[nfbwatlk] Question about Testing Procedures

[Jedi]

Actually, no. It doesn't surprise me in the least. If nothing else, 
I've learned that the disability profession can be more backward than 
general society sometimes.

Do you have this person's e-mail address? I thought about the cheating 
problem, too. I can always make sure my reader isn't someone who's read 
the text to me. Besides, aren't there plenty of ways a sighted student 
could cheat if they really wanted to? I feel confident enough with the 
material that it's a non-issue for me.

Anyone else?


Original message:
> I attended university when SSD offices were still a new idea. Electronic
> documents and word processing were still novel concepts, so I used readers
> all the time. I'm sure the reason she wants you to use a reader provided by
> the office is to protect against cheating. You could offer to take the test
> in the presence of a proctor. I often sat in the department secretary's
> office who proctored the exam for me. Other than the need to protect against
> cheating, I can't even imagine why anyone would care whether your reader was
> provided by the office or not. In fact, I would insist on providing a reader
> known to me. All readers are not created equal. What if the office provided
> a reader who was not competent to read the material in question? You should
> absolutely insist on having a reader whom you have worked with before
> because it would be a distinct disadvantage for you to have to train a
> reader during an exam.
> You might want to talk with Jim Marx of Montana. He runs a DSS and could
> tell you what the law says as well as suggesting procedures which would calm
> the nerves of your professor and the department chair.
> Isn't it interesting that it's the special ed department that's giving you
> trouble?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Jedi
> Sent: January 27, 2009 9:15 PM
> To: nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
> Cc: nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> Subject: [nfbwatlk] Question about Testing Procedures



> Fellow Federationists:

> I would like your advice. I have decided to opt out of the SSD office
> at my university in most cases because it's not terribly efficient in
> helping blind students succeed in a timely and convenient fashion.
> generally speaking, I have been able to arrange appropriate
> accommodations without difficulty. Most teachers have been really
> helpful in providing tests and other homework in electronic format, or
> letting me decide who to work with and under what conditions. Recently,
> i began a class in Special education. The professor uses a test program
> that apparently doesn't allow for electronic tests usable by students
> in any fashion. So, I decided that hiring a reader would be
> appropriate. At first, my teacher agreed providing that I cover myself
> by giving her proof of my blindness such as an eligibility letter for
> voc rehab services. I was fine with that. Tonight however, she sent me
> an e-mail saying that she'd never had a student opt out of using SSD
> offices, so she asked a higher-up in her department if I could indeed
> use my own reader. Apparently, according to her, I cannot. Apparently,
> I am required to use SSD provided readers for this exam. I was under
> the impression that I am allowed to hire and utilize my own readers
> and/or choose not to utilize SSD support in my classes. I can
> understand why she would prefer me to use an SSD reader so as to guard
> against possible cheating. I, however, am perfectly fine not hiring the
> reader who ordinarily reads my textbook to me. i have a few readers to
> choose from. What are my rights in this situation? What are my options?
> What would you do if you were me? Thanks very much for your help.

> --
> REspectfully,
> Jedi

-- 
REspectfully,
Jedi

Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit 
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.