[NFBC-At-Large] Fwd: [NFBC-Info] From the New Yorker: Annals of Sound
Carmen Weatherly
cweatherly101 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 16:22:46 UTC 2022
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Brian Buhrow via NFBC-Info <nfbc-info at nfbnet.org>
> Date: August 3, 2022 at 12:39:13 AM PDT
> To: nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> Cc: Brian Buhrow <buhrow at nfbcal.org>
> Subject: [NFBC-Info] From the New Yorker: Annals of Sound
> Reply-To: NFB of California List <nfbc-info at nfbnet.org>
>
> Hello fellow Federationists. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the work the NFB
> did to pass the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act, the article below tells the story of this
> act and the NFB's involvement. I personally worked in the test groups they mention, as well as
> walking alongside the rest of you in Congress to get the legislation passed. this act is the
> single most important reason why hybrid and electric vehicle sold since 2020 and beyond are
> loud enough to let us hear them before they run us over in the streets. I am proud of the work
> the NFB did to get this very important piece of legislation passed and the regulations written
> so we can continue to travel safely on our streets and byways. And now that you know about it,
> you should be too!
>
> Link and text pasted below.
>
> -Brian
>
>
> https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/08/08/what-should-a-nine-thousand-pound-electric-vehicle-sound-like?campaign_id=4&emc=edit_dk_20220802&instance_id=68225&nl=dealbook®i_id=27757237&segment_id=100212&te=1&user_id=cfbe3c49635d1550df5aa13245dda31d
>
> Annals of Sound
> August 8, 2022 Issue
>
> What Should a Nine-Thousand-Pound Electric Vehicle Sound Like?
>
> E.V.s are virtually silent, so acoustic designers are creating alerts for them. A
> symphony--or a cacophony--of car noise could be coming to city streets.
>
> By John Seabrook
>
> August 1, 2022
>
> I sleep on the second floor, in a bedroom facing a residential street in Brooklyn. Through
> the years, my sleeping brain has grown used to the nighttime noises of motor vehicles:
> mainly the growls of engines, but also the squeaks of truck springs wheezing over the
> street's speed hump, and the wheedling of open-door chimes from late-night Uber drop-offs.
>
> Fire engines, cop cars, unmuffled Harley-Davidson motorcycles, not to mention unhappy
> couples arguing and the occasional lost soul screaming at ghosts--none of that noise
> bothers me. On my first night in the country, however, I'm like Joe Pesci in "My Cousin
> Vinny," trying to sleep in rural Alabama: "What the fuck is that?"
>
> Unlike vision, smell, and taste, all of which dim when consciousness shuts down for the
> night, hearing is a 24/7 operation. For early humans, who were trying to rest outdoors with
> predators around, this trait was presumably a lifesaver. For people trying to sleep in the
> city that never does, though, all-night listening is mostly a liability. The brain must
> disregard a lot of ordinary metropolitan white noise, while remaining alert to unusual
> sounds that might be of vital importance. The waking brain performs a similar filtering
> function in the urban soundscape, ignoring as many of the meaningless noises as possible.
>
> Researchers into the neurobiology of hearing explain this phenomenon in terms of novelty
> and adaptation. Familiar and regularly patterned sounds, such as internal-combustion
> engines and air-conditioners, don't wake us; a new or irregular disturbance stands out, at
> least at first, amid the sonic clutter. In a 2005 paper, Ellen Covey, a psychologist at the
> University of Washington, and her co-authors identified these subconscious arbiters of
> sound and noise as the brain's "novelty detector neurons."
>
> But a novel or useful alert can become a meaningless repetitive noise over time. The
> beeping emitted by the new Walk / Don't Walk signals, which were recently installed on the
> corners of my block, initially struck me as abrasive; now I tune it out. Other, more
> aggressive sounds, such as back-up beepers on trucks, have been designed to resist
> assimilation, because that would diminish their efficacy as audible beacons. Far from
> blending together into a kind of acoustic ecosystem, city noises tend to compete with one
> another to be heard--an auditory cage match wherein the loudest sound eventually wins.
>
> The electrification of mobility presents humanity with a rare opportunity to reimagine the
> way cities might sound. Electric motorcycles, cars, trucks, and vans are legally mandated
> to replace all internal-combustion-engine (I.C.E.) vehicles in New York, L.A., and other
> cities by mid-century--a shift that will profoundly alter the acoustic texture of urban
> life. The internal-combustion engine, in addition to being the single largest source of
> CO[2] emissions, is the leading cause of global noise pollution, which studies have shown
> to have a similarly corrosive effect on human health. When moving at higher speeds,
> electric vehicles, or E.V.s, produce roughly the same wind and road noise that I.C.E.
> vehicles do, but at lower speeds they operate in near-silence: electricity flows from the
> battery to the motor, which spins with a barely audible hum. Therein lie the promise and
> the peril of E.V.s for city dwellers.
>
> A zero-emissions vehicle has obvious benefits for the environment, but a quiet car is a
> mixed blessing for the public good. Automobile engines, however annoying non-driving
> citizens find them, are rich in information, providing a protective web of sound that
> cushions us from collisions as we navigate the streets. Not only does engine noise announce
> a vehicle's presence; it can also convey its direction, its speed, and whether it is
> accelerating or decelerating. The same disturbances that my brain ignores while I'm
> sleeping help guide me when I'm cycling in traffic and can't take my eyes off the road to
> glance back. And, for pedestrians distracted by their phones, engine sounds are everyday
> lifesavers, as the tiger's distant roar was for napping early humans. Except that the
> predators are motor vehicles--and the new ones are virtually silent.
>
> In response to this threat, Congress passed the 2010 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act, a
> law that few Americans paid attention to at the time, and that took almost ten years to
> implement. As a result of the legislation, every E.V. and hybrid manufactured since 2020
> and sold in the U.S. must come equipped with a pedestrian-warning system, also known as an
> acoustic vehicle alerting system (AVAS), which emits noises from external speakers when the
> car is travelling below eighteen and a half miles per hour. (Similar regulations apply in
> Europe and Asia.)
>
> Automakers have enlisted musicians and composers to assist in crafting pleasing and
> proprietary alert systems, as well as in-cabin chimes and tones. Hans Zimmer, the film
> composer, was involved in scoring branded sounds for BMW's Vision M Next car. The
> Volkswagen ID.3's sound was created by Leslie Mándoki, a German-Hungarian
> prog-rock/jazz-adjacent producer. The Atlanta-based electronic musician Richard Devine was
> brought in to help in making the Jaguar I-Pace's voltaic purr. Some automakers cooked up
> sounds entirely in-house. The Porsche Taycan Turbo S has one of the boldest alerts: you're
> in Dr. Frankenstein's lab as he flips the switch to animate the monster. Engineers in the
> Audi Sound Lab made the lower frequencies of the Audi E-Tron GT Quattro's alert by
> algorithmically mixing different tones produced by recording an electric fan through a long
> metal pipe; the full alert references the sumptuous soundscapes of the film "Tron" and its
> sequel.
>
> Other alerts tilt more toward nature. Danni Venne, the head designer behind the Nissan
> Leaf's Canto sound palette, said in a Business Insider video that "you really have to go
> for instruments that don't have a hard attack to them. Wind instruments, flutes, oboes,
> clarinets . . . can kind of waver a bit." Elon Musk has suggested that Teslas could make
> goat noises, or, perhaps, clopping-coconut sounds, like those made by the crusaders in
> "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" because they lack actual steeds.
>
> Only one in twenty new cars sold in the U.S. is an E.V., so these alerts are still a rarity
> in New York, but one day everyone will live with them. I'm already wondering how I'm going
> to sleep.
>
> It took a lot of effort to make naturally quiet vehicles noisier. The campaign that led to
> the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act began at the grassroots level. One November morning
> in 2003, a friend dropped by the Illinois home of Deborah Kent Stein, a blind writer and an
> activist with the National Federation of the Blind, or N.F.B. The friend wanted to show
> Stein and her family his new Toyota Prius, a hybrid vehicle. "It's completely silent when
> it's running on its battery," he announced. "No kidding--you can't hear a thing."
>
> Stein later described this fateful encounter with the automotive future in an essay she
> published on the N.F.B.'s Web site:
>
> Two men in togas walk through Pompeii as Mount Vesuvius erupts
> "I'm really trying not to freak out about every little cataclysm."
> *
> *
> *
> *
>
> Cartoon by Lars Kenseth
>
> I stood at the curb and listened as our friend climbed into the driver's seat and slammed
> the door. I waited to hear the Prius hum into life and move forward. I heard the chatter of
> sparrows; the distant roar of a leaf blower; and, after a minute or two, the opening of the
> car door.
>
> "When are you going to start?" I asked.
>
> "I did start," our friend answered. "I drove down to the end of the block, and then I
> backed past you and drove up in front of you again." I felt a cold sense of dread. I
> thought, we've got a real problem.
>
> A few years later, Lawrence D. Rosenblum, a professor of psychology at the University of
> California, Riverside, read something about the danger of quiet cars. He had done acoustic
> research showing that the brain pays special attention to sounds moving toward the
> listener, automatically calculating what Rosenblum calls "time-to-arrival." He published an
> account of his work in a 2010 book, "See What I'm Saying: The Extraordinary Powers of Our
> Five Senses."
>
> With a grant from the N.F.B., Rosenblum set up an experiment in which blindfolded subjects
> stood next to a roadway and listened as both a gas-powered Honda Civic and a hybrid Prius
> running on its battery drove past. Subjects were told to press buttons on a device to
> indicate when they could hear a vehicle and to identify its direction. The results,
> Rosenblum told me, "couldn't have been clearer. People could hear the Honda when it was
> still twenty feet away, whereas they couldn't hear the Prius until it had passed them."
>
> At its headquarters, in Baltimore, the N.F.B. established a committee to investigate the
> problem of quiet cars. Discussions were held with automotive regulators and auto-industry
> engineers. "Smart" solutions were proposed involving sensors, cameras, and in-cabin alerts
> that would warn an E.V.'s driver of an impending collision. The sonic plague of back-up
> beepers unleashed by Ed Peterson's mid-sixties invention, the Bac-A-Larm, has been tempered
> by back-up cameras in newer trucks and vans, which warn only the driver, and not the rest
> of the street, if someone is behind the vehicle. Couldn't E.V. alert systems work
> similarly, especially with the proliferation of sensors and cameras in the latest models?
> But the blind community strongly opposed that approach, in part because it was predicated
> on an imminent collision, rather than on preventing such incidents from occurring in the
> first place.
>
> At one meeting, an automotive engineer made a suggestion. Since maximum-noise laws for
> gas-powered automobiles already existed, why not establish a minimum-noise standard that
> E.V.s had to meet? "It was a revolutionary idea," Stein wrote.
>
> But, in order to convince Congress to consider a law requiring a minimum-noise standard,
> the N.F.B. needed data. And in the nineties and early two-thousands, with so few hybrids
> and E.V.s on the road, the number of accidents involving pedestrians, visually impaired or
> not, was statistically negligible. The N.F.B. did collect many anecdotal reports about
> close calls, and even accounts of minor injuries. "But anecdotal evidence isn't statistical
> engineering evidence," John Paré, the N.F.B.'s executive director for advocacy and policy,
> who served as the national coördinator of the campaign against quiet cars, told me.
>
> Without real-world data proving that quiet cars could be dangerous, the National Highway
> Traffic Safety Administration, the federal agency charged with reducing deaths, injuries,
> and economic losses on the nation's roadways, could do nothing. The breakthrough came later
> in the decade, when the N.H.T.S.A. investigated crash rates for hybrids and E.V.s in
> incidents involving sighted pedestrians and cyclists, and compared those with crash rates
> for I.C.E. vehicles in similar incidents. The results, which were published in a 2009
> report, based on limited data from 2000 to 2007, showed that hybrids and E.V.s were twice
> as likely as I.C.E. vehicles to be involved in accidents with pedestrians. A follow-up
> report in October, 2011, using a larger sample size, found that hybrids and E.V.s had a
> thirty-five per cent greater likelihood of accidents with pedestrians, and a fifty per cent
> greater likelihood of accidents with cyclists. Most of these incidents occurred not on the
> road but in parking lots and driveways, when a driver was reversing or turning.
>
> The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act, calling for a "sound or set of sounds for all
> vehicles of the same make and model," was passed in the last hours of the 111th Congress,
> and President Barack Obama signed it into law on January 4, 2011. The Act did not specify
> what those alerts should sound like. That question took six years for the N.H.T.S.A. to
> resolve, and resulted in three hundred and seventy-two pages of mostly numerical acoustic
> rules and parameters. What took so long?
>
> "We thought that they had to sound to some degree like cars--otherwise, the alerts won't
> provide safety," Paré told me. "Society has already been trained to know what cars sound
> like." However, he added, "it's really hard to specify what a car sounds like. How do you
> put into regulatory legal language that a car should sound like a car?"
>
> Many electrical appliances make sounds, although few are scored by famous composers. My
> family's seven-piece kitchen ensemble, for example--dishwasher, electric oven, microwave,
> refrigerator and freezer, electric kettle, and coffee maker--creates a discordant symphony
> of simple beeps, tones, and chimes of clashing frequencies and rhythms throughout the day
> to inform us when the machines have begun or completed the particular tasks they were
> designed for. An acoustic ecosystem it's not.
>
> Electric vehicles offer a vast new stage for sound designers, both inside and outside the
> vehicles. As sensors, computer vision, and cloud-based algorithms take over more and more
> of the driving, sound will become a user's primary interface with such machines. If a car
> can drive, its user won't need to look up from her book or wake from a nap unless there's
> an audible alert. Many newer cars, outfitted with semi-autonomous features that assist a
> driver in adjusting the speed or changing lanes, already make in-cabin sounds when they
> perform these actions, mainly to reassure the driver and any passengers that the vehicle is
> executing a plan, and not just randomly drifting. (In psychoacoustic research, these are
> known as "priming" sounds.) There are also more urgent collision-avoidance alerts, should a
> car's cameras or sensors detect objects close by.
>
> Nicolas Misdariis is the head of the Sound Perception and Design group at the Institute for
> Research and Coordination in Acoustics/Music (IRCAM), in Paris, a world center of
> psychoacoustic research. Since 2008, his team has worked with the Renault Group, designing
> sounds for the French automaker's lineup of electric cars, both prototypes and vehicles in
> production.
>
> IRCAM's office is next to the Pompidou Center, in Paris's Fourth Arrondissement, and as I
> walked there one day in February to visit Misdariis I kept mostly to the streets, because
> the narrow sidewalks were overflowing with pedestrians and electric-scooter riders. I
> listened to the whine of diesel-fuelled cars and the whokada-whokada of two-stroke mopeds
> behind me--engines that give European cities a different audible flavor from American urban
> environments--in order to know when to get out of the way. The only close calls I had were
> with the shareable e-bikes that Paris, like New York, has embraced since the pandemic.
> E-bikes are not legally required to emit sounds when moving--yet--although some proactively
> do.
>
> When the researchers first began working with Renault, Misdariis told me, the collaborators
> struggled to find a common language in which to talk about acoustic design. "When a graphic
> designer says to you, `This is a red triangle,' there is no different interpretation
> possible," he said. "But if you say, `I would like a warm sound'--what is a warm sound?
> What is a round sound? What is a rough sound? A green sound? What is a smiling sound? We
> know what happy music is, but what is a two-second sound that is happy?" Misdariis added,
> "It is the sound designer's job to translate high-level visual representations into sound
> parameters--this is a very tricky point of our discipline." The Renault team eventually
> developed tools for visually sketching sounds, frequencies, and modulations. "We needed
> these tools to create efficient sound design," he said.
>
> The IRCAM researchers also investigated fundamental issues such as whether E.V. sounds
> should be sonic metaphors for the noise of internal combustion, similar to a cell phone's
> synthetic bell or the reassuring paper-crumpling that indicates you've discarded a document
> on your MacBook--a form of acoustic design known as skeuomorphism. Another option was to
> use "ear-cons"--audible symbols, such as the abstract clicks a Geiger counter makes, which
> everyone recognizes as the sign of radioactivity. Misdariis's team developed and tested
> options in both categories. They discovered, he said, that "metaphors are easy to
> understand but hard to remember, whereas symbols are harder to understand but easier to
> imprint."
>
> The IRCAM team worked with Andrea Cera, an Italian music producer and composer. Cera said
> that he views the electrification of mobility as a chance to fundamentally rethink the
> chaotic acoustics of a city. He envisions an urban soundscape modelled on birdsong in
> nature, in which, instead of competing to be heard, different sounds fit into an over-all
> acoustic ecosystem. By analyzing soundscapes around the world, Cera told me, he has
> identified "these little niches where you could put a little sound so that you could be
> present without being loud. Just a tone, not a melody." The sounds he and the IRCAM team
> have designed for Renault aim to complement those niches. He added, "If the soundscape is
> very chaotic--cars, phones, horns, radios--the best way to be noticed is to be still."
>
> IRCAM's Renault sounds were, indeed, surprisingly mellow, although perhaps less like
> birdsong than like a washing machine set to the delicates cycle. The Parisian soundscape
> will surely benefit from them. But would anyone hear these élégantes French alerts in New
> York, particularly over the bedlam and blare of all the gas-powered vehicles in its
> traffic-clogged streets?
>
> An automobile powered by internal combustion makes a racket. The induction of air, its
> compression inside the piston sleeves, the explosion of the vaporized gasoline, and the
> expulsion of CO[2] exhaust ("suck, squeeze, bang, and blow," in car talk) produce loud,
> low-frequency reports, rumbles, and vibrations.
>
> At General Motors, engineers in the Noise and Vibration Center are responsible for
> fine-tuning that din. Douglas Moore, a senior expert in exterior noise at G.M., started
> working at the company in 1984, when he was still an undergraduate at Michigan State. He
> has spent all but eight years of his career with G.M., where his job, and that of his Noise
> and Vibration colleagues, has been to silence, dampen, and modulate the sounds made by
> internal combustion, depending on the brand. Traditionally, when tuning a Cadillac, Moore
> and his colleagues would try to make the engine as quiet as possible, because quiet
> signifies luxury to the classic Cadillac buyer. In tuning a Corvette, Chevrolet's "muscle
> car," on the other hand, the engineers want some of the bang-bang-bang of internal
> combustion to come through, because that conveys power to the driver.
>
> The engine's sound isn't the only thing that the engineers work on. Many prospective
> buyers' first experience of a car or a truck is the CLICK ker-CHUNK that the driver's-side
> door makes when they close it, followed by a faint harmonic shiver given off by the
> vehicle's metal skin. The door's weight, latches, and seals are carefully calibrated to
> create a psychoacoustic experience that conveys comfort, safety, and manufacturing
> expertise.
>
> In designing electric versions of popular brands, U.S. automakers have to decide whether to
> make the E.V.s mimic their gas-driven counterparts or whether, like Renault, to divert from
> the familiar sound. The Passenger Safety Enhancement Act directives allow automakers to
> craft their own branded alerts, so long as they meet certain specifications.
>
> Moore's first E.V. project was the 2012 Chevy Volt, which emitted a pedestrian alert years
> before the law required one--a vacuum-cleaner-like hum that increased in frequency as the
> car sped up. "I have new colors to paint with," Moore said. "Instead of a palette of
> internal-combustion sounds, I have a palette of AVAS sounds. But it's the same approach.
> Now, instead of generating them with the physical components of the car, which has its pros
> and cons, we're generating them electronically."
>
> Moore is also the longtime chair of a group within the Society of Automotive Engineers
> called the Light Vehicle Exterior Sound Level Standards Committee, which helps develop
> tests that regulators use to measure safety on the road in the U.S. His group led the
> investigation into developing minimum-sound standards for E.V.s and hybrids, and
> establishing parameters to govern the decibel level, pitch, and morphology of the warning
> signals. Moore once came to the N.F.B. headquarters and tried navigating in traffic when
> blindfolded. His N.F.B. instructor was impressed that the engineer could identify a 2005
> Chevrolet Camaro and a 2009 Cadillac Escalade by their distinctive engine sounds.
>
> Moore explained the S.A.E.'s relationship with federal highway-safety regulators by saying,
> "We figure out how to measure things. N.H.T.S.A. says how much." I asked Moore why the
> regulations don't require that E.V.s more closely resemble I.C.E. vehicles, since, as the
> N.F.B.'s John Paré had noted to me, we're already used to those noises. Moore replied, "The
> purpose of this sound is to provide information about what the vehicle is doing. And
> there's more than one way to provide that." He paused. "Yes, we've learned
> internal-combustion sounds over a hundred years," he continued. "But before cars were
> around we knew that the clip-clop of horses meant the wagon was coming. So, there's nothing
> inherent in those engine sounds."
>
> Lobster arguing its case as its pulled out of tank
> "But I'm one of the cool ones!"
> Cartoon by Suerynn Lee
>
> A well-designed alert reaches the people who need to hear it, without annoying those who
> don't. To thread this sonic needle, engineers can vary a particular sound's decibel level,
> which indicates the volume of air pressure that the sound waves displace, and they can also
> adjust the sound's pitch, or frequency. Both decibel level and pitch determine the
> intrusiveness of that sound. The danger is that you create a sound that cries wolf, as it
> were: it works at first, but after a while people tune it out, so you have to pump up the
> volume.
>
> Although humans are capable of hearing frequencies between twenty and twenty thousand
> hertz, we hear in "octave bands," in which the highest frequency is double the lowest one.
> (In a musical C octave, the high C is twice the frequency of the low C.) The regulations
> specify that AVAS sounds must cover four separate, nonadjacent octave bands. A so-called
> broadband sound of this type, such as the staticky squawk that Amazon delivery vans
> recently began making when reversing, is less piercing, more robust, and easier for the
> hearer to locate directionally than an alert that occupies a narrow frequency range, such
> as the back-up beepers on Con Ed trucks. Not incidentally, the nonadjacent-octave-band rule
> precludes using a musical phrase as an alert--the pitch-shifting would sound awful--as well
> as any vocal alerts, human or animal. How would the blind tell the street from the sidewalk
> if electric cars spoke or barked?
>
> By permitting automakers the latitude to brand their alerts, the N.H.T.S.A. rules have
> created a new design form: acoustic automobile styling. Pedestrians and cyclists won't just
> hear the vehicle coming; they'll know what kind of car it is. For acoustic designers, both
> the pedestrian alerts of E.V.s and their rich in-cabin menus of sonic information represent
> the dawn of a new age. "I feel fortunate that I get to work on features that will influence
> the way the world will sound," Jigar Kapadia, the creative-sound director for General
> Motors, told me.
>
> Kapadia, who studied electronics and telecommunications engineering at Mumbai University
> and has a master's in music technology from N.Y.U., collaborates with Moore and others at
> G.M.'s sound lab in Milford, Michigan. For each sound, the team comes up with about two
> hundred variations and then tests them on their colleagues in the jury room, until they
> have arrived at a few finalists they can road test on vehicles.
>
> Kapadia likens an alert-system sound to a perfume. "Just like a perfume, it unfolds," he
> told me. "The alert has a base note, a middle note, and a top note." He added, "These
> layers are amalgamated together to bring out a cohesive organic sound, or a futuristic
> sound, based on what kind of brand we are focussing on." He noted that the pedestrian alert
> on the 2023 Cadillac Lyriq, the first electric version of G.M.'s long-standing luxury car,
> was made with a didgeridoo, an ancient Australian wind instrument that is based on the
> musical interval known as a perfect fifth. However, for G.M.'s nine-thousand-pound electric
> Hummer, which recently went on sale, Kapadia said, "we wanted a more distorted sound." He
> paused, and then added, "A bold Hummer sound." The Hummer's forward-motion alert made me
> think of church, when the organist launches into the next hymn. The back-up sound is
> something like its dystopian twin.
>
> At the Ford Motor Company, in order to find out what car buyers thought electric vehicles
> should sound like, engineers and consultants conducted "customer clinics" and launched a
> Facebook campaign. Judging from the number of responses, Ford fans were keen to make their
> opinions known. My own survey, largely based on reading comments under YouTube videos of
> various branded E.V. sounds, is that most people think that E.V.s should not resemble
> I.C.E. cars. Higher frequencies are thought to signify clean energy and software-driven
> intelligence; E.V.s ought to whoosh and zoom like the flying personal vehicles of
> science-fiction films such as "The Fifth Element," "Gattaca," "Blade Runner," and, of
> course, "Star Wars." In many cases, in fact, Foley artists created those futuristic
> vehicles' sound effects from recorded I.C.E. noise. In Ridley Scott's "Blade Runner 2049,"
> the twist is that Ryan Gosling's flying vehicle sounds like a broken-down I.C.E. jalopy.
>
> Ford's Brian Schabel, a sound engineer who, like Moore at G.M., has spent his career in
> Noise and Vibration, was part of the group that worked on the Mustang Mach E, Ford's sporty
> but practical electric S.U.V. "We knew we wanted to keep some aspect of that low-frequency
> modulation and link it to the past," he told me. "And then we looked at everything out
> there. Machinery--what do people associate powerful electric motors with? Formula E
> vehicles are very high-pitched, raw-sounding. How can we blend those two pieces together?
> We didn't want something that was too `Batman' or `Blade Runner.' " Mach E's forward sound
> put me in mind of a hovering dragonfly. The back-up sound is like a broadband cricket.
>
> In creating the company's new palette, Ford collaborated with Listen, an audio-branding
> firm based in Brooklyn. One member of the Listen agency, Connor Moore (no relation to
> Douglas), is the founder of CMoore Sound, and has worked with Google on Firefly, its
> self-driving-car project, as well as with Tesla, Lucid, Uber, and other tech companies. An
> electronic musician, Moore explained that he uses the same process and production tools for
> cars that he relies on to make music, mixing synthetic tracks with recordings of physical
> objects and nature sounds.
>
> "With the F-150 Lightning," Moore said, discussing the electric model of Ford's immensely
> popular pickup, "you're thinking about the size and the scale of the car. So some of that
> means recording heavy objects: metals, stone, things that have weight. You want something
> with low-end distortion that hits you in the chest. We also worked with more organic
> elements, like wind and water sounds, and clay and wood. We really leaned on a lot of the
> organic material for the in-car alerts."
>
> I asked Moore about the possibility that, by allowing for a unique identity for each of the
> sixty major auto brands in the world, we were setting ourselves up for a sonic
> catastrophe--a cacophony of competing thrums and whirs and chimes and tones. If every car
> is emitting a unique branded alert as it passes under my bedroom window, aren't my novelty
> detectors going to go haywire? I described my street to Moore, noting that there is a
> traffic light about twenty yards away, where there are often six or eight cars waiting.
> Once the cars are all E.V.s, will I need to move to an apartment at the top of the nearby
> ninety-three-story Brooklyn Tower just to get some sleep?
>
> Moore replied, "I think with intentional-design thinking we can actually, maybe, make the
> world quieter. That's my goal." However, he added, "we could wake up in five years with
> eighty per cent E.V.s, and it's a cacophony of sound and dissonance if these cars are all
> singing different tunes, in different key signatures and pitches." Moore speculated that
> cities might one day have to designate a particular key for all the alerts made in their
> streets. (I nominate F-sharp major, the key of Jay-Z and Alicia Keys's "Empire State of
> Mind.") On second thought, Moore said, "maybe, you know, that would potentially drive
> people crazy."
>
> Then there is the question of how customizable a vehicle's alert system should be. In 2017,
> automakers petitioned the N.H.T.S.A. to be allowed to offer drivers a range of options that
> they could select from. The agency, after a public-review period, denied the request for
> safety reasons, but the issue could come up again. If Boombox, a software feature in
> Teslas, is any indication of what's on the way, it will be difficult to limit the sounds
> that drivers play through E.V.s' external speakers. Boombox, which was released in
> December, 2020, as part of a software update, allows Tesla drivers, according to its
> promotional literature, to "delight pedestrians with a variety of sounds from your
> vehicle's external speaker," including goat bleats, ice-cream-truck music, applause, and
> flatulence. In early 2022, the N.H.T.S.A. found the Boombox feature noncompliant with its
> rules. Musk called regulators the "fun police," but Tesla nonetheless issued a firmware
> update that prohibits the use of Boombox when driving, although hackers will probably find
> a way around it. Teslas can still fart when parked.
>
> Another possibility is that New York City is just too loud for the relatively civilized
> decibel levels established for the alert systems by N.H.T.S.A. regulations. Douglas Moore
> told me that "the levels are set to where a normal person would be able to hear it in a
> normal situation. It is not expected to be heard in all places"--such as construction
> zones--"at all times. Otherwise, you're in the death spiral of just cranking the levels
> up."
>
> But a death spiral could be what we get. Because, after all, what's the point of an alert
> if you can't hear it? I borrowed a Mach E not long ago, and took it for a spin around
> Brooklyn with a colleague who was planning to record the car in motion. He jumped out on
> Kent Street, in Williamsburg, and stood with his microphone as I drove past, but the Mach
> E's forward-motion alert barely registered. As a second-story sleeper, I was reassured. As
> a cyclist, not so much.
>
> Just before six the other morning, while I was still asleep, my hearing picked up a novel
> sound coming toward me: a thud-thUD-THUD, reverberating off the façade of the apartment
> building across the street, getting louder as it came closer.
>
> Was it an E.V. alert? I woke up just long enough to grasp that it was someone bouncing a
> ball down the middle of the street. After passing under my window, the THUD-THud-thud faded
> until the street was quiet again. At 6:45 a.m., the first of the garbage trucks came by. cD
>
> Published in the print edition of the August 8, 2022, issue, with the headline "On Alert."
>
> _______________________________________________
> NFBC-Info mailing list
> NFBC-Info at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for NFBC-Info:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/cweatherly101%40gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbc-at-large_nfbnet.org/attachments/20220804/6ccc1c97/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NFBC-At-Large
mailing list