[Sportsandrec] Research Not Survey

[JUSTIN LOUCHART]

Hi, Ashley,

That makes sense. We're taught as soon as we get a cane that it is a
cane, it has a proper name, and persons who have any opportunity to
know that name should both know and implement that name.
Unfortunately, cultural rules are very often not truths. It is a
stick. At its core, it is a stick. I call it a cane, I'm mildly amused
when others don't call it a cane, but I'm not offended. I happen to
know the difference between an initialism and an acronym, and there is
a strict grammatical (and thereby cultural)  differentiation between
those two words just as it is a strict differentiation between a cane
and a stick. I try not to be offended, however, when someone doesn't
know or chooses not to utilize what I understand to be a clear
separation of terms. They have their reasons, I have mine, and it's
important to me to not be offended by their less permanent choices.
We're not destroying the integrity of the thing by nominating it
tangentially to its cultural nomination.

Regards,
Justin

On 8/11/12, Ashley Bramlett <bookwormahb at earthlink.net> wrote:
> IMO, call a cane what it is, a white cane. I get offended when sighted
> people call my cane a stick. To me that diminishes its importance.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JUSTIN LOUCHART
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 11:06 AM
> To: Sports and Recreation for the Blind Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Sportsandrec] Research Not Survey
>
> Good morning, Jody,
>
> A stick is actually grammatically and fundamentally correct, seeing as
> it serves no other function. A stick is not a definitional preface
> based upon matter or material thereof. Our cultural disposition to
> meet the word stick with negativity is only that, a cultural
> disposition.
> In every language I speak the word for the long cane is comparable to
> an English word for stick, as in German, schtuk. I would be dismayed
> to find this singular cultural disposition causing a glitch between
> multiple parties of the blindness contingent. We deal with enough
> negativity as humans in the first place, dealing with extra relative
> merely to our dialectical diction seems... unnecessary.
>
> Similarly, I'm totally on board with helping to explore historically
> significant paradigm shifts. Bring on the Louis and Clark!
>
> Justin
>
> On 8/11/12, jody at thewhitehats.com <jody at thewhitehats.com> wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> Yes, and a sighted guide will forget to remind you of curbs and obstacles
>> but the guide dog does not forget.  Hahahaha
>>
>> Especially spouses.
>>
>> JODY
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sportsandrec mailing list
>> Sportsandrec at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/sportsandrec_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Sportsandrec:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/sportsandrec_nfbnet.org/jalouchart%40gmail.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Justin Louchart
> JALOUCHART at GMAIL.COM
>
> Inveniam Viam Aut Faciam
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sportsandrec mailing list
> Sportsandrec at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/sportsandrec_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Sportsandrec:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/sportsandrec_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sportsandrec mailing list
> Sportsandrec at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/sportsandrec_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Sportsandrec:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/sportsandrec_nfbnet.org/jalouchart%40gmail.com
>


-- 
Justin Louchart
JALOUCHART at GMAIL.COM

Inveniam Viam Aut Faciam