[nfbmi-talk] why wasn't automark used here?

Tue Nov 20 11:58:25 UTC 2012

Here is another  example of an NFB teaching moment, and the purpose of the
NFB national voter hotline and survey that was posted on here following the
election.

-----Original Message-----
From:  Jim in Detroit

The people in the Detroit Dept. of Elections should hear this.

-----Original Message----- 
From: joe harcz Comcast

Both the Help America Vote Act and the ADA require that such accessible
equipment is in working order. That is the law and both are civil rights
laws.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elizabeth Mohnke" <lizmohnke at hotmail.com>
To: "NFB of Michigan Internet Mailing List" <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [nfbmi-talk] why wasn't automark used here?

I think this would be a good idea. Also, it is possible the Automark  was
not working properly when the voter went to vote. I know this could be
possible because it happened to me. However, I have good reason to believe
that my ballot was marked how I wanted it to be marked. I just felt bad
taking so much time with the poll workers reading the ballot to a sleep
deprived college student even though I know this is part of there job. I
actually think the punch cards were more accessible in terms of having to
have someone read you the ballot. I felt as though I had more control over
who I was voting for when using the punch card system as I could physically
punch in my selections after they were read to me.

Just my thoughts on the subject for what they are worth.

Elizabeth

.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jason Meddaugh" <jj at bestmidi.com>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:09 PM
To: "NFB of Michigan Internet Mailing List" <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>
Subject: Re: [nfbmi-talk] why wasn't automark used here?

> Not all people are comfortable with using the technology, even if it is 
> available. Some would just prefer the help. We can certainly work to 
> educate more people on the benefits of using the machines, etc.
> It may be something to think about for 2014, having the NFB of MI hosting 
> some demonstrations in key locations. Would also be good PR for us.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "joe harcz Comcast" <joeharcz at comcast.net>
> To: <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:28 AM
> Subject: [nfbmi-talk] why wasn't automark used here?
>
>
> Why wasn't the Automark used?
>
>
>
> Joe Harcz
>
>
>
>
>
> Pontiac precinct accused of changing blind voter's ballot
>
>
>
> Published: Tuesday, November 06, 2012
>
> Get RSS Feed
>
> Print This
>
> Email This
>
> Share on Stumble Upon
>
> share/share_comment
>
> 8
>
>
>
> By MEGAN SEMERAZ
>
> Megan.Semeraz at oakpress.com
>
> ; Twitter:
>
> @MeganSemeraz
>
>
>
> A Lansing organization called Protecting Michigan Taxpayers, which 
> strongly opposes Proposal 2, has accused Pontiac Precinct 13 of breaking 
> election law
>
> after they say a blind voter's ballot was changed.
>
>
>
> Nick DeLeeuw, spokesman for the organization, said the blind voter 
> requested a "no" vote on Michigan ballot proposals, and instead recorded a

> "yes" vote.
>
> A poll watcher saw the incident, and wanted to challenge it.
>
>
>
> When the vote was challenged, DeLeeuw said the Precinct Captain Carla 
> Williams refused to accept the challenge on the ballot.
>
>
>
> Pontiac City Clerk Sherikia Hawkins said she had heard about the incident,

> but that is not what happened. She said the legally blind voter was being 
> assisted
>
> and wanted the help.
>
>
>
> Hawkins said that the group is misinforming people, and the vote was not 
> changed.
>
>
>
> Jared Rodriguez, a spokesperson for Protecting Michigan Taxpayer said: 
> "The precinct captain's refusal to accept a legally required 'challenge' 
> on the ballot
>
> cast by a voter whose vote was shamelessly changed against his will is 
> reprehensible."
>
>
>
> Contact Megan Semeraz at 248-745-4628 or email
>
> Megan.Semeraz at oakpress.com
>
> or follow her on Twitter @MeganSemeraz
>
>
>
> Pontiac precinct accused of changing blind voter's ballot
>
>
>
> Published: Tuesday, November 06, 2012
>
> Get RSS Feed
>
> Print This
>
> Email This
>
> Share on Stumble Upon
>
> share/share_comment
>
> 8
>
>
>
> By MEGAN SEMERAZ
>
> Megan.Semeraz at oakpress.com
>
> ; Twitter:
>
> @MeganSemeraz
>
>
>
> A Lansing organization called Protecting Michigan Taxpayers, which 
> strongly opposes Proposal 2, has accused Pontiac Precinct 13 of breaking 
> election law
>
> after they say a blind voter's ballot was changed.
>
>
>
> Nick DeLeeuw, spokesman for the organization, said the blind voter 
> requested a "no" vote on Michigan ballot proposals, and instead recorded a

> "yes" vote.
>
> A poll watcher saw the incident, and wanted to challenge it.
>
>
>
> When the vote was challenged, DeLeeuw said the Precinct Captain Carla 
> Williams refused to accept the challenge on the ballot.
>
>
>
> Pontiac City Clerk Sherikia Hawkins said she had heard about the incident,

> but that is not what happened. She said the legally blind voter was being 
> assisted
>
> and wanted the help.
>
>
>
> Hawkins said that the group is misinforming people, and the vote was not 
> changed.
>
>
>
> Jared Rodriguez, a spokesperson for Protecting Michigan Taxpayer said: 
> "The precinct captain's refusal to accept a legally required 'challenge' 
> on the ballot
>
> cast by a voter whose vote was shamelessly changed against his will is 
> reprehensible."
>
>
>
> Contact Megan Semeraz at 248-745-4628 or email
>
> Megan.Semeraz at oakpress.com
>
> or follow her on Twitter @MeganSemeraz
>
>
>
>
>
> Source:
>
>
>
>
http://www.theoaklandpress.com/articles/2012/11/06/news/local_news/doc509990
7e6d7e2663725273.txt
> _______________________________________________
> nfbmi-talk mailing list
> nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nfbmi-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/jj%40bestmidi.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfbmi-talk mailing list
> nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nfbmi-talk:
>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/lizmohnke%40hotmail.
com
>

_______________________________________________
nfbmi-talk mailing list
nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbmi-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/joeharcz%40comcast.n
et

_______________________________________________
nfbmi-talk mailing list
nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
nfbmi-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/james.prather%40comc
ast.net 

_______________________________________________
nfbmi-talk mailing list
nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbmi-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/terrydeagle%40yahoo.
com