[Nfbc-info] H.R. 3765, The ADA Education and Reform Act of 2015

Wed Nov 18 02:27:26 UTC 2015

This bill is about to become law in a few days. What can the NFB do to delay
or stop its passage? This puts an undue Burdon on a singled-out class of
individuals. It also makes it harder for attorneys to represent us if the
process becomes cost-prohibitive. 

From,
Lisa Irving 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nfbc-info [mailto:nfbc-info-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Justin
Harford via Nfbc-info
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:12 PM
To: NFB of California List
Cc: Justin Harford
Subject: Re: [Nfbc-info] H.R. 3765, The ADA Education and Reform Act of 2015

It would've been on the basis that it went contrary to federal law, and the
state cannot counter federal law.

This is a proposal for a change in federal law so any state Bill would no
longer be contrary to the Fed.

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Lisa Irving via Nfbc-info
<nfbc-info at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> I believe the California ninth circuit Superior Court turn down a 
> similar motion a few years ago deeming this was unreasonable and 
> unconstitutional
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Justin Harford via Nfbc-info
<nfbc-info at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Looks like this act creates an excess of regulations for civil rights
attorneies sending demand letters, and adds an extra punishment for people
with disabilities sending such letters.
>> 
>> While the law already puts the responsibility on the victim of
discrimination to prove their case, this takes it even further, by requiring
an excessive 60-day notice., As if 30 years notice were not enough.
>> 
>> While it sounds nice that they are creating a structure at the national
level of certified access specialists, the way that it is being handled in
California, in which CASPS collude with businesses to avoid the law does not
give us much hope.  
>> 
>> The bill is supported by the national Hotel Association, representing
some of the most famous violators of the Americans With Disabilities Act,
which gives you an idea of the spirit that it comes from.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Ali Faraj via Nfbc-info
<nfbc-info at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Just a heads up in the event this interests you, you're for or against
it.
>>> 
>>> H.R.3765 -- ADA Education and Reform Act of 2015 (Introduced in 
>>> House - IH)
>>> 
>>> To amend the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to promote 
>>> compliance through education, to clarify the requirements for demand 
>>> letters, to provide for a notice and cure period before the 
>>> commencement of a private civil action, and for other purposes.
>>> 
>>> IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
>>> October 20, 2015
>>> 
>>> Mr. POE of Texas (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, and Mr. 
>>> JOLLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 
>>> A BILL
>>> 
>>> To amend the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to promote 
>>> compliance through education, to clarify the requirements for demand 
>>> letters, to provide for a notice and cure period before the 
>>> commencement of a private civil action, and for other purposes.
>>> 
>>> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
>>> United States of America in Congress assembled,
>>> 
>>> SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
>>> 
>>> This Act may be cited as the `ADA Education and Reform Act of 2015'.
>>> 
>>> SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE THROUGH EDUCATION.
>>> 
>>> Based on existing funding, the Disability Rights Section of the 
>>> Department of Justice shall, in consultation with property owners 
>>> and representatives of the disability rights community, develop a 
>>> program to educate State and local governments and property owners 
>>> on effective and efficient strategies for promoting access to public 
>>> accommodations for persons with a disability (as defined in section 
>>> 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12102)). Such 
>>> program may include training for professionals such as Certified 
>>> Access Specialists to provide a guidance of remediation for 
>>> potential violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
>>> 
>>> SEC. 3. UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE ACTS AND PRACTICES RELATING TO ADA 
>>> COMPLIANCE DEMAND LETTERS.
>>> 
>>> It shall be unlawful for any person to send or otherwise transmit a 
>>> demand letter or other form of pre-suit notification alleging a 
>>> violation of section 302 or 303 of the Americans with Disabilities 
>>> Act of 1990 (29 U.S.C. 12182; 12183) if such letter or communication 
>>> does not specify in detail the circumstances under which an 
>>> individual was actually denied access to a public accommodation, 
>>> including the address of property, the specific sections of the 
>>> Americans with Disabilities Act alleged to have been violated, 
>>> whether a request for assistance in removing an architectural 
>>> barrier to access was made, and whether the barrier to access was a 
>>> permanent or temporary barrier. Any person who violates this section 
>>> shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
>>> 
>>> SEC. 4. NOTICE AND CURE PERIOD.
>>> 
>>> Paragraph (1) of section 308(a) of the Americans with Disabilities 
>>> Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12188(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
>>> `(1) AVAILABILITY OF REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES-
>>> `(A) IN GENERAL- Subject to subparagraph (B), the remedies and 
>>> procedures set forth in section 204(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 
>>> 1964
>>> (42 U.S.C. 2000a-3(a)) are the remedies and procedures this title 
>>> provides to any person who is being subjected to discrimination on 
>>> the basis of disability in violation of this title or who has 
>>> reasonable grounds for believing that such person is about to be 
>>> subjected to discrimination in violation of section 303. Nothing in 
>>> this section shall require a person with a disability to engage in a 
>>> futile gesture if such person has actual notice that a person or 
>>> organization covered by this title does not intend to comply with its
provisions.
>>> `(B) BARRIERS TO ACCESS TO EXISTING PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS- A civil 
>>> action under section 302 or 303 based on the failure to remove an 
>>> architectural barrier to access into an existing public 
>>> accommodation may not be commenced by a person aggrieved by such 
>>> failure unless--
>>> `(i) that person has provided to the owner or operator of the 
>>> accommodation a written notice specific enough to allow such owner 
>>> or operator to identify the barrier; and
>>> `(ii)(I) during the period beginning on the date the notice is 
>>> received and ending 60 days after that date, the owner or operator 
>>> fails to provide to that person a written description outlining 
>>> improvements that will be made to remove the barrier; or
>>> `(II) if the owner or operator provides the written description 
>>> under subclause (I), the owner or operator fails to remove the 
>>> barrier or to make substantial progress in removing the barrier 
>>> during the period beginning on the date the description is provided 
>>> and ending 120 days after that date.'.
>>> 
>>> SEC. 5. MEDIATION FOR ADA ACTIONS RELATED TO ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS.
>>> 
>>> The Judicial Conference of the United States shall, under rule 16 of 
>>> the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any other applicable law, in 
>>> consultation with property owners and representatives of the 
>>> disability rights community, develop a model program to promote the 
>>> use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, including a stay 
>>> of discovery during mediation, to resolve claims of architectural 
>>> barriers to access for public accommodations. To the extent 
>>> practical, the Federal Judicial Center should provide a public 
>>> comment period on any such proposal. The goal of the model program 
>>> shall be to promote access quickly and efficiently without the need for
costly litigation.
>>> The model program should include an expedited method for determining 
>>> the relevant facts related to such barriers to access and steps 
>>> taken before the commencement of litigation to resolve any issues 
>>> related to access.
>>> 
>>> SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
>>> 
>>> This Act and the amendments made by this Act take effect 30 days 
>>> after the date of the enactment of this Act.
>>> 
>>> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c114:H.R.3765:
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Ali
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nfbc-info mailing list
>>> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfbc-info:
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/blindstein%40
>>> gmail.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nfbc-info mailing list
>> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfbc-info:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/peacefulwoman8
>> 9%40cox.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbc-info mailing list
> Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfbc-info:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/blindstein%40gm
> ail.com

_______________________________________________
Nfbc-info mailing list
Nfbc-info at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Nfbc-info:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbc-info_nfbnet.org/peacefulwoman89%40cox
.net