[stylist] would it?

[LoriStay at aol.com]

Of course, that is what NFB members have in common.   But the blind people 
and people who are blind --semantics only.
Lori
In a message dated 4/2/09 4:14:02 PM, johnlee at clarktouch.com writes:


> 
> 
> No, NFB values blindness as a central part of identity.  That's why NFB
> promotes "blind people" instead of "people who are blind."
> 
> If it was merely a characteristic, then why "blind people"?  But it is
> patently clear from NFB's literature that blindness is at the core.
> 
> 




**************
Feeling the pinch at the grocery store?  Make dinner for $10 or 
less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001)