[NFBCS] Grammarly accessibility (or something similar)?

[Littlefield, Tyler]

I have a decent twitter following, I tweeted at them and it's getting 
shares and attention; hopefully I'll get something of a response.
Office grammar check isn't terrible, but Grammarly caught a lot of 
things office doesn't seem to; the only reason I know is because while I 
had it installed, I was getting emails with my most common grammar mistakes.
Thanks,

On 4/6/2020 10:11 AM, Gary Wunder via NFBCS wrote:
> I thought about Grammarly, but they had little interest in pursuing
> acc3essibility with me. Many of the reviews suggest that Office has as good
> a checker as they do.
>
> Write off list if you want to discuss.
> gwunder at earthlink.net
>   
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Littlefield, Tyler via
> NFBCS
> Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2020 6:05 PM
> To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List <nfbcs at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Littlefield, Tyler <tyler at tysdomain.com>
> Subject: [NFBCS] grammarly accessibility (or something similar)?
>
> All:
>
> I would like to begin writing a bit more seriously. I've seen tools like
> grammarly, and I would be happy to pay for the pro version and the extra
> checks at this point, but I'm not really seeing how it is accessible at
> all with JAWS. Has anyone had any luck/experience? If not, are there
> other accessible alternatives?
>
> Thanks,
>

-- 

Take Care,
Tyler Littlefield (he/him/his)

Tyler Littlefield Consulting: website development and business 
solutions. <http://tylerlittlefield.me> My personal site 
<http://tysdomain.com> My Linkedin 
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/ty-lerlittlefield> @Sorressean on Twitter 
<http://twitter.com/sorressean>