[Nfbmo] More on Heritage for the Blind

DanFlasar at aol.com DanFlasar at aol.com
Wed Oct 30 23:41:50 UTC 2013


All,
      All media outlets are required to  provide a certain amount of 
'public interest' programming - which can include  pitches from charities.  Radio 
and TV stations aren't going to pull an ad  because we say so - they'll need 
some proof - and the best way to go about that  is through the Attorney 
General.   What we have now is citations of  successful suits against Heritage 
for the Blind in New York, Ohio and  Pennsylvania.   Strong evidence, and it 
might make the case but not  until the AG is made aware of it.   I wondered 
in my earlier post  whether the National NFB  should get involved, which 
would mean dealing  with the IRS - no easy feat.   These guys need to be taken 
down but it  will be a long process.  In the meantime, we'll all have to 
work state by  state.  
   More later.
Dan
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/30/2013 2:43:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
randycarmack at gmail.com writes:

Gene,

I hate to rain on your parade but my fear is that they  might  already be
confused between our legitimate cause and the other  organization.

Can't  we just rally support from  the radio  stations to get them to pull
the advertisements  from these other  guys?  Just a thought.

Thanks,
Randy Carmack


On Wed,  Oct 30, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Gene Coulter  
<escoulter at centurytel.net>wrote:

> One note of  caution---
> If we go after Heritage for the Blind  and there is  publicity folks on 
the
> street may get us confused with them and we  might loose donations of both
> cars and cash.
>
>
>  -----Original Message----- From: James Moynihan
> Sent: Wednesday,  October 30, 2013 8:38 AM
> To: NFB of Missouri Mailing List
>  Subject: Re: [Nfbmo] More on Heritage for the Blind
>
> Gary et  al
>
> As I see it the main problem with Heritage for the Blind is  that the
> average
> listener can not sort through the  confusion.  The public could donate 
cars
> to our vehicle donation  program which is legitimate.  I think we should
> make
> an  effort to have the atgen scrutinize Heritage for the Blind.
>
>  Cordially,
>
> Jim Moynihan
>
> ----- Original Message  ----- From: "Gary Wunder" <gwunder at earthlink.net>
> To: "'NFB of  Missouri Mailing List'" <nfbmo at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Tuesday,  October 29, 2013 5:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nfbmo] More on Heritage for the  Blind
>
>
>  Hello, Dan. Thank you for sending this to  the list. I read the 
information
>> you sent, and if this is in fact  Heritage for the Blind, perhaps we have
>> more of a case than we  thought. We have looked at this before and have
>> concluded that,  while it is highly unethical, it may not be illegal.
>> Certainly ABC  news does not claim to verify the accuracy of all of its
>>  commercials. Heritage for the Blind runs commercials here at least  six
>> times
>> a day. Gene Coulter has verified that the  number called can lead to
>> several
>> different  numbers.
>>
>> As far as I can tell the only thing they do  is operate a website which, 
in
>> turn, makes referrals to other  websites and uses the publications of 
other
>> organizations. I think  that what Jim's friend says is quite correct 
about
>> the fact that  you can enjoy tax-exempt status based on the proclaimed
>> purpose of  your organization and not on any in-depth study about how 
your
>>  organization's funds are spent. Of course, I should observe here that  a
>> number of people would complain if the Internal Revenue Service  focused
>> more
>> on the objectives of the organization.  Some of you will remember that 
they
>> are currently in trouble for  showing bias against very liberal and very
>> conservative  organizations, the thought seeming to be that the mission
>>  statement should be the only thing used to determine whether or not  an
>> organization should be tax exempt.
>>
>> I  don't really know where to take this now. The best information I get  
is
>> that what they are doing is not against the law. If we could  cause the
>> Missouri Atty. Gen. to have a different view, this  probably would be a
>> good
>> thing for blind people and  for those wanting to donate to us. The
>> unfortunate consequence of  this kind of activity, however, is that it
>> subjects all of us to  extra scrutiny and this scrutiny translates into
>> extra
>>  time we have to spend making sure that we document the good that we  do.
>> You
>> may remember that a disgruntled woman who was  once one of our members
>> reported to the Atty. Gen. that we raised  money only to give gifts to
>> ourselves. It turns out that her  allegation revolved around the fact 
that,
>> instead of giving  flowers to those in the hospital, we were taking the
>>  money
>> we would have spent on them and giving it as a gift card. We  had to
>> demonstrate to the Atty. Gen. that these expenditures  represented a 
small
>> percentage of our program services and that we  were not raising money 
for
>> the purpose of giving it to  ourselves.
>>
>> I welcome your  ideas.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original  Message-----
>> From: Nfbmo [mailto:nfbmo-bounces at nfbnet.**org  
<nfbmo-bounces at nfbnet.org>]
>> On Behalf Of  DanFlasar at aol.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:19  PM
>> To: nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: [Nfbmo] More on  Heritage for the Blind
>>
>> Hi all,
>>   I've been following through on the "Heritage for  the Blind"  issue and
>> found that it is only one instance of a large group  of  similarly 
unknown
>> 'charities' all related to a New Jersey  religious sect called  the Oorah
>> in
>> New  Jersey.  I'm sending a link that refers to a St. Louis   
Post-Dispatch
>> story from last year which details a lot about Oorah  based ona  
deceptive
>> charity called "Kars4Kids".  The  New York Attorney General  identified
>> "Heritage
>>  for the Blind" as being another front for the Oorah  sect.  As the  
article
>> below notes, donations to these websites  have little  if any relation to
>> services for the blind.
>>    Note that all these false charities seem to all have IRS   
certification
>> for their non-profit status, but there are numerous  stories from  the
>> Better
>>
>> Business  Bureau noting that they received little or no requested
>>  information from these 'charities'.  The question is, what do we do   
about
>> it?  I
>> don't think we need to spend any  money, get any lawyers  or anything 
like
>> that,
>>  but a note to the Attorney General might make a  difference.    And to 
the
>> point, since this is a national problem, is  it  something the national 
NFB
>> should get involved in?  Should  the NFB call  out "Heritage for the 
Blind"
>> as
>> a  fraud, and if so, how?
>>
>>    Here's the link -  it's a pretty disheartening  story.
>>
>>  
http://kars4kids-scam.**blogspot.com/<http://kars4kids-scam.blogspot.com/>
>>
>>  Dan
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
>> Nfbmo mailing  list
>> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>>  
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org>
>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info  for
>> Nfbmo:
>>  http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/**
>>  
gwunder%40earthlink.net<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/gwunder%40earthlink.net>
>>
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
>> Nfbmo mailing  list
>> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>>  
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org>
>>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info  for
>> Nfbmo:
>>  http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/**
>>  
jamesmmoynihan%40gmail.com<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/jamesmmoynihan%40gmail.com>
>>
>
>
>  ______________________________**_________________
> Nfbmo mailing  list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>  
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org>
>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>  Nfbmo:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/**
>  
escoulter%40centurytel.net<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/escoulter%40centurytel.net>
>
>  ______________________________**_________________
> Nfbmo mailing  list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
>  
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org>
>  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>  Nfbmo:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/**options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/**
>  
randycarmack%40gmail.com<http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/randycarmack%40gmail.com>
>
_______________________________________________
Nfbmo  mailing  list
Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for  
Nfbmo:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/danflasar%40aol.com




More information about the NFBMO mailing list