[Nfbmo] Fw: [Missouri-l] Infant is returned to blindcoupleafterstate pla...

DanFlasar at aol.com DanFlasar at aol.com
Thu Jul 22 03:17:22 UTC 2010


I was telling a friend about this case this afternoon and when I noted that 
 it is not uncommon for any woman, sighted or not, to need some advice in  
initiaing breastfeeding, she laughed and said that in 1985, when she had 
just  given birth to her daughter at Barnes Hospital (always listed as among 
the most  prestigious and
state of the art hospital centers in the country), they had NO ONE on staff 
 to help her out!  No lactation nurses, no training for it for the nursing  
staff, nothing.  She told her doctor about it and he went off to find 
someone to help.  He brought in a 50 year old black woman who had  assisted 
her children and grandchildren
in  assisting the nursing process.
     My friend said it worked out really well but she  was amazed that the 
only in-hospital newborn information availible to new  mothers was how to 
bathe the baby.
     Her child, of course, was not taken from her  despite these initial 
problems.
     When I had told her the whole story, her jaw  almost hit the floor and 
noted that her sister, who was blind, raised her child  by herself.  I 
think more than anything else, the response I get from my  friends about this
outrage is a startled WHAT????
     Dan
 
     
 
 
In a message dated 7/21/2010 8:49:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
johnsusanford at earthlink.net writes:

One of the  saddest partsof this story has not yet been told.  In 1975, 
1976, 
and  1977 the NFB first organized what was called the Committee on Parental 
 
Concerns, primarily because a number of us wanted to adopt and were not  
being seriously considered because we were blind.  This was before my  kids 
were born and they are now 35 and 34.  Orlo and Mary Nichols  from Maryland 
were the first couple of the group of us who were  successful.  I think 
they 
adopted 4 children.  Isn't it sad that  35 years ago it was found that 
blind 
parents can be successful at raising  children and then 35 years later, we 
have to start all over because social  workers and nurses still haven't 
learned about the capabilities of blind  people.  Just for the record, 
Brenda 
nursed for more than ten months  and didn't suffocate once.  I didn't know 
any more than Erika did  about nursing, but I had caring, considerate 
nurses 
and the help of La  Leche League when I got worried that I must not be 
doing 
it right.   As Debbie said, it has nothing to do with her blindness that 
caused the  nursing problem.  It was her inexperience.  When Brenda's baby  
was botrn in February, she had the benefit of a whole lactation unit at  
the 
hospital whose job it is to work with new parents with individual  
instruction, and classes in early parenting to help and support  them.  
Some 
hospitals are more progressive than others.  Boise  may be rural, but it is 
more progressive than  Independence.

Susan

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  <DanFlasar at aol.com>
To: <nfbmo at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Wednesday,  July 21, 2010 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Nfbmo] Fw: [Missouri-l] Infant is  returned to 
blindcoupleafterstate pla...


>I forwarded this  story to my sighted friends with the  following note to
>  them.  I haven't gotten any reaction yet but I will not  be  surprised 
if a 
> few
> defend the state action.  I feel it's  absolutely  necessary to spread
> stories like these and explain  why these things are so  wrong.  In all 
> honesty,
> my  heart feels lighter knowing that this child has  gone home with  her
> parents.  The cynic in me felt that this was going to  be  a huge, 
damaging 
> affair.
>
>      I can only echo whoever said that this shows both  the power - and  
the
> need  for - the NFB.
>
>
> Friends,
>  This was the big topic at the NFB convention in  Dallas. A presentation  
on
> the case was made at the beginning of the  conference.   The outraged 
> crowd,
> which included many, many blind  parents,  gave extremely generously to 
the
> campaign to get the  child back to her  parents.  It was shocking that 
such
>  ignorance still
> exists, and that a state would take such precipitous  action as to take a
> child from it's mother solely on hte basis of a  disability but it did. 
> The
> state capitulated minutes before a  judicial hearing took place.
>    We had been prepared for a  long drawn-out and expensive  court
> challenge.   It is  further evidence that civil rights can only  be 
> achieved by  the
> concerted action of those who face discrimination,   especially the most
> insidious form - well-meaning and ignorant  individuals  with power.
>     The article below  does a very good job in  detailing the story.
>  Dan
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/21/2010  11:13:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> goodfolks at charter.net  writes:
>
> Well, I  remember when I was told the same thing  about 20 years ago in
> South
> Carolina. Chalk it up to  ignorance, something we face on a regular  
basis.
>
> Fred  Olver
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dewey   Bradley" <dewey.bradley at att.net>
> To: "NFB of Missouri Mailing  List"  <nfbmo at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010  10:00  AM
> Subject: Re: [Nfbmo] Fw: [Missouri-l] Infant is  returned to blind
> coupleafterstate placesher in protective  custody
>
>
>> Well as a  blind pairent what do you  think about this?
>> ----- Original Message  ----- 
>>  From: "Fred Olver" <goodfolks at charter.net>
>> To:  "NFB  Chapter Presidents discussion list"
>>   <chapter-presidents at nfbnet.org>; <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>; "NFB  of
> Missouri
>> Mailing List" <nfbmo at nfbnet.org>;   <Blindad at babel-fish.us>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010  7:57  AM
>> Subject: [Nfbmo] Fw: [Missouri-l] Infant is returned  to blind  couple
>> afterstate placesher in protective   custody
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original  Message -----
>>> From: Chip Hailey
>>> To: MCB  Listserve
>>> Sent:  Wednesday, July 21, 2010 7:47  AM
>>> Subject: [Missouri-l] Infant is  returned to blind  couple after state
>>> placesher in protective   custody
>>>
>>>
>>> Posted on Wed, Jul.  21, 2010 12:15  AM
>>> Email
>>> Infant is  returned to blind couple after  state places her in  
protective
>>> custody
>>> By LEE HILL   KAVANAUGH
>>> The Kansas City Star
>>> Fifty-seven  days after  she was born, Mikaela Sinnett was home for  the
>>> first time Tuesday  with her parents, Erika Johnson  and Blake Sinnett 
of
>>>  Independence. State officials had  worried they were unable to care for
>>> her.
>>>  DAVID EULITT | The Kansas City Sta
>>>  Fifty-seven days  after she was born, Mikaela Sinnett was home for the
>>> first  time
>>> Tuesday with her parents, Erika Johnson  and Blake  Sinnett of
>>> Independence. State
>>> officials   had worried they were unable to care for her.
>>>
>>>  A  folding cane used by Blake Sinnett rested in the baby carrier used  
to
>
>>> carry home his  daughter.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday,  Blake Sinnett,  guided by his mother, Jenne Sinnett, 
carried
>>> his   2-month-old daughter, Mikaela Sinnett. Behind them was  Mikaela's
>>>  mother, Erika Johnson.
>>> Erika  Johnson will never be able to see her  baby, Mikaela.
>>> But  for 57 days she couldn't keep her newborn  close, smell her  baby's
>>> breath, feel
>>> her downy   hair.
>>> The state took away her 2-day-old infant into  protective  custody -
>>> because Johnson
>>> and  Mikaela's father are  both blind.
>>> No allegations of  abuse, just a fear that the new  parents would be
>  unable
>>> to care
>>> for the   child.
>>> On Tuesday, Johnson still couldn't stop crying,  although  Mikaela was
> back
>>> in her
>>>  arms.
>>> "We never  got the chance to be parents," she said.  "We had to prove
> that
>>> we  could."
>>>  Tuesday, she and Blake Sinnett knew their baby was finally  coming  
home
> to
>>> their Independence
>>> apartment,  but an  adjudication hearing was scheduled for the afternoon
>  on
>>>  whether
>>> the state would stay involved  in the rearing of the baby.  Then from a
>>> morning  phone
>>> call to their attorney,  they learned that the  state was dismissing
> their
>>>  case.
>>>  "Every minute that has passed that this family wasn't  together is  a
>>> tragedy. A legal
>>> tragedy and a moral   one, too," said Amy Coopman, their attorney. "How
> do
>>>  you  get
>>> 57 days back?"
>>> Arleasha Mays, a  spokeswoman for  the Missouri Department of Social
>>>  Services, said
>>>  privacy laws prohibited her from speaking  about specific cases. But 
she
>
>>> added,  "The
>>> only time we recommend a child be removed  is if  it's in imminent
> danger."
>>> Johnson said she knew the  system  eventually would realize its horrible
>>> mistake,  but
>>>  she often was consumed with sadness. Sinnett tried  his best to keep
>>> Johnson hopeful.
>>> For almost  two months she and  Sinnett could visit their baby only two
>  or
>>> three  times
>>> a week, for just an hour  at a time, with a foster parent  monitoring.
>>> "I'm a  forgiving person," Johnson said, but she's  resentful that  
people
>>> assumed she
>>> was   incapable.
>>> "Disability does not equal inability," she   said.
>>> Representatives of the sightless community agreed  that  people were
>>> well-meaning but
>>>  blinded by  ignorance.
>>> Mikaela was born May 21 at  Centerpoint Medical Center  of Independence.
>>> The  doctors
>>> let Sinnett "see" her  birth by feeling the  crowning of her head.
>>> For Johnson, hearing  Mikaela's  whimpers was a thrill. The little human
>>> inside   her
>>> all these months, the one who hiccupped and burped, who  kicked  and
> moved,
>>> especially
>>> at  night, was now a real person  whom she loved more than anything  
else
>>> she'd ever
>>>   imagined.
>>> In her overnight bag was Mikaela's special  homecoming  outfit, a green
>>> romper from
>>>  Johnson's mother, with  matching bottoms and a baby bow.
>>>  Questions arose within hours of  Mikaela's birth, after Johnson's  
clumsy
>>> first  attempts
>>> at breast-feeding  - something many new mothers  experience.
>>> A lactation  nurse noticed that Mikaela's nostrils were  covered by
>>>  Johnson's breast.
>>> Johnson felt that  something was wrong  and switched her baby to her
> other
>>> side,   but
>>> not before Mikaela turned blue.
>>> That's  when the  concerned nurse wrote on a chart: "The child is  
without
>>> proper  custody,
>>> support or care  due to both of parents being blind and  they do not 
have
>>>  specialized
>>> training to assist  them."
>>>  Her words set into motion the state mechanisms intended to   protect
>>> children from
>>> physical or sexual  abuse,  unsanitary conditions, neglect or absence of
>>>  basic  needs
>>> being met.
>>> Centerpoint said  it could not comment  because of patient privacy laws,
>>>  but spokeswoman
>>> Gene  Hallinan said, "We put the welfare  of our patients as our top
>>>  priority."
>>> A  social worker from the state came by Johnson's  hospital room and
>  asked
>>> her questions:
>>> How could she  take  her baby's temperature? Johnson answered: with our
>>>  talking  thermometer.
>>> How will you take her to a doctor  if she gets sick?  Johnson's reply: 
If
>>> it were  an
>>> emergency, they'd call  an ambulance. For a regular  doctor's
> appointment,
>>> they'd   call
>>> a cab or ride a bus.
>>> But it wasn't enough  for the  social worker, who told Johnson she would
>>>  need  24-hour
>>> care by a sighted person at their  apartment.
>>>  Johnson said they couldn't afford it, didn't  need it.
>>> "I needed  help as a new parent, but not as a  blind parent," Johnson
> said.
>>>  She recalled the  social worker saying: " 'Look, because you guys are
>>> blind, I  don't
>>> feel like you can adequately take care  of her.'  And she left."
>>> The day of Johnson's discharge, another   social worker delivered the
> news
>>> to the  couple
>>> that  Mikaela was not going home with them. The  parents returned the
> next
>>> day to visit
>>>  Mikaela before she left the hospital,  but they were barred from  
holding
>>> her.
>>> "All we could  do was touch  her arm or leg," Johnson said.
>>> The couple began  making  calls. Gary Wunder, president of the National
>>>   Federation
>>> of the Blind of Missouri, had trouble believing it  at  first.
>>> "I needed to verify their whole story," he  recalled. "We  had to do due
>>> diligence.
>>> .  I found the couple to be  intelligent and responsible.
>>>  "We knew this was an outrage that had  taken place."
>>> He  notified Kansas City chapter president Shelia  Wright, who  visited
> the
>>> 24-year-olds.
>>> Hearing  about  the empty crib, the baby clothes, Wright recalled, "I
>  felt
>>> as  helpless
>>> as I've ever felt in my  life.
>>> "I hurt so bad  for them. This is  unforgivable."
>>> They rallied other associations  for the  blind nationwide. More than 
100
>>> people at
>>>  a  national convention in Dallas volunteered to travel to Kansas City  
to
>
>>> protest and
>>> testify, both as blind  parents and as the  sighted children of blind
>>> parents.  (Mikaela
>>> has  normal sight.)
>>> They also  hired Coopman, who watched the young  couple with their  baby
>>> girl on Tuesday.
>>> "I'm sorry,"  she  said, wiping tears. "But this should not have
>  happened."
>>>  Johnson kept a journal that Coopman is  keeping closed for now. She
>>> indicates that
>>>  legal action will be  taken.
>>> "Whether a couple is  visually impaired or deaf or in a  wheelchair, the
>>> state  should
>>> not keep them from their  children," she  said.
>>> Now breast-feeding is a lost option. And the   beautiful newborn clothes
>>> hanging in
>>> the  closet went  unworn, because their baby was growing bigger in the
>  arms
>>> of  someone
>>> else.
>>>  The couple said they had tried to prove  themselves to the  sighted
>>> community since
>>> their early   years. Sinnett rode his bicycle on the street with the 
help
>>> of  a  safety
>>> gadget. Johnson graduated from high school with  honors. But  all the
>>> challenges they've
>>>  endured over the years  shrink compared to the responsibility of  
caring
>>> for 10  pounds
>>> of squirming baby  girl.
>>> Johnson cuddled  Mikaela. Gave her a bottle. Patted  her back until she
>>> burped.  Mikaela
>>> gave  a tiny smile.
>>> In their 24 years, the  couple said,  they've both endured prejudice 
from
>>> others.   They
>>> don't want any other blind parent to suffer the same  obstacle  they 
did.
>>> Fifty-seven days are too precious to  lose.
>>>  The Star's Laura Bauer contributed to this report.  To reach Lee Hill
>>> Kavanaugh, call
>>> 816-234-4420  or send e-mail  to
>>>   lkavanaugh at kcstar.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>   To unsubscribe from the Missouri-L list, send an email message  to:
>>>  Missouri-l-request at MoBlind.org
>>> with  the word, unsubscribe in the  subject  field.
>>>
>>> Other email lists available from  MCB  include:
>>> ATI - A general discussion of adaptive  technology.   To join, send a
> blank
>>> EMail  message to:
>>>  ATI-Join at MoBlind.Org
>>> Chat -  A general discussion list.  Just  about anything goes.  To  
Join,
>>> send a blank EMail message  to:
>>>  Chat-Join at MoBlind.Org
>>>
>>> Visit the MCB  home  Page at:
>>> WWW.MoBlind.Org
>>>   _______________________________________________
>>> Nfbmo  mailing  list
>>> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>>>   http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
>>>  To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info  for
>>> Nfbmo:
>>>
>  
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/dewey.bradley%40att.net
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>> Nfbmo  mailing  list
>> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>>   http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
>> To   unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info  for
>>  Nfbmo:
>>
>  
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/goodfolks%40charter.net
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Nfbmo mailing   list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
> To   unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>  Nfbmo:
>  
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/danflasar%40aol.com
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Nfbmo mailing  list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
> To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>  Nfbmo:
>  
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/johnsusanford%40earthlink.net


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



No  virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -  www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3020 - Release Date:  07/21/10  
18:36:00

_______________________________________________
Nfbmo  mailing  list
Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for  
Nfbmo:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/danflasar%40aol.com




More information about the NFBMO mailing list