[nfbmi-talk] he's been notified over and over again

joe harcz Comcast joeharcz at comcast.net
Tue Aug 31 01:15:30 UTC 2010


March 24, 2010

 

Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.

E-mail: joeharcz at comcast.net

 

 

Mr. Patrick Cannon, Director of the Michigan Commission for the Blind and State of Michigan ADA Coordinator

E-mail: cannonp at michigan.gov

 

Dear Mr. Cannon,

 

Though I’ve sent you the effective communications requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 before, and in fact have sent you them and other free technical assistance for that matter several times perhaps you haven’t read them. I would have thought that as the Director of the Michigan for the Blind and the State ADA Coordinator you’d be intimate with them (as well as all of the regulations for that matter). Regardless I’m sending them to you once again so that you might get up to speed in discharging your duties in these regards.

 

Sincerely,

 

Paul “Joe” Harcz, Jr.

 

Cc: DOJ

Cc: Great Lakes TAC

Cc: several attorneys at law

Cc: several interested parties

Cc: Governor Jennifer Grandholm

Attached:

 

 

ADA Title II Subpart E Communications

 

{35.160 General.

 

Section 35.160 requires the public entity to take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that communications with applicants, participants, and members

of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others.

 

Paragraph (b)(1) requires the public entity to furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services when necessary to afford an individual with a disability

an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, the public entity's service, program, or activity. The public entity must provide an

opportunity for individuals with disabilities to request the auxiliary aids and services of their choice. This expressed choice shall be given primary

consideration by the public entity ({35.160(b)(2)). The public entity shall honor the choice unless it can demonstrate that another effective means of

communication exists or that use of the means chosen would not be required under {35.164.

 

Deference to the request of the individual with a disability is desirable because of the range of disabilities, the variety of auxiliary aids and services,

and different circumstances requiring effective communication. For instance, some courtrooms are now equipped for "computer-assisted transcripts," which

allow virtually instantaneous transcripts of courtroom argument and testimony to appear on displays. Such a system might be an effective auxiliary aid

or service for a person who is deaf or has a hearing loss who uses speech to communicate, but may be useless for someone who uses sign language.

 

Although in some circumstances a notepad and written materials may be sufficient to permit effective communication, in other circumstances they may not

be sufficient. For example, a qualified interpreter may be necessary when the information being communicated is complex, or is exchanged for a lengthy

period of time. Generally, factors to be considered in determining whether an interpreter is required include the context in which the communication is

taking place, the number of people involved, and the importance of the communication.

 

Several commenters asked that the rule clarify that the provision of readers is sometimes necessary to ensure access to a public entity's services, programs

or activities. Reading devices or readers should be provided when necessary for equal participation and opportunity to benefit from any governmental service,

program, or activity, such as reviewing public documents, examining demonstrative evidence, and filling out voter registration forms or forms needed to

receive public benefits. The importance of providing qualified readers for examinations administered by public entities is discussed under {35.130. Reading

devices and readers are appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to permit an individual with a disability to participate in or benefit

from a service, program, or activity.

 

Section 35.160(b)(2) of the proposed rule, which provided that a public entity need not furnish individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use

or study, or other devices of a personal nature, has been deleted in favor of a new section in the final rule on personal devices and services (see {35.135).

 

In response to comments, the term "auxiliary aids and services" is used in place of "auxiliary aids" in the final rule. This phrase better reflects the

range of aids and services that may be required under this section.

 

A number of comments raised questions about the extent of a public entity's obligation to provide access to television programming for persons with hearing

impairments. Television and videotape programming produced by public entities are covered by this section. Access to audio portions of such programming

may be provided by closed captioning.

 

Section 35.161 Telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD's).

 

Section 35.161 requires that, where a public entity communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, TDD's or equally effective telecommunication

systems be used to communicate with individuals with impaired speech or hearing.

 

Problems arise when a public entity which does not have a TDD needs to communicate with an individual who uses a TDD or vice versa. Title IV of the ADA

addresses this problem by requiring establishment of telephone relay services to permit communications between individuals who communicate by TDD and individuals

who communicate by the telephone alone. The relay services required by title IV would involve a relay operator using both a standard telephone and a TDD

to type the voice messages to the TDD user and read the TDD messages to the standard telephone user.

 

Section 204(b) of the ADA requires that the regulation implementing title II with respect to communications be consistent with the Department's regulation

implementing section 504 for its federally conducted programs and activities at 28 CFR pt. 39. Section 35.161, which is taken from {39.160(a)(2) of that

regulation, requires the use of TDD's or equally effective telecommunication systems for communication with people who use TDD's. Of course, where relay

services, such as those required by title IV of the ADA are available, a public entity may use those services to meet the requirements of this section.

 

Many commenters were concerned that public entities should not rely heavily on the establishment of relay services. The commenters explained that while

relay services would be of vast benefit to both public entities and individuals who use TDD's, the services are not sufficient to provide access to all

telephone services. First, relay systems do not provide effective access to the increasingly popular automated systems that require the caller to respond

by pushing a button on a touch tone phone. Second, relay systems cannot operate fast enough to convey messages on answering machines, or to permit a TDD

user to leave a recorded message. Third, communication through relay systems may not be appropriate in cases of crisis lines pertaining to rape, domestic

violence, child abuse, and drugs. The Department believes that it is more appropriate for the Federal Communications Commission to address these issues

in its rulemaking under title IV.

 

Some commenters requested that those entities with frequent contacts with clients who use TDD's have on-site TDD's to provide for direct communication between

the entity and the individual. The Department encourages those entities that have extensive telephone contact with the public such as city halls, public

libraries, and public aid offices, to have TDD's to insure more immediate access. Where the provision of telephone service is a major function of the entity,

TDD's should be available.

 

Section 35.162 Telephone emergency services.

 

Many public entities provide telephone emergency services by which individuals can seek immediate assistance from police, fire, ambulance, and other emergency

services. These telephone emergency services--including "911" services--are clearly an important public service whose reliability can be a matter of life

or death. The legislative history of title II specifically reflects congressional intent that public entities must ensure that telephone emergency services,

including 911 services, be accessible to persons with impaired hearing and speech through telecommunication technology (Conference report at 67; Education

and Labor report at 84-85).

 

Proposed {35.162 mandated that public entities provide emergency telephone services to persons with disabilities that are "functionally equivalent" to voice

services provided to others. Many commenters urged the Department to revise the section to make clear that direct access to telephone emergency services

is required by title II of the ADA as indicated by the legislative history (Conference report at 67-68; Education and Labor report at 85). In response,

the final rule mandates "direct access," instead of "access that is functionally equivalent" to that provided to all other telephone users. Telephone emergency

access through a third party or through a relay service would not satisfy the requirement for direct access.

 

Several commenters asked about a separate seven-digit emergency call number for the 911 services. The requirement for direct access disallows the use of

a separate seven-digit number where 911 service is available. Separate seven- digit emergency call numbers would be unfamiliar to many individuals and

also more burdensome to use. A standard emergency 911 number is easier to remember and would save valuable time spent in searching in telephone books for

a local seven-digit emergency number.

 

Many commenters requested the establishment of minimum standards of service (e.g., the quantity and location of TDD's and computer modems needed in a given

emergency center). Instead of establishing these scoping requirements, the Department has established a performance standard through the mandate for direct

access.

 

Section 35.162 requires public entities to take appropriate steps, including equipping their emergency systems with modern technology, as may be necessary

to promptly receive and respond to a call from users of TDD's and computer modems. Entities are allowed the flexibility to determine what is the appropriate

technology for their particular needs. In order to avoid mandating use of particular technologies that may become outdated, the Department has eliminated

the references to the Baudot and ASCII formats in the proposed rule.

 

Some commenters requested that the section require the installation of a voice amplification device on the handset of the dispatcher's telephone to amplify

the dispatcher's voice. In an emergency, a person who has a hearing loss may be using a telephone that does not have an amplification device. Installation

of speech amplification devices on the handsets of the dispatchers' telephones would respond to that situation. The Department encourages their use.

 

Several commenters emphasized the need for proper maintenance of TDD's used in telephone emergency services. Section 35.133, which mandates maintenance

of accessible features, requires public entities to maintain in operable working condition TDD's and other devices that provide direct access to the emergency

system.

 

{35.163 Information and signage.

 

Section 35.163(a) requires the public entity to provide information to individuals with disabilities concerning accessible services, activities, and facilities.

Paragraph (b) requires the public entity to provide signage at all inaccessible entrances to each of its facilities that directs users to an accessible

entrance or to a location with information about accessible facilities.

 

Several commenters requested that, where TDD-equipped pay phones or portable TDD's exist, clear signage should be posted indicating the location of the

TDD. The Department believes that this is required by paragraph (a). In addition, the Department recommends that, in large buildings that house TDD's,

directional signage indicating the location of available TDD's should be placed adjacent to banks of telephones that do not contain a TDD.

 

{35.164 Duties.

 

Section 35.164, like paragraph (a)(3) of {35.150, is taken from the section 504 regulations for federally conducted programs. Like paragraph (a)(3), it

limits the obligation of the public entity to ensure effective communication in accordance with Davis and the circuit court opinions interpreting it. It

also includes specific requirements for determining the existence of undue financial and administrative burdens. The preamble discussion of {35.150(a)

regarding that determination is applicable to this section and further explains the public entity's obligation to comply with {{35.160-35.164. Because

of the essential nature of the services provided by telephone emergency systems, the Department assumes that {35.164 will rarely be applied to {35.162.

 

 



More information about the NFBMI-Talk mailing list