[Nfbf-l] Frantic GOP fringe turns back on Bob Dole and the Persons with Disabilities convention!
Alan Dicey
adicey at bellsouth.net
Mon Dec 10 16:18:59 UTC 2012
Editorial from USA Today
Frantic GOP fringe turns back on Bob Dole and the Persons with Disabilities
convention.
Dole, a former party leader and a disabled veteran, tried to champion the
treaty in the Senate. The opponents persuaded 38 Republican senators to vote
no, enough to deprive the pact of the two-thirds needed for ratification. By
walking away from the treaty, the U.S. loses a chance to champion the
principles of non-discrimination overseas.
Last week, when the Senate rejected a United Nations treaty banning
discrimination against the disabled, the vote received relatively little
attention. And why would it? The United States already has laws that prevent
such bias. They've made curb cuts and wheelchair ramps common sights across
America.
But the Senate's failure to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities was nevertheless remarkable - for what it said
about the state of domestic politics. Despite GOP efforts to recalibrate
after last month's election losses, the treaty vote reflected the continuing
influence of a fringe that gets frantic about anything involving the United
Nations.
If that sounds unduly harsh, consider the treaty's history. It sprang from
an effort to promote worldwide adoption of the values of equality and
non-discrimination pioneered by Americans.
One of the treaty's biggest backers is Bob Dole, the former Senate
Republican leader, former party chairman and 1996 GOP nominee for
president - not to mention a disabled World War II veteran. When Dole, 89,
came to the Senate for last week's vote, he was received politely but kept
at considerable distance.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., another distinguished combat veteran and
presidential candidate, is also a big supporter, as are a host of military
and veterans organizations. Not long ago, the treaty would have passed
easily amid lots of self- congratulations.
But too many in today's GOP have turned their backs on the party's past and
embraced concocted scenarios of U.N. bureaucrats telling Americans how to
lead their lives and structure their laws. The opponents persuaded 38
Republican senators to vote no, enough to deprive the pact of the two-thirds
needed for ratification.
Supporters are vowing to try again next year in the new Senate, but the
failure leaves the United States in an odd position. Since 1990, the
Americans with Disabilities Act (or ADA) has barred discrimination against
the disabled and afforded greater access to buildings and public facilities.
Now that a movement is spreading for similar laws worldwide, the current
Senate has conspicuously declined to give its endorsement.
To be sure, the U.N. is hardly the most efficient or effective organization.
It is ponderous, politicized and easily distracted by petty squabbles. But
it has no interest in micromanaging U.S. laws or telling Americans how to
parent their disabled children, as critics charge. And if it did, it would
have no success because it has no tools to pose a threat, nor cause to act
because the U.S is the world leader in rights of the disabled. Those who
hold the treaty up as some kind of threat are seeing boogeymen.
A more interesting question is how U.S. courts would interpret the treaty.
While the ADA is much more detailed, a close reading of the treaty shows a
few areas that could be seen as going further. For instance it requires that
disabled people have affordable access to mobility devices. Would courts
give credence to claims made entirely on the basis of the treaty? Possibly.
But with 20 years of case law on discrimination, the chances that major
changes would be required seem slim.
By walking away from the treaty, the U.S. loses a chance to champion the
principles of non-discrimination overseas. And the Senate looks captive to
fringe members peddling half-baked ideas about the U.N.
With Best Regards,
Alan
And they ask why I call them "Repugnents" instead of Republicans!
Miami, Florida
__._,_.___
More information about the NFBF-L
mailing list