't be willing to make the changes Senator Johnson demands is fooling
themselves.
A link to the op-ed piece:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/opinion/senate-health-care-bill.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-#continues-post-newsletter
--
Jack Heim, john at johnheim.com
More information about the nFB-Talk
mailing list