[nfbmi-talk] all about the state plate
joe harcz Comcast
joeharcz at comcast.net
Wed Nov 13 21:51:08 UTC 2013
>From the March BSBP Commissioners meeting in Rodgers own words....It is clear the destruction of the MCB was in large part all about the priority (which still exists by the way) over the State Plate and of course to purloin some federal funds....
This is from the transcript and is verbatim:
15 MS. MOGK: Anything else about the training
16 center at this point? Okay. Good. Thank you very much. The
17 next item on the agenda is Ed Rodgers discussing HR 4256, to
18 just explain to us all what it means for the Business
19 Enterprise Program.
20 MR. RODGERS: Thank you, Madam Chair. This
21 will be really brief so I won't hold up your schedule for the
22 day. The bill was introduced -- this is the same bill
23 basically that was introduced last session of the legislature,
24 and through some behind the scenes activities we were able to
25 make sure that it didn't get to the top of the calendar, and
1 never really saw the light of day. It just kind of sat there
2 and, of course, it dies. Every two years we have a new
3 legislature, and then the old legislature goes out, then all
4 bills that are pending die.
5 So this was a reintroduction of a prior bill,
6 and I am terrible at remembering numbers per se. So I don't
7 remember what last years was, but it's basically the same
8 bill. I have been working with the head leadership of the
9 House and the House staff, along with the Deputy Director of
10 the Department of Budget, DMB -- DTMB. I never get used to
11 combining those two. Also, working or having consulted with
12 the Attorney Generals Office as well as working with Mike
13 Zimmer, our Chief Deputy Director who I report to, and we
14 believe that the bill is the same that it was last year in
15 terms of it's a shot across our bow.
16 If we are successful in the project that we are
17 working with, the House leadership and filling the Anderson
18 Building, the old State Plate facility, with a new operation
19 that will be fruitful and be successful, we don't think then
20 that the bill will have much "legs" in terms of being passed,
21 okay. There clearly doesn't appear to be a lot of motivation
22 against the majority of House members. And when I get to my
23 regular report, we'll go into a little more detail about the
24 state plate, but at this point I've been reassured by people
25 at the House of Representatives that not to worry about this
1 bill. And I take them at their word because they're also
2 involved in this project with me for the state plate.
3 MS. MOGK: Would you just briefly tell
4 everybody with the contents of the bill is.
5 MR. RODGERS: All right. The bill basically,
6 in about two sentences, would remove what I call our BEP
7 preference. If you'll recall under Randolph-Sheppard and
8 state law, the BEP program has preferences in State and
9 Federal buildings between the two statutes, and as such we're
10 supposed to be entitled to that preference so that we can have
11 blind or partially sighted, legally blind individuals running
12 stands, cafeterias, restaurants, et cetera in the various
13 Federal and State facilities.
14 We also, of course, as most people know, have a
15 vendor program along all State and Federal highways. And as
16 such, this would remove from those laws the preference as to
17 it applies to the State legislature itself. As we're taught
18 in 8th grade or 9th grade in government or civics, whenever we
19 have that class, I'm so old I think I had it in 9th grade but
20 now-a-days they probably teach it in 7th or 8th grade, the
21 legislature can pass laws which exempts themselves from
22 anything they want. Up until now they have not exempted
23 themselves from the Randolph-Sheppard or the State Acts in
24 terms of the BEP program, but the bill is aimed at doing that.
25 Because there are certain buildings that are under control of
1 the legislature, the Anderson Building, which houses the State
2 House of Representatives and their staff, the Farnum Building
3 which houses all the Senate members and their staff, the
4 Capital Building, and I think the Romney Building is under
5 their control technically.
6 There may be one or two more that I'm missing.
7 So basically this bill would say, we don't have to have a BEP
8 operator in here, we can put anybody we want in here because
9 it's our building. So it's aimed at that. And, like I say,
10 that's why I think it's a shot across our bow. I'm reassured
11 that it's probably not going to go anyplace, if we finish
12 successfully what we want to do with the State Plates
13 operation.
14 MR. HUDSON: Mike Hudson.
15 MR. RODGERS: Go ahead, Mike.
16 MR. HUDSON: Is it safe to surmise then that
17 perhaps one of the motivations for such a legislation would be
18 they want a quality cafeteria in their midst and somebody has
19 got to deliver that?
20 MR. RODGERS: I think you just hit a home run,
21 if I can use -- I'm always using sports examples. That's
22 right. What they want, and their biggest complaint before
23 that facility was closed in December of 2011, was that they
24 were not receiving what they believed to be quality service,
25 that the BEP program was not delivering, and to a certain
1 extent the operators who were in place at that time were --
2 and there were also some disagreements by the House leadership
3 and the BEP operators.
4 There is a history there of conflict. I don't
5 want to get into all the details before my time. And so some
6 of the stuff that's relayed to is by way of hearsay, but
7 clearly the public relations between the two groups, the BEP
8 program and the legislature, broke down. And I have been
9 working tirelessly since October 1st to repair that, quite
10 frankly. And I have -- I've been complained of by certain
11 members of the EOC, which is the Elected Operators Committee,
12 and certain members in the community who are either BEP
13 present or past operators that I'm being real secretive.
14 And to a certain extent, I confess to that.
15 Because we are in very delicate negotiations that have borne
16 some fruit already. And once we're in a position that we can
17 carry out our plan, then we can make it public and everybody
18 will be aware of what it is. But, yeah, clearly that's their
19 way of pushing us. I mean I already had my marching orders
20 when I took this position to do something with the State
21 Plate. So that was one of my first -- I think my first day on
22 the job I dealt with three or four phone calls dealing with
23 the State Plate. So this is probably to hold my feet to the
24 fire a little bit, as well as all the other parties involved
25 in the negotiations.
1 MS. MOGK: Okay. Thank you. Are there any
2 other questions or comments on that topic? No? Okay. We'll
3 just proceed with Ed and your vision for the future.
More information about the NFBMI-Talk
mailing list