[NFB-Talk] Presidential Release Meeting
m.barber817 at gmail.com
m.barber817 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 21:02:24 UTC 2020
I really hope we've exhausted this topic for now. I wish everybody who wanted could have gotten in, above the over 800 who did, but we all know technology can sometimes be a bear when it wants to, and it has nothing to do with an organization's competency or incompetency. I do not believe for one minute the NFB was trying to keep anyone out either. So, can we just call it an unfortunate experience and move on?
Thanks.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: nFB-Talk <nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Cory McMahon via nFB-Talk
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 3:53 PM
To: 'NFB Talk Mailing List' <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>; mike at michaelhingson.com
Cc: Cory McMahon <cory.j.mcmahon at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NFB-Talk] Presidential Release Meeting
You're correct, Mark--I also tried, and was notified that the meeting had: "reached a maximum of 300 participants." I don't recall reading anything about a participant limitation in any of the announcements regarding this release.
Sincerely,
Cory McMahon
-----Original Message-----
From: nFB-Talk <nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Mark Tardif via nFB-Talk
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 9:31 PM
To: mike at michaelhingson.com; NFB Talk Mailing List <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: Mark Tardif <markspark at roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: [NFB-Talk] Presidential Release Meeting
Well, I'm glad to hear that. But I certainly couldn't get in and I wasn't the only one.
Mark Tardif
Nuclear arms will not hold you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Hingson via nFB-Talk
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 10:28 PM
To: 'NFB Talk Mailing List'
Cc: mike at michaelhingson.com
Subject: Re: [NFB-Talk] Presidential Release Meeting
I will comment on your first point. At its peak the meeting had over 950 attendees. I found no ineptness concerning this meeting.
Best Regards,
Michael Hingson
-----Original Message-----
From: nFB-Talk On Behalf Of Sherri via nFB-Talk
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 7:23 PM
To: 'NFB Talk Mailing List' <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: Sherri <flmom2006 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NFB-Talk] Presidential Release Meeting
I tried several times to get into the meeting as well and voiced my concern
and displeasure to Chris Danielson and President Riccobono. I feel this is
technology that should have been well-understood before endeavoring to hold
a meeting of this kind and publicize it so heavily. It makes us look inept.
I was very disappointed.
I would like to know if the National Convention was discussed. Thank you.
Sherri
-----Original Message-----
From: nFB-Talk [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Mark Tardif
via nFB-Talk
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 9:00 PM
To: Blind Talk Mailing List <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: Mark Tardif <markspark at roadrunner.com>; NFB Talk Mailing List
<nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Subject: [NFB-Talk] Presidential Release Meeting
Hello, friends. We were asked to join the live Presidential Release meeting
of April, 2020 this evening. We were told this was a great forum to listen
and ask questions of the president. We were cordially asked to participate,
and nonmembers were also asked to participate in this meeting. However,
when I tried to call in, twice, I might add, I was bounced out and told that
the meeting was full as there were over 300 participants. I tried using
Zoom on my computer and was told the meeting had reached its capacity.
While I’m sure this was an honest mistake, this was an unfortunate oversight
on the part of the Federation. Obviously, the technology wasn’t researched
properly. Frankly that angers me, but what’s worse is that this was
advertised as a meeting we could all participate in or at least listen to
live. To me this seems like a serious misrepresentation. If people are new
and interested, it will appear that we don’t have our “ducks in a row.”
Yes, I’m sure we can listen to Presidential Release 493 some time in April,
that’s really not the point. At the very least, there should have been some
warning that the Zoom capacity for this meeting was limited, so we should
have called quite early. I didn’t see this in any of the emails concerning
this meeting. We talk about being a “Federation family.” This hardly seems
like a proper example of what that should be. If we can’t do better than
this, maybe it’s understandable that some blind people don’t particularly
like us.
Mark Tardif
Nuclear arms will not hold you.
_______________________________________________
nFB-Talk mailing list
nFB-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nFB-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/flmom2006%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
nFB-Talk mailing list
nFB-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nFB-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/mike%40michaelhingson.com
_______________________________________________
nFB-Talk mailing list
nFB-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nFB-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/markspark%40roadrunner.com
_______________________________________________
nFB-Talk mailing list
nFB-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nFB-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/cory.j.mcmahon%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
nFB-Talk mailing list
nFB-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nFB-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/m.barber817%40gmail.com
More information about the nFB-Talk
mailing list