[Ohio-talk] Congressman LaTourette making trouble in the House

Tue Feb 28 15:35:21 UTC 2012

Barbara and all,
Just an update from Cincinnati.  At the end of last week, I wrote to the 
appropriate staff members in both Rep. Steve Chabot's and Jean Scmidt's 
offices.  So far, nary a peep has been heard in reply.  If I haven't had 
response by Friday morning, I'll try again.
Deborah

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barbara Pierce" <bpierce at oberlin.net>
To: "'NFB of Ohio Announcement and Discussion List'" <ohio-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:37 AM
Subject: [Ohio-talk] Congressman LaTourette making trouble in the House

>I have seen nothing on this list about the instructions that state
> presidents got for mobilizing legislative effort across the country, so I 
> am
> stepping in as the legislative committee chair to urge everyone to call or
> email      Steve LaTourette's staff member handling the commercialization
> amendment for H.R. 7, a reauthorization bill. His name is John Miceli, and
> his email address is john.miceli at mail.house.gov. The number for the
> LaTourette office is 202-225-5731. Probably next week Steve is supposed to
> introduce this amendment-Dennis Kucinich is a cosponsor, by the way. It
> would invite the big boys in food service operations to bid on vending
> machine service for rest stops on the nation's highways. This would 
> destroy
> the Kennelly vending sites in rest areas. These are among the best 
> locations
> for our business enterprise program vendors. Steve has always been a 
> friend
> to the blind. I can't believe that he decided to sponsor this amendment in
> the knowledge that it would destroy blind vendors' livelihoods. Please 
> call
> or write John Miceli to make your views of this amendment known. This
> amendment does not exist in the Senate version of this bill, so it should
> not be a big deal to withdraw it from the House bill.
>
>
>
> The other issue that is very important right now is urging Ohio members to
> cosponsor H.R. 3086, the Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities Act. 
> This
> would remove the certificate of exemption from the Fair Labor Standards 
> Act.
> This is the section that allows employers to hire disabled people at less,
> sometimes much less, than the minimum wage. We got lots of attention when 
> we
> were on Capitol Hill for this bill, but the sheltered shops have come
> roaring back with a brochure claiming that disabled people would be put 
> out
> of work if this law were passed. Despite the fact that Missouri was 
> targeted
> on this effort, Gary Wunder tells me that he has just gotten eight new
> sponsors. Ohio currently has none, as far as I know, though Tom Anderson
> says that Tim Ryan has agreed to go on, and Jean Schmidt told Deborah
> Kendrick and Sharri Albers that she would go on as well. We need to get 
> our
> representatives on as cosponsors. Clovernook has a few workers earning 
> less
> than  the minimum wage, but no other operation hiring blind workers in 
> Ohio
> is paying less than the minimum wage. That should make it pretty easy for
> our reps to sign on. It will take no courage at all to do so. I am going 
> to
> append to this email the letter that President Maurer has sent to every
> member of Congress refuting the arguments made by the Easter Seals and 
> Good
> Wills that count on paying as little as $.16 an hour to protect their
> upper-level management salaries of hundreds of thousands of dollars. 
> Please
> contact your member of Congress and urge him or her to contact Tim 
> Bishop's
> office for Dems and Cliff Stearns's office for Republicans to agree to 
> sign
> on to this bill. Here is the letter:
>
>
>
> Dear United States Representative:
>
>
>
> I am writing to you in support of H.R. 3086, the Fair Wages for Workers 
> with
> Disabilities Act of 2011.  If you are already one of the cosponsors of 
> this
> bill, I thank you.  If you have not signed on as a cosponsor, I urge you 
> to
> do so as quickly as you can.  I am also writing to you representing 
> disabled
> Americans who are affected by subminimum wage payments who want this bill 
> to
> pass.  Furthermore, I am writing to you to sound the alarm against those 
> who
> say that they know better what to do for the disabled than disabled
> Americans themselves.  They will tell you that disabled Americans cannot
> speak for themselves and that they have taken on "this burden."  They are
> trying to deny us our own voice in Congress and we ask you to listen to 
> the
> people, not to the self-appointed so-called spokesmen of the people.
>
>
>
> The National Federation of the Blind and the growing list of over forty
> other organizations of disabled Americans that support this legislation 
> are
> well aware that those of you who are cosponsoring this legislation or
> considering doing so are receiving considerable pressure from
> representatives of sheltered workshops and others holding special wage
> certificates that allow them to pay less than the federal minimum wage. 
> You
> are being told that the workers who receive subminimum wages in the
> sheltered workshop system have nowhere else to go, and that their lives
> would be destroyed by H.R. 3086.  Those of you from Missouri, in fact, may
> have received a piece of correspondence that asks, "Where will Sammy, 
> Patti,
> and Becky go when you eliminate their jobs?"  This flyer also contains
> quotes from parents, siblings, and caregivers of sheltered workshop
> employees, wondering what H.R. 3086 will mean for their loved ones.
>
>
>
> Whatever the motives of the people behind it, the correspondence is based 
> on
> outdated ideas about the capacity of workers with disabilities and a
> misguided commitment to an antiquated model of service to such workers.
> Rather than participating in a constructive dialogue about what life will 
> be
> like for workers with disabilities, once the subminimum wage exemption is
> phased out in three years as required by H.R. 3086, the workshops choose 
> to
> circulate correspondence meant to pull on your heartstrings, to evoke your
> pity, and to promote low expectations.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> United States Representative
>
> February 23, 2012
>
> Page two
>
>
>
>
>
> The argument of the sheltered workshops is that some people, particularly
> those with severe developmental disabilities, are simply unfit for
> competitive employment.
>
> This is simply wrong.  To continue this practice when proven employment
> strategies exist is inexcusable.
>
>
>
> We are also told that these individuals must be given a choice.  We are 
> all
> for freedom of choice, but true freedom of choice can only come with
> unbiased and accurate information.  Do Sammy, Patti, and Becky know that
> people like them are in fact working in competitive jobs?  Do they know 
> that
> services like supported employment are already available to help them
> acquire and keep such jobs?  Do their parents, guardians, and loved ones
> know this?  My experience tells me that they do not. Rather, they have far
> more likely been told by sheltered workshop staff-who all too often share
> society's low expectations for disabled people and have an obvious 
> conflict
> of interest-that Sammy, Patti, and Becky will never achieve competitive
> employment and that the sheltered workshop is the best they can hope for.
> In short, what they have been told is neither accurate nor unbiased.
>
>
>
> Despite the manipulative tone of the correspondence, however, it is fair
> enough to ask what will happen to Sammy, Patti, and Becky and others like
> them if this bill passes.  I believe that the answer to this question is
> limited only by the spirit, ambition, and imagination of disabled workers
> themselves, and by our willingness as a society to work hard to help them
> succeed in their goals.  I believe that disabled workers can do far better
> than receiving pennies per hour.  Under this bill, they will either earn
> real wages in the workshops that currently employ them, or they will 
> receive
> the training and support that they need to obtain competitive employment
> somewhere else.  Imagine for a moment that all of the government and
> philanthropic resources that are currently supporting the sheltered 
> workshop
> system were redirected to finding real employment opportunities for people
> with disabilities.  If they were, I suspect that solutions as yet undreamt
> of would emerge to help such individuals succeed in competitive employment
> situations.
>
>
>
> The sheltered workshop industry has existed for over seventy years.  Many
> argue that it is an acceptable status quo, which must not be changed.  We
> reject this formulation.  Even if you believe that those of us advocating
> against subminimum wages do not have all the answers, this is no excuse 
> for
> allowing the system to continue.  The current practice of paying 
> subminimum
> wages is unfair, discriminatory, and immoral, and no amount of 
> hand-wringing
> about what may follow it can change that.  Please do not simply let 
> inertia
> direct our course.  We are urging you and other willing partners, 
> including
> any from the sheltered workshop industry, to work with us to find real
> solutions for people like Sammy, Patti, and Becky, rather than shrugging
> your
>
>
>
>
> United States Representative
>
> February 23, 2012
>
> Page three
>
>
>
>
>
> shoulders and saying that the exploitation must continue because we as a
> society will not expend the effort to come up with anything better.
>
>
>
> There was a time in our nation's history when African-Americans were
> believed to have limited capacity and were fit only for slave labor on
> plantations.  There was a time when women were thought capable only of
> maintaining the family home, and thus were not even permitted to vote.
> Fortunately we realized as a nation that it was bigotry and low 
> expectations
> that were defining the roles of African-Americans and women rather than
> their true capabilities.  We realized, albeit belatedly, that America 
> would
> be a better nation if the true capacities of these citizens were 
> unleashed.
> Americans with disabilities are now calling upon our fellow citizens to
> realize that the soft bigotry of low expectations is condemning workers 
> with
> disabilities to near-slave labor, and that the system that arises from 
> these
> low expectations must be abolished.
>
>
>
> H.R. 3086 allows for a grace period of three years before sheltered
> workshops and other nonprofit employers currently holding special wage
> certificates must begin to pay their workers at least the federal minimum
> wage.  This is plenty of time for sheltered workshops to study the 
> business
> models of similar entities that are already paying their employees
> competitive wages and make adjustments to their own policies and 
> practices.
> Meanwhile, policy makers can redirect resources to enhance programs like
> supported employment, and create new solutions, to help workers with
> disabilities transition to real work for real wages.
>
>
>
> As for freedom of choice: I am a person with a disability.  I have been
> blind all of my life.  I know the pain and despair that comes with low
> expectations and prejudice.  Fortunately, I was given the opportunity to
> make real choices about my life and career, and to experience the joy of 
> the
> accomplishments that can only come through full and equal participation in
> society.  I want Sammy, Patti, and Becky to have the choices that I had. 
> If
> workers with disabilities truly want to stay in the sheltered workshop 
> that
> currently employs them, or a facility like it, then no one will prohibit
> them from doing so.  However, if H.R. 3086 is enacted, wherever they 
> choose
> to work, they will receive real wages that allow them to live fuller 
> lives.
> They will know the satisfaction of receiving the equal pay for equal work
> that they deserve, in addition to any satisfaction that they may receive
> from getting out of the house and being among their friends.  They will no
> longer be dependent upon the resources of their loved ones or on public
> assistance in order to buy the things they need.  They will have 
> disposable
> income to spend in the community, thereby contributing to our society and
> its economy.  They will go from a subsistent existence to one in which 
> they
> can enjoy taking in a movie with their friends, an occasional restaurant
> meal, and all of the other small pleasures of life that other American
> workers take for granted.  They will become free people with real choices,
> not virtual slaves with false ones.
>
>
>
>
> United States Representative
>
> February 23, 2012
>
> Page four
>
>
>
>
>
> On behalf of the National Federation of the Blind, the over forty other
> organizations that support this bill, and the millions of disabled people 
> we
> represent, we urge you to join us in our effort to change the paradigm of
> low expectations and kindly meant but devastating exploitation that has 
> too
> long dominated the lives of over three hundred thousand Americans with
> disabilities.  We ask you to express the courage to support H.R. 3086 and
> the creativity to seek solutions that allow Americans with disabilities to
> become productive citizens.  I thank you for your attention to this urgent
> matter.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Marc Maurer, President
>
> NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Barbara Pierce
>
> Braille Monitor
>
> 237 Oak Street
>
> Oberlin, OH 44074
>
> Phone/fax: 440-775-2216
>
> <mailto:bpierce at nfb.org> bpierce at nfb.org
>
>
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> Ohio-talk mailing list
> Ohio-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/ohio-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Ohio-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/ohio-talk_nfbnet.org/dkkendrick%40earthlink.net
> 