[nfbmi-talk] important implecations here for all state entities
joe harcz Comcast
joeharcz at comcast.net
Sun Sep 5 12:50:51 UTC 2010
2009 ADA TRANSITION PLAN
Executive Summary:
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA, as amended) dictates comprehensive
civil right protections to individuals with disabilities in areas related to employment (Title
I), public services (Title II), public accommodations and services operated by private
entities (Title III), telecommunications (Title IV), and miscellaneous (Title V). In
particular Title II has the broadest impact on the Michigan Department of Transportation
(MDOT) as it prohibits the discrimination of individuals with disabilities in relation to
programs, services or activities offered by local and state governments. Provisions in
Title II encompass areas of public transportation, and the updating of existing
infrastructure to attain accessibility and consistency with the ADA.
In 1992, the U.S. Department of Justice issued 28 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 35, Nondiscrimination on the basis of Disability in State and Local Government
Services, to implement Subtitle A of Title II of the ADA. In particular, this regulation
extended the prohibition of discrimination in federally assisted programs already
established in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to all activities of state and
local governments regardless of funding source.
A provision in the regulation, 28 CFR 35.150(d) included a requirement for state and
local governments to prepare a transition plan. In accordance with the regulation, MDOT
completed a self evaluation and transition plan of its activities and programs in 1994 that:
1. Identified the physical obstacles in MDOT facilities that limit the accessibility
of programs and activities to individuals with disabilities;
2. Described the methods that would be used to make the facilities accessible;
3. Specified a schedule for taking steps necessary to achieve accessibility.
4. Indicated the official responsible for the implementation of the plan.
The 1994 MDOT self-evaluation and transition plan was very detailed, and specific to
each bureau, division and district within MDOT, each with their identified limiting
policies and practices, and corrective actions necessary to address non-compliance.
Since the implementation of the 1994 transition plan, increasing emphasis has been
placed on accessibility of infrastructure within public right-of-way, and connectivity of
this infrastructure to state trunkline roadways, in particular the continued integration of
sidewalk ramps. MDOT has incorporated sidewalk ramps into construction projects since
1973, and has progressively modified and updated standards addressing accessibility.
However at this time, not all sidewalk ramps within MDOT right-of-way conform to the
most current MDOT standards for accessibility.
Although MDOT does not own, operate or maintain sidewalks and sidewalk ramps,
sidewalk ramps are upgraded in conjunction with alteration of the roadway according to
the MDOT Standard Plan for “Sidewalk Ramp and Detectable Warning Details” as
required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The MDOT standard is
primarily based on the U.S. Access Board’s Public Rights of Way Accessibility
Guidelines (PROWAG).
With respect to infrastructure within MDOT right-of-way, or on property owned by
MDOT, inventories have either been completed or will be re-assessed as new national
accessibility criteria develops. An exhaustive sidewalk ramp inventory has recently been
completed for the purpose of evaluating the current status of compliance. For each of the
identified assets, the MDOT objective is to achieve and maintain accessibility as outlined
in this new transition plan required by the FHWA.
MDOT has also re-visited programs and services previously included in the original
transition plan that are either directly or indirectly provided to the general public. These
programs and services are beyond a compliance transitional stage and are considered to
be in compliance maintenance. Those assets considered in compliance maintenance are
recurrently assessed when alterations are programmed.
The MDOT Transportation Highway Program is based on a rolling Five-Year Plan that
covers a wide range of programs specifically targeted to maintain, improve, and in some
cases, expand the transportation infrastructure in Michigan. The Five-Year Plan is re-
assessed and extended annually with a new 5th year. As part of this Five-Year Plan, any
sidewalks, or sidewalk ramps that are altered by roadway projects, will be updated to the
most current standard. Pedestrian facilities not altered by the current/planned MDOT
Five-Year Plan are not upgraded by MDOT as they are the Title II obligation of the local
agency owning and maintaining the pedestrian facility.
Maintained Accessibility (Addressed by the original MDOT Transition Plan):
MDOT buildings:
MDOT is committed to ensuring continued program accessibility at Region
Offices, Transportation Service Centers (TSC), Welcome Centers, rest areas and
other facilities utilized by the traveling public or commercial customers.
Additionally, MDOT implements measures necessary to attain compliance for a
facility where a specific employee ADA-related need has been identified.
Where required in the original MDOT Transition Plan, changes were made to
policies and practices to ensure alignment with the regulation. The original self-
evaluation plan included onsite inspections of all MDOT buildings and parking
lots, with a corrective action plan developed and completed as necessary for each
location. Since the conclusion of the self-evaluation program, all facilities-related
construction projects have been reviewed by the Department of Energy, Labor,
and Economic Growth (DELEG), Bureau of Construction Codes to ensure
continued compliance with accessibility requirements.
Commercial properties leased to MDOT are also required to be accessible. Per
state law, the Department of Management and Budget (DMB) approves and
administers all lease agreements on behalf of MDOT. DMB lease agreements
contain language specifically requiring the landlord to ensure accessibility.
Leased premises are required by state law to meet accessibility requirements in
the Michigan Building Code. In addition, they are required by federal law to meet
ADA requirements.
Currently, MDOT performs regular, on-going assessments of all its facilities,
which includes a review of continued compliance for each location; deficiencies
are documented and addressed.
Public Transit Programs:
For urban transit agencies that receive federal funding directly from the Federal
Transit Administration (FTA), the FTA has primary oversight of their ADA
compliance. For rural transit agencies that receive federal funding through
MDOT, MDOT oversees ADA compliance as part of its ongoing compliance
monitoring activities. In addition, state law requires that all fixed route transit
buses that are procured with state funds be accessible by wheelchair and also
requires a local review process (Local Advisory Committees) to ensure there is an
adequate number of lift-equipped buses in the fleets of agencies that receive state
funds for demand-response vehicles. MDOT does not have an oversight role over
private sector passenger carriers unless MDOT provides financial assistance. For
example, MDOT purchases and leases intercity motor coaches to Indian Trails
and Greyhound. MDOT purchases only lift-equipped motor coaches.
2009 Assessment and Transition Plan (Not addressed by the original MDOT Transition
Plan):
Car Pool Lots:
MDOT Car Pool lots currently provide designated accessible parking. Carpool
lots are in compliance maintenance and are monitored by each region.
Accessibility upgrades are included with programmed alterations.
Shared Use Paths:
Shared use paths are most commonly owned by local agencies. There are
currently very few MDOT owned shared use paths. They are constructed to the
most current requirements at the time of construction and are updated as required
in conjunction with alterations as part of compliance maintenance.
Pedestrian Activated Signals:
Currently the installation of pedestrian activated signals is designed according to
the MDOT Signal Standard Plans and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices which includes accessibility requirements. Current installations identified
as non-compliant are corrected in conjunction with new construction and alteration projects. A full assessment of all pedestrian activated signals is deferred
pending anticipated new requirements from the U.S. Access Board that are
estimated to be finalized in the Public Rights of Way Guideline by the end of
2010. Sidewalk ramps within MDOT right-of-way:
The physical obstacles present within roadway crossings are defined by absence
of accessibility to pedestrian crossings, or where accessibility is limited.
To make these facilities accessible, MDOT maintains a policy of compliance with
the current FHWA approved MDOT standard plan. In conjunction with new
construction and alterations to roadways adjacent to pedestrian facilities, accesses
to crossings are upgraded to the current standard.
To facilitate the development of this supplemental plan, a detailed inventory was
conducted by each Region using an existing GIS system to identify pedestrian
crossings within MDOT right-of-way, to determine if they meet current
accessibility standards defined by the MDOT standard plan. The inventory was
subsequently used to develop a timeline for corrective actions to be incorporated
in each Region’s program. A detailed inventory is on file at each Region office.
The schedule for implementation is dictated by the MDOT Five-Year
Transportation Highway Program for capital investments in the transportation
infrastructure. The Five-Year plan is re-assessed and extended with a new 5th year
annually. As part of the rolling Five-Year plan, pedestrian accessibility and
accessibility upgrades within the right-of-way will be scoped with proposed
roadway improvements. Please refer to Appendix A for a schedule of pedestrian
crossings to be upgraded as part of the current Five-Year plan.
The MDOT official currently responsible for implementation of the transition plan will
be Mr. Greg Johnson, P.E., Chief Operating Officer of MDOT. Additionally, Ms. Cheryl
Hudson, MDOT ADA/504 Coordinator is the designated contact for ADA complaints.
Whether an MDOT program, activity or service is in compliance transition or
maintenance, the public may submit complaints of discrimination against persons with
disabilities to the ADA/504 Coordinator.
Ms. Cheryl Hudson
ADA/504 Coordinator
Michigan Department of Transportation
425 W. Ottawa Street, B450
Lansing, Michigan 48909
Phone 517-373-0980
E-mail hudsonc1 at michigan.gov
APPENDIX A
2009 MDOT Accesibility SurveyMICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY SURVEY
PART A
Table with 2 columns and 5 rowsProgram Name
State Trunkline System
Program Description
Roadway Infrastructure
Bureau/Division/Office/Region
Highways
Reviewer (s)
Statewide
Review Date
2009
Table end 1. List all processes, procedures, guidelines, regulations and activities that were reviewed
during the evaluation of the program listed above.
Sidewalk ramp connectivity to state trunkline roadways and compliance with current standards.
2. Describe any item listed in number 1 that limits persons with disabilities from
participating in this program. Attach separate sheet if necessary. If there are no
limiting practices or policies, skip question 2a and 2b, answer 3 and proceed to the next
program to be evaluated using additional copies of Part A of this form.
Not all roadway pedestrian crossings are joined with sidewalk ramps meeting current MDOT
standards.
a. Describe the steps that will be taken to eliminate limiting practices or policies
identified above.
All sidewalks intersecting state trunkline roadways have been assessed for compliance with
the most current MDOT sidewalk ramp standard. All road and bridge projects programmed
for new construction, reconstruction or alteration will include in its scope of work the
upgrading of sidewalk ramps identified in the statewide sidewalk ramp assessment as non-
standard. This practice will apply for all current and future budgeted program periods so that
accessibility in design and construction evolves with the roadway and pedestrian
infrastructure. While the measure of compliance has and will evolve based on refinements to
state and national standards, accessibility is also measured by the elimination of barriers. The
presence of curb ramps provides at a minimum a barrier free path. The status and goals will
be adjusted periodically with the Department’s annual call for projects. The goals for the
current Five-Year Transportation Highway Program are as follows;
Table with 8 columns and 10 rowsREGION
TOTAL
CROSSING
POINTS
2008
PROJECTED
%
COMPLIANT
% BARRIER
FREE
%
COMPLIANT
% BARRIER
FREE
2009
2014
2009
2014
Bay
6138
13%
81%
14%
16%
81%
85%
Grand
2735
3.4%
95.1%
8.3%
41.2%
95.1%
95.9%
Metro
15653
15.9%
94.3%
15.9%
28.1%
94.3%
99.1%
North
3035
7.8%
90%
11.9%
32%
90%
93%
Southwest
6493
0.12%
82.12%
2.16%
5.4%
84.2%
87.4%
Superior
2515
12%
100%
14%
33%
100%
100%
University
4,440
5.63
89.6%
14%
32.5%
91.4%
92.2%
Table endDetailed information regarding specific locations can be obtained by contacting the Region Offices.
Table with 5 columns and 8 rowsREGION
CONTACT
ADDRESS
PHONE
Bay
Linda Burchell
55 E. Morley Drive
Saginaw, MI 48601
989-754-0878, Ext. 226
Grand
Tim Little
1420 Front Avenue N.W.
Grand Rapids, MI 49504
616-451-6116
Metro
Mike Eustice
18101 W. Nine Mile Road
Southfield, MI 48075
248-483-5102
North
Jason Gailitis
1088 M-32 East
Gaylord, MI 49735
989-731-5090, Ext. 301
Southwest
(Interim)
1501 Kilgore Road
Kalamazoo, MI 49001
269-337-3930
Superior
Raymond Roberts
1818 3rd Avenue North
Escanaba, MI 48929
906-786-1830, Ext. 310
University
Willard Thompson
4701 W. Michigan Avenue
Jackson, MI 49201
517-750-0425
Table end b. If limiting practices or policies can not be eliminated describe the reason(s)
In accordance with the ADA guidelines, where conditions do not permit full compliance
with the standards in conjunction with roadway alterations, the standards will be met to
the maximum extent feasible.
It is expected that locations not altered by the MDOT Transportation Highway Program
are to be addressed by the Title II local agency having authority, ownership and
maintenance responsibility of the pedestrian facility.
3. Each program should be examined to determine whether it falls within the definition
for a historic program and whether it provides access to persons with disabilities. If
applicable, describe on a separate sheet steps to be taken to ensure alternate ways of
providing access to this historic program are available to persons with disabilities.
This program is not historic in general but historic buildings and districts are sometimes
encountered. Conflict resolution is coordinated with MDOT historians and the state historic
preservation officer. Accessibility is provided to the maximum extent feasible without
destroying or threatening historic significance.
More information about the NFBMI-Talk
mailing list