[nfbmi-talk] PLEASE REFORM E-MAIL IN 36 POINT FONT PRINT--THANKS
James Schmidt
jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 30 15:17:59 UTC 2013
TO: ELIZABETH WHITE--(GAYLORD)-- I AM LEGALLY BLIND--citing--42 U.S.C. section (l( (1) (B)--(Supp. IV 1986) (1)--pursuant to the "AMERICAN PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 1973"--citing "29 U.S.C. section 794 (and amendments)" and --citing "42 U.S.C. section 12101" et seq. ---I AM LEGALLY BLIND--citing "M.C.L.. 393.351-Sec. 1 (a)" (MICHIGAN DEFINITION OF LEGALLY BLIND)-AND M.C.L. 750.502 c (2), (B)-BLIND PERSONS (d) HANDICAPPED (e) PHYSICALLY LIMITED".--I FALL UNDER THE "MICHIGAN PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT" --being--"PUBLIC ACT 220 of 1976 (amends)"-et seq. ---I HEREBY QUALIFY UNDER THE FEDERAL AMERICAN PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 1990--42. U.S.C. 12189 AUTHORITY--5 U.S.C. 301: 28 U.S.C. 509/510; 42 U.S.C. 12134, SECTION 504/503 -TITLE 11 --TITLE 11 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MANUAL SECTION 2-7.1100 (PRIMARY CONSIDERATION" et seq. MY MCB CASE WAS CLOSED ILLEGALITY BY JULIA CLARK OUT OF THE GAYLORD OFFICE; FOR NO VALID REASON --I (JAMES E. SCHMIDT ARE
CLAIMING DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION --being--AGE DISCRIMINATION--GENDER DISCRIMINATION--MINORITY DISCRIMINATION -ETC. PER MY M.C.B. CASE BEING LEGALLY BLIND-67 YEARS OLD--USE A ELECTRIC WHEELCHAIR FOR DISTANCES. AS PRIMARY AUTHORITY--I AM CITING "TITLE 11 PART 35 --NONDISCRIMINATIONON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERMENT SERVICES-(SEPT 15-2010 RULE WAS PUBLISHED)--AUTHORITY 5 U.S.C. 502; 28 U.S.C. 509/510 42 U.S.C. 12134. TITLE 11 TECHNICAL MANUAL, SECTION 2-7.1100 PRIMARY CONSIDERATION.---I HAVE THE ABILITY TO FILE A CIVIL CASE IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN GRAND RAPIDS IN GRANDS--AGAINST--JULIA CLARK & BBPS --JOINTLY & SEVERALLY (FEDERAL CIVIL CASES HAVE TO BE AT LEAST $45,000 IN DAMAGES)--AND ALSO A CROSS COMPLAINT IN THE 30th CIRCUIT COURT (MICHIGAN COURT OF CLAIMS)--PER MICHIGAN STATUES. IN BOTH FEDERAL & STATE COURT CASES; I WOULD BE SEEKING: PUNITATIVE-COMPENSATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN DAMAGES. ------PLEASE USE THIS AS
MY "NOTICE OF INTENT"-TO BOTH JULIA CLARK & BBPS. {IN FEDERAL CASES OF --DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION IN FEDERAL COURT--UPON PREVAILING THE PLAINTIFF IS AUTOMATICALLY AWARED --ATTORNEY FEES PLUS COURT COSTS BESIDES THE ACTUAL JUDGEMENTS---RESPECTIVELY YOURS--JAMES E. SCHMIDT--8101 DAVIS STREET--CENTRAL LAKE--MICHIGAN--49622--TODAY--SEPT 30-2013 --P.S. AS PRIMARY I WOULD ALSO BE CITING --"TITLE 11--A.D.A. -2-3.1100 RETALIATION OR COERCION" ----SINCE THE M.C.B. CASE WAS ILLEGALLY CLOSED THAT CASE SHOULD REOPENED IMMEDIATELY WHEREAS ALL THE DOCUMENTS WERE SIGNED & DATED BY ME & JULIA CLARK LAST SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER 2012. --(1 ATTACHMENT)
________________________________
From: "White, Elizabeth (LARA)" <whitee2 at michigan.gov>
To: James Schmidt <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>; "Jones, Leamon (LARA)" <jonesl2 at michigan.gov>; "Rodgers, Edward (LARA)" <rodgerse at michigan.gov>
Cc: "Clark, Julie (LARA)" <ClarkJ3 at michigan.gov>; "Oberlin, Sarah (LARA)" <OberlinS at michigan.gov>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: PLEASE REFORM E-MAIL IN 36 POINT FONT PRINT--THANKS
Hi James. As you have requested. Thanks for letting me know.
Elizabeth White
Central Region Manager
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
From:"White, Elizabeth (LARA)" <whitee2 at michigan.gov>
To: James Schmidt <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Rodgers, Edward (LARA)" <rodgerse at michigan.gov>; "Jones, Leamon (LARA)" <jonesl2 at michigan.gov>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
Hi James. Thank you for sharing your concerns. I will try to answer them in order.
First, as you probably already know, our determination of eligibility is based on the legal definition of blindness that Social Security uses: visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in the best eye with correction or visual field loss of 20 degrees or more. If someone has an eye condition that has a prognosis of rapid deterioration, such as retinitis pigmentosa, and their current visual acuity, again in the better eye, is 20/100, we may be able to open a case.
If a counselor has conflicting eye reports, or needs more information to make a sound basis of eligibility, they need to seek additional information from a qualified eye doctor, at the bureau’s expense. Julie’s assessment of needing more information is reasonable, and she is following the proper process to do this, including paying for further information. She has 60 days from the date of application to make this determination of eligibility. This procedure is sound as it assures you that appropriate services will be outlined based on what the bureau can provide and what is needed to assist you in becoming successfully employed if and when you are determined eligible.
It appears that your prior case was closed because Julie requested in both a letter (dated 12/19/12) and e-mail (dated 12/19/12), that you contact her by January 2, 2013, to talk about your case progress or your case would be closed. On January 3rd, she still had not heard from you, and proceeded with case closure. It is required by BSBP policy that counselors maintain a minimum of 90 day contact with each individual they serve. Again, this assures they are doing their job in moving your case forward to successful employment, wherever you are in the vocational rehabilitation process.
Services that BSBP provides are based on identified needs through conversations you have with your counselor and of course, as always, must be vocationally related if you are in the Vocational Rehabilitation Program. Julie is very familiar with our policy and procedures and follows them. A counselor is required to gather all relevant information prior to an Individualized Plan for Employment development and this process is called Comprehensive Assessment for Rehabilitation Need or CARN. As you are re-applying for services, this step will be part of the process. Services or equipment you are requesting must again be related to your vocational rehabilitation goal that will be mutually created in your IPE if determined eligible.
As you may know, we are a small bureau typically serving numerous counties with one office, such as Gaylord. We do not have the ability to change counselors assigned when there are disagreements. You certainly can change counselors by moving to a different county not served by the Gaylord office.
If you are not happy with the services, lack of, or any step in the vocational rehabilitation process, the agency to contact is the Client Assistance Program. Their 800 # is (800)292-5896, and their website address is: http://www.icdri.org/legal/MichiganCAP.htm.
As you have recently re-applied for services, I would ask that you allow Julie the time to process your case through the proper steps and at the time of your discussion regarding services for your IPE, if you are still dissatisfied, to then contact CAP. Your case hasn’t yet reached the stage of outlining needs and who/how those will be met to help you be successfully employed. To say she won’t provide you with something without having the actual conversation at the proper point in your process, may be jumping the gun.
Please let me know if you have further questions or concerns that I might be able to assist you with.
Elizabeth White
Central Region Manager
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
From:James Schmidt [mailto:jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:37 PM
To: White, Elizabeth (LARA); JAMESSCHMIDT1946 at YAHOO.COM; Jones, Leamon (LARA); Rodgers, Edward (LARA)
Subject: PLEASE REFORM E-MAIL IN 36 POINT FONT PRINT--THANKS
TO ELIZABETH WHITE---PLEASE REFORMAT YOUR E-MAIL IN 36 POINT FONT 7 RESEND--AS PER SECTION 504/503/501--TITLE 1--11--111--I REQUEST ALL DOCUMENTS IN 36 POINT FONT PRINT AS DEFINERD ALSO BY "MICHIGAN PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES--PUBLIC ACT 220 OF 1976 (AMENDS).---I HAVE HAD A MICHIGAN I.D. FOR ALMOST 20 YEARS.---I AM LEGALLY BLIND PURSUANT TO---M.C.L"S AND I HONESTLY BELIREVE I AM BEING DISCRIMINATED BECAUSE OF MY DISABILITY CITING--"SECTION 35 OF TITLE 11" OF THE FEDERAL DISABILITIES ACT-(amends)---i was very assured before i orginally e-mailed thsat one Michigan State Employee is not going against Another Michigan State Employee---It is called a BROTHERHOOD -- SO EVEN THOUGH YOUR DID REPLY--YOUR REPLY WAS UNSATISFACTORY!!! JULIA CLARK --GOT A KNOT IN HER KNICKERS--BECAUSE I FOLLOWED THE PROPER PROCEDURE AND HAD MY LAST EYE EXAM--DONE @ CAMPBELL EYE CENTER IN PETOSKEY--OF WHOM IS A LICENSED EYE SURGEON--(NOT JUST A OPTOMERIST)--AND JULIA CLARK CLOSED
THE CASE WITHOUT ANY MERIT WHAT SO. {IF YOU LOOK INTO MY FILE YOU WILL FIND THIS TO BE 100% TRUE}. AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED THE CAP ADVOCATE IS NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE FOR THE CONSUMER. LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR E-MAIL PROPERLY FORMATTED IN 36 POINT FONT PRINT WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY REQUEST AND AS SARAH OBERLIN & JULIA CLARK ARE WELL AWARE OF.---CC: LEMON JONES & EDWARD RODGERS--TERRI WILCOX--(MICHIGAN N.F.B. --TODAY IS SEPT 27--2013--P.M.
From:"White, Elizabeth (LARA)" <whitee2 at michigan.gov>
To: James Schmidt <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Rodgers, Edward (LARA)" <rodgerse at michigan.gov>; "Jones, Leamon (LARA)" <jonesl2 at michigan.gov>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
Hi James. Thank you for sharing your concerns. I will try to answer them in order.
First, as you probably already know, our determination of eligibility is based on the legal definition of blindness that Social Security uses: visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in the best eye with correction or visual field loss of 20 degrees or more. If someone has an eye condition that has a prognosis of rapid deterioration, such as retinitis pigmentosa, and their current visual acuity, again in the better eye, is 20/100, we may be able to open a case.
If a counselor has conflicting eye reports, or needs more information to make a sound basis of eligibility, they need to seek additional information from a qualified eye doctor, at the bureau’s expense. Julie’s assessment of needing more information is reasonable, and she is following the proper process to do this, including paying for further information. She has 60 days from the date of application to make this determination of eligibility. This procedure is sound as it assures you that appropriate services will be outlined based on what the bureau can provide and what is needed to assist you in becoming successfully employed if and when you are determined eligible.
It appears that your prior case was closed because Julie requested in both a letter (dated 12/19/12) and e-mail (dated 12/19/12), that you contact her by January 2, 2013, to talk about your case progress or your case would be closed. On January 3rd, she still had not heard from you, and proceeded with case closure. It is required by BSBP policy that counselors maintain a minimum of 90 day contact with each individual they serve. Again, this assures they are doing their job in moving your case forward to successful employment, wherever you are in the vocational rehabilitation process.
Services that BSBP provides are based on identified needs through conversations you have with your counselor and of course, as always, must be vocationally related if you are in the Vocational Rehabilitation Program. Julie is very familiar with our policy and procedures and follows them. A counselor is required to gather all relevant information prior to an Individualized Plan for Employment development and this process is called Comprehensive Assessment for Rehabilitation Need or CARN. As you are re-applying for services, this step will be part of the process. Services or equipment you are requesting must again be related to your vocational rehabilitation goal that will be mutually created in your IPE if determined eligible.
As you may know, we are a small bureau typically serving numerous counties with one office, such as Gaylord. We do not have the ability to change counselors assigned when there are disagreements. You certainly can change counselors by moving to a different county not served by the Gaylord office.
If you are not happy with the services, lack of, or any step in the vocational rehabilitation process, the agency to contact is the Client Assistance Program. Their 800 # is (800)292-5896, and their website address is: http://www.icdri.org/legal/MichiganCAP.htm.
As you have recently re-applied for services, I would ask that you allow Julie the time to process your case through the proper steps and at the time of your discussion regarding services for your IPE, if you are still dissatisfied, to then contact CAP. Your case hasn’t yet reached the stage of outlining needs and who/how those will be met to help you be successfully employed. To say she won’t provide you with something without having the actual conversation at the proper point in your process, may be jumping the gun.
Please let me know if you have further questions or concerns that I might be able to assist you with.
Elizabeth White
Central Region Manager
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
From:James Schmidt [mailto:jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 11:19 AM
To: White, Elizabeth (LARA); JAMESSCHMIDT1946 at YAHOO.COM
Subject: Re: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
SURE--& IF YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY SOONER THAT WOULD BE NICE!!! THE SUMMATION OF THE MATTER PRIOR TO MEETING YOU IS: THERE WAS NO LEGAL REASON TO CLOSE MY CASE; JULIA CLARK HAS A CHIP ON HER SHOULDER (AND IT IS NOT UP TO ME TO COPE WITH THE CHIP ON HER SHOULDER)----I WOULD PREFER WITH SOMEONE MORE OBJECTIVE OF THEIR VIEWS & PERSONALITY WITH A LEGALLY BLIND PERSON--(BEING MYSELF)----JUST AS A EXAMPLE THE--CAMPBELL EYE CENTER REPORT --JULIA CLARK HAS ALREADY A COPY OF--WHICH SHOWS THAT THE FINGER COUNT WAS THE ONLY THING I WAS ABLE TO ACCOMPOLISH & SHE ATTEMPTED THIS EYE REPORT AS AN EXCUSE TO DENY ME A LINE PHONE LINE!! BASICALLY JULIA CLARK--IS MORE DETERMINED TO TRY & DENY ME SERVICES FROM MICHIGAN BUREAU OF BLIND PERSONS--TO THE POINT I AM AFRAID SHE IS GOING TO COME DOWN WITH APALEXY (OR ULCER)--. A LOT OF TIMES A YOUNG LADY SUCH AS JULIA HAS PERSONAL PROBLEMS IN HER OWN LIFE--(SUCH AS FAILED RELATIONSHIP OR FAILED MARRIAGE)--WHICH THEY TAKE
TO THE WORK PLACE!!--THERE IS A MICHIGAN STATE AGENCY THAT A INDIVIDUAL CAN FILE A GRIEVANCE WITH A STATE EMPLOYEE (CIVIL SERVICE COMPLAINT)---WOULD YOU PLEASE SUPPLY ME WITH THEIR WEBSITE & FORM NUMBER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR TIME & COOPERATION--I WISH TO REMAIN--VERY RESPECTIVELY YOURS--JAMES E. SCHMIDT---TODAY SEPT 27--2013----CC: ED RODGERS--TERRI WILCOX (MICHIGAN NATIONAL FEDERATION FOR THE BLIND)--ETC.
From:"White, Elizabeth (LARA)" <whitee2 at michigan.gov>
To: James Schmidt <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Rodgers, Edward (LARA)" <rodgerse at michigan.gov>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
Hi James. The next time I am in your area will be early November. We could certainly schedule something for that time if you wanted. Let me know. Thanks, Beth
Elizabeth White
Central Region Manager
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
From:James Schmidt [mailto:jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 5:03 PM
To: White, Elizabeth (LARA); Rodgers, Edward (LARA); JAMESSCHMIDT1946 at YAHOO.COM
Subject: Re: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
I APPRECIATE YOU GETTING BACK TO ME--BUT UNFORTUNATELY I DO NOT HAVE A PHONE---BUT--YES --I POSIBLE COULD MEET YOU AT THE CENTRAL LAKE NLIBRARY SOMETIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE--VERY RESPECTIVELY YOURS---JAMES E. SCHMIDT--TODAY --SEPT 26--P.M.
From:"White, Elizabeth (LARA)" <whitee2 at michigan.gov>
To: James Schmidt <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>; "Clark, Julie (LARA)" <ClarkJ3 at michigan.gov>; "Rodgers, Edward (LARA)" <rodgerse at michigan.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
Hi James. If you would like to talk with me about your concerns, my direct number is (517)335-5521. I am back in the office all day tomorrow. Thanks.
Elizabeth White
Central Region Manager
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
From:James Schmidt [mailto:jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 4:43 PM
To: White, Elizabeth (LARA); JAMESSCHMIDT1946 at YAHOO.COM; Clark, Julie (LARA); Rodgers, Edward (LARA)
Subject: Re: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
YES--TO ELIZABETH WHITE---I HAVE LOST THE TRAIN OF THOUGHT AS TO WHY THE CASE IS ALLEGED BTO HAVE BEEN CLOSED--WAS IT BECAUSE I POLITELY REQUESTED A LAND LINE OR WAS IT BECAUSE I WAS ON PAROLE OR WAS IT BECAUSE I AM LEGALLY BLIND --(LAST 20 YEARS I HAD ONLY A MICHIGAN I.D.--CANNOT NOT DRIVE)---AS LOOK BACL INTO MY E-MAILS---JULIA CLARK HAS A E-MAIL TO ME STATING THAT CAMPBELL EYE CARE IN PETOSKEY--STATED (QUOTING) --JULIA CLARK--THAT THE FINGERS COUNT EWAS THE BEST I WAS ABLE TO SEE AND THEREBY I DID NOT NEED A LAND LINE!!! THE MCB--AND THE NEW MBBP--DOES NOT STATE THAT I SPECIFIC --OPTOMOLOGIST NEED BE USED--SO I CHOOSE CAMPBELL EYE CARE IN PETOSKEY AND PAID FOR THE EXAM & TRANSPORTATION MYSELF AS I AM IN PETOSKEY @ THE BURNS CLINIC FREQUENTLY!!!---MY CASE WAS ORIGINA;LLY OPENED USING THE CAMPBELL EYE CARE EXAM IN NOVEMBER 2012!!!------WHEREAS THEC MCB & THE MBBP IN THE RULES & REGULATIONS DO NOT SPECIFICALLY STATE WHAT OPTOMOLOGIST HAS TO BE USED
AS OF COARSE THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF MY 14th AMENDMENT RIGHTS!!----CC: ED ROGERS--&--LEGAL NNF OF MICHIGAN. RESPECTFULLY YOURS--JAMES E. SCHMIDT--TODAY--SEPT 26-P.M.---IN SUMMATION --JULIA CLARK ONLY SEEMS TO CLASH WHEN A MAN KNOWS THE LAW AND CANNOT BE TALKED DOWN TO!!!
From:"Clark, Julie (LARA)" <ClarkJ3 at michigan.gov>
To: James Schmidt <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "White, Elizabeth (LARA)" <whitee2 at michigan.gov>; "Oberlin, Sarah (LARA)" <OberlinS at michigan.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
09/26/2013
Hi James, As soon as your case is opened and there is a completed IPE re-created and signed and only at that time can BSBP consider re-ordering your adaptive watch or any adaptive items that you may need. Also, James the watch was working when BSBP originally sent it to you on 12/18/2013. When the watch was returned broken you had already owned it from a period of time. At the time you returned the watch your case was closed so BSBP did not reorder the watch due to the time frame. BSBP does not repurchase items once they have been purchased already. See the note that is attached to all authorizations created on a IPE if it involved adaptive equipment and similar to what you signed previously.
***Maintenance, upkeep, and replacement will be the responsibility of the client.***
Thank you for your understanding that there are is policy in place and I will follow it.
I have included Elizabeth White’s email if you should have any questions. Also, please be advise you are always able to contact CAP (Clients Assistance Program) if you should have any concerns in regards to your rights. I have enclosed their number below: 517-487-1755 or 1-800.288-5923.
Julie K. Clark, M.A., LLPC
Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
LARA
209 West First Street; Suite 102
Gaylord, MI 49735
Direct Phone: (989) 732-5814
Office Phone: (989) 732-2448
Toll Free: (800) 292-4200
Fax: (989) 731-3587
E-Mail: Clarkj3 at michigan.gov
"Life is a chain of moments so don't forget to enjoy the climb!"
From:James Schmidt [mailto:jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:11 AM
To: Clark, Julie (LARA); JAMESSCHMIDT1946 at YAHOO.COM; Ford, Leanne (LARA)
Subject: Re: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
NOT REALLY--I RETURNED THE BROKEN WATCH WHICH YOU ORGINALLY SENT --ME--(THIS WAS BACK IN DECEMBER 2012)---YOU HAD ALREADY O.K.ed THE TALKING WATCH TO BE SENT TO ME--(LEANNE FORD)--. WHY MAKE IT ANY HARDER ON YOURSELF--(WHAT DO I HAVE TO FILE A MICHIGAN DEPT OF CIVIL RIGHTS--COMPLAINT???? CC: LEANNE FORD----RESPECTIVELY YOURS---JAMES SCHMIDT--TODAY SEPT 26
From:"Clark, Julie (LARA)" <ClarkJ3 at michigan.gov>
To: 'James Schmidt' <jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Oberlin, Sarah (LARA)" <OberlinS at michigan.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
09/25/2013
Hi James this is Julie Clark; Sorry I have not responded sooner, I was out with the flu. BSBP can’t send you a new watch until we determine that your case will be opened and your IPE has been created and signed.
Thank you for your understanding.
Julie K. Clark, M.A., LLPC
Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor
Bureau of Services for Blind Persons
LARA
209 West First Street; Suite 102
Gaylord, MI 49735
Direct Phone: (989) 732-5814
Office Phone: (989) 732-2448
Toll Free: (800) 292-4200
Fax: (989) 731-3587
E-Mail: Clarkj3 at michigan.gov
"Life is a chain of moments so don't forget to enjoy the climb!"
From:James Schmidt [mailto:jamesschmidt1946 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:35 PM
To: Oberlin, Sarah (LARA); Clark, Julie (LARA); JAMESSCHMIDT1946 at YAHOO.COM
Subject: I RETURNED BROKEN WATCH TO YOU--CAUSE WAS BROKEN
TO SARAH OBERLIN--IS THERE A POSSIBLITY THAT YOU COULD SEND ME A NEW TALKING WATCH TO REPLACE THE TALKING WATCH; THAT I SENT BACK TO YOU OF EARLIER?? VERY RESPECTIVELY YOURS---JAMES E. SCHMIDT---TODAY--SEPT 19--P.M.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DOC 1 001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 552828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/attachments/20130930/cae0bbe1/attachment.jpg>
More information about the NFBMI-Talk
mailing list