[nfbmi-talk] Fw: an open take down of maro

[David Robinson]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: joe harcz Comcast 
To: Mark A. Riccobono NFB Pres. 
Cc: Lewis, Anil ; Larry Posont NFBMI Pres. ; Michael Powell ; mary wurtzel NFB MI ; Fred Wurtzel ; Derek Moore ; Georgia Kitchen FANFB ; Mary Ann Robinson NFB MI ; David Robinson NFB MI ; terry Eagle ; Mark Eagle ; Bill Earl MI ADAPT ; Clark Goodrich MIADAPT ; 'Scott Heinzman' ; Kelly Buckland NCIL ; Bruce Darling ; stephanie.adapt at sbcglobal.net ; Marsha Katz ; Mark Johnson 
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 8:03 AM
Subject: an open take down of maro


This is from Eleanor Canter of Peer Action Alliance. She is a freedom fighter for people with disabilities and is commenting on the call to basically sustain  sub-minimum wage and segregated employment comments made by MARO and their hypocrisy before the Developmental Disabilities Council on April 5.

 

This should be widely circulated especially by NFB  and ADAPT who has long supported the end of these barbaric acts of discrimination by “Community     Rehabilitation Organizations” (i.e. sheltered workshops).

 

And it goes to our joint protest over these issues on September 17, 2015 during our MARO (among other criminals) sponserred “ADA Celebration”.

 

Joe Harcz

Member: NFB and ADAPT



 

An Open Takedown of MARO’s Talking Points on Subminimum Wages

 

The Michigan Association of Rehabilitation Organizations (

MARO)

submitted testimony to the Michigan Developmental Disabilities Council on April 1, 2016. We must correct untrue and ableist statements made by MARO Executive

Director Todd Culver, who wields a great deal of influence over the lives of Michiganders with disabilities by publicly representing the interests of the

businesses exploiting us and by actively lobbying in support of sheltered work and subminimum wages.

 

Let’s unpack!

 

MARO Statement: In a manufacturing environment, when a productivity level is not consistent with assigned unit labor costs, it is simply not sustainable

as a business practice – this is true for workers with and without disabilities.

 

Reality Check: Yes, the businesses you represent employ a model that relies on exploitation of the disability community and it is not sustainable. Why is

that the disability community’s problem? MARO members have made themselves filthy rich off the backs of our people. We will not put our civil rights on

hold for your continued enrichment at our expense.

 

MARO Statement: We must also work toward a rate structure that acknowledges that the supports required to achieve the desired outcome of competitive integrated

employment will be more intensive, and more expensive, than currently designed. I am hopeful that we will continue to allocate resources in pursuit of

our shared objectives, rather than focusing energy on eliminating choices from the menu of employment options available to people with disabilities in

Michigan. The more intensive our focus on the desired outcome, the more likely we are to achieve success.

 

Reality Check: We are going to talk about eliminating the disgusting practice of paying subminimum wage to people with disabilities – a practice the majority

of MARO’s members are engaged in. You don’t get to appropriate the voice of the disability community, tell us what’s best for us, continue exploiting us,

and then demand more money. Our civil rights don’t depend on expanded funding for the businesses exploiting us.

 

MARO Statement: Simply eliminating the option of maintaining a 14(c) certificate, without consideration for the supports necessary to ensure the success

of individuals with the most significant disabilities, could actually reduce opportunities to work. And with those lost opportunities, the intangible benefits

of purpose, dignity, self-esteem, and a sense of accomplishment and pride could be lost as well.

 

Reality Check: So not only are people with significant disabilities forced to work for subminimum wages while non-profit executives walk away with obscene

salaries – we’re also expected to be thankful for the opportunity? Millions of taxpayer dollars are supporting the outdated and discriminatory practices

your members are engaged in. Take a moment and think what could be done with all of that money. It defies common sense to argue that millions of taxpayer

dollars should be spent keeping people with disabilities isolated, segregated, disenfranchised, and financially abused at the businesses you represent.

It is overwhelmingly clear that our “dignity” is not their motivating factor.

 

MARO Statement: MARO supports initiatives to enhance meaningful, informed choice for individuals with the most significant disabilities, including increased

opportunities to work in competitive integrated employment (at or above the minimum or prevailing wage) and self-employment. We fully support the recent

Executive Order on Employment First. We believe in the capability of every person, equal access, and innovation.

 

Reality Check: Your actions tell a different story. We know

you tampered with the Employment First Executive Order,

rendering it toothless. We know what you mean when you use the word choice: the choice to be exploited. Do the non-disabled people working at MARO’s member

organizations have the “choice” to work for subminimum wages? No. That would be wrong for very obvious reasons. Segregating people and paying them less

than their peers based solely on disability is the definition of ableism.

 

MARO Statement: Relative to employment service options, 55% of our members hold a 14(c) certificate, authorizing payment of special minimum wages; 45% of

our members do not hold a 14(c) certificate. With respect for this diversity, MARO does not actively lobby In support of “subminimum” wages. We do feel

that any movement to eliminate or phase out 14 (c) should not advance without careful consideration of the consequences of eliminating this employment

option for people with disabilities.

 

Reality Check: You submitted this testimony, which urged a Governor-appointed Council to avoid taking a position against subminimum wages. Lobbying in support

of subminimum is literally what you’re doing right now. With regard to MARO’s membership,

the 45% of your members that do not hold a 14c certificate is comprised of Michigan’s Centers for Independent Living,

which have absolutely no business supporting sheltered work.

 

Mr. Culver: You’re not fooling anyone. Not anymore.

 

MARO Testimony on Subminimum Wages

 

To: Michigan Development Disabilities Council

From: Todd Culver: Executive Director, Michigan Association of Rehabilitation Organizations (MARO)

 

April 1, 2016

 

It has come to my attention that the DD Council will allocate time during its April 5 meeting to discussion of Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards

act, and has encouraged public comment from interested parties. As such, I respectfully request that the Council will take the following into consideration:

 

I represent MARO, the statewide network of organizations providing employment and other support services on behalf of individuals with disabilities and

other barriers to community access in Michigan. Relative to employment service options, 55% of our members hold a 14(c) certificate, authorizing payment

of special minimum wages; 45% of our members do not hold a 14(c) certificate. With respect for this diversity, MARO does not actively lobby In support

of “subminimum” wages.

 

We do feel that any movement to eliminate or phase out 14 (c) should not advance without careful consideration of the consequences of eliminating this employment

option for people with disabilities. The reason that a number of our member organizations choose to hold a 14(c) certificate authorizing payment of special

minimum wages, commensurate with productivity, is the recognition that by doing so, they can create employment opportunities for individuals with significant

disabilities -jobs that without this provision in the law would not otherwise currently exist.

 

In a manufacturing environment, when a productivity level is not consistent with assigned unit labor costs, it is simply not sustainable as a business practice

-this is true for workers with and without disabilities. This provision in the Fair Labor Standards Act authorizes businesses that strive to employ people

with disabilities to provide an option for this type of employment – it is simply a choice among a menu of options. Arbitrary elimination of this choice

could result in the unintended consequence of eliminating employment options within the current landscape – instead, I encourage consideration of a shift

in focus, toward improving the supports and services necessary to achieve higher earning capacity and sustainable business practices for all.

 

Some organizations in Michigan that have chosen not to renew their 14(c) certificate are fortunate enough to have the financial resources to subsidize workers

who are not meeting productivity rates; we are supportive of those organizations that have navigated this transition – but this is not applicable to all.

 For businesses where these conditions do not exist, simply eliminating the option of maintaining a 14(c) certificate, without consideration for the supports

necessary to ensure the success of individuals with the most significant disabilities, could actually reduce opportunities to work. And with those lost

opportunities, the intangible benefits of purpose, dignity, self-esteem, and a sense of accomplishment and pride could be lost as well.

 

MARO supports initiatives to enhance meaningful, informed choice for individuals with the most significant disabilities, including increased opportunities

to work in competitive integrated employment (at or above the minimum or prevailing wage) and self-employment. We fully support the recent Executive Order

on Employment First. We believe in the capability of every person, equal access, and innovation.

 

As an association, we also recognize that many community jobs are no longer industrially based and do not depend on production rates in the manner that

industrial jobs do; we are promoting best practices in the field of job development and job coaching, in pursuit of competitive employment outcomes; and

we are actively engaged in programming to develop a stronger community of practice in the field of benefits coordination and counseling – as fear of losing

benefits remains among the greatest disincentives to employment success. We must also work toward a rate structure that acknowledges that the supports

required to achieve the desired outcome of competitive integrated employment will be more intensive, and more expensive, than currently designed. We promote

business practices that result in recognized credentials of service quality. And all these things must align to effect continuous improvement, and meaningful

systems change.

 

MARO has appreciated its partnership with the DD Council through the Employment First State Leadership Mentoring Program, the technical assistance grant

sponsored by the US Department of Labor’s Office of Disability Employment Policy. This project has allocated resources to pursue an increased number of

competitive integrate employment outcomes – an objective embraced by MARO. I am hopeful that we will continue to allocate resources in pursuit of our shared

objectives, rather than focusing energy on eliminating choices from the menu of employment options available to people with disabilities in Michigan. The

more intensive our focus on the desired outcome, the more likely we are to achieve success.

 

Thank you for your consideration,

 

Todd Culver

Executive Director

MARO