[nfbcs] FW: your advice would be appreciatedFW: [List] Handling

Wed Jun 26 02:07:49 UTC 2013

Hm... My overall sense is that the prof is a bit out of line and that 
the main concern is with having to make the exams, etc., accessible. It 
sounds like this is a required course for the degree, though.

The student would need sighted assistance for the photo work and for 
devising color schemes, and maybe to check layout. But most of that is 
so mathematical that it can be done novisually with a text editor. I 
miss Dreamweaver, but web design can be done without it! If you 
understand the DOM and the box model, you can do the math and use good 
coding practices, and there you have it. You'll want to have someone 
give it a visual check, true. A lot of sighted professional designers I 
know have someone check their designs over before going live, too. It's 
just a good idea after you've been working on something too long. /smile/

It could be of benefit to the student to learn how the purely graphical 
facets of web design work and the principles involved there. Even some 
work with photos is mathematical, although I wouldn't want to just put a 
photo I've processed up on the web without having a sighted person look 
it over first! /lol/

I can't help seeing the arguments about the specific software as somehow 
specious. It does sound like there has been an issue with that teacher 
and student before on that score. If the purpose of the class is web 
design and maintenance, then the principles are what is important, not 
the exact tools.

Tami

On 06/25/2013 05:43 AM, Gary Wunder wrote:
> Folks, can you help me in helping a student who wants to know if it is
> realistic for him to take a class in computer design?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary ellen [mailto:gabias at telus.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 2:25 PM
> To: Wunder, Gary
> Subject: your advice would be appreciatedFW: [List] Handling
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> I just received the following correspondence from and about a student who is
> part of CFB.  I don't know enough about the specific issues to answer him.
> This strikes me as one more example of us playing catch up with software
> that isn't accessible in any meaningful way.  Is he right to drop the
> course, or is the teacher being a grump?  Are there alternative ways to
> demonstrate proficiency with the concepts but using different software as
> Eric suggests?  The teacher says "My main concern is that this is a design
> course, and as such it is a highly visual course. Some of the concerns I
> have are documented in my earlier e-mail - in addition to that, there is a
> module on creating Flash Video in the course and I am pretty sure that this
> will be problematic, and I am not sure how Karl-Erik will be able to perform
> tasks such as using an eyedropper tool to sample colours from an image when
> developing a colour scheme for a website.."  Is that correct, or is it an
> example of a sighted person believing lots of things are too visual for us
> to grasp.  Would working with a reader help?  So many blind people don't
> even consider that option these days.
>
> Sorry to hit you with these questions so close to convention.  I'd say leave
> it until afterw Orlando, but then you have the Convention Roundup to write.
>
>
> I thought you did a masterful job with the sad Oklahoma story.  Mike's a
> very bright guy who cares a lot!  It's a shame that he self-destructed.  The
> entire June issue was good, as is true with the Monitor generally.
>
> Mary Ellen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karl-erik at Sonvisen.com [mailto:karl-erik at Sonvisen.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 11:16 AM
> To: list at cfb.ca
> Subject: [List] Handling
>
>
> As of May,  I'm enrolled this fall for a full course load, and while sorting
> out textbooks, a teacher whom I've had before, emails the school's
> disability resource center concerning their course's accessibility. To
> summarize, this was one of the last lines in the email:
>
> Quote
> : "I don't want to be faced with the highly time-consuming task of
> recreating course materials and exams for a single use."
> Unquote
>
> This is perhaps the most insulting thing I've ever heard, to me as a
> disabled person, to all students, and to the school itself.
>
> The crux of the matter is that the course is a web design and maintenance
> course using specific and very expensive software to achieve results that
> I've known how to do since middle school using notepad. However, because of
> the specific programs used, I'm not able to challenge the course without the
> unfair disadvantage of not knowing those programs, even though I know how to
> achieve the desired results perhaps/probably better than the other students.
>
> I understand this is a highly visual course, however, I'm not the one who
> decided to make it mandatory for their bachelor program, and I'm not the one
> who put it together using ninaccessible software. regardless, I will likely
> end up seeking an alternative course simply to avoid this teacher.
>
> Anyways, I'd like to know if anyone has any other suggestions on handling
> this? I've attached the teacher's previous emails for your perusal.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Karl-Erik
>
> Most recent email:
>
> No I have no objection to you copying my e-mail and sending it to Karl-Erik.
>
> He took another course from me earlier (BUS 141), but this was a much less
> visual course and this still seemed to present some problems for him.
> Also, we had to rewrite all of our exams in BUS 140 as the screen reader was
> unable to work with the Flash based simulations in MyITLab, which was very
> time consuming for us as they were only used the one-time.
>
> My main concern is that this is a design course, and as such it is a highly
> visual course. Some of the concerns I have are documented in my earlier
> e-mail - in addition to that, there is a module on creating Flash Video in
> the course and I am pretty sure that this will be problematic, and I am not
> sure how Karl-Erik will be able to perform tasks such as using an eyedropper
> tool to sample colours from an image when developing a colour scheme for a
> website..
>
> In addition to my concerns about the highly visual nature of a design
> course, there is also the issue of the Adobe Creative Suite software. We
> have a limited set of licenses which are all in use in our dedicated lab as
> the licenses are very expensive. The issue will be with exams for which we
> cannot supply a license for DRC, or for Karl-Eric's personal use. We use
> Adobe CS6 - I am not sure if this is available anymore as Adobe has replaced
> it with a cloud based version (CS7) for which you have to pay a monthly fee.
> We are staying with CS6 as we already have the licenses for it, but I am
> unsure as to Adobe's policy about selling CS 6 - I know that you cannot buy
> earlier versions of software from Microsoft for example. We also use a very
> old version of ExamView for course quizzes and for part of the final exam
> and I don't know if the screen reader software is capable of reading the
> question and answer choices from this tool.
>
> While I fully support the work that DRC does to help students, and fully
> support DRC students in my courses, I am very anxious about having a blind
> student in a design course that relies so heavily on the visual aspects of
> design, and I don't want to be faced with the highly time-consuming task of
> recreating course materials and exams for a single use.
>
> It is for these reasons that I am wondering if another course would be a
> more suitable choice for someone with Karl-Eric's specific disability.
> End most recent email.
>
> Start first email, (sent to a DRC Counsellor):
>
> I wanted to check in with you before I answer Karl regarding the textbook
> and software as I am wondering if a website design course is an appropriate
> course for a blind student to take. The issue is that much of this course is
> visual - we use graphic design software (Photoshop) to process photographs
> (cropping, colour contrast, contrast and brightness, levels, and sharpening
> for example), and we use Fireworks to develop website banners, buttons, and
> filler graphics. These are all highly visual tasks. In addition, we use CSS
> for page layout (Dreamweaver), and students must be able to see if they have
> "column-drops" and other broken layout issues. I am not sure that screen
> reader software is capable of supporting these tasks in the web design
> environment.
>
> End first email.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> List at box334.bluehost.com
> http://box334.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/list_cfb.ca
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfbcs mailing list
> nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/tami%40poodlemutt.com
>