[NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

Fri Jun 26 00:40:43 UTC 2026

Hi John,

I gave this task to an LLM-based research agent that I’ve been working on, and here’s the result. Let me know if this is in line with your recollection.

1. Executive Summary

John's recollection of the Metec "braille screen" is confirmed as accurate. The device — officially named TAWIS (Taktile Windows) — was a real, pioneering full-page refreshable braille display developed by Friedrich Lüthi at Metec AG in Stuttgart, Germany. It used 7,200 electro-mechanically actuated pins in a 120×60 matrix, could display both braille text and tactile graphics, was physically massive, and only 2–3 units were ever produced.

Eleven sources were identified and analyzed, ranging from an eyewitness email and a YouTube video to a German government research report (BMBF grant 16SV1667/1668) archived at the TIB — German National Library of Science and Technology. The BrailleDis report (2008) confirms continued TAWIS software development and documents a modular 10-dot braille module with piezo actuators, capacitive touch sensors, and MID (Molded Interconnected Device) technology. [1]–[11]

2. The Company: Metec AG

Metec Ingenieur GmbH was founded in 1974 in Stuttgart, Germany by Mr. Schaefer, commercializing the first small electromagnetic braille cell invented at the University of Stuttgart's Institute of Design and Production in Precision Engineering. The company transitioned to piezo actuator technology in 1987 and became Metec Ingenieur AG in 1998. It is still active at Hasenbergstraße 31 in Stuttgart, employs ~20 people, and holds ~55% of the global market share for braille actuator cells. [2][5][10]

Company Milestones

Year

Event

1974

Founded in Stuttgart; technology from Stuttgart University [2][5]

1975

First pocket calculators with braille readout [2][5]

1982

First electronic single-line braille displays [2]

1987

Piezo actuator technology introduced [2]

1998

Converted to Metec Ingenieur AG [2]

3. The Device: TAWIS

The TAWIS (Taktile Windows) was developed by Friedrich Lüthi at Metec AG based on a pin matrix originally designed in 1985. [3][8]

Technical Specifications

Parameter

Value

Pin matrix

120 pins wide × 60 pins tall = 7,200 pins [3][4][9]

Pin spacing

2.5 mm (standard braille pitch) [3]

Actuation

Electro-magnetic (individual solenoid pins) [4]

Braille cells (6-dot)

~60 cells wide × 20 rows = 1,200 cells [4]

Display type

Braille text + tactile graphics simultaneously [3]

Physical size

"Massive" — desktop/lab form factor [1]

Entity Relationship Graph

The diagram below visualizes 11 entities and their documented relationships. The central subject is Metec AG, the company that designed and built the TAWIS.

Entity Graph: Metec AG (center) developed the TAWIS; Friedrich Lüthi was lead developer; BMBF funded the BrailleDis project; Angaris GmbH was terminated as subcontractor. John (NFBCS poster) is the sole known eyewitness. [1]–[11]

4. The BrailleDis Project (2004–2008)

A BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) funded project, BrailleDis (grants 16SV1667 / 16SV1668), ran from 2004–2008 as a joint venture between Metec Ingenieur AG and Blista-Brailletec gGmbH, Marburg. Its final report (14 pages) was discovered at the TIB — German National Library of Science and Technology. [11]

Key Revelations

TAWIS software continued: Section 2.1.7 of the report confirms the TAWIS (Taktile Windows) software was further developed and adapted to contemporary Windows versions. It could display icons, program windows, contours, and line graphics with direct touch input. [9][11]

Modular 10-dot braille module: A 5×12.5 mm (2×5 dot) module using piezo bending actuators with a wedge gear, MID (Molded Interconnected Device) housing, integrated capacitive touch sensors, and a 200V high-voltage driver chip from IMS Stuttgart. [8][11]

Planned demonstrator: 48 modules = 32×15 = 480 dots; tactile area 37.5×120 mm. [11]

Subcontractor failure: Angaris GmbH (data bus specialist) was terminated and taken to court. Partial payments recovered. Metec hired an in-house developer. [10][11]

BrailleDis Module Specifications

Component

Detail

Module size

5 × 12.5 mm per module (2 × 5 dots) — tiles seamlessly [11]

Actuator

Piezo bending element + wedge gear (converts lateral to vertical motion) [11]

Actuator voltage

+200 V — custom IMS Stuttgart 10-channel HV driver chip [11]

Housing

MID (Molded Interconnected Device) — circuitry laser-etched onto LCP plastic [11]

Touch sensor

Capacitive; finger position tracking + double-click detection [11]

Bus

Serial daisy-chain per row; common USB data bus to host [11]

5. Timeline

The timeline below shows 11 key events from the founding of Metec in 1974 through the opening of this investigation in June 2026.

Timeline (tabular)

Year

Event

1974

Metec Ingenieur GmbH founded [2][5]

1975

First braille pocket calculators [2][5]

1982

First electronic braille lines [2]

1985

TAWIS pin matrix designed (120 × 60 pins) [3][8]

1987

Piezo actuator technology introduced [2]

~1990

TAWIS seen at University of Stuttgart by John [1]

1998

Metec becomes an AG [2]

2004

BrailleDis BMBF-funded project launches [11]

2005

Angaris contract terminated; Metec takes over in-house [11]

2008-02-26

BrailleDis final report submitted [11]

2008-04-12

TAWIS video uploaded to YouTube [4]

6. Resolved Contradictions

C1: Display Dimensions (80×25 vs. 120×60)

John recalls 80 braille characters × 25 rows (12,000 pins). The documented spec is 120 × 60 = 7,200 pins (~60 cells × 20 rows). Likely explanations: (a) 80×25 is a standard terminal size (VT100) — John may have associated the format after 30+ years; (b) the device may have scrolled; (c) different pin-to-cell mapping. Resolution: partial — device existence confirmed; 120×60 pins is the verified spec. [1][3][4]

C2: "Braille Screen" Terminology

John's "braille screen" vs. Metec's "Braille lines"/"graphic displays"/"pin-matrix device." Resolution: terminology evolution in the early 1990s — not a real contradiction. [1][3]

C3: Electromagnetic vs. Piezo

Metec introduced piezo in 1987; TAWIS used electromagnetic pins. Resolution: different product lines used different technologies. The TAWIS was designed independently of the piezo transition and retained the older electromagnetic approach. [2][4][6]

7. Open Leads

Lead

Priority

Next Step

YouTube TAWIS video analysis

High

Frame-by-frame for cell count/dimensions

Contact Metec AG directly

High

Inquiry to contact at metec-ag.de for records

Univ. Stuttgart archives

Medium

Search library & repository for Metec pubs

NFB Braille Monitor article

Medium

Retrieve full text (behind Cloudflare)

Patents by Lüthi / Metec

Medium

Search EU/US patent databases

Contact John (NFBCS poster)

Low

Reply to thread, ask for more details

BrailleDis PDF figures

Complete

4 figures show module design; text extracted

Reverso Context snippet

Low

Retrieve full page via alternative means

8. Source Reference List

Reference

Type

Description

Credibility

[1] NFBCS Mailing List Post (2026-06-25)

Email

Eyewitness account by "John". 80×25 braille, ~2-3 units, Stuttgart Univ. lab.

Medium

[2] Metec AG Company History Page

Webpage

metec-ag.de — Official timeline: founded 1974, calculators 1975, piezo 1987.

High

[3] HyperBraille Project Page (Wayback)

Webpage

TAWIS name confirmed, 1985 pin matrix, Lüthi as developer.

High

[4] YouTube: "Tawis on pin-matrix device"

Video

youtube.com/watch?v=z0fktwCPjjc — 120×60 electro-magnetic pins.

High

[5] BioRegio STERN Database

Database

bioregio-stern.de — Founded 1974, braille calculators 1975.

High

[6] ScienceDirect Article (2008)

Academic

Schaefer started Metec, piezo Braille display in late-1980s.

Medium

[7] NFB Braille Monitor (Jan 2000)

Publication

nfb.org — Schaefer and Metec history, early mechanical displays.

High

[8] stiftung-barrierefrei-kommunizieren.de

Database

German: "1985 erste Phase der Stiftplatte als TAWIS entwickelt."

Medium

[9] ResearchGate BrailleDis 9000 Figure

Academic

researchgate.net — "120 times 60 piezo actuated pins."

Medium

[10] ItactI Consortium Profile

Webpage

smarttec.co.uk — Metec ~55% global braille actuator market share.

Medium

[11] BrailleDis BMBF Final Report (2008)

Government

edocs.tib.eu — 14 pages, BMBF-funded, modular braille module, TAWIS SW.

High

9. Conclusion

John's memory of the Metec "braille screen" is confirmed as accurate. The device — officially the TAWIS (Taktile Windows) — was a real, pioneering full-page refreshable braille display built by Metec AG in Stuttgart. It used 7,200 electro-mechanically actuated pins in a 120×60 matrix, could display braille text and tactile graphics, was massive in size, and only 2–3 units were ever produced.

The primary surviving documentation is a YouTube video, a Wayback Machine archive of the HyperBraille project page, a single German assistive technology database entry, and a BMBF project final report from the German National Library of Science and Technology. The device is effectively invisible to web search without knowing the internal project name: "TAWIS."

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of John Gardner via NFBCS
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2026 5:06 PM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List <nfbcs at nfbnet.org>
Cc: John Gardner <john.gardner at viewplus.com>
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

The company Metec of Stuttgart, Germany, did manufacture a “braille screen”, 80 braille characters wide x 25 6-dot braille characters high. I saw one in Stuttgart in a University of Stuttgart lab, and it was indeed massive. This was some time in the early 1990’s. Metec sold only two or three of these, but I do not remember the price. I did a quick Google search and could find no mention of this device, but I am sure I did not dream it. 

John

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of dandrews920--- via NFBCS
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2026 8:22 AM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List' <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: dandrews920 at comcast.net <mailto:dandrews920 at comcast.net> 
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

There is not currently a 25 line by 40 cell display on the market. It would be huge, and expensive, and unless some very inexpensive technology is developed, we will probably never see one!

Dave

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Peter via NFBCS
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2026 7:02 PM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List' <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: Peter <pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com <mailto:pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com> >
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

Hello David and everyone,

It’s designed for a very specific purpose displaying graphics. Even the Monarch isn’t something you would want to carry around wherever you go. We had the chance to see the Monarch last April. The lack of 25 lines of Braille with 40 cells per line makes it a non-starter with us.

Peter Donahue

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of dandrews920--- via NFBCS
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2026 3:40 PM
To: 'NFB sin Computer Science Mailing List' <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: dandrews920 at comcast.net <mailto:dandrews920 at comcast.net> 
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

I do not remember, off the top of my head how many lines it will display, but it certainly isn’t sixty.  That would be massive, several feet tall, at least.

Dave

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Peter via NFBCS
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2026 10:36 PM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List' <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: Peter <pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com <mailto:pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com> >
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

Good evening everyone,

The Graphiti has 60 lines and a massive fundraising challenge for anyone wanting to buy one free and clear.

Peter Donahue

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Elijah Massey via NFBCS
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2026 7:07 PM
To: nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> 
Cc: Elijah Massey <emassey0135 at gmail.com <mailto:emassey0135 at gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

I think the biggest Braille display you can buy is the Canute, which has 9 lines of 40 cells (360 cells total). The Monarch has 10 lines of 32 cells (320 cells). The Monarch is more expensive, but refreshes much faster and also does tactile graphics which the Canute does not.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 23, 2026, at 18:55, Amanda Lacy via NFBCS <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> > wrote:

The Graphiti has terrible Braille! The pins are spaced way too far apart. It also doesn't come with protective membranes or even so much as a case, and the pins frequently get stuck so you can expect to send it to Orbit for repairs frequently. It works okay for displaying graphics but if you want a Braille display it's a waste of money.

 on it.

On Jun 23, 2026, at 6:39 PM, Peter via NFBCS <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> > wrote:

Good evening everyone,

Nothing but a 40-cell Braille display with at least 25 lines of Braille will do for us. This alone makes the Braille Note Evolve a non-starter for consideration. It’s a 40-cell line with at least 25 lines of Braille or we go elseware. The Graphiti from Orbit Research meets these criteria and more. Now to raise the funds to buy one without involving rehab.

Peter Donahue

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Elijah Massey via NFBCS
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2026 3:48 PM
To: snfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:snfbcs at nfbnet.org> 
Cc: Elijah Massey <emassey0135 at gmail.com <mailto:emassey0135 at gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] FW: Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

I listened to the review, and I still think the Evolve is a good device even with the trade-offs. Maybe the best thing to say about it is what Jonathan Mosen said, that the Evolve doesn't really fit the BrailleNote brand. KeySoft on the Evolve is a collection of things trying to make Windows more efficient to use rather than a standalone application suite, and I agree that this means that there are some groups of users, like young children or people new to computers, that this makes the Evolve less good for.

However, if I got the Evolve, I wouldn't get it for KeySoft, because I can just install JAWS and Leasey and get the virtual ribbons in Office, a main menu for launching applications, and everything else that KeySoft has and far more, such as a simple word processor, notes manager, and media center designed to be efficient to use by the blind.

I would get it because it combines a full Windows computer and a Braille display into a small form factor, with a Perkins keyboard instead of QWERTY allowing it to be smaller, and it has things like the modifier keys and the Braille IME that make Windows easier to use and more seamless with Braille input. For things like small class desks, or if you want a Windows computer with Braille that you can quickly set up and easily carry around, or if you want to use it on a bus or plane, I think it is much more convenient than a Windows laptop plus a Braille display, especially since on laptops the trackpad in between makes it less efficient to switch between typing on the QWERTY keyboard and reading from the Braille display. Performing Windows and screen reader commands are also the main thing preventing me from just using the Perkins keyboard alone to control Windows.

Its true that the battery life is a big disadvantage though. I wonder if anything can be done to make that longer or what's causing that. The Braille editor not having a find feature is definitely a serious and strange omission, especially since it should be easy to add. I'm not that bothered about there being no Braille terminal yet though, because they plan to add it soon after release. I am not that bothered by the processor either, although I do wish it was a newer generation and could be upgraded. The lack of upgradability is probably the main concern, but I think the Intel Ultra 5 125U will perform most tasks I would want to do on it very responsively. I did notice the long response times when launching the main menu and sometimes other KeySoft applications, but honestly I doubt that this is because of the processor. I think its probably because these applications were either poorly designed or not optimized well. This processor has very similar Geekbench scores to a MacBook Neo, and many people have reported that the MacBook Neo is very responsive and can do almost everything people want to do on it very well. I have a MacBook Neo myself, and while I wouldn't use it for heavy tasks like compilation or gaming inside a virtual machine or things like that, I have been able to do all the productivity tasks I've tried with high responsiveness, like editing documents, browsing the web, email, etc. I can even run a Windows VM and multi-task between Windows and Mac programs and everything still runs well, and when it doesn't, I think the main issue is RAM, not CPU, and the Evolve has 32 GB of RAM. The BT Speak and BT Braille also do not have a Braille terminal, although they should be getting one soon as well, and its a feature that makes a Braille device like this significantly more useful but its not its main purpose or the main thing I would get it for.

I agree the BT Braille is a very good device though. I have one and I really like both the Blazie mode programs like the editor and the ability to use Linux desktop programs and the Linux terminal. But if I get the Evolve I would use them both for different things, because they're good at different things. For example, while the BT Braille has Libre Office, its not very good for reviewing PowerPoint presentations or editing complex documents with tables and math and things like that, but the BT Braille is much better for editing text or Braille documents very efficiently and quickly, with no lag or issues to work around like I sometimes encounter in Microsoft Office. What they can do overlap a lot but I think there's still a lot that each does the best.

But most of all I'm glad that we're finally getting notetakers that run full mainstream operating systems and don't restrict the apps you can install. At least we don't have to choose between either a laptop plus a Braille display, or something much more portable and convenient but that you can't customize or install anything on. And at least we finally have an alternative to Android for this, hopefully meaning it won't stop getting updates and get really slow and pretty much useless like my BrailleNote Touch did. And we have two, the BT Braille for Linux, and the BrailleNote Evolve for Windows, each with their own advantages. The BrailleSense 7 might be good to try out too because it runs a very modern version of Android and has the longest battery life out of all three, so I'm going to try it out during convention and see what I think of it. But I already know that there are a lot of things I couldn't do on it that I could do with the BT Braille or BrailleNote Evolve.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 23, 2026, at 14:50, dan TeVelde via NFBCS <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> > wrote:

This sounds harsh but I was underwhelmed by this product. It’s expensive and yet one more example of adding a proprietary interface onto a device which is supposed to be what a vendor calls a mainstream device. I couldn’t believe that the Braille editor doesn’t have a find command. I’m more excited about the BT Braille. It’s cheaper. I know there is a learning curve with Linux but the device has the familiar Blazie interface which I have missed since the demise of the Braille Lite.

Dan

From: Joe Orozco <jsorozco at gmail.com <mailto:jsorozco at gmail.com> > 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 12:07 PM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: dan.tevelde at comcast.net <mailto:dan.tevelde at comcast.net> 
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] FW: Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

I was finally able to listen to Jonathan’s review in its entirety. Sadly, or fortunately, it discouraged me from making the purchase.

I’m glad Jonathan did the math for us. Too often I have felt as though consumer groups have given companies a pass because the market is too small, the research and development is too expensive, and so on. Yet, if the company’s market really is the educational sector, this should be fleshed out in their marketing. The $6,000 plus price tag feels a little startling even for the educational sector, but I understand this is the way of the world.

I thought I might wait for the QWERTY model. Yet, changing the keyboard doesn’t seem like it will have a profound change on the core experience.

I’m a little bummed. I really was hoping to approach the product as an all-in-one experience. I’ll still check it out on the exhibit floor, and compliments to Humanware for taking a substantial run at blending the notetaker with a mainstream concept. I hope it is the beginning of a new trend.

And thanks to Jonathan for the thorough and honest assessment. It’s good to know we have someone at the helm who can recognize the wonderful things that come of our partnership with the corporate sector but still be able to step back and offer an unbiased assessment. This ultimately benefits the end customer who is not relying on government funds to make the investment. At north of 6K, it is indeed a steep investment.

Very appreciative,

Joe

On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 2:05 PM dan TeVelde via NFBCS <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> > wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

I thought your review was comprehensive and you raised some issues I hadn’t thought of. I won’t be getting this device. You noted several things which resonated with me. I have a QBraille and agree with you that it was an innovative device. I stopped using it when I ran into issues with windows 11 and needed a Mantis to do programming. My main concern with the QBraille was its unreliable Bluetooth connections. I think Selvas technical support has suffered recently. In one of their webinars I asked them if they were going to keep the QBraille updated and they were dismissive even when I pointed out that its hybrid interface was worth keeping. I explained how I liked to use it and not need to depend on a screenreader. I found the presence of Windows modifier keys helpful except when I needed to execute complicated JAWS and NVDA commands. I tried using the Windows sticky keys feature but that didn’t work. I think these shortcomings could have been addressed in a new product. Instead, Selvas introduced a Braille display with a stupid name and was a basic copy of the Brailliant with some other features.

When my Braille Sense U2 Mini became obsolete and stopped working I bought a Brailliant 20. I didn’t want a full-fledged notetaker and thought that the Humanware hybrid approach would be sufficient for my needs. Initially I was very satisfied with the device and found connecting it to iOS devices to be easy. I was disappointed with the Victor Reader app and the fact that there are file size limitations even for BRF files. The latest Humanware software update has made things worse. People complained about an issue where in the Victor Reader app where the process of selecting recently read books was slow. Humanware addressed that issue in one of their software updates but then the issue resurfaced with last year’s latest update. I think the processor and amount of RAM might not be sufficient. The user can’t open multiple files in the same application which I would think would be an important requirement for a device. I was astounded to learn that the BrailleNote Evolve doesn’t have a find function for BRF files. How could Humanware have left such an important feature out of the initial implementation. It boggles my mind.

I think we are at a dead end with most notetakers. It seems like Humanware and Sellvas are doing more of the same things with newer generations of hardware and software. I heard a demonstration of the Braille Sense 7 and wasn’t impressed. The only new product which excites me is the BT Braille. I think the Blazie family is listening closely to customers and offering features which have never been available before. Yes, the Linux environment is new to some people but the amount of available hard drive storage is impressive. I will probably buy the BT Braille once the product matures a bit. the Blazie family has worked closely with the National Federation of the Blind and I think the organization deserves a lot of credit for getting the initial notetaker concept off the ground. Jonathan’s product reviews are more useful than just attending a webinar where company representatives tell you about their products. All too often, company representatives tell people what they want them to hear.

I know my e-mail is harsh but I think in this day and age consumers need to do their homework and not take products at face value. I have made that mistake before.

Dan

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Mosen, Jonathan via NFBCS
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2026 10:15 AM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: Mosen, Jonathan <jmosen at nfb.org <mailto:jmosen at nfb.org> >
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] FW: Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

Hello Joe, yes, I have two months’ hands-on experience with BrailleNote Evolve. I will not restate the findings of the review, which is comprehensive.

If you are going to use it for coding, you may wish to, as you say, either connect a qwerty keyboard, or use computer Braille, which has fewer potential ambiguities.

There is more to this question than writing the code though. The three-year-old processor in the device may have a bearing on whether it will meet your needs. You will find outcomes to be speedier for many use cases if you use something like a Mantis Q40 to connect to a computer with a more powerful CPU.

The Mantis Q40 offers local basic note taking without having to buy anything else, which BrailleNote Evolve does not unless you count the BRF editor which has no find function.

Jonathan Mosen
Executive Director for Accessibility Excellence
National Federation of the Blind 
410-659-9314 ex 2233   
 <mailto:jmosen at nfb.org> jmosen at nfb.org

Reminder: Attend  <https://nfb.org/convention> National Convention, July 3-8, 2026, in Austin, Texas.
“It’s the time of year where blind people are the majority.”

 <https://nfb.org/> <image001.jpg>

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Joe Orozco via NFBCS
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2026 10:37 AM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List' <nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >
Cc: Joe Orozco <jsorozco at gmail.com <mailto:jsorozco at gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: [NFBCS] FW: Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

Does anyone here have hands-on experience with the device? I was tempted by the Perkins model but have hesitated based on unconfirmed reports that things were still buggy. That is, of course, to be expected, not a reflection on the device itself, but for things like coding, I wonder if it makes more sense to wait for the QWERTY model. Yes, you can currently connect a QWERTY keyboard to it now, but I’d really like to reduce the number of devices I carry around.

Anyway, just some questions for anyone with firsthand experience.

Actually, if anyone can speak to the Mantis Q40 and whether this would be a more viable and more affordable alternative, that would be great information as well.

Joe

From: NFBCS <nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> > On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson via NFBCS
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2026 9:33 AM
To: nfbcs at nfbnet.org <mailto:nfbcs at nfbnet.org> 
Cc: Steve Jacobson <steve.jacobson at outlook.com <mailto:steve.jacobson at outlook.com> >
Subject: [NFBCS] FW: Access On: The BrailleNote Evolve from HumanWare

This week's Access On features a comprehensive review and demonstration of BrailleNote Evolve, the latest generation of BrailleNote from HumanWare running Windows 11 Pro. here are the segments in the episode, which you can skip to using the chapter feature of your podcast player or app. Looking ahead to our gaming Access On webinar 0:00:00 What is BrailleNote Evolve 0:02:13 The evolution that led to BrailleNote Evolve 0:06:11 BrailleNote Evolve with JAWS 0:12:22 Hardware 0:15:25 Dimensions and portability 0:24:38 The keyboard 0:28:13 Setup 0:33:02 Starting, and the Main Menu 0:34:44 Testing the microphones 0:40:01 Word, BrailleNote Evolve, and NVDA 0:42:47 Options 0:58:18 Braille Editor 1:10:14 Victor Reader 1:11:54 File Manager 1:16:41 No Braille Terminal 1:18:16 Final thoughts 1:19:45 Andrew Flatres and Rachel Ramos from HumanWare 1:31:18 Closing and contact info 2:02:08 

Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/access-on/id1777481188?i=1000773156189

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/attachments/20260625/baa2554d/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 64833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/attachments/20260625/baa2554d/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 58291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/attachments/20260625/baa2554d/attachment-0003.png>