[nfbmi-talk] Fw: Fw: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer andPat Cannon
joe harcz Comcast
joeharcz at comcast.net
Thu Apr 21 20:00:26 UTC 2011
This is funny in a sad sort of way. Note this is the Director of Michigan
Protection and Advocy Services...
----- Original Message -----
From: "joe harcz Comcast" <joeharcz at comcast.net>
To: "ELMER CERANO" <ECERANO at mpas.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer andPat
Cannon
>I know. Please note the ADA violation (surcharge for accommodations)
>herein, which are numerous violations of the ADA, subparte e,
>communications by the Michigan Commission for the Blind that I've
>documented over the years with MPAS with no action taken.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ELMER CERANO" <ECERANO at mpas.org>
> To: "joe Comcast" <joeharcz at comcast.net>
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer andPat
> Cannon
>
>
> Mr. Harcz,
>
> I recieved your FOIA request for personnel records for Mel Farmer and Pat
> Cannon. Please be advised that neither of these two individuals were ever
> employed by Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service Inc.
>
>
> Elmer L. Cerano
>
>>>> "joe harcz Comcast" <joeharcz at comcast.net> 4/19/2011 8:04:13 AM >>>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: joe harcz Comcast
> To: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:03 AM
> Subject: Re: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer and Pat
> Cannon
>
>
> Again, sir this is from the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Title
> II regulations which apply to all entities of State and local government.
> As I've sent them to you before in toto I assume that your violations are
> chronic, pervasive, and deliberate acts of discrimination with malice and
> forethought.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
>
>
>
> § 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination
>
>
>
> (a) No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of
> disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of
> the services,
>
> programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to
> discrimination by any public entity.
>
>
>
> (b)(1) A public entity, in providing any aid, benefit, or service, may
> not, directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, on
> the basis
>
> of disability --
>
>
>
> (i) Deny a qualified individual with a disability the opportunity to
> participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service;
>
>
>
> (ii) Afford a qualified individual with a disability an opportunity to
> participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service that is not
> equal to
>
> that afforded others;
>
>
>
> (iii) Provide a qualified individual with a disability with an aid,
> benefit, or service that is not as effective in affording equal
> opportunity to obtain
>
> the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of
> achievement as that provided to others;
>
>
>
> (iv) Provide different or separate aids, benefits, or services to
> individuals with disabilities or to any class of individuals with
> disabilities than is
>
> provided to others unless such action is necessary to provide qualified
> individuals with disabilities with aids, benefits, or services that are as
> effective
>
> as those provided to others;
>
>
>
> (v) Aid or perpetuate discrimination against a qualified individual with a
> disability by providing significant assistance to an agency, organization,
> or
>
> person that discriminates on the basis of disability in providing any aid,
> benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the public entity's program;
>
>
>
> (vi) Deny a qualified individual with a disability the opportunity to
> participate as a member of planning or advisory boards;
>
>
>
> (vii) Otherwise limit a qualified individual with a disability in the
> enjoyment of any right, privilege, advantage, or opportunity enjoyed by
> others receiving
>
> the aid, benefit, or service.
>
>
>
> (2) A public entity may not deny a qualified individual with a disability
> the opportunity to participate in services, programs, or activities that
> are not
>
> separate or different, despite the existence of permissibly separate or
> different programs or activities.
>
>
>
> (3) A public entity may not, directly or through contractual or other
> arrangements, utilize criteria or methods of administration:
>
>
>
> (i) That have the effect of subjecting qualified individuals with
> disabilities to discrimination on the basis of disability;
>
>
>
> (ii) That have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially
> impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the public entity's program
> with respect
>
> to individuals with disabilities; or
>
>
>
> (iii) That perpetuate the discrimination of another public entity if both
> public entities are subject to common administrative control or are
> agencies of
>
> the same State.
>
>
>
> (4) A public entity may not, in determining the site or location of a
> facility, make selections --
>
>
>
> (i) That have the effect of excluding individuals with disabilities from,
> denying them the benefits of, or otherwise subjecting them to
> discrimination;
>
> or
>
>
>
> (ii) That have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially
> impairing the accomplishment of the objectives of the service, program, or
> activity with
>
> respect to individuals with disabilities.
>
>
>
> (5) A public entity, in the selection of procurement contractors, may not
> use criteria that subject qualified individuals with disabilities to
> discrimination
>
> on the basis of disability.
>
>
>
> (6) A public entity may not administer a licensing or certification
> program in a manner that subjects qualified individuals with disabilities
> to discrimination
>
> on the basis of disability, nor may a public entity establish requirements
> for the programs or activities of licensees or certified entities that
> subject
>
> qualified individuals with disabilities to discrimination on the basis of
> disability. The programs or activities of entities that are licensed or
> certified
>
> by a public entity are not, themselves, covered by this part.
>
>
>
> (7) A public entity shall make reasonable modifications in policies,
> practices, or procedures when the modifications are necessary to avoid
> discrimination
>
> on the basis of disability, unless the public entity can demonstrate that
> making the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the
> service,
>
> program, or activity.
>
>
>
> (8) A public entity shall not impose or apply eligibility criteria that
> screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability or any
> class of
>
> individuals with disabilities from fully and equally enjoying any service,
> program, or activity, unless such criteria can be shown to be necessary
> for
>
> the provision of the service, program, or activity being offered.
>
>
>
> (c) Nothing in this part prohibits a public entity from providing
> benefits, services, or advantages to individuals with disabilities, or to
> a particular
>
> class of individuals with disabilities beyond those required by this part.
>
>
>
> (d) A public entity shall administer services, programs, and activities in
> the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified
> individuals
>
> with disabilities.
>
>
>
> (e)(1) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require an individual
> with a disability to accept an accommodation, aid, service, opportunity,
> or benefit
>
> provided under the ADA or this part which such individual chooses not to
> accept.
>
>
>
> (2) Nothing in the Act or this part authorizes the representative or
> guardian of an individual with a disability to decline food, water,
> medical treatment,
>
> or medical services for that individual.
>
>
>
> (f) A public entity may not place a surcharge on a particular individual
> with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover
> the costs
>
> of measures, such as the provision of auxiliary aids or program
> accessibility, that are required to provide that individual or group with
> the nondiscriminatory
>
> treatment required by the Act or this part.
>
>
>
> (g) A public entity shall not exclude or otherwise deny equal services,
> programs, or activities to an individual or entity because of the known
> disability
>
> of an individual with whom the individual or entity is known to have a
> relationship or association.
>
>
>
> (h) A public entity may impose legitimate safety requirements necessary
> for the safe operation of its services, programs, or activities. However,
> the public
>
> entity must ensure that its safety requirements are based on actual risks,
> not on mere speculation, stereotypes, or generalizations about individuals
> with
>
> disabilities.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> § 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination
>
>
>
> (a) No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of
> disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of
> the services,
>
> programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to
> discrimination by any public entity.
>
>
>
> (b)(1) A public entity, in providing any aid, benefit, or service, may
> not, directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, on
> the basis
>
> of disability --
>
>
>
> (i) Deny a qualified individual with a disability the opportunity to
> participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service;
>
>
>
> (ii) Afford a qualified individual with a disability an opportunity to
> participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service that is not
> equal to
>
> that afforded others;
>
>
>
> (iii) Provide a qualified individual with a disability with an aid,
> benefit, or service that is not as effective in affording equal
> opportunity to obtain
>
> the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of
> achievement as that provided to others;
>
>
>
> (iv) Provide different or separate aids, benefits, or services to
> individuals with disabilities or to any class of individuals with
> disabilities than is
>
> provided to others unless such action is necessary to provide qualified
> individuals with disabilities with aids, benefits, or services that are as
> effective
>
> as those provided to others;
>
>
>
> (v) Aid or perpetuate discrimination against a qualified individual with a
> disability by providing significant assistance to an agency, organization,
> or
>
> person that discriminates on the basis of disability in providing any aid,
> benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the public entity's program;
>
>
>
> (vi) Deny a qualified individual with a disability the opportunity to
> participate as a member of planning or advisory boards;
>
>
>
> (vii) Otherwise limit a qualified individual with a disability in the
> enjoyment of any right, privilege, advantage, or opportunity enjoyed by
> others receiving
>
> the aid, benefit, or service.
>
>
>
> (2) A public entity may not deny a qualified individual with a disability
> the opportunity to participate in services, programs, or activities that
> are not
>
> separate or different, despite the existence of permissibly separate or
> different programs or activities.
>
>
>
> (3) A public entity may not, directly or through contractual or other
> arrangements, utilize criteria or methods of administration:
>
>
>
> (i) That have the effect of subjecting qualified individuals with
> disabilities to discrimination on the basis of disability;
>
>
>
> (ii) That have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially
> impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the public entity's program
> with respect
>
> to individuals with disabilities; or
>
>
>
> (iii) That perpetuate the discrimination of another public entity if both
> public entities are subject to common administrative control or are
> agencies of
>
> the same State.
>
>
>
> (4) A public entity may not, in determining the site or location of a
> facility, make selections --
>
>
>
> (i) That have the effect of excluding individuals with disabilities from,
> denying them the benefits of, or otherwise subjecting them to
> discrimination;
>
> or
>
>
>
> (ii) That have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially
> impairing the accomplishment of the objectives of the service, program, or
> activity with
>
> respect to individuals with disabilities.
>
>
>
> (5) A public entity, in the selection of procurement contractors, may not
> use criteria that subject qualified individuals with disabilities to
> discrimination
>
> on the basis of disability.
>
>
>
> (6) A public entity may not administer a licensing or certification
> program in a manner that subjects qualified individuals with disabilities
> to discrimination
>
> on the basis of disability, nor may a public entity establish requirements
> for the programs or activities of licensees or certified entities that
> subject
>
> qualified individuals with disabilities to discrimination on the basis of
> disability. The programs or activities of entities that are licensed or
> certified
>
> by a public entity are not, themselves, covered by this part.
>
>
>
> (7) A public entity shall make reasonable modifications in policies,
> practices, or procedures when the modifications are necessary to avoid
> discrimination
>
> on the basis of disability, unless the public entity can demonstrate that
> making the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the
> service,
>
> program, or activity.
>
>
>
> (8) A public entity shall not impose or apply eligibility criteria that
> screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability or any
> class of
>
> individuals with disabilities from fully and equally enjoying any service,
> program, or activity, unless such criteria can be shown to be necessary
> for
>
> the provision of the service, program, or activity being offered.
>
>
>
> (c) Nothing in this part prohibits a public entity from providing
> benefits, services, or advantages to individuals with disabilities, or to
> a particular
>
> class of individuals with disabilities beyond those required by this part.
>
>
>
> (d) A public entity shall administer services, programs, and activities in
> the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified
> individuals
>
> with disabilities.
>
>
>
> (e)(1) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require an individual
> with a disability to accept an accommodation, aid, service, opportunity,
> or benefit
>
> provided under the ADA or this part which such individual chooses not to
> accept.
>
>
>
> (2) Nothing in the Act or this part authorizes the representative or
> guardian of an individual with a disability to decline food, water,
> medical treatment,
>
> or medical services for that individual.
>
>
>
> (f) A public entity may not place a surcharge on a particular individual
> with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover
> the costs
>
> of measures, such as the provision of auxiliary aids or program
> accessibility, that are required to provide that individual or group with
> the nondiscriminatory
>
> treatment required by the Act or this part.
>
>
>
> (g) A public entity shall not exclude or otherwise deny equal services,
> programs, or activities to an individual or entity because of the known
> disability
>
> of an individual with whom the individual or entity is known to have a
> relationship or association.
>
>
>
> (h) A public entity may impose legitimate safety requirements necessary
> for the safe operation of its services, programs, or activities. However,
> the public
>
> entity must ensure that its safety requirements are based on actual risks,
> not on mere speculation, stereotypes, or generalizations about individuals
> with
>
> disabilities.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
> To: 'joe harcz Comcast'
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 9:20 AM
> Subject: RE: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer and Pat
> Cannon
>
>
> The difference in processing costs is because your March 27, 2011 request
> for a copy of the records in Mr. Patrick Cannon's personnel file includes
> the estimated labor and duplication costs for searching for, examining the
> records to separate/redact exempt from nonexempt information, and
> additional labor costs for processing each hard-copy page (about 500
> pages) into the accessible format you requested.
>
>
>
> Your April 5, 2011 request for Melvin Farmer's personnel file records
> includes the processing costs of the estimated labor and duplicating costs
> searching for, examining to separate/redact exempt from nonexempt records
> from about 520 hard-copy pages in Mr. Farmer's file. As there was no
> request in your April 5, 2011 request that these hard-copy pages be put
> into an accessible format, there are no additional labor processing costs
> involved.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: joe harcz Comcast [mailto:joeharcz at comcast.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 6:52 PM
> To: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
> Subject: Re: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer and Pat
> Cannon
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Farmer,
>
>
>
> A simple question here: Why in the world een if these costs are
> legitimate would Patrick D. Cannon's file cost almost twice as much as
> your file?
>
>
>
> Oh, yes and why aren't his evaluations routinely made public on the State
> of Michigan web site as the vote on them is indeed made public without the
> details?
>
>
>
> This is all kind of silly isn't it?
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Joe Harcz
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
>
> To: 'joe harcz Comcast'
>
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:11 AM
>
> Subject: FW: FOIA's Requesting Personnel Records of Mel Farmer and Pat
> Cannon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> April 15, 2011 Sent by U.S. Mail and e-mail
>
>
> (joeharcz at comcast.net)
>
> Mr. Paul Joseph Harcz
>
> 1365 Mt. Morris Rd.
>
> Mt. Morris, MI 48458
>
>
>
> RE: Freedom of Information Act Requests- Personnel Records
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Harcz:
>
>
>
> This notice is in response to your March 27, 2011, March 31, 2011 and
> April 5, 2011 emails (attached) requesting copies of public records under
> the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq., you
> describe as the personnel files of Melvin Farmer, Jr., Patrick D. Cannon,
> and Ms. Jo Anne Pilarski in her capacity as a Michigan Commissioner for
> the Blind MCB) for the last decade. It is noted in your April 5, 2011
> email that you no longer request the personnel file of Ms. Jo Anne
> Pilarski.
>
>
>
> Please be informed that, pursuant to MCL 15.235, Section 5(2)(c) of the
> FOIA, your request has been partially granted and partially denied as
> indicated in the following notifications regarding your FOIA requests for
> copies of the personnel files and salary information for Melvin Farmer, Jr
> and Patrick D. Cannon:
>
> --April 12, 2011 email from me to you granting your April 5, 2011 FOIA
> request for Melvin
>
> Farmer, Jr's personnel file records and salary information upon
> payment of $287.74
>
> estimated processing cost.
>
> --April 14, 2011 email from me to you granting your March 27, 2011 FOIA
> request that
>
> included the request for records/information related to Patrick D.
> Cannon's personnel
>
> file records and salary information upon payment of $460.25 estimated
> processing
>
> costs. NOTE: Other portions of your March 27, 2011 request have been
> addressed by
>
> the April 14, 2011 response letter from the MCB.
>
>
>
> Copies of my April 12, 2011, April 14, 2011, as well as, MCB's April
> 14, 2011 response notices will be attached to the mailed version of this
> response.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
>
>
> Melvin Farmer, Jr
>
> Central FOIA Coordinator
>
> (517)373-0194
>
>
>
> Attachments
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: joe harcz Comcast [mailto:joeharcz at comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:18 AM
> To: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
> Subject: Re: foia canon stuff and more
>
>
>
> Mr. Farmer,
>
>
>
> Say what about those draft meeting minutes of the last MCB meeting ? In
> your failure to remit them them to this very date (April 5, 2011) is a
> violation of the OMA, the FOIA, the Americans with disabilities Act of
> 1990, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (both Title I and Section 504) (and
> the very act that funds and creates MCB to begin with, by the way). But,
> here you all have hit the big bonanza in violating two state laws and two
> federal laws at the same time.
>
>
>
> And not that you can copy and paste very well, but again I do not wish
> for Ms. Pilarski's personnel file as she does not work for the state of
> Michigan, but rather is the Chair of the Michigan Commission for the
> Blind.
>
>
>
> If I wish for her personnel file I'll write to the School District
> which employs her. (Oh, in that regard wouldn't Bradlee v. Saranac
> Community Schools be most apt?)
>
>
>
> But, again to reiterate I wish for your personnel file Mr. Melvin
> Farmer.
>
>
>
> And while I'm at it I'm requesting here and now to know your salary and
> other annual compensation.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: joe harcz Comcast [mailto:joeharcz at comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 9:12 PM
> To: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
> Subject: Re: foia canon stuff and more
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Farmer,
>
>
>
> Again I am now requesting your personnel file along with that of
> Mr. Patrick D.Cannon and now that of Ms. Jo Anne Pilarski in her official
> capacity of the Michigan Commission for the Blind for the last decade and
> might I cite the following case:
>
>
>
>
>
> From: joe harcz Comcast [mailto:joeharcz at comcast.net]
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 11:59 PM
> To: Haynes, Carla (DELEG)
> Cc: Jo Anne Pilarski MCB, Chair; Larry Posont; lydia schuck;
> John Scott MCB, Commissioner; Joe Sibley MCBVI Pres.; John L Wodatch
> USDOJ; Cannon, Patrick (DELEG); mcb2020-L at LISTSERV.MICHIGAN.GOV; TOM
> MASSEAU MPAS
> Subject: foia canon stuff and more
>
>
>
> FOIA Canon Information FOIA
>
>
>
> March 27, 2011
>
> Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
>
> 1365 E. Mt. Morris Rd.
>
> Mt. Morris, MI 48458
>
>
>
> Carla Haynes, Michigan commission for the Blind
>
> FOIA
>
> (via E-mail)
>
>
>
> Dear Ms. Haynes,
>
>
>
> I am writing you today to request via and pursuant to the
> rights and obligations of the Michigan Freedom of information Act and
> concurrent obligations under the Americans with disabilities Act and the
> rehabilitation act of 1973 the complete personnel file of Mr. Patrick D.
> Cannon, Director of the Michigan commission for the Blind(except for
> legally redacted information materials like social Security Number for
> example) , along with all salary and compensation for all State of
> Michigan activities and purposes of employment therein since he assumed
> office or directorship of MCB and any other State of Michigan employment
> considerations including his role as State of Michigan Americans with
> Disabilities act coordinator.
>
>
>
> I am requesting specifically and at a minimum the following
> information:
>
> -academic credentials
>
> -pay and other compensation schedules over years
>
> -any and all evaluations including those by the Michigan
> Commission for the Blind (board)
>
> -all closed session minutes and records of the above listed
> item (re: bradlee v. Saranac Community Schools)
>
> -all disciplinary records
>
> (Again ref Bradlee and subsequent case law)
>
> -all actions in courts of law, Civil Service Commission, or
> other administrative bodies, or quasi-judicial or judicial or judicial in
> nature in his personnel file
>
> Again this request includes all public domain, and all
> adjudications public or private against him in his official capacity in
> courts of law or other quasi-legal or administrative jurisdictions
>
> -any criminal cases or legal considerations against him
>
> -any cases in which he testified or was subpoenaed or gave any
> legal and binding deposition under law in which perjury might be a
> consideration
>
> -any signed document to which he affixed his hand in official
> capacity related to the administration of federal funds and assurances
> with the United States Government relative to same in his official
> capacity including contracts, or contracts per se between the state of
> Michigan and the United States government including, but not exclusive of:
> the United States of America, Departments of Education, Dept. of Labor,
> Dept. of Justice, or any other "third party pass through agreements"
> including all those of which Patrick D. Cannon affixed his hand regarding
> memorandums of understanding with various state of Michigan entities over
> his term as Director.
>
>
>
> In other words, lest this is an exercise in futility I wish for
> any document signed by Patrick D. Cannon in his official capacity as
> Director of Michigan Commission for the Blind since his sworn and most
> accomplished role as MCB Director.
>
>
>
> Moreover, I am now also officially requesting any documents by
> Ms. Jo Anne Pilarski, since she assumed the position of MCB commissioner
> and Chair of MCB, in her official capacity as same.
>
>
>
>
>
> /Again, I wish for each and every requested document in
> accessible format. Finally I, as a person who is documented as legally
> blind am requesting that any and all, except for purely redacted, exempt
> information under either the federal FOIA and the Michigan FOIA request
> pursuant to concurrent obligations under the Americans with Disabilities
> Act (Title II, subpart e, effective communications) and the relevant
> portions of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("auxiliary aid and services""
> request with no "surcharge" for such accommodations that such remissions
> are made in a timely and accessible manner (re: Tyler v. Manhattan to name
> one case cite)).
>
>
>
> To wit: I ask for all the requested information within 30 days
> in the format most accessible to me without charge for the accommodation.
> That format is to make the documents available to me as either Word or
> plain text attachments, or enclosures to my E-mail address listed above.
>
>
>
> Reasonable redactions to the original request may be made as
> does the U.S. Dept. of Justice or other entities in these regards by
> simply xxxx out the redacted information. In other words I don't wish for
> Patrick D. Canon's social security number for example. And it can and
> should be easily redacted without making a federal or state case over
> other required information.
>
>
>
> Any stalling or other violations of this request over quibbles
> will be attended to with all legal vigor and with the full force of law.
>
>
>
> I thank you, as I have in the past for your, Carla Hayne's,
> prompt, courteous and accessible responses to such inquiries.
>
>
>
> Most sincerely,
>
>
>
> Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
>
> Cc: U.S DOJ
>
> Cc: Office for Civil Rights, Ed.
>
> Cc: NFB MI
>
> Cc: Advocates for the Blind
>
> Cc: MCBVI
>
> Cc: MCB Commissioners
>
> Cc: ACLU Michigan
>
> Cc: MPAS
>
> Cc: Great Lakes Techinical Assistence Center
>
> Cc: Governor Rick Snyder
>
> Cc: Michigan Attorney General
>
> Cc: Rheabiliation and Services Administration (RSA) (Craig
> McManus, MI Llaission, Lynnae Ruttledge RSA Commissioner)
>
> Cc: several media and legal contacts.
>
>
>
> P.S. It would be prudent to place upon the Michigan commission
> for the blind web site all requested information in a timely and
> accessible manner as a means of complying both with the letter and spiritt
> of this request for information along with all of the years of State Plan
> and other required information to.
>
>
More information about the NFBMI-Talk
mailing list