[stylist] Children and learning
LoriStay at aol.com
LoriStay at aol.com
Mon Jan 5 18:52:06 UTC 2009
It's off topic, I know.
But here are my thoughts; I've been to public school and I've been to
private school, and Private is better. Why? The classes are smaller, and the
children get more individual attention.
Children home schooled are far ahead of those who attend classes with other
children in terms of scholastic achievement. Why? Again, individual
attention. If the child has a question, he can ask it, and the teacher won't say,
"You're sixth in line to ask a question, and oh, there's the bell so forget
it."
Lori
In a message dated 1/4/09 11:06:39 PM, poetlori8 at msn.com writes:
> Then again, who knows how the schools will twist what that law would say.
> After all, no child left behind meant that all children are to learn the
> material of each grade level before they can be moved up. And, at least
> here in Iowa, they seem to think that it means we must socially promote the
> children. After all, no child left behind; keep them with their peers to
> keep their self-esteem up. Now they want to make preschool mandatory when
> kindergarten isn't even so. Someone forgot to tell them that some of us
> know that.
> Barbara
>
>
**************
New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026)
More information about the Stylist
mailing list