[Nfbc-info] social networking website resolution
Angela fowler
fowlers at syix.com
Sat Dec 6 03:06:06 UTC 2008
Deepa Garraya authored the resolution.
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Barbour
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:40 PM
To: NFB of California List
Subject: Re: [Nfbc-info] social networking website resolution
I believe that's what the technology committee is supposed to do. That is,
evaluate if a website is "inaccessible" and if so start a dialog with the
website authors.
I believe that several people have sent feedback to facebook with no result.
Who authored the resolution? I'm afraid I've forgotten.
Jim
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 05:24:30PM -0800, Angela fowler wrote:
> Have Facebook or Myspace, to anyone's knowledge, even been approached
> about accessibility yet?
> It could be, if we build a strong case that the sites aren't
> accessible and provide practical solutions to this problem that these
> guys will work with us. In that case, legal action wouldn't be necessary.
> If they have been approached, and they have refused to work with us
> however, then maybe we should break out the law books.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Tim Elder
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: 'NFB of California List'
> Subject: Re: [Nfbc-info] social networking website resolution
>
> I agree with you Brian. And the intent of a facebook suit would also
> be to bridge the gap. However, Target, was a cutting edge decision
> that barely made it through by the skin of its teeth. The judge
> narrowly held that only those web-based services that have some
> connection to the physical store are covered by the ADA. Without this
> nexus, a judge would have to go out on a serious limb, against
> standing law to re-interpret the language of the ADA to include
> websites. Bottom line, a facebook suit is possible, but we would be
> seriously pushing our luck. A suit against facebook could be so
> radically distinguishable from Target that it would go against us. A
> bad decision in a facebook case might prevent us from nudging the
> Target logic to the next baby step. Say, applying the ADA to all
> web-based services that are even related to a physical location. A suit
against facebook would skip this step and might slam the door on pushing the
Target logic forward a bit.
>
>
> My last post was focusing on the potential success of a facebook suit,
> given no physical location whatsoever and high probability of user
> error. We really need a federal amendment to the ADA or at least some
> regs/guidelines that incorporate websites into the ADA on some level.
> I would love to see a requirement that websites with a certain traffic
> amount or sales volume be required to comply with the ADA. What a
> Washington Seminar issue that would be for next year...
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Miller
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:03 AM
> To: 'NFB of California List'
> Subject: Re: [Nfbc-info] social networking website resolution
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> I think part of the intent of the Target lawsuit was to try and
> establish the principle of online sites as facilities equivalent to
> brick and mortar stores, therefore being covered under the ADA,
> addressing the point you succinctly make below.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Tim Elder
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:06 AM
> To: 'NFB of California List'
> Subject: Re: [Nfbc-info] social networking website resolution
>
> Unlike Target.com, there is no Brick and Mortar physical Facebook
> store to link a law suit to facebook. The Target suit was only
> successful because they have physical stores which are in fact
> covered by the ADA. Without physical stores overlapping the web-based
> services, there isn't much good law to base a suit upon. So far, the
> reach of the ADA to web-only services is extremely limited.
>
> That being said, updating to the latest version of your browser
> (Internet Explorer 7, Firefox etc.)and the Flash player plug-in
> version 10 makes a big difference in accessibility of facebook. Also,
> Jim Barber mentioned on another list that m.facebook.com is another
> good alternative way to access facebook.
>
> I did have one question for the list though: For those using facebook
> with some success, I am wondering if the chat function is accessible.
> As far as I can tell, the chat function isn't usable, even though I
> can access most other functions. Jim?
>
> Tim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Lisamaria Martinez,
> NOMC
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 6:32 PM
> To: NFB of California List
> Subject: [Nfbc-info] social networking website resolution
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what we've done about the social networking website
> resolution.
>
> I have desperately tried to learn the layout of the new FaceBook, but
> I swear the page is refreshing. Plus, certain aspects of the page just
> don't read well with JAWS. for instance, JAWS will say, "---- has
> accepted your friend request." I have no idea who may have accepted my
> friend request because JAWS doesn't read it. But something is there.
>
> It is getting to be quite frustrating especially since many groups,
> organizations, etc. are on FaceBook. My high school class reunion is
> starting to organize on FaceBook and I can't access everything.
>
> If we sued Target, why aren't we suing FaceBook?
>
> LM
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbc-info mailing list
> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Nfbc-info:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/tim%40timel
> dermus
> ic.com
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.10/1810 - Release Date:
> 11/24/2008
> 2:36 PM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbc-info mailing list
> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Nfbc-info:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/brian-r-mil
> ler%40
> uiowa.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbc-info mailing list
> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Nfbc-info:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/tim%40timel
> dermus
> ic.com
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.10/1810 - Release Date:
> 11/24/2008
> 2:36 PM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbc-info mailing list
> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Nfbc-info:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/fowlers%40s
> yix.co
> m
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbc-info mailing list
> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfbc-info:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/jbarbour%40
> barcore.com
_______________________________________________
Nfbc-info mailing list
Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfbc-info:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/fowlers%40syix.co
m
More information about the NFBC-Info
mailing list