[nfbwatlk] transportation state government

[Nightingale, Noel]

The Washington Legislative Hotline, for those of you interested in transit issues, is (800) 562-6000.


-----Original Message-----
From: nfbwatlk [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Jacob Struiksma
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:19 PM
To: NFB of Washington Talk Mailing List
Subject: [nfbwatlk] transportation state government

Olympia's Whacked Out Transportation Priorities Nobody loves new roads like the Senate Majority Coalition.
Jennifer Langston
 on November 18, 2013 at 4:39 pm
Facebook
Twitter
Email Post

Last week, we argued that the rest of the Washington state should simply walk away from a $12.3 billion transportation package  being floated by the Senate Majority Coalition Caucus. This chart explains why: Its priorities are exactly the reverse of what people say they want.

        Transportation priority chart

Click here to embiggen.

A
new public survey from the Washington State Transportation Commission  released last Friday offers a reality check on negotiations underway in Olympia about what new transportation investments should look like. The survey actually asked people if they had 100 points to devote to transportation priorities-or in this case, let's call it a dollar-how would they want want to spend it?

The public favors a balanced transportation system. State residents would opt to spend 26 cents of every dollar on maintaining our current transportation system; followed by 23 cents on building or expanding roads and other capacity; 21 cents on expanding travel options through transit, bike, pedestrian, and HOV projects; 16 cents on increasing safety; and 14 cents on reducing pollution and boosting environmental benefits.

By contrast, how would the Washington Senate Majority Coalition Caucus leaders spend each dollar generated by an 11.5-cent gas tax increase they've proposed?
By spending 3 times more money on highway expansions and new roads than their constituents say they want.

Find this article interesting?
Support our work during Sightline's fall fund drive through November 24th!

Given the same priorities, their transportation package would spend a whopping 76 cents of every dollar on building or expanding highways and roads, plus a tiny bit of new ferry capacity. That leaves precious little left over for everything else.
In the most generous analysis possible, their transportation package would spend 17 cents on maintenance, 2 cents on safety, less than 2 cents on transit/bike/pedestrian projects, and arguably 2 cents on environmental benefits (more on that in the notes below).

Ironically, the
Majority Coalition Caucus
 made up of Senate Republicans and led by Sen. Rodney Tom came up with its proposed transportation package after a much touted "listening tour" of the state.
Clearly, they weren't listening very well.

Notes on Methodology:

While the Washington State Transportation Commission survey asked respondents to limit their total number of points to 100, they apparently had trouble choosing among the priorities, as their collective point total adds up to 111. We adjusted the percentages in the chart and analysis above to total 100, which is why they differ from the numbers in question 6 of the survey.

To arrive at comparable percentages in the Senate Majority Coalition proposal, we included the following line items from their  Transportation Proposal Balance Sheet  in the following categories. In the interest of fairness, we tried to assign credit wherever possible to non-capacity-related categories, and assumed only
40 percent of local distributions would be used for road building. In reality, the MCC proposal would likely focus a greater share of its resources on highway building than our analysis shows:

list of 5 items
 Improving capacity: Improvement projects (highway and road), a new ferry, debt service, and 40 percent of direct distributions to cities and counties.
Maintenance: Highway preservation, facilities, traffic operations, new ferry terminals, county road improvement board funding, 60 percent of direct distribution to cities and counties. Safety: Any highway improvement project with the word "safety" prioritized in the title and Washington State Patrol funding. Transit/bikes/pedestrian
projects: Grants for transit, vanpool, bicycle, and pedestrian projects, Safe Routes to Schools + Complete Streets Environment:  The Senate Majority Coalition Caucus proposal would actually spend zero money from the gas tax increase on environmental benefits. It eliminated funding for culverts that help fish safely navigate roads and would pay for stormwater projects from a state fund that's supposed to help clean up toxic sites.
list end

About 5 percent of the Senate Majority Coalition Caucus proposal would fund priorities that are not specifically mentioned in the public survey, such as freight mobility.

We are a community-supported resource and we can't do this work without you!
Please make a donation today and help keep us running.
Share:
Facebook
Twitter
Email Post
Print

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Name

Email

Your website (optional)

Comment

You may add a link with HyperText Markup Language: <a href="URL">text to display</a>

Post Comment






search landmark
Search for:

Search
list of 8 items
 Subscribe
Stay up to date on the Northwest's most important sustainability issues.

Enter e-mail...
Go
Manage your subscriptions.  fall fund drive  Stay Connected Facebook Twitter Sightline on Google Plus Sightline on LinkedIn RSS  Popular Posts list of 5 items nesting level 1  US Oil Train Trends: Four Basic Pictures Weekend Reading 11/8/13 Oil Train Explodes in Alabama We Don't Need a $12B Transportation Package Walk Score Scores Again list end nesting level 1  Recent Posts list of 5 items nesting level 1  Olympia's Whacked Out Transportation Priorities Weekend Reading 11/15/13 We Don't Need a $12B Transportation Package US Oil Train Trends: Four Basic Pictures What Can Climate Scientists Learn from Lady Gaga?
list end nesting level 1
 Recent Comments
list of 5 items nesting level 1
 Steve Erickson
 on
We Don't Need a $12B Transportation Package Laurie Dougherty  on US Oil Train Trends: Four Basic Pictures RalphS  on What Will Ridesharing Be When It Grows Up? chris conover  on US Oil Train Trends: Four Basic Pictures Elizabeth  on The Great Diaper Debate list end nesting level 1  Blog Topics Series list of 6 items nesting level 1  Burning Rubber(s) Parking? Lots! Sightline at 20 The Northwest's Pipeline on Rails The Wrong Side of the Tracks Weekend Reading list end nesting level 1 View all series >

Current Work
list of 5 items nesting level 1
 Cascadian Demographics Flashcards Making Sustainability Legal Northwest Coal Exports Stormwater Solutions: Curbing Toxic Runoff list end nesting level 1 View older work >

Issue Areas
list of 5 items nesting level 1
 Climate & Energy Economy & Jobs Environment Food & Sustainable Living Land Use & Transportation list end nesting level 1  Regions list of 3 items nesting level 1  British Columbia Oregon Washington list end nesting level 1 list end content info landmark list of 5 items  Contact Privacy Policy Free Use Policy RSS Manage Email Subscriptions list end Sightline Daily brought to you by Sightline Institute.
1402 Third Avenue, Suite 500 | Seattle, Washington 98101 | tel: 
+1.206.447.1880
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 3997 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen


_______________________________________________
nfbwatlk mailing list
nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbwatlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org/noel.nightingale%40ed.gov